Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                           Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                     Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
EICB-TV, LLC.                   )          File No. EB-02-DL-530 
Licensee of KUOT-CA in Oklahoma City, OK     )
Facility ID #31368              )           NOV No. V20043250001
Cedar Hill, Texas               )

                       NOTICE OF VIOLATION

                                               Released: April 8, 

By the District Director, Dallas Office, Enforcement Bureau:

     1.   On is a Notice of Violation ("Notice") issued  pursuant 
to Section  1.89 of  the Commission's  Rules,1 to  EICB-TV,  LLC, 
licensee of station KUOT-CA in Oklahoma City, OK. 

     2.   On August 18, 2003, an agent of the Commission's Dallas 
Office inspected television station KUOT-CA, licensed to Oklahoma 
City, Oklahoma, and observed the following violations:

       2)a.    47 C.F.R.    11.35(a):   ``Equipment  operational 
       readiness...Broadcast   stations...are   responsible   for 
       ensuring  that EAS  Encoders, EAS  Decoders and  Attention 
       Signal generating and receiving equipment used as part  of 
       the  EAS  are   installed  so  that  the  monitoring   and 
       transmitting functions are available during the times  the 
       stations  and systems  are in  operation.    Additionally, 
       broadcast  stations...must  determine  the  cause  of  any 
       failure  to  receive the  required  tests  or  activations 
       specified in  11.61(a)(1) and (2).  Appropriate  entries 
       must be made in the broadcast station log as specified  in 
        73.1820  and   73.1840 of this  chapter ...  indicating 
       reasons why any tests were not received.''  There were  no 
       entries made  in the station  logs indicating why  records 
       of reception of EAS tests were absent in the logs for  the 
       second monitored source.

       2)b.    47 C.F.R.    11.52(d): ``Broadcast  stations  and 
       cable systems and wireless cable systems must monitor  two 
       EAS sources. The monitoring assignments of each  broadcast 
       station and  cable system  and wireless  cable system  are 
       specified in the State EAS Plan and FCC Mapbook. They  are 
       developed in accordance with FCC monitoring  priorities.''  
       At the  time of the  inspection the audio  level from  the 
       second receiver was too low to be monitored.

       2)c.    47 C.F.R.  73.1125(c): ``Each Class A television 
       station shall maintain a main studio at a location within 
       the station's predicted Grade B contour, as defined in  
       73.683 and calculated using the method specified in  
       73.684. With respect to a group of commonly controlled 
       stations, Class A stations whose predicted Grade B 
       contours are physically contiguous to each other may 
       locate their main studio within any of these contours. If 
       a Class A station is one of a group of commonly 
       controlled Class A stations, but its predicted Grade B 
       contour is not physically contiguous to that of another 
       Class A station in the commonly owned group, its main 
       studio shall be located within its own predicted Grade B 
       contour. Alternatively, a Class A television station 
       shall maintain a main studio at the site used by the 
       station as of November 29, 1999.'' At the time of the 
       inspection the contour map at the station was not based 
       on the station's licensed ERP and an estimation of the 
       Grade B contour in the direction of the studio indicates 
       the studio is outside of the contour.

       2)d.    47  C.F.R.    73.1545(c):  ``TV  stations.    The 
       departure of the visual carrier frequency of a TV  station 
       may not exceed  1000 Hz from the assigned visual  carrier 
       frequency.''  At  the time  of the  inspection the  visual 
       carrier  frequency   was  6300  Hz   below  the   assigned 

       2)e.    47 C.F.R.   73.1820(a)(1)(iii):   ``Station  Log.  
       Entries  must be  made in  the station  log...An entry  of 
       each test  and activation  of the  Emergency Alert  System 
       (EAS)...''   During the  period from  August 24,  2002  to 
       April 2, 2003, there were no logs available.

       2)f.    47    C.F.R.          73.1870(c)(3):      ``Chief 
       operators...The   chief  operator   is   responsible   for 
       completion  of  the following  duties  specified  in  this 
       paragraph below.  When  the duties are delegated to  other 
       persons,  the chief  operator shall  maintain  supervisory 
       oversight  sufficient to  know that  each requirement  has 
       been fulfilled in a timely and correct manner...Review  of 
       the station records  at least once each week to  determine 
       if  required  entries  are  being  made   correctly...Upon 
       completion  of  the review,  the  chief  operator  or  his 
       designee  must  date  and  sign  the  log,  initiate   any 
       corrective action which  may be necessary, and advise  the 
       station    licensee   of    any   condition    which    is 
       repetitive...''  A review of the available logs  indicated 
       there were  repetitive violations which continued  through 
       the time  of the  inspection with  no apparent  corrective 

     3.   Pursuant to Section 308(b) of the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended,2  and Section 1.89  of the Commission's  Rules, 
EICB-TV, LLC,  must submit  a written  statement concerning  this 
matter within 20 days  of release of  this Notice.  The  response 
must fully explain  each violation, must  contain a statement  of 
the specific  action(s)  taken  to  correct  each  violation  and 
preclude  recurrence,  and  should   include  a  time  line   for 
completion of pending corrective action(s).  The response must be 
complete in itself and  signed by a principal  or officer of  the 
licensee with personal knowledge of the matter.  All replies  and 
documentation sent in  response to this  Notice should be  marked 
with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to  the 
following address:

                    Federal Communications Commission
                    Dallas Office
                    9330 LBJ Freeway, #1170
                    Dallas, Texas 75243

     4.   Failure  to  respond  to  this  Notice  constitutes   a 
separate violation  that could  result in  additional  penalties, 
including monetary forfeiture.

     5.   The Privacy Act  of 19743 requires  that we advise  you 
that the Commission  will use all  relevant material  information 
before it, including any information disclosed in your reply,  to 
determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to  ensure 
your  compliance.   Any  false   statement  made  knowingly   and 
willfully in  reply  to this  Notice  is punishable  by  fine  or 
imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.4

     6.   This Notice shall be sent to EICB-TV, LLC, 406 Copeland 
Drive, Cedar Hill, Texas 75104.

                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

                              James D. Wells
                              District Director
                              Dallas Office

1 47 C.F.R.  1.89
2 47 U.S.C. 308(b)
3 P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C.  552a(e)(3)
4 18 U.S.C.  1001 et seq