WPC& 2BBER@Z3|P  e4#XP7  PT6QXP#"5@^*8DSS88S^*8*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx8Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf8.8NS8JSJSJ8SS..S.SSSS8A.SSxSSJP!PZ*8888CE8SSxJxJxJxJxJooJfJfJfJfJ8.8.8.8.xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxJxSxSxSxSxS]SxSxJxJoJoJoJfJfJfJxSxSxxSxSxSxSCS8S888SAxSf.fExSxSxSxo8oE]A]AN:*LS8JSSSSS.4}}S2S}288JJS88SS8J82t8[[[[^ee*C`^.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*********************************8DSS88S^*8*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx8Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf8.8NS8JSJSJ8SS..S.SSSS8A.SSxSSJP!PZv**8SJSS8]8****88JJ:S8A8x**x*8SSSS!S8.S^8SC[228`L*824S}}}Jxxxxxxoffff8888xxxxxxx^xxxxxx]SJJJJJJoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSSSHP LaserJet 4Si MXHPLA4SMX.WRSX\  P6G;,,,}&d~P2Q Et@X e4#XP7  PT6QXP#"5@^2CRdd$CCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`l2CC!CCPRCddYYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddoddYYYYYzYzYzYddddddPdCdCCCdNdz8zRdddCRoNoNNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddnddddddd n9B8*XB7  PT6QP DPC2XXP7  PT6QXPTimes New RomanxxWPC 2BVR@Times New Roman n9B8*XB7  2S &@ (@ %@3|P "5@^!,6CCoh,,CK!,!%CCCCCCCCCC%%KKK;{`YY`RJ``,4`Rv``J`YJR``~``R,%,?C,;C;C;,CC%%C%hCCCC,4%CC`CC;@@H!,,,,57,CC`;`;`;`;`;vYY;R;R;R;R;,%,%,%,%`C`C`C`C`C`C`C`C`C`C`;`C`C`C`C`CJC`C`;`;Y;Y;Y;R;R;R;`C`C``C`C`C`C5C,C,,,C4`CR%R7`C`C`Cv`Y,Y7J4J4N/!((((01(<CWU(<0E<1<2O=3=Technical[5]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g0&!"  . Technical[6]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g1&#$  . Technical[2]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g2*%&    Technical[3]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g3''(   2A4>5F?6?7{@Technical[4]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g4&)*   Technical[1]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g54+$,     Technical[7]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g6&-.  . Technical[8]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g7&/0  . 2O8 2A9?B:v C;ovOCitatorFormat Secretary's Citator Output File8W r5-#d6X@`7Ͽ@# XX  X B r5-S  BFormat DownloadFormat Downloaded Document9iޛ r5- XX    \ #d6X@`7Ͽ@#MACNormal:;     X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<    #:}D4P XP#T I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)T,0*ÍÍ,*Í ., US!!!! ! #:}D4P XP#     X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<    #:}D4P XP#,0*ÍÍ,*Í ., US!!!! ! #:}D4P XP#Footnote;Íč2T<P=iP>Q?~Rfootnote tex#<'p #FxX  Pg9CXP#header=Ax 4 <D  #FxX  Pg9CXP# reference>;#FxX  Pg9CXP#itemizeX1?&V 8F ` hp xr#FxX  Pg9CXP#2X@iBTA^UBO WCrXXheader2@I ` hp x`    #FxX  Pg9CXP# heading 3AF` hp x #FxX  Pg9CXP# footer!B!!#d\  PCP#a2AgendaC2[DXErYF}ZG}Za1AgendaAgenda ItemsD7D yP ) I. a3AgendaEa1Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FF$ a2Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FG/ 2]H7[I[Jh\K]a3Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FH: a4Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FIE a5Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FJP   a6Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FK[   2`L]M^N_O`a7Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FLf  a8Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FMq Heading7=4@6FChapter Heading=('87=F4*'Ç.7=.EN3  *  ׃  Right Par5@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EO<@    2bP`QpyaRqaSeZbSubheading@6FSubheading>_' =('87=F7*'Ç.7=.EP.   2*Ç.7=G@6FDocument Style=('87=FG*'Ç.7=.EQ56` ` ` 3*Ç.7=H@6FDocument Style=('87=FH*'Ç.7=.ER7 8 . 4*Ç.7=I@6FDocument Style=('87=FI*'Ç.7=.ES 9: 2dTebUVcVpcWYd5*Ç.7=J@6FDocument Style=('87=FJ*'Ç.7=.ET ;< 6*Ç.7=K@6FDocument Style=('87=FK*'Ç.7=.EU*=>   7*Ç.7=L@6FDocument Style=('87=FL*'Ç.7=.EV?@` ` ` 8*Ç.7=M@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EW8AB@   2gXeYeZMf[f9*Ç.7=N@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EXACD@` `  ` ` ` 10Ç.7=O@6FDocument Style=('87=FO*'Ç.7=.EY0E F    11Ç.7=P@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EZJGH` ` @  ` `  12Ç.7=Q@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E[SIJ` `  @  2j\g]h^Ei_ j13Ç.7=R@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E\\KL` `  @hh# hhh 14Ç.7=S@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E]eMN` `  hh#@( hh# 15Ç.7=T@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E^nOP` `  hh#(@- ( 16Ç.7=U@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E_wQR` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2pm`kakbOlcl17Ç.7=V@6FDocument Style=('87=FV*'Ç.7=.E`FST *  ׃  18Ç.7=W@6FTechnical Document Style7=FW*'Ç.7=.Ea&UV  . 19Ç.7=X@6FTechnical Document Style7=FX*'Ç.7=.Eb&WX  . 20Ç.7=Y@6FTechnical Document Style7=FY*'Ç.7=.Ec*YZ    2pdme7nfng{o21Ç.7=Z@6FTechnical Document Style7=FZ*'Ç.7=.Ed'[\   22Ç.7=[@6FTechnical Document Style7=F[*'Ç.7=.Ee&]^   23Ç.7=\@6FTechnical Document Style7=F\*'Ç.7=.Ef4_$`     24Ç.7=]@6FTechnical Document Style7=F]*'Ç.7=.Eg&ab  . 2rh2pipjdqkr25Ç.7=^@6FTechnical Document Style7=F^*'Ç.7=.Eh&cd  . Format Downl@6FFormat Downloaded Document=Fc*'Ç.7=.EiUgh XX    X\ #d6X@7@#Word222Null@6FWord222Null_' =('87=Fp*'Ç.7=.Ej1{1|#/x PX##/x PX#Normal7=r@6FNormal>_' =('87=Fr*'Ç.7=.Ek1}1~#Xj\  PG;XP##/x PX#2F}l smun(xozHEADING 7t@6FJ>_' =('87=Ft*'Ç.7=.El0p Zwp x (#DDDDDD#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# HEADING 6v@6Ff>_' =('87=Fv*'Ç.7=.Em0p Zwp x (#DDDDDD#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# HEADING 5w@6F>_' =('87=Fw*'Ç.7=.En0p Zwp x (#DDDDDD#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# HEADING 4x@6F>_' =('87=Fx*'Ç.7=.Eo0 Zwp x (#rr#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# 2ۂpx}qwrs3NORMAL INDEN@6F>_' =('87=Fy*'Ç.7=.Ep'4 <DL!T$#&n P&P##&n P&P#enumlev1=z@6F>_' =('87=Fz*'Ç.7=.Eq$p  N hp x (#aa#&n P&P#4` hp x (##&n P &P#footnote ref@6Ffootnote reference'87=F{*'Ç.7=.ErR#V\  P!UP#Default Para@6FDefault Paragraph Font87=F}*'Ç.7=.Es((2t uvawpage number@6Fpage number_' =('87=F~*'Ç.7=.Et226Ç.7=@6Ffootnote text =('87=F*'Ç.7=.Eu>4??USlist.7=@6Flist >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.Ev>??endnote refe@6Fendnote reference'87=F*'Ç.7=.EwRR#Xj\  P"G;XP##c P#7P#2 x%yz{gline number@6Fline number_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.ExOO#Xj\  P$G;XP##c P%7P#Highlight@6FMiddle Article Highlight7=F*'Ç.7=.Ey''#G }&Y##\9> (P'YP#Headline=@6FHeadline for newsletter87=F*'Ç.7=.Ez''#> }(Y##\9> (P)YP#2nd line Hea@6F2nd line headline'87=F*'Ç.7=.E{''#b> }*Y##\9> (P+YP#2C|?