GN Docket No. 93-252
Implementation of Sections 3(n and 332 of the Communications Act Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services
April 10, 1995
May 5, 1995
: June 5, 1995
Reply Comment Date
: June 26, 1995
By the Commission:
1. In this Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making,
we propose to amend our 45 MHz spectrum cap for cellular
telephone service, Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) service,
and broadband Personal Communications Service (PCS). While
the spectrum cap currently applies only to licensees in
these services who are classified as Commercial Mobile
Radio Service (CMRS) providers, we propose to extend it
to all cellular, SMR, and broadband PCS providers regardless
of their regulatory classification. We also seek comment
on applying the spectrum cap to those "grandfathered" SMR
licensees who continue to be regulated as Private Mobile
Radio Service (PMRS) providers until August 10, 1996.
2. When we initially proposed the spectrum cap in the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in this proceeding,(n1) we framed the issue in terms of aggregation of CMRSspectrum, and did not address aggregation of PMRS spectrum.(n2) In the Further Notice we proposed a broad-based spectrum cap covering all CMRS, or alternatively, a more limited cap that would apply to CMRS providers in specified services only, i.e., cellular, SMR, and broadband PCS.(n3) We did not address the issue of whether licensees in these services providing Private Mobile Radio Service (PMRS) should also be subject to the cap. On August 9, 1994, in the Third Report and Order in this proceeding, we applied the cap only to cellular, SMR, and broadband PCS services.(n4) As adopted, the cap was limited to cellular, SMR, and broadband PCS licensees whose activities are regulated as CMRS.(n5)
3. Because the spectrum cap is limited to CMRS providers
in the three affected services, it leaves open the possibility
that licensees could avoid the cap by providing PMRS as
opposed to CMRS offerings.(n6) We question whether the applicability
of the spectrum cap should turn on the CMRS/PMRS distinction,
however. In the Third Report and Order, we concluded that
a cap was needed for cellular, SMR, and broadband PCS because
of the potential for licensees to aggregate large amounts
of spectrum in these services, thereby limiting the availability
of spectrum to other competitors in the mobile services
market.(n7) We note that this potential for a licensee to
reduce the number of competitors by aggregating spectrum
exists regardless of whether the licensee is providing
CMRS or PMRS. Moreover, the services provided by PMRS
providers may well be viewed as competitive alternatives
to CMRS by customers; thus, excluding them from the cap
could provide PMRS providers with an unfair competitive
advantage over CMRS providers. Finally, even if most cellular,
SMR, and broadband PCS providers provide CMRS services,
as is likely to be the case, determining the precise amount
of CMRS spectrum that should be attributed for spectrum
cap purposes is likely to be difficult, particularly in
the case of PCS, SMR, and possibly cellular licensees who
provide both CMRS and PMRS offerings under a single authorization.
4. For all of these reasons, we propose that the 45 MHz
spectrum cap be revised to apply to all cellular, SMR,
and broadband PCS licensees regardless of regulatoryclassification.
We believe that such a revision will greatly simplify
the application of the cap and will provide greater certainty
regarding its effect to cellular, SMR, and broadband PCS
applicants and licensees. We seek comment on this proposal.
Moreover, in light of our proposal, we seek comment on
whether there is any need to delay the applicability of
the spectrum cap until August 10, 1996 for "grandfathered"
SMR licensees, who will continue to be regulated as PMRS
providers until that time. When we adopted the CMRS-only
spectrum cap in the Third Report and Order, we stated that
this issue warranted further examination.(n8) If we decide
to extend the cap to SMR licensees classified as PMRS,
however, this rationale for delaying the applicability
of the cap to grandfathered SMR licensees appears not to
apply.(n9) We seek comment on this analysis.
5. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. We certify
that the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply
to this proceeding. Any action taken as a result of this
Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is unlikely
to have a significant economic effect on a substantial
number of small business entities, as defined by Section
601(3) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because the proposed
change is minor and because entities that acquire 45 MHz
of spectrum in a given geographic market are unlikely to
be small businesses. The Secretary shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rule Making, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in accordance
with paragraph 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.
6. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is
a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding.
Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the
Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as
provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R.
§§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a).
7. Comment Dates. Pursuant to applicable procedures set
forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules,
47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file
comments on or before June 5, 1995, and reply comments
on or before June 26, 1995. To file formally in this proceeding,
you must file an original and four copies of all comments,
reply comments, and supporting comments. If you want each
Commissioner to receive a personal copy of your comments,
you must file an original plus nine copies. You should
send comments and reply comments to Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.
Comments and reply comments will be available for public
inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Room 239,1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554.
8. For further information about this Notice, contact
Lisa Warner, Legal Branch, Commercial Radio Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0620.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Caton
Footnote 1 Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, GN Docket No. 93-252, 9 FCC Rcd 2863 (1994) (Further Notice).
Footnote 2 CMRS is defined as any service that is: (1)(A) provided for profit; (B) an interconnected service; and (C) available to the public, or to such classes of eligible users as to be effectively available to a substantial portion of the public; or (2) the functional equivalent of such a mobile service described in paragraph (1). PMRS is defined as a mobile service that is neither a commerical mobile radio service nor the functional equivalent of a service that meets the definition of commercial mobile radio service. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.3.
Footnote 3 Id., paras. 92-96.
Footnote 4 Third Report and Order, GN Docket No. 93-252, 9 FCC Rcd 7988 (1994) (Third Report and Order).
Footnote 5 Id., para. 263.
Footnote 6 SMR and PCS licensees may already offer non-CMRS services. Cellular licensees may not currently offer non-CMRS services, although several pending petitions for reconsideration of the Second Report and Order in this docket urge the Commission to lift this restriction.
Footnote 7 Third Report and Order, paras. 258-260.
Footnote 8 Third Report and Order, para. 283.
Footnote 9 Applying the spectrum cap to grandfathered SMR licensees would not require them to divest current license holdings or prevent them from seeking to obtain PCS licenses in the upcoming auctions. In the Third Report and Order, we stated that SMR licensees who exceeded the spectrum cap by acquiring broadband PCS licenses would not be required to divest until after the auction (within ninety days of the license grant). See Third Report and Order, paras. 283-285. 47 CFR § 20.6(e).