******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Global Cellular Communications, Inc. ) Lottery ID No. 049 ) Application for authority ) to construct and operate a ) nationwide, commercial ) 220 MHz SMR system, ) Channels 151-155 ) ORDER Adopted: February 6, 1998 Released: February 6, 1998 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On October 18, 1996, National Communications Group, Capital Communications Group, Columbia Communications Group, Lonesome Dove Communications, All-American Communications Partners, and Shiner Bock Group (collectively, Petitioners) filed a Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) of the Memorandum Opinion and Order in which the Commission denied their Application for Review challenging Global Cellular Communications, Inc.'s (Global) application for a five-channel, nationwide, commercial 220 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio system. Previously, Petitioners had filed an informal objection to Global's application, which the former Private Radio Bureau (Bureau) dismissed as untimely and lacking in merit, and a petition for reconsideration of that decision, which the Bureau denied. 2. Section 1.106(b)(3) of the Commission's rules states that "[a] petition for reconsideration of an order denying an application for review which fails to rely on new facts or changed circumstances may be dismissed by the staff as repetitious." In denying Petitioners' Application for Review, the Commission rejected their argument that Global's financial qualifications showing was defective. The Petition challenges the Commission's conclusion that Global was not required to file a firm financial commitment letter with an original signature. Petitioners suggest that their Petition may not be dismissed because it challenges an analysis of this issue that the Commission employed for the first time in its MO&O. We disagree. We find that the Petition merely restates Petitioners' previous argument regarding Global's financial qualifications showing, which the Commission has already fully addressed, and relies on no new facts or changed circumstances. Therefore, we dismiss the Petition as repetitious. 3. For the above reasons, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 0.331 and 1.106(b)(3) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331, 1.106(b)(3), the Petition for Reconsideration filed by National Communications Group, Capital Communications Group, Columbia Communications Group, Lonesome Dove Communications, All-American Communications Partners, and Shiner Bock Group on October 18, 1996, IS HEREBY DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David L. Furth Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau