WPC-4 2MBVRKZ3|aM 7jC:,Xj\  P6G;XP"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDdDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddxHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxdHP LaserJet 5SiHPLAS5SI.PRSXj\  P6G;\$tXP2> K Z3|aM "i~'^09CSS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS//]]]Ixnnxg]xx9?xgxx]xn]gxxxxg9/9MS9ISISI9SS//S/SSSS9?/SSxSSIP!PZ9+ZM999+999999S9S/xIxIxIxIxIlnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxIxSxRxSxSxS]SxIxIxInInInZnIxigIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999Su]ZZxSg/gCg9g9g/xSbxSxSxSxSxn9n9n9]?]?]?]ZgFg/gMxSxSxSxSxSxSxxZgIgIgIxSg9xS]?g9xSi+SS88WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNI\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>\>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\nBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\Times New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman ItalicCourier S- I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#&J\  P6Qu&P##&J\  P6Qu&P#"i~'^5>g\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>ggg\yyrF\yrgyy>3>j\>\gQgQ>\g3>g3g\ggQF>g\\\QI(I_>0_j>>>0>>>>>>\>g3\\\\\QyQyQyQyQD3D3D3D3g\\\\gggg\\g\\\\pg\\\QQ_QyQyQyQyQ\\\_\gjF3FgF>Fgg__gy3ySy>yIy3ggg\\QQQgFgFgFg_y^y>yjgggggg_yQyQyQgy>ggFy>\0\\=2=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBa\>\\\\\\7>\7>\7>>\\\??n\\nBnnBsgg>\\7"yyyy\nlc\gnn\2&K vpKk"i~'^ %,77\V%%%7>%7777777777>>>0eOIIOD>OO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%7%7O0O0O0O0O0aHI0D0D0D0D0%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O0O7O6O7O7O7>7O0O0O0I0I0I;I0OED0D0D0D0O7O7O7O;O7O;O7%%7%%%7M>;;O7DD,D%D%DO7AO7O7O7O7aOI%I%I%>*>*>*>;D.DD3O7O7O7O7O7O7gOO;D0D0D0O7D%O7>*D%O7E77%%WMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(BB(37%07777j7#TT7!#TT7T!%%007n&&Bn77lBTn(nBB(AZZ>>n%07\n!"IIIITTenn7TnB@;7>lBBn7a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  2RkXvhta5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# 2   ha1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# 2R F a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# 2]]-a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . 2hma6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   2!\3h a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)Documentg2?'!e%6&&PleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""2"2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d""M\\>>>\}0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>}}}\rryrr>Qygyrr\grrggF3FM\>\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\FF3\QyQQFI3Ic>0cM>>>0>>>>>>\>\3r\r\r\r\r\yyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3y\\\\\\\\\gQr\\\\gQ\r\r\r\r\yQyQycyQnrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\\ccyQg3gBg>g;g3y\jy\y\\\yrFrFrF\F\F\FccgBg3gM\\\\\\ygcgFgFgF\g>y\\Fg>g\n0\\=(=WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNBnnB_\F\\\\\\3;\7;\7>>gg\??n\\nBnnBb\\>g\7"yyyy\njc\}nn\2\0+4=y.X80,ɒX\  P6G;P>2a=5,u&a\  P6G;&P?2e=5,&e4  pG;&@P:% ,J:\  P6G;JPAH5!,),5\  P6G;,P\B{,W80,%BZW*f9 xr G;X\C0_=5,%&_*f9 xr G;&X<?xxx,<x6X@`7X@7jC:,ynXj\  P6G;XP  &    &   &  &,BN *p+7x-18YBN *c10a10bPBN *p-7x S' X   ( S' w #&J\  P6Qu&P#Federal Communications Commission`(#:DA 99368 ă   yx}dddy (P Before the w ԊFederal Communications Commission  S'"Washington, D.C. 20554    S'wIn the Matter of Applications ofhh)ppXFile Nos.  96006919600711  S'` `  ,hhh)ppX  96007149600718(#(#  S'PLAINCOM, INC. ,hhh)  Sh'` `  ,hhh) ppX    S5'to Provide 39 GHz PointtoPoint Microwave Radio ) ppX  xx  G(#(#  S'Service in Various Locationshhh) ` `  ,hhh) ` `  S6 ' ORDER Đw  S ' Adopted: February 22, 1999hhh  ppXReleased: February 23, 1999 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:   S' I. INTRODUCTION w 1. This Order consolidates the disposition of twentysix petitions to deny (Petitions) filed by WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp. (WinStar), a subsidiary of WinStar Communications, Inc. (WSC) against applications filed by Plaincom, Inc. (Plaincom) for 38.640.0 GHz (39 GHz) pointtopoint microwave radio station licenses in Chicago, IL; Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA; Dallas, TX; Cleveland, OH; San Diego, CA; Cincinnati, OH; Washington, DC; Tampa, FL; Tacoma, WA; San Francisco, CA; Buffalo, NY; Denver, CO; Miami, FL; Kansas City, MO; Los Angeles, CA; Houston, TX; Detroit, MI; New York, NY; New York (West); New York (Long Island); Baltimore, MD; Pittsburgh, PA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; and Milwaukee, WI. As discussed in further detail below, we find that the Plaincom applications are defective because they were untimely filed. Consequently, the WinStar Petitions, filed December 1, 1995, are hereby granted and the Plaincom applications are dismissed.  