}~CGraphics hea@6FHeadlines for graphics87=F*'Ç.7=.E|** #o> P},YP##\9> (P-YP# Graphics bod@6Fchart data _' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E}** #Alo> P}.YXP##\9> (P/YP# Article head@6FHeadline for new article7=F*'Ç.7=.E~*'#r"z0C# #\9> (P1YP# endnote text@6Fendnote text' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.EYO#X}xP27XP##I2P3QP#2ݕZuZώZ)Ztoc 17=@6Ftoc 1>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(#`` hp x (#toc 27=@6Ftoc 2>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#`` hp x (#toc 37=@6Ftoc 3>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#` hp x (#toc 47=@6Ftoc 4>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E (#` hp x (#2ϝZZiÚZutoc 57=@6Ftoc 5>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.Eh(#` hp x (#toc 67=@6Ftoc 6>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(# ` hp x (#toc 77=@6Ftoc 7>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E2(toc 87=@6Ftoc 8>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(# ` hp x (#2iZZ[ZZtoc 97=@6Ftoc 9>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(#`` hp x (#index 17=@6Findex 1>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#` hp x (#index 27=@6Findex 2>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#`` hp x (#toa heading@6Ftoa heading_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(#` hp x (#2Fתcaption7=@6Fcaption>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.EYO#X}xP47XP##I2P5QP#_Equation Ca@6F_Equation Caption'87=F*'Ç.7=.EOO#X}xP67XP##I2P7QP#27Ç.7=@6FDefault Paragraph Font87=F*'Ç.7=.Eww#X}xP87XP##&sxP97&P#HEADING 9@6F >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'34 <DL!T$#c P:7P##c P;7P#2pmqݮeNHEADING 8@6F >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'34 <DL!T$#c P<7P##c P=7P#28Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` ` ` 29Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E  . 30Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E  2߱eJpݰM31Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E  32Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E*   33Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` ` ` 34Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E8@   2A35Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EA@` `  ` ` ` 36Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E0    37Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EJ` ` @  ` `  38Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.ES` `  @  2ҷĴz939Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E\` `  @hh# hhh 40Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.Ee` `  hh#@( hh# 41Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.En` `  hh#(@- ( 42Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.Ew` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2dCȹ43Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.EF *  ׃  44Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 45Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 46Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E*    2+o47Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E'   48Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&   49Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E4$     50Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 2[&Eۿ51Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 52Ç.7=@6F: >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'4 <DL!T$#&n P>&P##&n P?&P#53Ç.7=@6Ffootnote reference'87=F*'Ç.7=.E>#V\  P@UP#54Ç.7=@6FDefault Paragraph Font87=F*'Ç.7=.E25/d55Ç.7=@6Ffootnote text =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E* ??US56Ç.7=@6Fendnote reference'87=F*'Ç.7=.E>>#Xj\  PAG;XP##B\  PBUP#57Ç.7=@6F_Equation Caption'87=F*'Ç.7=.E;;#XX2PCQXP##I2PDQP#HIGHLIGHT 1@6FItalics and Bold('87=F*'Ç.7=.E 2-gc0cDRAFT ON=@6FHeader A Text = DRAFT and Date*'Ç.7=.E X 8#x6X@E7X@#`] (#EDRAFTă `;(#@D3 1, 4D  ӷDRAFT OFF@6FTurn Draft Style off87=F*'Ç.7=.ED      LETTER LAND@6FLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5F*'Ç.7=.E    '3   LEGAL LAND@6FLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5=F*'Ç.7=.E   'A   2c(cn\LETTER PORT@6FLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11=F*'Ç.7=.E  3'   LEGAL PORT@6FLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 147=F*'Ç.7=.E  A'   TITLE7=@6FTitle of a Document87=F*'Ç.7=.E* ăBLOCK QUOTE@6FSmall, single-spaced, indented*'Ç.7=.E 2djsI`HIGHLIGHT 2@6FLarge and Bold=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E HIGHLIGHT 3@6FLarge, Italicized and Underscored*'Ç.7=.E  LETTERHEAD@6FLetterhead - date/margins7=F*'Ç.7=.E!  X  3'   * 3' Ѓ   INVOICE FEE@6FFee Amount for Math InvoiceF*'Ç.7=.E F, $0  2<<(dMEMORANDUM@6FMemo Page Format('87=F*'Ç.7=.E   * M E M O R A N D U M ă y<N dddy INVOICE EXP@6FExpense Subtotals for Math Invoice*'Ç.7=.E!" ,p, $0INVOICE TOT@6FTotals Invoice for Math Macro*'Ç.7=.E#$ p,p, $0INVOICE HEAD@6FHeading Portion of Math Invoice*'Ç.7=.E%&   p,X 9 I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#x6X@F7X@# XX  *$HHީ  ӧ   XX  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Ҳ#x6X@G7X@# XX  *$HHީ2[[r[[(SMALL7=@6FSmall Typestyle=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'(FINE.7=@6FFine Typestyle=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E)*LARGE7=@6FLarge Typestyle=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E+,EXTRA LARGE@6FExtra Large Typestyle87=F*'Ç.7=.E-.2[<VERY LARGE@6FVery Large Typestyle87=F*'Ç.7=.E/0ENVELOPE=@6FStandard Business Envelope with Header'Ç.7=.E.12 V,  X  , 8 I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#x6X@H7X@#    `   Style 14=@6FSwiss 8 Pt Without Margins=F*'Ç.7=.E'3'4#Co> PIQP##)a [ PJQ)P#Style 12=@6FDutch Italics 11.5'87=F*'Ç.7=.E'5'6#)^ `> XiKQ)X##)a [ PLQ)P#2 ssStyle 11=@6FInitial Codes for Advanced II*'Ç.7=.EȔ 78#)a [ PMQ)P# dn  #  [ b, oT9 ! I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PNQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XiOQ)X#`e%(Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   x I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PPQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XiQQ)X#Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   xw I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PRQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XiSQ)X#   Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`e%APage  w#)a [ PTQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XiUQ)X#   Page ``e%)Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 37=@6FDutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/Tabs*'Ç.7=.E9:#)a [ PVQ)P# n  ## b, oT9 !Style 47=@6FSwiss 8 Point with Margins=F*'Ç.7=.EG;<#Co> PWQP# dd  #  Style 17=@6FDutch Roman 11.5 Font87=F*'Ç.7=.E7=>#)a [ PXQ)P# dn 2DRStyle 27=@6FDutch Italic 11.5'87=F*'Ç.7=.E'?