Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
)
Harry Steinmetz ) File No. EB-FIELDNER-12-00003930
)
North East, MD ) NOV No. V201232340008
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Released: September 10, 2012
By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement
Bureau:
1. This is a Notice of Violation (Notice) issued pursuant to Section 1.89
of the Commission's rules (Rules), to Harry Steinmetz, owner of a
marine vessel called "Luciferous," located in North East, Maryland.
Pursuant to Section 1.89(a) of the Rules, issuance of this NOV does
not preclude the Enforcement Bureau from further action if warranted,
including issuing a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture for
the violation noted herein.
2. On August 24, 2012, in response to a complaint from the United States
Coast Guard concerning interference on Marine Channel 16, an agent of
the Enforcement Bureau's Columbia Office conducted an investigation in
North East, Maryland, and observed the following violation:
47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a): "Stations must not engage in superfluous radio
communications." At the time of the investigation, agents determined that
a continuous carrier was inadvertently being transmitted on Marine Channel
16 from a malfunctioning marine radio station located on Mr. Steinmetz's
vessel, which was docked in slip 47 at the Shelter Cove Marina in North
East, Maryland.
3. Pursuant to Section 308(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1.89 of the Commission's rules, we seek
additional information concerning the violations and any remedial
actions taken. Therefore, Harry Steinmetz must submit a written
statement concerning this matter within twenty (20) days of release of
this Notice. The response (i) must fully explain each violation,
including all relevant surrounding facts and circumstances, (ii) must
contain a statement of the specific action(s) taken to correct each
violation and preclude recurrence, and (iii) must include a time line
for completion of any pending corrective action(s). The response must
be complete in itself and must not be abbreviated by reference to
other communications or answers to other notices.
4. In accordance with Section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, we direct
Mr. Steinmetz to support his response to this Notice with an affidavit
or declaration under penalty of perjury, signed and dated by Mr.
Steinmetz verifying the truth and accuracy of the information therein,
and confirming that all of the information requested by this Notice
which is in his possession, custody, control, or knowledge has been
produced. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or
conceal any material fact in reply to this Notice is punishable by
fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
5. All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should
be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to
the following address:
Federal Communications Commission
Columbia Office
9200 Farm House Lane
Columbia, MD 21046
6. This Notice shall be sent to Harry Steinmetz at his address of record.
7. The Privacy Act of 1974 requires that we advise you that the
Commission will use all relevant material information before it,
including any information disclosed in your reply, to determine what,
if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Salomon Satche
District Director
Columbia District Office
Northeast Region
Enforcement Bureau
47 C.F.R. S: 1.89.
47 C.F.R. S: 1.89(a).
47 U.S.C. S: 308(b).
47 C.F.R. S: 1.89(c).
Section 1.16 of the Rules provides that "[a]ny document to be filed with
the Federal Communications Commission and which is required by any law,
rule or other regulation of the United States to be supported, evidenced,
established or proved by a written sworn declaration, verification,
certificate, statement, oath or affidavit by the person making the same,
may be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the unsworn
declaration, certification, verification, or statement in writing of such
person . . . . Such declaration shall be subscribed by the declarant as
true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following
form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date).
(Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16.
18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17.
P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3).
Federal Communications Commission
3
Federal Communications Commission