WPCe 2?BJBECourier#|x w RomanArialArial Italic  P6G;ynXP#CourierTimes New RomanArialArial ItalicTimes New Roman Italic\0$FwX@ X2#Xj\  P6G; XP#2,qKXCourierTimes New Roman"i~'^DO]uuĶOOOu=O=AuuuuuuuuuuAAgרOYͨۨOAOkuOgugugOuuAAuAuuuuOYAuuuugp/p~O=~kOOO=OOOOOOuOuAggggg͘gggggOAOAOAOAuuuuuuuuuuguruuuuggggg~ggggguuu~u~uOAOuOOOu~~uA]OOAuuuuuͨOOOYYY~bAkuuuuuuۨ~ggguOuYOu=uuN*NWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNTTkuOguuuuuAKuFKuFOOgguPPuu匱T錌TOguF"u錇~u匌u<?xxx,ix6X@`7X@7jC:,ynXj\  P6G;XPX` hp x (# W B B  B   B index 2in2 ^h ZCourierTimes New RomanArial#|x HP LaserJet 5SiHPLAS5SI.PRSx  @\0$FwX@2X"lzllR<?xxx,x6X@`7X@7jC:,ynXj\  P6G;XP9NC,Ӽ2PG;P1mC9,Xm2PG;XPQuick _Quick _Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font footnote referencefootnote reference 2V  t 8 endnote textendnote text;1#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#endnote referenceendnote reference44#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#footnote textfootnote text;1#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#toc 1toc 1X` hp x (#(#`(#`X` hp x (#2   toc 2toc 2X` hp x (#` (#` (#X` hp x (#toc 3toc 3 X` hp x (#` (#`` (#`X` hp x (#toc 4toc 4 X` hp x (# (#` (#`X` hp x (#toc 5toc 5 X` hp x (#h(#`h(#`X` hp x (#2 2 vPtoc 6toc 6 X` hp x (#(# (# X` hp x (#toc 7toc 7  toc 8toc 8X` hp x (#(# (# X` hp x (#toc 9toc 9X` hp x (#(#`(#`X` hp x (#2R$4Rp!#index 1index 1X` hp x (#` (#` (#X` hp x (#index 2index 2X` hp x (#` (#` (#X` hp x (#toa headingtoa headingX` hp x (#(#(#X` hp x (#captioncaption;1#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#2D'$n>%%&_Equation Caption_Equation Caption11#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#Bibliogrphy6GXBibliography-=(-J!*-o1,!E Tech Init6GXInitialize Technical Style!*-o1,!E 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-4!     2)v'((;)a2Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-*    a3Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-'     a4Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-&     a5Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-&   . 2y,)w**+a6Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-&  . a7Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-&  . a8Technical+-o1,Technical Document Style,-=(-J!*-&  . Doc Init!6GXInitialize Document Style!*-o1,!E    I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentҲ2. ,!e-"-#q.a1DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*- F *  ׃  a2DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-!*    a3DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-"0     a4DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-# . 20$e0/%e/&p/'pj0a5DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-$   a6DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-% !" a7DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-&#$` ` ` a8DocumentE+-o1,Document Style,-=(-J!#*-'%&` ` ` 27(Z 1)ef6*p6+s;7Pleading!$6GXHeader for Numbered Pleading Paper*-o1,!E('(   ,#XX2PQXP##XX2PQXP##XX2PQXP##XX2PQXP##XX2PQXP##XX2PQXP##XX2PQXP# X  y*dddyy*dddy HP1 HP2 HP3 HP4 HP5 HP6 HP7 HP8 HP9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 H21 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28   Heading 2(6GXUnderlined Heading Flush Left(*-o1,!E))* Heading 1)6GXCentered Heading(-J!)*-o1,!E*+,* à  Bullet List6GXIndented Bullet ListJ!**-o1,!E+-.` ` ` 2,7-XL.X`/X6uDefault Para6GXDefault Paragraph FontJ!+*-o1,!E,' /' 0#x6X@7X@##d6X@ Q@#Technical 16GXTechnical 1-=(-J!-*-o1,!E- 1 2Technical 26GXTechnical 2-=(-J!.*-o1,!E. 3 4Technical 36GXTechnical 3-=(-J!/*-o1,!E/ 5 62U01П23eTechnical 46GXTechnical 4-=(-J!0*-o1,!E0 7 8X` hp x (# ` hp x (#Technical 56GXTechnical 5-=(-J!1*-o1,!E1 9 :X` hp x (# ` hp x (#Technical 66GXTechnical 6-=(-J!2*-o1,!E2 ; <X` hp x (# ` hp x (#Quick 1.3 . 245U67endnote refeendnote reference4;; XN P  x P footnote texfootnote text59 8  XN P  x P footnote reffootnote reference6; ;  XN P  x P _Equation Ca_Equation Caption78'8( XN P  x P 289b:f;footerfooter8X` hp x (#!!X` hp x (#page numberpage number9 a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers::`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers;C @` A. ` ` (#` 2<=>6?a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers?h` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# 2@AB8C8a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers@pfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersAyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Technical 7(=tWTechnical 7(&8=v RK+&PW- =f—+&bBX` hp x (# ` hp x (#Technical 8(=tWTechnical 8(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bCX` hp x (# ` hp x (#2D<:EvFGvDocument 1(=tWDocument 1(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bDX` hp