ÿWPC8 ûÿ2ÿÿBJ Z  úCourier3|xBoldTimes New Roman@ɹ`7ûX@þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿHP LaserJet 4M (PCL) (Add) RM 802HL4MPCAD.PRSÛx Œ @ɇÏð\ðz#I]X@ÐÐûÿ2äÿÿ6ÿÿFÿÿ  :ª3||CourierCourier BoldHPLAS5P.PRS5Ûx Œ @ɇÏð\ð‘$Ð~X@ÐÐCourierCourier BoldTimes New RomanTimes New Roman Boldûÿ2XKnK¹ÿÿE[<ÿÿ‰?xxx,þiôxþ6X@ɹ`7ûX@þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¸ÿÿ‰?xxx,×ÔôxÐ `É“7ûX€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¢ÿÿ©@|ND,©5¼|ô\  PŽ6G;¼Pþþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿàÿÿ©@€ND,%ìå¼€ô4  pŽ–ÂG;¼þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ"‚i~×'ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ^DO]uuĶOOOuƒ=O=AuuuuuuuuuuAAƒƒƒgרšš¨‘ƒ¨¨OY¨‘ͨ¨ƒ¨šƒ‘¨¨Û¨¨‘OAOkuOgugugOuuAAuA¶uuuuOYAuu¨uugp/p~åO=~kOOO=OOOOOOOOuA¨g¨g¨g¨g¨g͘šg‘g‘g‘g‘gOAOAOAOA¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨g¨u¨r¨u¨u¨uƒu¨g¨g¨gšgšgš~šg¨“‘g‘g‘g‘g¨u¨u¨u¨~¨u¨~¨uOAOuOOOu£ƒ~~¨u‘A‘]‘O‘O‘A¨uŠ¨u¨u¨u¨uͨšOšOšOƒYƒYƒYƒ~‘b‘A‘k¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨uÛ¨¨~‘g‘g‘g¨u‘O¨uƒY‘O¨u“=uuN*NW££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNTŒŒTkuOguuuuàuAK±±uFK±±u±FOOgguéPPŒéuuå±éT錌TŠÂƒƒéOguÄéF"šššš±±×ééu±éŒ‡~uƒåŒŒéu"‚i~×'ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ^DOƒuuéÄOOOuƒ=O=AuuuuuuuuuuOOƒƒƒuÛ¨š¨¨š‘¶¶Yu¶šÛ¨¶‘¶¨ƒš¨¨é¨¨šOAO‡uOuƒgƒgOuƒAOƒAăuƒƒgYOƒu¨uug]3]yåO=y‡OOO=OOOOOOuOƒA¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u騨gšgšgšgšgVAVAVAVA¨ƒ¶u¶u¶u¶u¨ƒ¨ƒ¨ƒ¨ƒ¨u¨u¨ƒ´u¶u¨u¨uŽƒ¨u¨u¨u¨g¨g¨y¨g¨­šgšgšgšg¶u¶u¶u¶y¶u¶ƒ¶‡YAYƒYOYƒ½ƒyy¶ƒšAšišOš]šA¨ƒ¨¨ƒ¨ƒ¶u¶u稨g¨g¨gƒYƒYƒYƒyšwšOš‡¨ƒ¨ƒ¨ƒ¨ƒ¨ƒ¨ƒé¨¨yšgšgšg¨ƒšO¨ƒƒYšO¨uª=uuN?NW££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNTŒŒT|uOuuuuuàuFO±±uFO­­u±FOOuuuéPPŒéuué±éT錌T“ƒƒéOuuÄéF"šššš±±×ééu±éŒŠ~uƒåŒŒéuûÿ26 Ô ©aÈá<:ÔÐÐÔÇv ÔÐÐà ÃÑ#¼|ô\  PŽ6G;©5¼P#ÑStatement of Harold Furchtgott©Roth ÔŒM ÔCommissioner, Federal Communications Commission Ôª7 Ôbefore the Nevada Broadcasters Association ÔÔApril 29, 1998 Ô ©a á<ÔÔ *ÔLas Vegas, NevadaÄ ÄÔTìÔÐÐÔP°Ô ÁxÁIt is a great honor to be here in Las Vegas for the Nevada Broadcasters Association. ÁxÁI have always had a fondness for Nevada. Nevada has always struck me as a place where, at least relative to other states, individuals do a bit more regulating than governments. In most states if you want to set up a casino or many other types of business, the government, not the individual, says you cannot. In Nevada, it is the individual as much as the government that says you can. ÁxÁSome would say that Nevada needs more rather than less regulation. Some would say that Nevada is a godless place. That a place where "Anything goes" is a place where "Nothing worthwhile goes." Ô"D(0*0*0*°°>+:"ÔŒÁxÁCasinos are not everyone's cup of tea. I assure you, Ô²$Qthat Ôthey are not mine. Much that goes on in this city is not exactly my cup of tea. But I would rather that individuals, not governments,Ô ²$Q Ô Ô ²$Q Ô make decisions about what is appropriate. At all times, Nevada has been a state of quiet courage. People don't boast about doing things a little differently. They just go ahead and do it. ÁxÁLas Vegas is one of the fastest growing cities in the country. The growth is only Ô ²$Q Ôin Ô ²$Q Ôpart from the gaming and tourism industry. In part, the growth comes from manufacturing businesses fleeing excessive taxes and regulation in a certain neighboring state. In part, the growth comes from retirees flocking here for the good climate©©both weather and business. ÁxÁTourism, manufacturing, and retirement have at least one thing in common: individuals not government make location decisions. And when individuals make decisions, they are attracted to Nevada. ÁxÁThere is much to commend Las Vegas and its growth. But it was not always this