@#)^ `> XiYQ)X#Style 57=@6FDutch Bold 18 Point87=F*'Ç.7=.E'A'B#T~> pZQTp##)a [ P[Q)P#Style 77=@6FSwiss 11.5>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'C'D#)ao> P\Q)P##)a [ P]Q)P#Style 67=@6FDutch Roman 14 Point87=F*'Ç.7=.E'E'F#w [ P^QP##)a [ P_Q)P#2; v $  ~Style 10=@6FInitial Codes for Advanced=F*'Ç.7=.EV GH#)a [ P`Q)P# dn   #  [ b, oT9 ! I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PaQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XibQ)X#`e%)Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   u I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PcQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XidQ)X#Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   u I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PeQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XifQ)X#   Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`e%APage   I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PgQ)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> XihQ)X#   Page ``e%)Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 87=@6FInitial Codes for BeginningF*'Ç.7=.EV IJ#)a [ PiQ)P# dn  ## b, oT9  [  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PjQ)P# ## b, oT9 #)^ `> XikQ)X#`^e%)Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   v I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PlQ)P# ## b, oT9 #)^ `> XimQ)X#Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   v I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PnQ)P# ## b, oT9 #)^ `> XioQ)X#   Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`e%APage   I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PpQ)P# ## b, oT9 #)^ `> XiqQ)X#   Page ``e%)Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 97=@6FInitial Codes for Intermediate*'Ç.7=.ET KL#)a [ PrQ)P# dn  ## b, oT9 Њ [  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PsQ)P# ## b, oT9 #)^ `> XitQ)X#`e%'Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   z I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ PuQ)P# ## b, oT9 #)^ `> XivQ)X#Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide 2+ m**d*q;+Update7=@6FInitial Codes for Update Module*'Ç.7=.Ee MN#)a [ P{Q)P# dn  ##  [ b, oT9 ! I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#)a [ P|Q)P# ## b, oT9 !#)^ `> Xi}Q)X#`Ye%%Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   }58Ç.7=@6FFormat Downloaded Document=F*'Ç.7=.EUOP XX    #\ #d6X@7@#Bld/Und7=@6FBold and Underline Text87=F*'Ç.7=.EQR  a4Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'YZ2-q+qO,q,q1-a5Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'[\a6Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*']^a7Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'_`a8Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'ab2R0-f.//a159.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'8st@   a259.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'Auv@` `  ` ` ` a359.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'Jwx` ` @  ` `  a459.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'Syz` `  @  230:112a559.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'\{|` `  @hh# hhh a659.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'e}~` `  hh#@( hh# a759.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'n` `  hh#(@- ( a859.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'w` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2B63V445a160.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'8@   a260.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'A@` `  ` ` ` a360.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'J` ` @  ` `  a460.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'S` `  @  29t6*778a560.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'\` `  @hh# hhh a660.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'e` `  hh#@( hh# a760.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'n` `  hh#(@- ( a860.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'w` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2;p9$::S;1t >.x(Dt—Document Style >f.RK+P—!t >f—+b56` ` ` a129f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+P8@   a229f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+PA@` `  ` ` ` a329f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+PJ` ` @  ` `  2?*<<=O>a429f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+PS` `  @  a529f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+P\` `  @hh# hhh a629f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+Pe` `  hh#@( hh# a729f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+Pn` `  hh#(@- ( 2BJ?@AlBBa829f—+b—!tRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswH(RK+Pw` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp NORMAL INDENT ' 4 <DL!T$#&n P&P##&n P&P#footnote referencefootnote reference4#V\  PUP#Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font 2OEBnC.DgDfootnote textfootnote text US????USendnote referenceendnote reference44#XO\  PUXP##B\  PUP#_Equation Caption_Equation Caption11#XX2PQXP##I2PQP#FM7V,,6%TriangleoF4=(g4O7V ,*g4çFM7VE/02JEFF@RGa11I.E+')*'0Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers')8?I u*')8ij@   a21I.E+')*'0Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers')8?I u*')Akl@` `  ` ` ` a31I.E+')*'0Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers')8?I u*')Jmn` ` @  ` `  "5@^*8]SS.88S_*8*.SSSSSSSSSS88___SxoxxofASoxfx]oxxxxo8.8aS8S]J]J8S].8].]S]]JA8]SxSSJB%BW*8888CE8S]xSxSxSxSxSxxJoJoJoJoJA.A.A.A.x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSf]xSxSxSxJxJxJoJoJoJSSSS]]C]A]A8A]S]o.oEx]x]SxxJxJ]A]AN:*ZS8SSSSSS27}}S2||S}288SSS88SS8S82t8[[[[_ee*C`_.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*********************************8]SS.88S_*8*.SSSSSSSSSS88___SxoxxofASoxfx]oxxxxo8.8aS8S]J]J8S].8].]S]]JA8]SxSSJB%BWv**8SSSS8]8****88SS:S8A8x**x*8SSSS%S8|2S_8|SC[228`Z*827S}}}SxxxxxxxooooAAAAxx_xxxxxf]SSSSSSxJJJJJ....S]SSSSS[S]]]]S]2W@J@N@DQ@T"5@^77Shh~777h7777hhhhhhhhhh77V{hux_\{x.\oYx~bllhxxxre777hShY_Y_Y=__((Y(____:S=_\\\PJSJhhhhhhEhhe{Y{Y{Y{Y{YuY_Y_Y_Y_Y.(.(.(.(x_~_~_~_~_x_x_x_x_r\{Yxh~_~_r\x_b_{h{h{huYuhuhhhhhhh{_{h{{h{hxhxhhhhhhh.ehoYY(YEx_x_~hl:lElSlSNShh7V\\hhhDDh@SSh@77SSh==hhf7S7@t7[[ee*h\.wR\\n[Cfx\xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge7777777777777777777777777777777777Shh~777h7777hhhhhhhhhh77V{hux_\{x.\oYx~bllhxxxre777hShY_Y_Y=__((Y(____:S=_\\\PJSJh777hShhhl=777777SSShhfS=77r77hhhhShhSD\7Shh@@h\hh@D\V{{{{{{u____....xx~~~~~~xxxxrbeYYYYYYYYYYY((((____________\_"5@^77Vhh~777h7777hhhhhhhhhh77V{hux_\{x.\oYx~bllhxxxre777hShY_Y_Y=__((Y(____:S=_\\\PSSShhhhhhEhhe{Y{Y{Y{Y{YuY_Y_Y_Y_Y.(.(.(.(x_~_~_~_~_x_x_x_x_r\{Yxh~_~_r\x_b_{h{h{huYuhuhhhhhhh{_{h{{h{hxhxhhhhhhh.ehoYY(YEx_x_~hl:lElSlSNShh7V\\hhhDDh@SSh@77SSh==hhf7S7@t7[[ee*hb.wR\\n[CfxbxWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge7777777777777777777777777777777777Vhh~777h7777hhhhhhhhhh77V{hux_\{x.