Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************




                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                        )                              
                                                       
                        )                              
                                                       
     In the Matter of   )                EB-05-BS-077  
                                                       
     Gary Toussaint     )   NAL/Acct.No: 200632260003  
                                                       
     Mattapan, MA       )          FRN No. 0014744007  
                                                       
                        )                              
                                                       
                        )                              


                  NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE

                                                      Released: March 8, 2006

   By the District Director, Boston Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement
   Bureau:

   I. INTRODUCTION

    1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
       that Gary Toussaint ("Toussaint") apparently willfully and repeatedly
       violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
       ("Act"), by operating an unlicensed radio transmitter on the frequency
       102.9 MHz in Mattapan, MA. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of
       Act, that Toussaint is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the
       amount of ten  thousand dollars ($10,000).

   II. BACKGROUND

    2. On August 1, 2005, the Boston Office of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau
       received a complaint of an illegal broadcast station operating on
       102.9 MHz in the Dorchester/Mattapan, MA area.

    3. On August 10, 2005, agents in the Boston Office monitored signals on
       102.9 MHz in the Dorchester/Mattapan, MA area and, using mobile
       direction finding techniques, determined the source of the signal to
       be 452 Norfolk Street, Mattapan, MA. The agents observed two FM
       broadcast antennas mounted on the roof of the building and a cable
       going from one of the antennas to a window on the second floor of the
       building. The agents took field strength measurements and determined
       that the signals being broadcast exceeded the limits for operation
       under Part 15 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") and therefore the
       station required a license. FCC records showed that no licenses had
       been issued for the operation of an FM broadcast station on 102.9 MHz
       at this location.

    4. On that same day, after completing the field strength measurements,
       the agents conducted an inspection of the station while the station
       was in operation. The inspection was conducted with a man identified
       from his driver's license as Toussaint. During the inspection, the
       agents observed radio station studio equipment, including a 500 watt
       transmitter and associated audio equipment. At the completion of the
       inspection, the agents presented Toussaint with a written Notice of
       Unlicensed Radio Operation, which advised Toussaint that he must
       discontinue the unlicensed operation immediately and outlined the
       possible penalties for continued operation of an unlicensed station.

    5. Agents from the Boston Office again monitored the frequency 102.9 MHz
       in Mattapan, MA on August 23, 2005 and, using mobile direction finding
       techniques, determined the source of the signal to be 452 Norfolk
       Street, Mattapan, MA. Based on field strength measurements of the
       signal taken by the agents, the station still exceeded the limits for
       operation under Part 15 of the Rules and therefore still required a
       license.

    6. On October 7, 2005, the Boston Office sent a Warning Letter, via
       regular and certified mail, return receipt requested, to Gary
       Toussaint at the station's address as well as the address on
       Toussaint's driver's license. The letter again warned Toussaint that
       he must discontinue the unlicensed operation immediately and outlined
       the potential penalties for continued operation of an unlicensed
       station. To date, the Boston Office has not received a reply from
       Toussaint.

    7. The agents from the Boston Office subsequently discovered a website at
       [1]www.choice1029.com for a radio station operating on 102.9 MHz and
       identified as "Choice FM." The contact information posted on the
       website indicated that the station's address is 452 Norfolk Street,
       Mattapan, MA.

   III. DISCUSSION

    8. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or
       repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions
       of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of
       the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued
       by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture
       penalty. The term "willful" as used in Section 503(b) has been
       interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are committed
       knowingly. The term "repeated" means the commission or omission of
       such act more than once or for more than one day.

    9. Section 301 of the Act states that no person shall use or operate any
       apparatus for the transmission of energy or communications or signals
       by radio within the United States except under and in accordance with
       the Rules and with a license issued by the Commission. On August 10,
       2005 and August 23, 2005 Toussaint operated radio transmission
       equipment at 452 Norfolk St., Mattapan, MA without the required
       Commission authorization. Toussaint received written notice that his
       operation of the station was unauthorized on August 10, 2005, and
       October 7, 2005. Because Toussaint continued to operate the station
       even after receiving a written warning, his violation is willful.
       Toussaint's violation occurred on more than one day, therefore, it is
       repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Toussaint
       apparently willfully and repeatedly violated SectionS 301 of the Act
       by operating an FM radio transmitter without a license on 102.9 MHz in
       Mattapan, MA.

   10. Pursuant to The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment
       of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines,
       ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, the
       base forfeiture amount for operation without an instrument of
       authorization is $10,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount,
       we must also take into account the statutory factors set forth in
       Section 503(b)(2)(D) of the Act, which include the nature,
       circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations, and with respect
       to the violator, the degree of culpability, and history of prior
       offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may
       require. Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80, and
       the statutory factors to the instant case, we conclude that Toussaint
       is apparently liable for a ($10,000) forfeiture.

   IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

   11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311,
       0.314 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Gary  Toussaint is hereby
       NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of
       ten  thousand dollars ($10,000) for violations of Sections 301 of the
       Rules.

   12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the
       Commission's Rules within thirty days of the release date of this
       Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Gary Toussaint SHALL PAY
       the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written
       statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed
       forfeiture.

   13. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
       payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The
       payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above.
       Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal
       Communications Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA
       15251-8340.  Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Mellon
       Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670, Pittsburgh, PA
       15251.   Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 043000261,
       receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account number 911-6106.

   14. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications
       Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Northeast Region, Boston Office, 1
       Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA, 02169 and must include the NAL/Acct.
       No. referenced in the caption.

   15. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
       response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
       (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
       financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
       accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and
       objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's
       current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must
       specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
       financial documentation submitted.

   16. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent
       Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to:
       Associate Managing Director, Financial Operations, 445 12th Street,
       S.W., Room 1A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.

   17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
       for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
       Requested, and regular mail, to Gary Toussaint at his address of
       record.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Dennis Loria

   District Director,

   Boston Office

   Northeast Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   47 U.S.C. S 301

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b).

   Section 15.209(a) of the Rules authorizes operation of low power radio
   equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed
   the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. S
   15.209(a). The measurements taken on August 10, 2005 showed that the field
   strength of the station's signal was 79,332 times the permissible level
   for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter.

   The measurements taken on August 23, 2005 showed that the field strength
   of the station's signal was 9,018 times the permissible level for a
   non-licensed low-power radio transmitter.

   Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to
   violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the
   Act, provides that "[t]he term 'willful', when used with reference to the
   commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate
   commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate
   any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
   authorized by this Act...." See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6
   FCC Rcd 4387 (1991).

   Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(2), which also applies to
   violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the
   Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the
   commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
   such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
   for more than one day."

   12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R.
   S1.80.

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D).

   47 U.S.C. SS 301, 503(b), 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80.

   See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.

   (...continued from previous page)

                                                              (continued....)

   Federal Communications Commission

                                       2

   Federal Communications Commission

References

   Visible links
   1. http://www.choice1029.com/