x (#` hp x (#Document 2(=tWDocument 2(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bEDocument 3(=tWDocument 3(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bFDocument 4(=tWDocument 4(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bG   2lH4IJKDocument 5(=tWDocument 5(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bH;!;"#x6X@7X@##d6X@Q@#Document 6(=tWDocument 6(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bI;#;$#x6X@ 7X@##d6X@ Q@#Document 7(=tWDocument 7(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bJ;%;&#x6X@ 7X@##d6X@ Q@#Document 8(=tWDocument 8(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bK;';(#x6X@ 7X@##d6X@Q@#2fL2M2N2O24Right Par 1(=tWRight Par 1(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bL-.X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 2(=tWRight Par 2(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bM/0X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 3(=tWRight Par 3(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bN12X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 4(=tWRight Par 4(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bO34X` hp x (#` hp x (#2`P2Q2R2S2.Right Par 5(=tWRight Par 5(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bP56X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 6(=tWRight Par 6(&8=vRK+&PW- =f—+&bQ78X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 7(=tWRight Par 7(&8=v RK+&PW- =f—+&bR9:X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 8(=tWRight Par 8(&8=v!RK+&PW- =f—+&bS;<X` hp x (#` hp x (#2OTgU VWp(>l_%tu- :v  J G H_%t 5^I G Z_TU1IfmfU6hTechnical Document StylefU*DIfmfEV4$     2IfmfV6hTechnical Document StylefV*DIfmfEW*    2XYZ[/3IfmfW6hTechnical Document StylefW*DIfmfEX'   4IfmfX6hTechnical Document StylefX*DIfmfEY&   5IfmfY6hTechnical Document StylefY*DIfmfEZ&  . 6IfmfZ6hTechnical Document StylefZ*DIfmfE[&  . 2=\]k^_7Ifmf[6hTechnical Document Stylef[*DIfmfE\&  . 8Ifmf\6hTechnical Document Stylef\*DIfmfE]&  . 9Ifmf]6hDocument Style=(Df]*DIfmfE^F *  ׃  10Ifmf^6hDocument Style=(Df^*DIfmfE_*    2?`oaqbeuce11Ifmf_6hDocument Style=(Df_*DIfmfE`0    12Ifmf`6hDocument Style=(Df`*DIfmfEa  . 13Ifmfa6hDocument Style=(Dfa*DIfmfEb  14Ifmfb6hDocument Style=(Dfb*DIfmfEc  22dpqepfpQgq15Ifmfc6hDocument Style=(Dfc*DIfmfEd` ` ` 16Ifmfd6hDocument Style=(Dfd*DIfmfEe` ` ` 17Ifmfe6hDocument Style=(Dfe*DIfmfEf` ` ` 18Ifmff6hDocument Style=(Dff*DIfmfEg  . 21 hediej. kp 19Ifmfg6hDocument Style=(Dfg*DIfmfEh  20Ifmfh6hDocument Style=(Dfh*DIfmfEi  21Ifmfi6hDocument Style=(Dfi*DIfmfEj*   22Ifmfj6hDocument Style=(Dfj*DIfmfEk` ` ` 2 lc m n o% 23Ifmfk6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEl8@   24Ifmfl6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEmA@` `  ` ` ` 25Ifmfm6hDocument Style=(Dfm*DIfmfEn0    26Ifmfn6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEoJ` ` @  ` `  2p q r^s27Ifmfo6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEpS` `  @  28Ifmfp6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEq\` `  @hh# hhh 29Ifmfq6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEre` `  hh#@( hh# 30Ifmfr6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEsn` `  hh#(@- ( 2tuvw'31Ifmfs6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEtw` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 32Ifmft6hDocument Style=(Dft*DIfmfEuF *  ׃  33Ifmfu6hTechnical Document Stylefu*DIfmfEv&  . 34Ifmfv6hTechnical Document Stylefv*DIfmfEw&  . 2Sxyzz{35Ifmfw6hTechnical Document Stylefw*DIfmfEx*    36Ifmfx6hTechnical Document Stylefx*DIfmfEy'   37Ifmfy6hTechnical Document Stylefy*DIfmfEz&   38Ifmfz6hTechnical Document Stylefz*DIfmfE{4$     2|} ~?39Ifmf{6hTechnical Document Stylef{*DIfmfE|&  . 40Ifmf|6hTechnical Document Stylef|*DIfmfE}&  . 41Ifmf}6hTechnical Document Stylef}*DIfmfE~4$     42Ifmf~6hTechnical Document Stylef~*DIfmfE*    2@ 643Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE'   44Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE&   45Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE&  . 46Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE&  . 2r|647Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE&  . 48Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE&  . 49Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfEF *  ׃  50Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE*    2qeef51Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE0    52Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE  . 53Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE  54Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE  2 !ppmo 55Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE` ` ` 56Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE` ` ` 57Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfE8@   58Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEA@` `  ` ` ` 2$  . 