\oYx~bllhxxxre777hShY_Y_Y=__((Y(____:S=_\\\PSSSh777hShhhl=777777SSShhfS=77r77hhhhShhSD\7Shh@@hbhh@D\V{{{{{{u____....xx~~~~~~xxxxrbeYYYYYYYYYYY((((____________\_"5@^22K^^r222^2222^^^^^^^^^^22No^ilVSol*SdPlrYtaa^lllf[222^K^PVPVP7VV$$P$VVVV5K7VSSSHCKC^^^^^^>^^[oPoPoPoPoPiPVPVPVPVP*$*$*$*$lVrVrVrVrVlVlVlVlVfSoPl^rVrVfSlVYVo^o^o^iPi^i^^^^^^^oVo^oo^o^l^l^^^^^^^*[^dPP$P>lVlVr^a5a>aKaKNK^^2NSS^^^==^:KK^:22KK^77^^\2K2:t2RR[[&^S)|kJw|SSssscRC\lSlNaJlRTRY[B\BhWsNlRwgsg_k][2222222222222222222222222222222222K^^r222^2222^^^^^^^^^^22No^ilVSol*SdPlrYtaa^lllf[222^K^PVPVP7VV$$P$VVVV5K7VSSSHCKC^222^K^^^a7222222KKK^^\K722f22^^^^K^^K=S2K^^::^S^^:=SNooooooiVVVV****llrrrrrrllllfY[PPPPPPPPPPP$$$$VVVVVVVVVVVVSV"5@^22N^^r222^2222^^^^^^^^^^22No^ilVSol*SdPlrYtaa^lllf[222^K^PVPVP7VV$$P$VVVV5K7VSSSHKKK^^^^^^>^^[oPoPoPoPoPiPVPVPVPVP*$*$*$*$lVrVrVrVrVlVlVlVlVfSoPl^rVrVfSlVYVo^o^o^iPi^i^^^^^^^oVo^oo^o^l^l^^^^^^^*[^dPP$P>lVlVr^a5a>aKaKNK^^2NSS^^^==^:KK^:22KK^77^^\2K2:t2RR[[&^Y)|kJw|SSssscRC\lYlNaJlRTRY[B\BhWsNlRwgsg_k][2222222222222222222222222222222222N^^r222^2222^^^^^^^^^^22No^ilVSol*SdPlrYtaa^lllf[222^K^PVPVP7VV$$P$VVVV5K7VSSSHKKK^222^K^^^a7222222KKK^^\K722f22^^^^K^^K=S2K^^::^Y^^:=SNooooooiVVVV****llrrrrrrllllfY[PPPPPPPPPPP$$$$VVVVVVVVVVVVSV2d@W@6[ @v^@a"5@^2CRdd$CCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`l2CC!CCPRCddYYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddoddYYYYYzYzYzYddddddPdCdCCCdNdz8zRdddCRoNoNNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddnddddddd"5@^2Coddȧ8CCdr2C28ddddddddddCCrrrdzNdzoȐC8CtdCdoYoYCdo8Co8odooYNCodddYO,Oh2CC!CCPRCdodddddȐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddzodddYYYYYYddddooPoNoNCNodo8RoodȐYYoNoNNF2ldCddddddP}ks}b}sYkssssk5-5]P5PYGYG5PY-5Y-YPYYG>5YPsPPG?#?S(5555@B5PYsPsPsPsPsPssGkGkGkGkG>->->->-sY}P}P}P}PsYsYsYsYsPsPsY}P}PsPsPbYsPsPsPsGsGsGkGkGkG}P}P}}P}P}Y}Y@Y>Y>5>YP}Yk-kBsYsY}PssGsGY>Y>N8(VP5PPPPPP05xxP0wwPx055PPP55PP5P50t5XXXX[aa(@\[,rOPP{{{iXCbs\sSgOsXYX_aFbFn\zSsXn{nerca(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((5YPP-55P[(5(-PPPPPPPPPP55[[[Psksskb}}>P}ks}b}sYkssssk5-5]P5PYGYG5PY-5Y-YPYYG>5YPsPPG?#?Sq((5PPPP5Y5((((55PP8P5>5s((s(5PPPP#P5w0P[5wP@X005\V(505PxxxPssssssskkkk>>>>ss}}}}}[}sssssbYPPPPPPsGGGGG----PYPPPPPXPYYYYPY"5@^/>h]]4>>]j/>/4]]]]]]]]]]>>jjj]||rH]|rh||>4>m]>]hShS>]h4>h4h]hhSH>h]]]SI)Ia/>>>>KM>]h]]]]]S|S|S|S|SH4H4H4H4h]]]]hhhh]]h]]]]rh]]]SSS|S|S|S]]]]hhKhHhH>Hh]h|4|Mhh]SShHhHNA/e]>]]]]]]8>]8]8>>]]]>>]]>]>8t>ffffjqq/Klj3\]]{fCrlax\fhfnqRrRlafvtq/////////////////////////////////>h]]4>>]j/>/4]]]]]]]]]]>>jjj]||rH]|rh||>4>m]>]hShS>]h4>h4h]hhSH>h]]]SI)Ia//>]]]]>h>////>>]]A]>H>///>]]]])]>8]j>]Kf88>le/>8>]]||||HHHHjrh]]]]]]SSSSS4444]h]]]]]f]hhhh]h"U`^2Coddȧ8CCdr2C28ddddddddddCCrrrdzNdzoȐC8CtdCsksskb}}>P}ks}b}sYksssskO,Oh2CC!CCPRCdYsssssȠskkkkN>N>N>N>s}}}}sssssss}}sszbsssssskkk}}}}}}}P@N>N>N>dP}kkss}ȠssoYoYoDoDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDNF2ldCddddddsbssYskYbssssb`(`l2CC!CCPRCdPssssskzbzbzbzbC5C5C5C5ssssssssssssssssoYssskkkzbzbzbsssssssP@C5C5C5N>szbzbssskkoYoYo@o@@z@z@@@@@@@@@z@@z@NF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddnddddddd"U`^:NuuANNu:N:AuuuuuuuuuuNNu٨[uܨ騨NANuN||rH]|rh||\3\y:NN'NN]`Nuh黨||||[H[H[H[Hr|||]K[H[H[Hu]||黨hhOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONR:~uNuuuuuuFMuFuFNNuuuNNuuNuNFtN捍:]@suuCrxhnr:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::NuuANNu:N:AuuuuuuuuuuNNu٨[uܨ騨NANuNuggNuANA‚ug[Nuuug\3\y::NuuuuNN::::NNuuRuN[N:::Nuuuu3uNFuNu]FFN~:NFMuu騜[[[[uuuuuugggggAAAAuuuuuuuu"5@^(5APP}55PZ(5(-PPPPPPPPPP--ZZZGskksbYss5>sbssYskYbssssb5-5KP5GPGPG5PP--P-}PPPP5>-PPsPPGM MW(5555@B5PPsGsGsGsGsGkkGbGbGbGbG5-5-5-5-sPsPsPsPsPsPsPsPsPsPsGsPsPsPsPsPYPsPsGsGkGkGkGbGbGbGsPsPssPsPsPsP@P5P555P>sPb-bBsPsPsPsk5kBY>Y>N8(IP5GPPPPP,2xxP0zzPx055GGP55PP5G50t5XXXXZaa(@\Z,rOPP{{{iXCbs\sSgOsXYX_aFbFn\zSsXn{nerca(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((5APP}55PZ(5(-PPPPPPPPPP--ZZZGskksbYss5>sbssYskYbssssb5-5KP5GPGPG5PP--P-}PPPP5>-PPsPPGM MWq((5PGPP5Y5((((55GG8P5>5s((s(5PPPP P5z,PZ5zP@X005\I(502PxxxGsssssskbbbb5555sssssssZssssssYPGGGGGGkGGGGG----PPPPPPPXPPPPPPP2@^,^"5@^5Gvkkղ;GGkz5G5;kkkkkkkkkkGGzzzkƚSkɚw՚G;G|kGkw_w_Gkw;Gw;wkww_SGwkkk_T/To5GG$GGUXGkwkkkkk՚_____S;S;S;S;wkkkkwwwwkkwkkkkwkkk______kkkkwwUwSwSGSwkw;Xwwk՚__wSwSNK5skGkkkkkk@Fk@k@GGkkkGGkkGkG@tGuuuuzҁ5U{z:ikkuC{oiuwu~^^{ou555555555555555555555555555555555Gvkkղ;GGkz5G5;kkkkkkkkkkGGzzzkƚSkɚw՚G;G|kGkw_w_Gkw;Gw;wkww_SGwkkk_T/To55GkkkkGwG5555GGkkKkGSG555Gkkkk/kG@kzGkUu@@G{s5G@Fkk՚SSSSzwkkkkkk_____;;;;kwkkkkkukwwwwkw"H^^CYm0YYCYCJJJvYhYJY}YvvvYJJJYhJv5CYY,YYknYvvvvvvvvvvYJYJYJYJvvvvvvvvvkYYYYhJnYnhhN]CyYvJSPPYYvv YY Yv YPtYCkICuuCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCYm0YYCYCJJJvYhYJY}YvvvYJJJYhJv5CCYv Y YCCCCYYvv] YhYCCCY5YJYkPPYyCYPSvYYYYvvvvvvvvvvvJJJJ"H^^CY JYYCYCJYYh YJYYvvYJYJvhYvi;iCYY,YYknY vvvvvhJhJhJhJvvvvvvkhhYhJn vvhhN]CYPXPPYY YY  Y YPtYCkICuuCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCY JYYCYCJYYh YJYYvvYJYJvhYvi;iCCY Y Y CCCCYY] Y hYCCCY;YPYkPPYCYPX hhhhvvvvvJJJJ"(^CYm0YYCYCJJJvYhYJY}YwGSww5CYY,YYknYkYGYGYGYGwkUYGYGYGhSwwUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN]CyYvJSPPYYvv YY Yv YPtYCkICw~CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCYm0YYCYCJJJvYhYJY}YvvvYJJJYhJv5CCYv Y YCCCCYYvv] YhYCCCY5YJYkPPYyCYPSvYYYYvvvvvvvvvvvJJJJ2R@V^^"(^CY JYYCYCJYYh YJYYSkwi;iCYY,YYknYw hShShShSkUhShShSk ww[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[N]CYPXPPYY YY  Y YPtYCkICw~CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCY JYYCYCJYYh YJYYvvYJYJvhYvi;iCCY Y Y CCCCYY] Y hYCCCY;YPYkPPYCYPX hhhhvvvvvJJJJ"5@^5GWkk&GGkx5G5;kkkkkkkkkk;;xxx_ŚwGSwwɚG;GdkG_k_k_Gkk;;k;kkkkGS;kkkk_f+ft5GG$GGUXGkk__________G;G;G;G;kkkkkkkkkk_kkkkkwkk________kkkkkkUkGkGGGkSk;XkkkGXwSwSNK5akG_kkkkk;Bk@k@GG__kGGkkG_G@tGuuuuxҁ5U{x:ikkuC{oiuwu~^^{ou555555555555555555555555555555555GWkk&GGkx5G5;kkkkkkkkkk;;xxx_ŚwGSwwɚG;GdkG_k_k_Gkk;;k;kkkkGS;kkkk_f+ft55Gk_kkGwG5555GG__KkGSG555Gkkkk+kG;kxGkUu@@G{a5G@Bk_GGGGxwk___________;;;;kkkkkkkukkkkkkk"H^^?S}}FSS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}SS}a}SFS}S}ooS}FSF}oaS}}}ob7b?SS*SSdgS}}}}}}oooooaFaFaFaF}}}}}}}}}}}}}oooooo}}}}daaSa}Fg}ooaaNX?}S}}}}}}KS}K}KSS}}}SS}}S}SKtS?dD{}}C{nn?????????????????????????????????S}}FSS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}SS}a}SFS}S}ooS}FSF}oaS}}}ob7b??S}}}}SS????SS}}X}SaS???S}}}}7}SK}S}dKKS?SKS}}aaaa}}}}}}oooooFFFF}}}}}}}}"H^^?Sf}}-SS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}FFoSaSFSv}So}o}oS}}FF}F}}}}SaF}}}}ox2x?SS*SSdgS}}ooooooooooSFSFSFSF}}}}}}}}}}o}}}}}}}oooooooo}}}}}}d}S}SSS}a}Fg}}}SgaaNX?q}So}}}}}EN}K}KSSoo}SS}}SoSKtS?dD{}}C{nn?????????????????????????????????Sf}}-SS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}FFoSaSFSv}So}o}oS}}FF}F}}}}SaF}}}}ox2x??S}o}}SS????SSooX}SaS???S}}}}2}SE}S}dKKSq?SKN}oSSSS}oooooooooooFFFF}}}}}}}}}}}}}}2@@"b@"(^?Sf}}-SS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}FFoSaSFSv}SzoCNzoozzx2x?SS*SSdgS}dzzzzSCSCSCSCozzzdPSCSCSCaNzzooPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPNX?q}So}}}}}EN}K}KSSoo}SS}}SoSKtS?dD{}}Czovz?????????????????????????????????Sf}}-SS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}FFoSaSFSv}So}o}oS}}FF}F}}}}SaF}}}}ox2x??S}o}}SS????SSooX}SaS???S}}}}2}SE}S}dKKSq?SKN}oSSSS}oooooooooooFFFF}}}}}}}}}}}}}}"5@^(1<d<d<CCoodCCddCoCddzzzzzzzzzzCCCCozdddddddYYYYY8888dddddddndddddYd"5@^!)22SN!!28!2222222222888,\HCCH=8HH!'H=YHH8HC8=HH^HH=!!/2!,2,2,!222N2222!'22H22,006!!!!