Click here for Adobe Acrobat version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.



   March 1, 2011

   Mr. John DiStasio

   General Manager and Chief Executive Officer

   Sacramento Municipal Utility District

   6201 S. Street

   Sacramento, Ca. 95817-1899

   Re: EB-09-GB-0191

   Dear Mr. DiStasio:

   The Federal Communications Commission has previously notified your
   predecessor at Sacramento Municipal, Mr. Howard Posner, by letter on
   February 22, 2010, that it has received complaints of harmful radio
   interference possibly caused by equipment operated by your company. This
   interference has been reported by an operator in the Amateur Radio
   Service. The complainant is:

   (Name withheld)

   (Address withheld)

   (Address withheld)

   Tel: (Number withheld)

   In this letter, Mr. Posner was advised that this problem, if unresolved,
   could be a violation of Commission rules and could result in a monetary
   forfeiture. For this reason, we encouraged the parties involved to
   voluntarily resolve this matter without Commission intervention. If
   however it became necessary to facilitate a resolution, the Commission
   might investigate possible rules violations and address appropriate
   remedies, including monetary forfeiture.

   Mr. Posner was further advised that the Commission expects that most cases
   can be resolved within 60 days of the time they are first reported to the
   utility company. In addition, if Sacramento Municipal was unable to
   resolve this matter by April 23, 2010, they were directed to inform this
   office about the nature of the problem, the steps being taken to resolve
   it and the estimated time in which those steps could be accomplished.
   Sacramento Municipal was further advised to inform the complainant of what
   steps would be taken to correct this reported interference problem.
   Sacramento Municipal did not respond to the February 22, 2010 letter.
   Likewise, Mr. (name withheld) reports that there has been no reduction in
   the radio frequency interference.

   In order to avoid enforcement action on this matter, you have thirty (30)
   days from the date of receipt of this warning to respond to this office at
   the following address: 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325. The
   response must contain a statement of the specific action(s)

   taken to identify and eliminate the source(s) of Mr. (name withheld) radio
   interference. Your response must also include a carbon copy to Mr. (name
   withheld) so that he can confirm any statement that you make regarding
   resolution of the interference. If you have any questions about this
   matter, please contact me at 717-338-2577.


   Laura L. Smith, Esq.

   Special Counsel

   Enforcement Bureau

   cc: San Francisco Field Office

   Western Regional Director