way. I have in my office an atlas from the early 1920s. Back then, in the days before there was a broadcasting industry, Nevada was still a business©friendly place, but technology and the American economy had notÔ"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"Ô advanced far enough to take full advantage of the Ô ²$Q ÔSÔ ²$Q Ôtate. ÁxÁLas Vegas was far from the largest city in the Ô ²$Q ÔSÔ ²$Q Ôtate. Reno was. Las Vegas was not even second. Tonopah was. Then came Sparks and McGill in rank before Las Vegas. Henderson, which is now the third largest city in the Ô ²$Q ÔSÔ ²$Q Ôtate, did not even exist. Mining and ranching, railroads and desert defined Nevada in the early years of the century. ÁxÁNevada's growth has mirrored the broadcast industry growth, particularly the post©World War II television growth. I certainly grew up watching lots of TV and movies. And many of them referred to Nevada in general and Las Vegas in particular. It was a different place. A little wilder. A little less under government regulation. And those are characteristics that apply equally well to TV and broadcasting as to Nevada. ÁxÁThere are those in Washington, D.C. who do not see Nevada as a place free of Ô ²$Q ÔfÔ ²$Q Ôederal regulation. To many inside the beltway, Nevada evokes images of the Ô ²$Q ÔfÔ ²$Q Ôederal government, of military bases, of nuclear waste sites, of federal lands. Ô"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"ÔŒÁxÁIt is true that the federal government has its finger prints all over the state. But the growth and the viability of Nevada is not the product of federal ownership or federal programs, rather, it is the manifestation of the human spirit, unteathered by regulations of Washington, and left to assume forms chosen by individualsÔ ²$Q Ô ©© Ô ²$Q Ôsome good, some not so good. ÁxÁIt is all too fitting to be here today addressing the Nevada Broadcasters. Broadcasting is to America much like Nevada is to America: a free spirit, an escape for those who seeÔ ²$Q ÔkÔ ²$Q Ô escape, an opportunity for those who seek opportunity. Like the state of Nevada, broadcasters are at their best when they choose their own way based on the public interest of the local people rather than when they define the public interest only as seen in Washington, D.C. ÁxÁThere are those in Washington who seek to tell you what to do, whether you are a Nevadan or a simple broadcaster. There were probably those in the only part of the country who sought to tell the State, don't allow gambling. Nevada did not listen. You had courage.Ô ²$Q Ô Ô ²$Q Ô ÁxÁ Ô ²$Q ÔMÔ ²$Q Ôany of you may have reason to suspect me, or anyone else from the FCC. After all, it is the FCC, and not Nevada authorities, that exercise the legalÔ"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"Ô authority to regulate most broadcasting services, even local broadcast services. ÁxÁIt would be easy to imagine an FCC Commissioner enthralled with power, eager to tell you what to do and what not to do. Doubtlessly, there have been such Commissioners. Commissioners who say: "I am from the FCC and I am here to help." These Commissioners tell you to listen to Washington. They will tell you that Washington knows best how to regulate you. That Washington knows best what the public interest. Just listen to Washington and you will be all right. ÁxÁI am afraid that if you are looking for that sort of Commissioner, you found the wrong fellow. I have not come to talk as much as I have come to listen. ÁxÁBut perhaps most important of all, I want you to understand that I believe deeply in the public interest, and I believe that the public interest is to be found in local people, whether in Nevada or Massachusetts, not from the regulators