()!22H,H,H,H,H,YCC,=,=,=,=,!!!!H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H2H2H2H282H2H,H,C,C,C,=,=,=,H2H2HH2H2H2H2(2!2!!!2'H2==)H2H2H2YHC!C)8'8'N#-2!,22222KK2LL2K!!,,2d!!22bd!,d!t!77778c<<!)22SN!!28!2222222222888,\HCCH=8HH!'H=YHH8HC8=HH^HH=!!/2!,2,2,!222N2222!'22H22,006G!2,d22!d8!Y!!,,#2d!b'!HH!22222!L28!L2(7!:-!2KKK,HHHHHHYC====!!!!HHHHHHH8HHHHHH82,,,,,,C,,,,,222222272222222"5@^*8FSS$88Sq*8*.SSSSSSSSSS88qqqSffoxffxx8Jo]oxfxfS]xff]]A.AFS8SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSSAA.SJoJJAC.CZ*8888CE8SSfSfSfSfSfSooJfJfJfJfJ8.8.8.8.oSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]JfSxSxSxS]JxSfSfSfSfSoJoJoJfJfJfJxSxSxxSxSxSxSCS8S888SJoJ].]EoSoSxSofAfESASAN:*WSASSSSSS.4}}S2S}288]]S88SS8]82t8[[[[qee*C`q.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*********************************8FSS$88Sq*8*.SSSSSSSSSS88qqqSffoxffxx8Jo]oxfxfS]xff]]A.AFS8SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSSAA.SJoJJAC.CZv**8S]SS8S8****88]]:S8A8o**]*ASSSS.S8.Sq8SC[228`W*824S}}}Sffffffoffff8888xoxxxxxqxxxxx]fSSSSSSSoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSJS"5@^66Taa6IIa666Iaaaaaaaaaa66FrgirYTrw9AlT|_gN\wooaaIIIIIaIYFWL6QW++\+WYWW>>;WQt\QDIII6aaaaQg>N>N>NI6aa6FLLaaaDDaDIIaD66__a++aaY6_6Dt6PPXX%QW(yiHuyLLqqqaPCZjWjM_HjPRPWX@Z@eUpMjPueqe]i[X6666666666666666666666666666666666Taa6IIa666Iaaaaaaaaaa66FrgirYTrw9AlT|_gN\wooaaIIIIIaIYFWL6QW++\+WYWW>>;WQt\QDIII666a_aaaN+666666__IaaY>+66a66aaaaIaaIDL6IIQDDaWa6aDDLFrrrrrriYYYY9999w|wwwwa__IIIIIIoFLLLL++++YWYYYYYYWWWWQW2"!@"@$`$)"5@^*A]SS.88S_*8*.SSSSSSSSSS88___SoooxooxASofxxfxo]fxooff8.8_S8SSJSJ8S]..S.]SSSAA.]JoSJA:%:_*8888CE8SSoSoSoSoSoSxoJoJoJoJoJA.A.A.A.x]xSxSxSxSx]x]x]x]fJoSxSxSxSfJxSfSoSoSoSoJoJoJoJoJoJxSxSxxSxS]]CSASA8ASSoSf.fEx]x]xSxoAoE]A]AN:*SSASSSSSS,2}}S2||S}288SSS88SS8S82t8[[[[eee*C`_.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*********************************A]SS.88S_*8*.SSSSSSSSSS88___SoooxooxASofxxfxo]fxooff8.8_S8SSJSJ8S]..S.]SSSAA.]JoSJA:%:_v**8SSSS8]8****88SS:S8A8x**f*ASSSS%S8|,Se8|SC[228`S*822S}}}SoooooooooooAAAAxxxxxxx_xxxxxffSSSSSSSxJJJJJ....S]SSSSS[S]]]]JS"5@^DDizzD[[zDDD[zzzzzzzzzzDDXpiGQivbszz[[[[[z[pXl_Del66s6lpllNNJleseU[[[DzzzzeKz[v[[[[[Xp_p_p_p_G6G6G6G6lppppllllze[zppzepvl[zzXzepezzzzeezezzevzzzzGvzsi6iKllzآNNbNbNN[DzzDX__zzzUUzU[[zUDDvvz66zzpDvDUtDeeoo.el2Z__yeCpl`vZefeloPpPj`e~~troDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDizzD[[zDDD[zzzzzzzzzzDDXpiGQivbszz[[[[[z[pXl_Del66s6lpllNNJleseU[[[DDDzvzzzb6DDDDDDvv[zzpN6DDzDDzzzz[zz[U_D[[eUUzlzDzUU_XppppGGGGzvv[[[[[[X____6666plppppppllllel"U`^DDizzD[[zDDD[zzzzzzzzzzDDXpiGQivbszz[[[[[zrgirYTrw9AlT|_gN\wooaa[[[DzzzzeKz[_rrrrripYpYpYpYG9G9G9G9|wwwwzarrzawv_rrriiipYzazarrrrrwweQzazaG9zaliTiT||حggbNbNbGzGGsGzGGGGGGGGzGzGGzGN[DzzDX__zzzUUzU[[zUDDvvz66zzpDvDUtDeeoo.el2Z__yeCpZjjv_jfRlWpZepjuqtroDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDizzD[[zDDD[zzzzzzzzzzDDXpiGQivbszz[[[[[z[pXl_Del66s6lpllNNJleseU[[[DDDzvzzzb6DDDDDDvv[zzpN6DDzDDzzzz[zz[U_D[[eUUzlzDzUU_XppppGGGGzvv[[[[[[X____6666plppppppllllel"(^VVVttVVVtVVpZg}tttttrkHRkxdu||tttV'`txrrrrZHZHZHZH||xr||g||ZH|kk}d}d}ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZNtVVpyylllttlVVEEV)VltV:@syyCrxhnrVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVttVVVtVVpZg}ttttttpyVEEEcc_ltttVVV)}EVVVVVVtcEVVVVttlyVttllVllypZZZZttttttpyyyyEEEE2'^Tr$"H^^VVVttVVVtVVpZg}ttttttpyVEEEcc_ltttV'`ttttttpyyyyZEZEZEZEttpZE`cc}c}cNtVVpyylllttlVVEEV)VltV:@syyCzsffzVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVttVVVtVVpZg}ttttttpyVEEEcc_ltttVVV)}EVVVVVVtcEVVVVttlyVttllVllypZZZZttttttpyyyyEEEE n9B8*X B7  PT6QP, n9G8*X G7  pTQl}*N87X'}NxPQP}*N87X/aNpZQlp&F22X'%FxPQPp&F22X/9FpZQ DPC2XXP7  PT6QXP , DUC2X XU7  pTQX JVH6Xu&V7  PT6QP , J\H6X>\7  pTQ, j6D5(XD7  pTQ DUC2X XU7  pTQX O]N:X.]7  PT6QP , OcN:X*,c7  pTQ, |?O>/X0O7  pTQ0 OcN:X*,c7  pTQ j6@5(X]@7  PT6QPDPC2XXP7  PT6QXP [jYCX]T j7  PT6Q P, [qYCXZD q7  pTQ , H[G5X?[7  pTQ[qYCXZD q7  pTQ  HUG5X]%U7  PT6QP[jYCX]T j7  PT6Q P !UdS?X'd7  PT6QP"UdS?X'd7  PT6QP, UjS?Xb=j7  pTQ#UjS?Xb=j7  pTQt$8RC;X>+XR PE3QXP 'O)0(X}h07  PT6QhP% (B"(!Xm,(7  PT6Q,Pj )n9C8*XGjC7  xTQX!j &DPC2XGXP7  xTQXX n9D8*X`)D7  xTyQD*X=DX~m&X ptQ&$Dq"G16X~G ptQ#"*X=DX~m&X ptQ&$, O)3(Xzh37  pTQh jX-5,!Xݐ57  PT6QPDk6pNVX~2]p ptQ)D,Z>EX~i0Z ptQ0('k6pNVX~2]p ptQ)v}SzoCNzoozzx2x?SS*SZ e4   #ixP7}P##_xP7%P##Xj\  P6G;XP#vFederal Communications Commission ă` <$y FCC 9997    ydddy @-  -@   }Z'@-  -@  vw#ixP7}P#PAGE ؃1    k4  Њvg #s\  P6G;u&P#Before the#Xj\  P6G;XP#у  p43 v#|\  P6G; .P#Federal Communications Commission# Xj\  P6G;XP#у  k45vK#s\  P6G;u&P#Washington, D.C.#Xj\  P6G;XP#у  e4 In the Matter ofUv) Uv)  ej4Service Rules for the 746764 andUv)hXppWT Docket No. 99168<$p 776794 MHz Bands, andUv) Revisions to Part 27 of theUv) Commission's RulesUv)  | AG v # \  P6G;]T P#Notice of Proposed Rulemaking #Xj\  P6G;XP#у   e4` ` Adopted: May 13, 1999; q Released : June  &xP 3 &xP , 1999  e4  e4 Comments Due:  &xP July 19 &xP , 1999  e4 Reply Comments Due:  &xP August 1 &xP 3, 1999 By the Commission:  vAv4 #\  P6G;'P# Table of Contents #Xj\  P6G;XP#у  e4`!<$#X\  P6G; P#Paragraph  Y4#Xw PE37+XP#  e4X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:. Commenters who consider this issue should address what impact their suggested approaches would have on television broadcasters also using the band, both during the transition to DTV and to the extent the service rules may provide for new broadcast services.  e4#XP7  PT6QXP#  e47. Whether the service rules developed will provide for sharing between broadcast and fixed and mobile wireless services, including the prospect of audio, video, or data services that may not closely resemble existing broadcasting configurations, depends in part on our resolution of several issues that are not raised by flexible use allocations of narrower scope. These issues include the managing of interference between technically dissimilar services (at least in the familiar configurations of broadcast and wireless service), and the application of regulatory mechanisms suited to the range of services on these bands. To the extent that commenters suggest that our technical service rules enable services that closely resemble existing broadcast services, we start from the presumption that such services would be fully subject to Part 73 of our Rules. We ask that commenters consider whether there are any reasons that particular elements of Part 73 should not similarly be applied to such services when provided on these spectrum blocks. A prospective licensee could, however, also seek to offer a pointtomultipoint datacast service that would distribute data such as financial and market reports or video or music streams to the general public, and intend to recoup its costs and profit by inserting commercial"x  +&&ZZ" messages or some other nonsubscription mechanism. Such a service might, in its technical configuration, more closely resemble the existing fixed and mobile wireless services provided on other spectrum bands. As an initial matter we would expect such services are more appropriately regulated by the framework of Part 27.  