96Ifmf6hTechnical Document Stylef*DIfmfE&?@  . 97Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfEFAB *  ׃  98Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE*CD    2G=w;q <e}<e<99Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE0E F    100Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfEG H . 101Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE IJ 102Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfE KL 2?py=p=Y>>103Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfEMN` ` ` 104Ifmf6hDocument Style=(Df*DIfmfEOP` ` ` 105Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfE8QR@   106Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEAST@` `  ` ` ` 2~B?\@ AA107Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEJUV` ` @  ` `  108Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfESWX` `  @  109Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfE\YZ` `  @hh# hhh 110Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEe[\` `  hh#@( hh# 2KHBxCIDMF111Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEn]^` `  hh#(@- ( 112Ifmf6hRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*DIfmfEw_`` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp PLAIN PAPER6hPLAIN PAPER PARAMETERSf*DIfmfE]ab#x  @;@#   X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:PPCiPPPCPPPPPPPCvCCCCCCCCvvvvvC5PPPCgv5DPO5PPPvvvYCivvvPvPAu4/4WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNTT~PYVPTO33PPPPTTuu3OuO"uu~uu"i~'^99Ipp.DDNt9D99pppppppppp99tttp̅}9ep}}999\p.ppepp9pp..e.ppppDe9peeeeE5EtD9sZDDD9DDDDDDpD|9pppppȰepppp99999999pppppppppepp|pepppppeese|pppppppspsp9.D|DD9|Xssep.p:pDpDp.pxppppȼDDDeees}L}9}Zpppppps}e}e}eppDpe}Dp|8dp,(,WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNHxxHlpD|pppppLJpDHpD,,DDpDDxppxHxxHsdd,DdD"dxdldtxxd27_tVZZK\",^DDV6OOYAOAADDAwDADn6wD66w6RwDwwwuR?ROAnOOODOOOOOOuOAwCCCCCCCCwwwwwA6OOOAgw6AO[6RRRwwwTDnuuuOwOwDu414WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNTT~PYVPTO33PPPPTTyuu3OuO"uu~uu<?xxx,x6X@`7X@7jC:,ynXj\  P6G;XP9NC,Ӽ2PG;P1mC9,Xm2PG;XPT9ND,Å2xjAG;X@|ND,_|\  P6G;P\=yND,+by*f9 xr G;X"i~'^DObuuĶOOOu=O=AuuuuuuuuuuOOuבOgĚuđYAYbuOuugugAuuAAgAuuuuYYAugggY]A]~O=~bOOO=OOOOOOuOuAuuuuu͚gggggOAOAOAOAuuuuuuuuuguuuuguuuuugg~ggggguuu~u~uOAOuOOOuu~~gATOKAuuuuuۚYYYuYuYuY~~TAbuuuuuuĚ~YYYuOuuYOu=uuN3NWddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNTTyuYuuuuuuAKuFKuFOOuPPuu匱T錌T}uuOuF"u錇~u匌u2Ki_\aZe"i~'^:DTddDDDd4D48ddddddddddDDd||||DXp||dp||ppL8LTdDddXdX8dd88X8ddddLL8dXXXLP8PlD4lTDDD4DDDDDDdDd8|d|d|d|d|dX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8dddddddddpX|ddddpXd|d|d|d|dXXlXx|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDddllXp8pHpDp@p8dtdddd|L|L|LdLdLdLllpHp8pTddddddplpLpLpLdpDddLpDpdx4ddC,CWddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNHxxHhdLdddddd8@d<@d<DDppdDDxddxHxxHkddDpd<"dxtldxxd<?xxx,x6X@`7X@7jC:,ynXj\  P6G;XP9NC,Ӽ2PG;P1mC9,Xm2PG;XPT9ND,Å2xjAG;X@|ND,_|\  P6G;P\=yND,+by*f9 xr G;X\5hC:,+rXh*f9 xr G;XX -A1x  -1x  -"1x  -m1x  -H1x  2"6w_(ta  -Ap  -p  -"p  -p  X4#Xj\  P6G;ynXP#  a4&$E >&;,#|\  P6G;_P#MICHAEL K. POWELL ETCommissioner Federal Communications Commission bBefore the  Independent Telephone Pioneer Association Et(National Chapter)  LWashington, DC YMay 7, 1998    "Working Toward Independents' Day: C MidSize Carriers as the Special Forces of Deregulation"    ah4%(As Prepared For Delivery)#Xj\  P6G;ynXP#ѐ\     Good afternoon, and thank you for inviting me to be here today. My remarks will be brief, so you all can hurry back to your offices before the postlunch "food coma" takes hold. I want to share with you some of my thoughts on a critically important, but often neglected segment of the telecommunications industry. Many of you represent what I consider to be some of the unsung heros of the telecommunications revolution: midsize independent carriers. Large enough to command substantial resources and expertise, yet small enough to escape at least some of the onerous regulatory burdens imposed on larger carriers, midsize independents are on the front lines of competition and deregulation. Just as importantly, midsize independents are storming the beaches of innovation, both in terms of how some of these carriers market new products and services and in terms of how they employ new technologies. In the war to tear down the arcane regulatory walls that prevent firms from competing with other firms and from bringing customers the full benefits of a free market, I sometimes think of midsize independents as our "special forces." The Special Forces, for those of you