S'   Sm'II. BACKGROUND Đw 2. On March 4, 1994, WinStar's predecessor in interest, AvantGarde Telecommunications,  S'Inc. (AvantGarde),X yO<'  ' ԍAvantGarde was merged into WinCom Corp., a subsidiary of WSC. WinCom Corp. was the surviving corporation. On July 18, 1995, WinCom Corp. changed its name to WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp. filed applications to modify certain existing licenses in the 39 GHz band.V~ X yO!' ' ԍWinStar Application File Nos. 94041659404183, 94041859404188, 9404191, 9404193, 9504885. The Wireless  '^ Telecommunications Bureau granted WinStar Application File Nos. 9404165, 9404168, 9404170, 9404172, 9404175,  {O$#'  '" 9404178, 9404183 which were placed on Public Notice on February 10, 1998. See Public Notice, Wireless   'b Telecommunications Bureau Weekly Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1975 (released February 10, 1998). WinStar  {O$'  '& Application File No. 9504885 was withdrawn and placed on Public Notice on November 12, 1997. See Public  {O%' '; Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Weekly Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1962 (released November 12, 1997). V The  S'AvantGarde applications were placed on Public Notice on July 6, 1994.f X {O('ԍPublic Notice, Private Radio Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1090 (July 6, 1994). On April 11, 1995, Avant" , * *,," Garde filed an application for transfer of control of AvantGarde to WinCom Corp., a subsidiary of WSC (Transfer Application). In the Transfer Application, WSC asserted that the transfer of control  S'was for legitimate business purposes and would benefit the public. yO' ' ԍFCC Application for Consent to Transfer Control of AvantGarde Telecommunications, Inc. to WinCom Corp., File No. 9513155 (30), at Exhibit L. Specifically, WSC noted that the transfer would enable WSC to acquire financial strength and technical expertise and would ultimately: (a) allow the "expansion of [WSC]'s telecommunications operations throughout the United States"; (b) ensure that "advanced technologies are made available to AvantGarde's current customers" via WSC's "greater access to capital"; and (c) enhance "[WSC]'s service offerings and the competitiveness of 39  S'GHz operations."Q  {O[ 'ԍId. at Exhibit L.Q On May 1, 1995, the Transfer Application appeared on Public Notice as accepted  Sh'for filing.h {O '  ' ԍPublic Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1132 (May 1, 1995). 3. On June 26, 1995, the Division's Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch)  S'granted the Transfer Application.  {O{'  'x ԍPublic Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1142 (July 5, 1995). WinCom filed a letter on July 18, 1995, notifying the Commission  S 'that the subject merger had been consummated and that WinStar was the surviving corporation.&X f  yO'  ' ԍLetter from Stephen L. Goodman, Esq. to William F. Caton, Acting Secretary, FCC (July 18, 1995). The July   ' 18, 1995 letter also informed the Commission that WinCom Corp. had changed its name to WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp.& On August 4, 1995, WinStar filed letters (Notification Letters) informing the Commission that, pursuant to the AvantGarde/WinStar merger, the subject applications should be amended to specify WinStar as  S 'the applicant.* X  yO)'  ' ԍAmendment to Pending Applications to Specify the Transfer of Control to WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp. (dated   'Q Aug. 4, 1995). The Division accepted the amendments for filing in the August 16, 1995 Public Notice, Report No. 1148.* WinStar also requested that the Commission either categorize the Notification Letters  S 'as minor amendments or exempt them from the "cutoff" provisions of former Section 21.31c  yO'ԍFormerly 47 C.F.R.  21.31; now 47 C.F.R.  101.45. c of the  S 'Commission's Rules.*  6 yOs '  ' ԍAlthough 39 GHz applications are now subject to Section 101 of the Commission's Rules, Section 21 applies  {O;!'to the underlying applications because they were filed prior to July 31, 1996. See 47 C.F.R.  101.4(a).