WPC6 2 BPZ Courier 10cpi#|x x6X@8;X@HP LaserJet IIISi in room 254 lpt2:HPLAIIAD.PRSx  @H&$yX@2< ZL V#|x HP LaserJet IIISi in room 254 lpt2:HPLAIIAD.PRSx  @H&$yX@Courier 10cpiCG Times (Scalable)CG Times Bold (Scalable)CG Times Italic (Scalable)2Z8B  ?xxx,^x6X@8;X@68wC;,[AXw P7XP77zC;,"ZXz_ p^7X&86uC;,;/Xu&_ x$&7XX9V"G($,hG P7hP&X F($,;ohF&_ x$&7hXle)Univers Bold (Scalable)Univers Bold Italic (Scalable)Univers Italic (Scalabl"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYddddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdddddddd~d~d~d~ddddddddd8ddddoddd~d~d<|8tddddddlLkdkd~d~d~ddddddXCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"Ȑdhd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUvŐdȐYYCCCCŐz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲdxN`xoȐCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddddddddCddddddddo8dddddϐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddxoddddddodddddddddood8doddrddoddN8ooddddoNododdddooooȐdYCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"Ȑdsd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ`ȐȐȮzȐUvŐdȐddCCCCŐzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC"Sh5^;C`ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȰdxxxsCYoxxdoxxooCCCddCddYdY8dd88Y8ddddLL8dYYYLYdYddddddCddddddddd8xdxdxdxdxdYxYxYxYxYC8C8C8C8dddddddddoYxddddoYdxdxdxdxdddddxdxdxdxddddddddd8ddddddddododp8p8xddddxdxddLddddodododddddodpLCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCd]]ddddddFddddFCCddd88ddzzdddkddCddF"Ȑddd尰dCCȐzȰxCdzdodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUvŐdȐYYCCCCzzzozoYzNoYdYC8YooYdYzzdzddoYoYzzozzzzzCdoozYzzzzCCddddzdddooozCsdYC2F`4"Sh5^$(8<><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx2and the opportunity to access the customer's local service information.> Y2ԍ#XP\  P6Q[AXP#` ` The operating company and the structurally separated affiliate will apparently share access to a common computer system, at least for certain customers' records. This of course gives rise to issues of discrimination and cost allocation that can be avoided by  Y2maintaining the structural separation Congress specified.#Xx{2 PQ[AXP# I don't think this discrepancy is what Congress intended. Consider another example. Under Section 272(g)(1), the structurally separate affiliate may market the local service offerings of its affiliated operating company, provided that other entities may also do so. So, if a Bell operating company's structurally separated affiliate successfully markets a local service offering of the operating company (say, in selling the customer a second line), the majority's approach would say that the separate affiliate now has the right automatically to access the operating company's entire record on the customer for the purpose of marketing additional services. But if an unaffiliated entity, exercising the same right to sell the same service on behalf of the same operating company,  YA2successfully sells the operating company's local service, it does not acquire the same rights. Again, the result is anomalous.",r 0*0*0*"ԌIt bears emphasis that the issue here concerns solely the rights that the Bell operating companies and their structurally separated affiliates will have without customer approval. Under Section 222(c)(2), those customers who wish to empower any carrier to access any of their private information may make arrangements to that effect. But, absent an affirmative decision by the customer, I read Section 272 as precluding the kind of preferred relationship between a Bell operating company and its structurally separated affiliate that is created by  Yv2today's decision#Xx{2 PQ[AXP#.