who aren't military buffs, are elite, highly skilled forces adept at operating undetected behind enemy lines. The infamous Green Berets, a Special Forces unit, are small and nimble, allowing them to slip through the cracks, untethered by the logistical constraints faced by larger military forces. Fans of the Rambo films know their capability. Now, I'm an old soldier, so I'm comfortable with thinking of telecommunications competition in terms of war and revolution. For those of you who have gotten no closer to battle than the screen in your local movie theater, however, try thinking of the movie"3)0*0*0*'" "Independence Day." In that scifi thriller, aliens from outer space attack Earth and, in the process, establish a constellation of menacing space craft that surround the planet. For much of the movie, the prospects for humankind are bleak; we are outgunned and seemingly outnumbered by the technologicallysuperior aliens. Then Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum discover a way to thwart the attack by commandeering a ship that the aliens had left behind on a previous visit to Earth and by flying that single ship into the heart of the alien constellation. The aliens are caught offguard and Smith and Goldblum manage to destroy the constellation. They defeat a superior force using stealth and the element of surprise, much like the Special Forces might in a conventional battle against a human enemy. So how are midsize independents like the Special Forces or our movie heroes in the war to promote competition, deregulation and innovation? Well, for one thing, midsize independents operate quietly (in contrast to their larger counterparts, which constantly deploy teams of lobbyists to stir the pot in Washington), yet they are very effective. The independents, like Special Forces, employ creative, innovative techniques to succeed. Those of you who have heard me speak about midsize and smaller carriers know that I think most policymakers within the Beltway suffer from what I have termed "Big Guy Myopia" that is, we often set policies and measure the success or failure of such policies based on the positions of the major local and long distance companies. Faced with the momentous task of setting and removing policies on a national scale, we too often rush to address the concerns of the major players and deal with the smaller players as an afterthought, if at all. We thereby overlook the many midsize and smaller companies that are active in the marketplace. But our unfortunate tendency to focus only on the largest telecom players has an upside. Just as in the movie "Independence Day," our "Big Guy Myopia" creates an opportunity for midsize players to capitalize on stealth and the element of surprise and to help win the war to promote competition, deregulation and innovation. Specifically, I believe the experiences of midsize independents comprise a growing factual record that will both demonstrate the benefits of competition, deregulation and innovation and will serve as compelling evidence that our existing regulatory scheme will impede, if not prevent, the delivery of such benefits to customers. This is why I said midsize independents are our "Special Forces." Let me say a bit more on this point. In an upcoming law review article, I lay out the principles that I believe should guide policymakers as they try to navigate the rough terrain of change in communications that was unleashed or at least intensified by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. In my view, communications policymakers must not be content to respond and react to the dynamic  X#4changes that are before us. We must lead boldly, decisively and creatively. In carrying out our leadership roles, I believe we must be wellschooled in the fields of economics and competitive analysis, and be truly committed to the belief that competition and markets will ultimately prove superior devices for managing change. Further, we must be "technologywise," respecting at once the promise, practicalities and uncontrollable development of "%'0*((%" technology. Based on these principles, I suggest in the article that communications leaders focus, among other things, on (1) promoting innovation, because innovation breeds new markets and shatters the entrenched advantages of incumbency, as the recent history of communications has shown; (2) addressing convergence, because technology will continue to erase the differences that historically have justified regulating different services differently and thereby force policymakers to reconcile these conflicting regulatory approaches; and (3) strengthening enforcement, rather than continuing to rely on prospective, prophylactic