* The pending AvantGarde applications appeared on Public Notice on August  Sj'16, 1995 (August 16 Public Notice) under WinStar's name. j {O#' 'Q ԍPublic Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1148 (Aug. 16, 1995). "7 ,l(l(,,"Ԍ4. On October 16, 1995, Plaincom submitted competing applications against the AvantGarde/WinStar applications. On December 1, 1995, WinStar filed Petitions to Deny against Plaincom  S'application nos. 96006919600711 and 96007149600718.  yO'  '} ԍPlaincom filed a Consolidated Opposition on December 14, 1995. On January 11, 1996, WinStar filed a  yO'Consolidated Reply to the Consolidated Opposition.   Sg'   S4'III. DISCUSSION Đw 5. WinStar alleges that Plaincom's applications were filed after the sixty day cutdate. Plaincom, however, asserts its applications are timely because WinStar filed a major amendment to its original applications. We find that Plaincom's assertions are devoid of merit. 6. On July 6, 1994, the AvantGarde applications were first placed on Public Notice as  S'accepted for filing.G  {O 'ԍSee July 6 Public Notice.G Former Section 21.31(b) of the Commission's Rules provided that no application will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as  S 'accepted for filing.d  yOU'ԍFormerly 47 C.F.R.  21.31(b); now 47 C.F.R.  101.45.d As a result, the 60day filing window for Plaincom to file competing applications closed on September 5, 1994. However, if AvantGarde filed a major amendment to its applications, then the applications would be considered "newly filed" as of the date of the release of the Public Notice listing the major amendment to the applications, and a new 60day filing window for  S7'competing applications would be opened.$7B {O' x ԍFormerly 47 C.F.R.  21.23(c), now 47 C.F.R.  1.927(h). See Airsignal International, Inc., Memorandum  {O' x Opinion and Order, 81 FCC 2d 472 (1980) (Commission found that while such amendments may be major, they do  x not open a new filing window if the change in ownership was in the public interest . . . [and] . . . made to effect a legitimate business purpose). Former Section 21.23(c)(5) of the Commission's Rules provided that an amendment specifying a substantial change in ownership of an applicant is not a major amendment if the transfer or assignment "is for legitimate business purposes other than the  S'acquisition of applications."UH.  {Ol' ! ԍFormerly 47 C.F.R.  21.23(c)(5), now 47 C.F.R.  1.927(h). See Bell Atlantic Mobile System, Inc., Order,  ! 10 FCC Rcd 13262 (1995) (Commission permitted amendments to pending pointtopoint microwave and cellular  ! applications and granted exemption from cutoff rules); Loral Space & Communication Ltd and Orion Network  {O' ! Systems, Inc., Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4592 (1998) (Commission found that the merger served an independent business  {O ' ! purpose, i.e. to strengthen its financial resources, thus exempting from cutoff rules); see also Airsignal International,  {OZ!' ! Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 81 FCC 2d 472 (1980) (Commission granted request for exemption from  ! major amendment and cutoff rules because change in ownership was deemed to be in public interest and made to effect a legitimate business purpose, i.e. providing improved research and technical capabilities).U 7. We disagree with Plaincom's contention that the Notification Letters constitute major amendments to the AvantGarde applications. The Commission's Rules state that amendments are ">,l(l(,,"  S'classified on a casebycase basis.c yOh'ԍFormerly 47 C.F.R.  21.23(c); now 47 C.F.R.  1.927.c The August 16 Public Notice listed the subject applications,  S'reflecting the transfer of control from AvantGarde to WinStar.GX yO'ԍAugust 16 Public Notice at 17.G While amendments specifying a  S'substantial change in control of an applicant are generally deemed major amendments,( {O"'  'Z ԍFormerly 47 C.F.R.  21.23(c)(5); now 47 C.F.R.  1.927(h). See Applications of Tequesta Television, Inc.,  {O' ' Memorandum Opinion and Order, 103 FCC 2d 1182 (1986)(Commission found substantial change of controlling  {O' ' ownership, hence application was dismissed); see also Applications of Western California Cellular Partners and  {O 'MTEL Cellular, Inc., Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 5705 (1996).  