WPC' 2?BJSCourierCourierArial-#Xw PE37WXP# Z-  #2PG;P#[X@3|mes New Roman#Xw PE37WXP#2@q Z3 CourierCG TimesHP LaserJet 4P LPT1 (Local)HPLAS4P.PRS4x  @\ [X@CY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d|8|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddxxdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCxCddoddCdYds]xUvdYYCCCCx~oxoY~NYdYC8YooYdYxsdxdd~YYxoxxx~CdxYxxxxCCdddddddxCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`LCourierArialTimes New RomanTimes New Roman Bold9NC,2PG;PIdV,Ծ2PG;P1mC9,4Xm2PG;XP2JrZt/CourierArialTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman ItalicP#HP LaserJet 5PHPLAS5P.PRS5x  @\"TX@3|j",^CCU5PP[CPCCCCCvCCCk5vC55v5PvCvvvvP>PPCiPPPCPPPPPPPCvCCCCCCCCvvvvvC5PPPCgv5DPO5PPPvvvYCivvvPvPAu4/4WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNTT~PYVPTO33PPPPTTuu3OuO"uu~uu26Wt,KKCourierArialArial ItalicTimes New RomanTimes New Roman ItalicTimes New Roman Bold",^VVnEggtVgVVVV2VVVVEVEEEgVgPggVgggVgggggggV,VVVVVVVVVEgggVEXgfE,gggrVggTC<CWddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNllgJrnglfBBgg,gg,,,l,l,Bf,f",,,&,"i~'^99Ipp.DDNt9D99pppppppppp99tttp̅}9ep}}999\p.ppepp9pp..e.ppppDe9peeeeE5EtD9sZDDD9DDDDDDpD|9pppppȰepppp99999999pppppppppepp|pepppppeese|pppppppspsp9.D|DD9|Xssep.p:pDpDp.pxppppȼDDDeees}L}9}Zpppppps}e}e}eppDpe}Dp|8dp,(,WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNHxxHlpD|pppppLJpDHpD,,DDpDDxppxHxxHsdd,DdD"dxdldtxxd"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDdDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddxHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd2'KhKK!ZI$"i~'^:DpddȨDDDdp4D48ddddddddddDDpppd|Ld|pȐD8DtdDdpXpXDdp8Dp8pdppXLDpdddXP,PhD4htDDD4DDDDDDdDp8dddddȐXXXXXJ8J8J8J8pddddppppddpddddzpdddXXhXXXXXdddhdptL8LpLDLpphhp8ZDP8pppddƐXXXpLpLpLphfDtppppppȐhXXXpDppLDd4ddC6CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxHjdDddddddm  %mWPW2' X-#2PG;ԾP##Xm2PG;4XP#x` `  hh@hpp #Xj\  P6G;ߊXP#April 2, 1998#Xm2PG;4XP#  X-#Xj\  P6G;ߊXP#x` `   X- $,R  Separate Statement Nof  X-` Commissioner Susan Ness ĐTP  XN-Re:XxAmendment of Parts 2, 15, 18 and Other Parts of the Commission's Rules to Simplify  V9-and Streamline the Equipment Authorization Process for Radio Frequency Equipment(# xOur predecessor agency, the Federal Radio Commission, was established in 1927. The  X -raison d'etre for that commission was the need to prevent harmful interference to services using the airwaves. Managing the spectrum to prevent interference remains one of this agency's most important priorities today. xIn the digital age, an extraordinary number of devices have the potential to improve the quality of life. Many of these same devices also have the potential to cause harmful interference. This interference may degrade consumers' radio and TV reception, or it may jeopardize air traffic control systems, police and fire communications, or other services essential to public safety. That's why we have technical specifications for intentional and  X'-unintentional radiators to ensure that new products can continue to be designed without jeopardizing radio communications. xHow can we best ensure compliance with these rules without unnecessarily impeding the flow of useful products into the marketplace? That's what this item is about. xIn the past, we have liberalized equipment authorization procedures for products which were determined to present minimal risk of causing harmful interference. We are extending that liberalization today. A proceeding is already on the drawing board to take that process a step further to allow other organizations, instead of the Commission, to certify products. xI strongly support reducing unnecessary paperwork and delays. But we must not diminish our commitment to prevent harmful interference to authorized radio communications. Whatever our equipment authorization procedures, there will remain a danger that some products will not be designed to minimize the danger of interference. And there will also remain a problem of individuals who construct or operate transmitting devices with disregard for our rules. xOur responsibility to prevent harmful interference can only be fulfilled if we are prepared to follow through with credible enforcement. I sincerely hope that agency resources that are freed up, by today's order and by the thirdparty certification rulemaking, will be redirected to enforcement activities, so that instances of harmful interference can be swiftly remedied. A FCC  $,R ԃ")0*0*0*'"Ԍ $,R