ÿWPCå ûÿ2© ZB œ0¦ÿÿHP LaserJet IIISiXNô\  PXPÐЫXNô\  PXP(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX¼[ô\  P¼P%ô\  `&Times New Roman¼XNô\  PXP(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularXûÿ2Ûã3|xÐÐÑ#¼[ô\  P¼P#ÑÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁReleased June 8, 1998 ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ(Re: FCC 98©102)ÂÐ Ð Ð Â Ã ÃÐÐSeparate Statement of Commissioner Harold W. Furchtgott©RothÄ Ä Ã ÃIn re: Notice of Inquiry Ä Ä Ã Ãà ÃÄ ÄÃÃÄÄ1998 Biennial Regulatory Review ©© Conducted Emissions Limits for Equipment Regulated Under Parts 15 and 18 of the Commission's Rules ÐÐ Ä Ä Ã ÃÄ ÄÁÁI support adoption of this Notice of Inquiry. In my view, any reduction of unnecessary regulatory burdens is beneficial. To that extent, this item is good and I am all for it. This item should not, however, be mistaken for compliance with Section 11 of the Communications Act. ÁÁ ÁÁAs I have explained previously, I question whether the FCC is prepared to meet its statutory obligation to review all of the regulations covered by Section 11 in 1998. ÃÃSee generally 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review ©© Review of Computer IIIÄÄà à ÃÃÄ Äand ONA Safeguards and Requirementsà ÃÄÄÄ Ä, 12 FCC Rcd __ (Jan. 29, 1998). ÃÃÃÃÃÃÄÄÄÄÄÄ To my knowledge, the FCC has no plans to review affirmatively ÃÃà ÃÄ Äallà ÃÄ ÄÄÄ regulations applicable to the operations or activities of telecommunications providers and to make specific findings as to their continued necessity. Nor has the Commission issued general principles to guide our À Àpublic interestÀÀ analysis and decision©making process across the wide range of FCC regulations. ÐÐ* * * * * * *Ñ#XNô\  PXP#Ñ