e48. Another respect in which broadcast and nonbroadcast services operate in different  ev4regulatory contexts are the distinctive approaches to accessibility. Section 713 of the Act,<v nZ'ԍ 47 U.S.C.  613.< for example, directs the Commission to establish captioning regulations applicable to video  eH4programming;KXHX nZQ 'ԍ See Closed Captioning and Video Description of Video Programming, MM Docket No. 95176, Implementation of Section 305 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Video Programming Accessibility,  nZ 'Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 3272 (1998), recon., 13 FCC Rcd 19973 (1998).K Section 255,<Hx nZq'ԍ 47 U.S.C.  255.< effective on enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes an accessibility obligation for both equipment manufacturers and service providers, but in the telecommunications sector, not broadcasting. We ask whether and how these differing accessibility requirements should affect the development of service rules for these spectrum bands. We also seek comment on the implications of our service rule proposals, including technical and regulatory aspects, for implementation of third generation wireless technology in this spectrum.  e49. The full flexibility of use being considered for these bands, for example, may also require us to develop auction procedures that recognize and reconcile the characteristic regulatory  eb4elements of broadcast and wireless licenses (i.e., the community of license and geographic area  eK4referents for licensing), and perhaps consider distinctive approaches.nXK nZ'ԍ Combinatorial auctions are discussed at paras.  COMB122 ,  COMB282 . The procedures for individual broadcast auctions are set forth by public notice prior to the auction, 47 C.F.R.  73.5001, and general procedures for wireless auctions are specified in Part 1 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 1.n In developing service rules for the commercial spectrum involved here, and determining the extent to which they can or should accommodate both familiar broadcast services and innovative services that would be  e4licensed under Parts 73 and 27 of our Rules,R@(  nZ'ԍ The Table of Allocations permits a range of broadcast services, but the specific service rules will determine whether and to what extent specific services can or will be licensed. If the service rules ultimately include provision for broadcast services, the technical and regulatory issues raised by sharing this spectrum may result in service rules for licensees providing broadcast service under Part 27 that differ from existing Part 73 broadcast service rules in varied respects. The term "broadcasting" is so broadly applied that its use has, among other examples, required the Commission to clarify that a limited number of nonscrambled signals, transmitted by a Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) licensee, would not alter the licensee's classification as a nonbroadcast licensee. Revision of Rules and Policies for the Direct Broadcast Satellite Service, IB Docket No. 95168, PP"W% +&&N%"  nZ'Docket No. 93253, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 9712, 9762 (para. 130)(1996). See also 47 C.F.R. Part 100. R we are required by Section 303(y) of the Act to"X +&&ZZs" find that such a flexible approach would not result in harmful interference among users, would not deter investment in communications services and systems, or technology development, and that the allocation would be in the public interest. We recognize that proposals involving such a range of services make it especially important that our review of such "flexible use" allocations, mandated by Section 303(y) of the Act, examine the elements of that statutory review in light of the specific factual considerations raised by the scope of these proposals.  e_4 10. We therefore initially propose to permit licensees to determine the services they will provide within their assigned spectrum and geographic areas, and to subject these licensees  e14generally to Part 27 of our Rules, which governs Wireless Communications Service. Because Part 27 was originally developed with an architecture designed to accommodate flexible use, we believe it provides an appropriate licensing framework for the common elements of regulation  e 4that are applicable to wireless and broadcast services alike.MX X nZ'ԍ For wireless services, a Part 27 licensee could be subject to Part 22 if providing public mobile services, to Part 90 if providing private land mobile services, and to Part 101 if providing fixed microwave services. For broadcasting services, a Part 27 licensee could be subject to Part 73. M We ask whether broadcast services on these bands, to whatever extent they are subject to Part 73 in other respects, can or should be subject to the Part 27 licensing framework to facilitate our administrative coordination of these varied uses. Exceptions to this approach, if any, would arise from modifications we may adopt to reflect (1) the particular circumstances of this spectrum; and (2) statutory and other public interest requirements, gathered in Part 73 of our Rules, that govern broadcasting. We note that broadcast use of this spectrum would necessarily be subject to broadcastspecific statutory  eK4provisions, such as Sections 312(a)(7) and 315 of the Act.Kx nZt'ԍ Section 312(a)(7), 47 U.S.C.  312(a)(7), authorizes the Commission to revoke licenses or construction permits for willful or repeated failure to allow reasonable access to or to permit purchase of reasonable amounts of time for the use of a broadcasting station by a legally qualified candidate for Federal elective office on behalf of his candidacy. Section 315(a), 47 U.S.C.  315(a), requires broadcast licensees that permit a legally qualified candidate to use their station to afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station. . . .. Commenters may address whether such broadcast services, if provided in the context of spectrum blocks governed generally by Part  e427, should be subject to different rules than now apply under Part 73 to broadcast licensees.  nZ'ԍ See 47 C.F.R. Part 73, Subpart H, Rules Applicable to All Broadcast Stations, 47 C.F.R.  73.100173.4280. We request comment on the type of services that could be offered in this commercial spectrum, and our proposal generally to subject the spectrum to Part 27 and, when applicable, to other Parts of the rules, including Part 73. We also seek comment on alternative provisions that may minimize the economic impact of the proposals, if any, on small entities. "H  +&&ZZ"Ԍ e4 11. 303REF   ASSIGN  We seek comment on whether this approach is consistent with Section 303(y)(2) of  e4the Communications Act, as amended by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. nZb'ԍ Section 303(y)(2) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.  