in Washington. And I believe that you as the broadcasters of Nevada are best positioned to determine what the public interest is for your Nevada audience, far better than anyone in Washington. And I want to be sure that it stays that way. Ô"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"ÔŒÁxÁThere is a movement afoot in Washington to require broadcasters to provide free air time to politicians. And some have even suggested that the FCC acting alone should make this a requirement for all broadcasters. ÁxÁThis proposal is seductively placed in the context of such noblÔ ²$Q ÔeÔ ²$Q Ô©minded ideas as "campaign finance reform" and "the public interest." ÁxÁWho could possibly be against "campaign finance reform?" So obviously, you must be in favor of free air time for politicians. ÁxÁWho could possibly be against "the public interest?" So obviously, you must be in favor of free air time for politicians. ÁxÁ ÁxÁWell let me tell you, there is plenty wrong with the idea of free air time for politicians. ÁxÁTo begin with, there is no such thing as "free air time." All air time is valuable. The only way to make it "free" is first to take it from someone who has it and then to ration it away, because once you set the price to zeroÔ ²$Q , Ô you will have a lot of takers.Ô"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"ÔŒ™ÁxÁSo, if the FCC wants to give away free air time, Ô ²$Q! Ôfrom Ô ²$Q! Ôwhom are we going to take itÔ²$Q$ fromÔ? From you of course, the local broadcasters. Call it campaign finance reform. Call it gentle coercion. Call it a tax. Call it a fee. Call it excessive regulation. In the end, it is still the federal government coming in and taking from you the only resource you have ©Ô ²$Q' Ô©Ô ²$Q' Ô air time. ÁxÁUnder the FCC program, you may be made twice poor. First you may lose a substantial amount of advertising time. Second, some of your most eager advertisers ©© politiciansÔ ²$Q+ Ô ©© Ô ²$Q+ Ômay not be needing as much of your services anymore. ÁxÁTaking the air time is only half the fun. There still is the issue of how to divide it up. No, that is likely to be too important an issue to leave to local broadcasters. Instead we will need some Washington bureaucrats to make those decisions. And it won't be easy. When air time is free, you suddenly will have a lot of takers. New politicians. And why not.Ô ²$Q, Ô Ô ²$Q, Ô ÁxÁConsider Joe Smith's car dealership. Today, Mr. Smith pays you for a short spot that says: "Hi, I'm Joe Smith. I am an honest man. I have a car dealership. I treat my customers well. Come buy a car from me." Tomorrow,Ô"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"Ô you will give him the air time for an only slightly modified spot: "Hi, I'm Joe Smith. I am an honest man. I have a car dealership. I treat my customers well. Come vote for me in November." ÁxÁPersonally, I don not believe that free air time for politicians is a good idea. It would radically change the broadcast industry for the worseÔ²$Q- and poorerÔ. It would radically change politics in America. ÁxÁMaking all of those bad decisions is a pretty tall order even by Washington, D.C. standards. And for an independent agency with unelected bureaucrats, it is an overwhelming responsibility. ÁxÁThere is one additional problem. We at the FCC do not have the authority to mandate free air time. You won't find it in statutes. It isn't there. ÁxÁSome apologists for free air time will point to Section 4(i). It is the catch©all section that apologists for FCC advocates always cite. There is just one problem. Section 4(i) cannot possible apply. Section 4(i) requires thÔ ²$Q/ ÔatÔ ²$Q/ Ô Commission adventures outside the narrowest interpretation of the Ô ²$Q1 ÔCommunications