regulation. I point out in the article, however, that one of the biggest obstacles to policymakers truly promoting competition, deregulation and innovation is not legal, economic or technological; rather, it is psychological. One reason I believe that policymakers find it difficult, even after setting appropriate ground rules, to allow the market to run its course is, ironically, their fear of ceding control to the marketplace. The 1996 Act commands policymakers and industry to move away from the monopolyoriented, overregulatory origins of communications policy and toward a world in which the market, rather than bureaucracy, determines how communications resources should be utilized. Yet, so often, we cannot actually bring ourselves to let go, to jump off our regulatory perch. I do not dispute that risks await in free markets: risk that the consumers will be harmed by anticompetitive conduct on the part of firms with market power; risk that communications companies may be acquired, downsized or driven out of business; and risk that some individuals will not vie successfully for the many choice jobs that competition will create. Although these fears are not inconsequential, however, they nearly always are overstated and tend to paralyze us from taking action that would allow markets to flourish and competition to grow. Instead, we speculate about possible anticompetitive effects and then adopt policies intended to protect new entrants and consumers from them. Rather than protect these interests, however, we more often, in practical effect, handicap the market and postpone the arrival of competition and consumer choice. Communications leaders must not give into these fears so lightly and instead must have the courage to trust the market. Here's where midsize, independent companies come in as our "Special Forces." It is my view which I concede is at once optimistic and subversive that midsize companies provide a valuable testing ground for policymakers seeking to promote competition, deregulation and innovation. Specifically, policymakers can look to the experiences of midsize companies both to appreciate the benefits of deregulation and innovation and, hopefully, to quell regulators' fear that the sky will fall if we do not anticipate, and prospectively control, every potential anticompetitive effect or other negative consequence. I believe that even overly fearful regulators may feel comfortable letting midsize, independent carriers explore new markets and technologies with lesser regulatory burdens than"#'0*((%" larger carriers face and thereby hasten the great day when all carriers large and small are liberated from such burdens. Regulators may feel comfortable going easier on midsize  X4carriers simply because they are not large, such that regulators will not feel compelled to restrict the activities of such carriers to protect the vast majority of consumers.  X4Let me be clear: I do not favor setting up or perpetuating a scheme whereby regulators automatically impose greater regulatory burdens on larger carriers. But to the extent midsize, independent carriers can be freed from some of the restrictions faced by the larger carriers, I hope regulators can begin to comfort themselves that ceding control to the marketplace is not such a scary proposition after all. Thus, just as Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum disrupted the alien constellation in the movie, midsize independent carriers may be able to perform a "sneak attack" on regulatory fears of anticompetitive or other negative potentialities by providing evidence that such fears are, at times, overstated. This sneak attack by independents will, I believe, bring regulators that much closer to allowing the market to take hold and to focusing on innovation, convergence and enforcement. And how imminent is such a sneak attack by midsize independent carriers? I would say that, at least with respect to showing regulators the benefits of innovative marketing and applications of technology, the preparations are well under way. Take Citizens Communications, for example. Citizens operates in small and mediumsized markets in over a dozen states, offering a wide variety of services ranging from competitive wireline local and long distance service, to cellular, Internet access frame relay, DBS and cable. Roseville Telephone Company in Roseville, California, likewise has taken pride in being an innovator in the deployment of new technology. Roseville serves over 100,000 access lines and provides long distance service, directory assistance, equipment, alarm monitoring, cellular and PCS, as well. Anchoragebased ATU Telecommunications also prides itself on