303(y)(2), requires, as a condition of Commission exercise of its authority to provide for flexibility of use of spectrum, that: X(2) the Commission [first] finds, after notice and an opportunity for public comment, that(# ` ` (A) such an allocation would be in the public interest;(#` ` ` (B) such use would not deter investment in communications services and systems, or technology development; and(#` ` ` (C) such use would not result in harmful interference among users.(#` Ɛ This section grants the Commission authority to allocate spectrum for flexible use if the Commission finds that such an allocation (1) is in the public interest; (2) would not deter investment in communications services and systems, or technology development; and (3) would not result in harmful interference among users. Although Section 303(y) applies on its face to the allocation  ev4of spectrum rather than the development of service and operational rules,` v(  nZO'ԍ We note that the Commission stated in the 47 GHz Notice that: XWhile we are proposing flexible use for the 47 GHz band, we are not proposing to change any allocations for the band. We are proposing that the band may be used for all services permitted under the existing allocations, as reflected in the U.S. Table of Allocations. Consequently, we conclude that we need not make the findings required by Section 303(y) of the Act because Section 303(y) does not apply here.  Amendment to Part 27 of the Commission's Rules To Revise Rules for Services in the 2.3 GHz Band and To Include Licensing of Services in the 47 GHz Band, WT Docket No. 98136, Memorandum Opinion and Order on  nZ'Reconsideration and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 13 FCC Rcd 16947, 1697172 (para. 60) (1998) (47 GHz  nZ'Notice). the allocation proceeding for the 746806 MHz band began before enactment of Section 303(y) and neither the  eH4Reallocation Report and Order nor the Reallocation Reconsideration explicitly addressed Section 303(y). In accord with past Commission practice, inclusion of specific services in the Table of Allocations does not necessarily entail that service rules will be drafted to accommodate each such service, or that even flexible service rules will enable provision of the full range of allocated services. Indeed, we believe that considering the domestic Section 303(y)(2) factors as part of our development of service and operational rules effectively furthers the legislative purpose, because it enables us to assess the statutory factors on a record that reflects the  e 4characteristics of particular spectrum bands more specifically. @ P nZ#'ԍ The allocation of spectrum bands to a specific service is a separate action from the development of service  nZp$'rules that prescribe and authorize provision of that service. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.038.6 GHz and 38.640.0 GHz Bands, ET Docket No. 95183, Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications ActCompetitive Bidding, 37.038.6 GHz and 38.640.0 GHz, PP Docket No. 93"& +&& &"ԫ nZ'253, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 1861516 (para. 26) (39  nZX'GHz Report and Order). There, the Section 303(y) requirements respecting flexible use allocations are explicitly considered, and service rules that would effectuate the mobile service allocation and provide for such operations are deferred until provisions for interference protection have been determined. The Commission also recognized in its initial adoption of service rules for the 2.3 GHz band under Part 27 that outofband emission limits might, at least for the foreseeable future, make mobile operations in the affected spectrum technologically infeasible. Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Part 27, the Wireless Communications Service  nZ'( WCS), GN Docket No. 96228, 12 FCC Rcd 10785, 10855 (para. 138) (1997) (Part 27 Report and Order). This is especially significant"  +&&ZZA " when, as here, we consider including broadcast services in the potential mix of wireless services. Therefore, we undertake a Section 303(y)(2) analysis in this Notice.  e4 12. We tentatively find that making the spectrum available for flexible commercial use under our Part 27 Rules is in the public interest because it will contribute to technological and service innovation, the creation of new jobs for the American workforce, the fostering of national economic growth, and the enhancement of opportunities for all Americans to utilize, and realize the benefits of, the national telecommunications infrastructure. We seek comment on this tentative finding.  e 4 13. Section 303(y)(2)(B) of the Act, by requiring that such use not deter investment in communications services and systems, or technology development, addresses the possibility that too broad an approach to flexibility in spectrum use may have the undesired effect of deterring those investments needed to provide communications services and encourage new technologies on the newly allocated spectrum. We solicit comments from interested parties concerning what restrictions, if any, should be placed on licensee flexibility in order to ensure that the needed investments are made. Where commenters suggest that we restrict how spectrum may be used by a licensee, we are particularly interested in detailed quantitative analyses of the anticipated economic tradeoffs between flexibility and investment that led to the proposed constraints.  e44 14. The potential sharing of this spectrum between Broadcast service licensees and Fixed and Mobile wireless licensees further complicates these issues. We seek comment generally on the extent to which such sharing might affect investment in new technologies or more generally affect the development of nonbroadcast services in these bands, and how those effects would affect the public. We also seek comment on ways to ensure that the technical rules for the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands satisfy the requirement of Section 303(y)(2)(C), that flexible use allocations not result in harmful interference among users.  e|415. 303REF2  Finally, we seek comment on the extent to which, consistent with the statute, the spectrum here can and should be available for private mobile and private fixed radio services.  eN4For example, we note that the Balanced Budget Notice seeks comment on whether a new class of licensee called a "Band Manager" should be established to implement licensing of private land"7  +&&ZZ"  e4mobile services through competitive bidding. nZy'ԍBBA Implementation of Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended, WT Docket No. 9987, Promotion of Spectrum Efficient Technologies on Certain Part 90 Frequencies, RM9332, Establishment of Public Service Radio Pool in the Private Mobile Frequencies Below 800 MHz, Notice of  nZ'Proposed Rule Making, FCC 9952, paras. 