Act Ô ²$Q1 Ôare "necessary." It seems to me that the statutes governingÔ"|'0*0*0*°°N*:"Ô the broadcast industry with local broadcasters determining the public interest have worked remarkably well for decades without FCC©mandated free air time for politicians. It was not necessary before. Why today is it suddenly necessary? ÁxÁFree air time for politicians is too big of a bad decision for the FCC to make alone and without legal authority. If it really is a good idea, let Congress make the decision. Most members of Congress seem to think that it is their decision, not the FCC's, to make. ÁxÁ ÁxÁAnd even if the FCC does not implement new rules for free air time immediately, what is wrong with a little study? We at the FCC call it a Notice of Inquiry, or NOI. There seems to be a groundswell of support for an NOI in Washington.Ô ²$Q2 Ô Ô ²$Q2 Ô ÁxÁWhat harm could come from an NOI?Ô ²$Q3 Ô Ô ²$Q3 Ô ÁxÁI believe that there is a lot of harm that could come from an NOI. First, the Commission can only conduct studies on matters over which it has legal authority. Nuclear waste storage facilities are matters of national importanceÔ"|' 0*0*0*°°N*:"Ô and federal responsibility. But if FCC launched an investigation into nuclear waste sites, everyone could agree that it was a waste of taxpayer money. Why study an issue if you do not have the legal authority to do anything about it? Similarly, we should not study free air time for politicians because we simply do not have the legal authority to do it. ÁxÁConversely, if we conduct an NOI, we are implicitly asserting authority to implement rules. This is a treacherous precedent. ÁxÁSecond, what are the possible results of an NOI? That the FCC has no jurisdiction? That the FCC has jurisdiction, but free air time really is not necessary? Or that the FCC has jurisdiction, and the world will end tomorrow if we do not provide free air time for politicians? ÁxÁWhat do you think? Ô  @ÔÐÐÁxÁFree air time for politicians may come up in many guises. It may appear as Ô °xóÔa call for new public interest obligations in a digital age. Frankly, I think that the Ô °xÕÔcurrent practice of allowing local broadcasters to determine local public interest standards has worked well. I know of no evidence that it needs to be changeÔ ²$Q6 Ôd.Ô ²$Q6 Ô Ô"|' 0*0*0*°°N*:"ÔŒÔ  ×ÔÁxÁAnother guise may be so©called "voluntary standards" promulgated by the FCC.Ô ²$Q7 Ô Ô ²$Q7 Ô Ô  4ÔÁxÁLet me be clear. I don't believe that there is such a thing as a truly Ô °xLÔÔ ²$Q9" Ôvoluntary standard when it is applied by a government agency that has discretionary Ô °xÕÔauthority in many unrelated areas to impose enormous costs on you. Suddenly, voluntary looks all too mandatory. ÁxÁJust ask NBC and BET what is so voluntary about rating schemes. Ô  ÖÔÁxÁIn the world of movies, and television, and American culture, Nevada stands Ô °xÇÔout. It is different. It is a little bit on the edge, a little ahead of the rest of the country. The individual triumphÔ ²$Q@ ÔsÔ ²$Q@ Ô a little more clearly in Nevada. Ô  #ÔÁxÁIn all of the world, the United States is the leader in personal liberty and Ô °xMÔpersonal expression. The public interest is celebrated in America every day, and it is celebrated in the triumph of the individual. Ô  œÔÁxÁLet me conclude by urging you to be strong and firmÔ ²$QB Ô when it comes to Ô °xÅÔexcessive and possibly illegal regulation from Washington. Let America know thisÔ"|' 0*0*0*°°N*:"Ô Ô °x Ôis Nevada. Don't be duped. Don't be hoodwinked. Don't be coerced into bad standards, either voluntary or involuntary. Ô  mÔÁxÁDo what Nevadans have done at all times. Have quiet courage. You don't have to brag about it. Just go ahead and do things your own way. ÁxÁ ÁxÁÁ` `  Á