providing a variety of leadingedge technologies and services. For example, ATU provides digital cellular, LAN service, data and Internet services, wireless cable television and prepaid calling cards. ALLTEL of Little Rock, Arkansas, serves over a million access lines with local service, long distance, wireless Internet access and paging. The examples provided by these and other midsize independents serve multiple  X 4purposes. First, as I have said, I believe that the experiences of midsize independents may alleviate some of regulators' fears that incumbent LECs, in particular, will seize upon every potential anticompetitive opportunity that might arise if regulators fail to craft a prospective rule to foreclose that opportunity before the fact. I note that some independents are providing great value and choice to consumers despite the fact that they are the most established LECs in their service areas.  X#4Second, and relatedly, I believe that the experiences of midsize independents can help persuade regulators to take seriously the notion that in some cases the benefits of allowing the incumbent to provide new services outweigh the potential (and often largely unproven) risks of anticompetitive conduct and the like. Many independents are at the forefront of demonstrating the value to customers of allowing carriers to bundle traditionallydistinct"#'0*((%" services in new ways and to deploy new technology. My hope is that, by focusing on some of these companies, regulators can begin to see that the risk of anticompetitive effects they perceive may be unfounded or may be outweighed by the benefits that will accrue to customers if carriers are not unduly restrained.  X4Third, I hope that the relatively small size of midsize independents will allow regulators to become more comfortable with the notion that there may be benefits to replacing prospective regulation with careful monitoring for improper activity, coupled with vigorous enforcement. In addition to eliminating unnecessary regulation, this should provide a way around adopting onesizefitsall rules that sweep too broadly in terms of the carriers to which such rules apply.  X 4Fourth, because many midsize independents do offer a variety of services that  X 4traditionally have been offered by different types of providers (e.g., voice, data, video), I believe that the experiences of these independents will highlight the need to rationalize the existing regulatory scheme, according to which similar services are accorded different regulatory treatments depending on the transmission medium used. In particular, I hope that independents that manage diversified portfolios of services will have experiences while navigating this highly balkanized regulatory structure that will show increasingly that the inconsistencies of such regulation must be streamlined and ultimately eliminated. In closing, then, I ask those of you who represent midsize independent carriers to do  X4a few things. First, keep innovating. I trust that this won't be difficult, as one of the beauties of the market is that firms will innovate because it is in their selfinterest to do so.  X4Second, keep us regulators informed of your marketing successes, and your failures. Your practical, real world experience is invaluable, and by sharing it with us, you will help eliminate faulty assumptions and policies and thereby eliminate unnecessary and harmful regulation.  XP4Finally, when our rules inappropriately lump midsize independents together with larger carriers, help us build detailed, factual records that will allow us to carve out exceptions to these rules for midsize and smaller carriers if necessary. In this regard, I applaud the efforts of some independents to conduct a study to examine whether midsize carriers under price cap regulation experience the same productivity gains as the larger carriers do. This kind of factual contribution will be critical in helping us evaluate our rules and may help midsize independents obtain a level of freedom from regulation that is more tailored to their circumstances. The Army Special Forces' mission, like their motto, is "to free the oppressed" ("De Oppresso Liber"). I firmly believe that, by working with regulators and by otherwise serving as our "Special Forces" in the fight to promote competition, deregulation and innovation, mid X<&4size independent carriers will help free all carriers from the bonds of outmoded regulatory thinking and liberate consumers with more vigorous competition, lower prices and better"%'0*((%" services. When that happens, it will not only be a great day for independents, it will also be a great "independence day" for us all. Thank you.  Z4#2PG;ӼP#