in this instance, the Notifications Letters should be deemed minor amendments pursuant to former Section  S4'21.23(c)(6) of the Commission's Rules.4 {O ' ' ԍPublic Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1142 (July 5, 1995). 8. Furthermore, the Notification Letters specifically stated that the Transfer Application contained a description of the business purposes for the subject merger, which did not include  Sh'acquisition of the AvantGarde applications.Bh2  yO:'ԍNotification Letters at 2.B Exhibit L to the Transfer Application details those  S5'business purposes for the transfer of control. That exhibit explains, inter alia, that the company resulting from the merger will be more competitive, due to the expanded operations of the new  S'entity.]  {O2'ԍSee Exhibit L to the Transfer Application at 1.] Exhibit L also states that AvantGarde's customers will benefit from the merger because WSC's greater access to financial resources will permit advanced technologies to be provided to those  Sj 'customers.?j T  {O^'ԍId. at 12.? Therefore, we believe that WinStar, in its Transfer Application, made a sufficient business  S7 'interest showing for a finding that the Notification Letters be deemed minor amendments.7  {O' ' ԍPublic Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1142 (July 5, 1995). Consequently, the August 4, 1995 filing did not initiate a new filing window, and thus Plaincom's competing applications were not timely filed pursuant to former Section 21.31 of the Commission's Rules. 9. Moreover, any assertions made by Plaincom in its Opposition to the Petitions regarding the Transfer Application are untimely and, thus, we will not address the merits of such assertions. We note that Plaincom had an opportunity to address these issues by filing a petition to deny pursuant to  S'applicable Commission Rules when the Transfer Application was first filed.L@ {O$'  ' ԍFormer 47 C.F.R.  21.30.  See Application of Lawrence Daniels, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC   ' Rcd. 7327 (Dec. 29, 1988) (Commission asserts that "the Communications Act clearly provides for public   ' participation in our processes . . . and . . . provides that it is proper to specify an orderly procedure for such   ' participation," noting that the purpose of the cutoff date is to provide for a fair and orderly procedure by which to file petitions to deny).L Its failure to timely",l(l(,,H" object to the Transfer Application before it became final renders the objections untimely at this  S'juncture.~ {O5'  ' ԍSee Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Relocate the Digital Electronic Message Service from the 18  {O'  ' GHz to the 24 GHz Band and to Allocate the 24 GHz Band for Fixed Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order,   ' 13 FCC Rcd. 15147 (July 17, 1998) (Commission found Petitioner's challenges to license grants to be grossly   '. untimely, where Petitioner filed its petition almost eight months after the last of the initial license grants were made);  {OY'  '. see also Application of HHT/Estate of Robert D. Hanna, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 1582 (March   ' 1, 1993) (Commission denied petition to deny because it was filed six years after the due date prescribed by Section 21.30 of the Commission's Rules).   Sg' III. ORDERING CLAUSES Đw 10. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 309(d), and Section 21.30 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  21.30, Petitions to Deny filed by WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp. on August 18, 1995 against Plaincom, Inc. Application Nos. 96006919600711 and 96007149600718, ARE HEREBY GRANTED. 11. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 308 of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 308, and Section 21.28 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  21.28, that the applications of Plaincom, Inc. filed on October 16, 1995 ARE DISMISSED.  12. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.131, 0.331. ` `  ,hhhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  ` `  ,hhhD'wana R. Terry ` `  ,hhhChief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division ` `  ,hhhWireless Telecommunications Bureau  ?l4#Xx6X@DQX@#"l,l(l(,,"  X4  #XP\  P6QynXP#j:\sblake\39ord2 J. Burton R. Melson (# (# (#w ` `  ,h