8895, released Mar. 25, 1999 (Balanced Budget Notice), 1999 WL 163011. We also note that the Land Mobile Communications Council (LMCC) has submitted supplemental comments to its pending petition for rule making (RM9267), asking the Commission to allocate a portion of the 746764 and  e4776794 MHz spectrum bands for private mobile radio services._x nZ 'ԍ LMCC Supplemental Comments in RM9267, April 20, 1999._ Commenters in this proceeding who are interested in bidding on these bands in order to provide private mobile or private fixed services, functioning as a Band Manager or through some other mechanism, should  ev4address the range of issues raised by the Balanced Budget Notice in this regard.  eH416. We seek to develop service rules that are not based on a Commission prediction of how these bands will ultimately be used, but instead reflect a record that enables us to establish maximum practicable flexibility. We will determine whether implementing the full range of allocated services is practicable on the basis of the record developed with regard to both  e 4technical rules, including, e.g., the size of spectrum blocks, geographical licensing basis, and interference limits, and the application of policies and rules that are governed by the classification of the service in legal and administrative terms.  e 4  e'X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<(  nZ"'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  27.15.> provides that licensees may apply to partition their licensed geographic service areas or disaggregate their licensed spectrum at any  e4time following the grant of their licenses.r=  nZ%'ԍ Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 1083639 (paras. 96103). r The Commission has decided to permit geographic"H = +&&ZZ" partitioning of any service area defined by the partitioner and partitionee, to permit spectrum disaggregation without restriction on the amount of spectrum to be disaggregated, and to permit  e4combined partitioning and disaggregation.> nZK'ԍ Id. at 1083637, 10839 (paras. 9799, 102), (citing Partitioning and Disaggregation Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 2184748 (paras. 2324)). We request comment on our proposal that licensees in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands be eligible to the same extent to partition service areas and disaggregate spectrum.  ev4%38. Pursuant to Section 27.15, the partitioning licensee must include with its request a description of the partitioned service area and a calculation of the population of the partitioned  eH4service area and the licensed geographic service area.K?H  nZ 'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  27.15(b)(1).K Section 27.15 also contains provisions  e14against unjust enrichment.t@1 nZ'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  27.15(c)(1)(2); see also 47 C.F.R.  1.2111.t We propose to adopt these provisions, as well as the remaining provisions governing partitioning and disaggregation in Section 27.15, for licensees in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands.  e 4&39. We also propose to adopt the methods that the Commission adopted in the Part 27  e 4Report and Order for parties to partitioning, disaggregation, or combined partitioning and  e 4disaggregation agreements to meet construction buildout requirements.AX @ nZ'ԍ Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10836 (para. 96) ( We also conclude that the specific rules  nZ`'pertaining to partitioning and disaggregation in WT Docket No. 96148 shall apply to WCS licensees.); see also  nZ('Partitioning and Disaggregation Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 21857, 21865 (paras. 42, 6263). Specifically, we propose to allow parties to partitioning agreements to choose between two options for satisfying the construction requirements. Under the first option, the partitioner and partitionee would each certify that it will independently satisfy the substantial service requirement for its respective partitioned area. If a licensee fails to meet its substantial service requirement during the relevant license term, the nonperforming licensee's authorization would be subject to cancellation at the end of the license term. Under the second option, the partitioner certifies that it has met or will meet the substantial service requirement for the entire market. If the partitioner fails to meet the substantial service standard during the relevant license term, however, only its license would be subject to cancellation at the end of the license term. The partitionee's license would not be affected by that failure.  e4'40. Our proposal to offer two options to partitioning parties is based on our belief that Part 27 licensees may be motivated to enter into partitioning arrangements for different reasons and under various circumstances. For example, a Part 27 licensee might be motivated to partition its license in order to reduce its construction costs. In that case, the original licensee would have less population to cover in order to meet its substantial service requirement. Thus, it"7` A +&&ZZ_" may find the first option most attractive for its purposes. Under another scenario, a Part 27 licensee that has met or is close to meeting its substantial service requirement may be approached by another entity interested in serving a niche market in a portion of the service area. Under these circumstances, the second option may seem most attractive to the parties.  e4(41.  95AB  Finally, we propose to allow parties to disaggregation agreements to choose between two options for satisfying the construction requirements. Under the first option, the disaggregator and disaggregatee would certify that they each will share responsibility for meeting the substantial service requirement for the geographic service area. If parties choose this option, both parties' performance will be evaluated at the end of the relevant license term and both licenses could be subject to cancellation. The second option would allow the parties to agree that either the disaggregator or the disaggregatee would be responsible for meeting the substantial service requirement for the geographic service area. If parties choose this option, and the party responsible for meeting the construction requirement fails to do so, only the license of the nonperforming party would be subject to cancellation.  e'X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:X_ nZ 'ԍ 47 U.S.C.  160. > Under this authority, the  eH4Commission has required the complete detariffingkYH nZ'ԍ Complete detariffing refers to a policy of neither requiring nor permitting nondominant interexchange carriers to file tariffs pursuant to Section 203 of the Communications Act for their interstate, domestic,  nZ)'interexchange services. See, e.g., Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace, Implementation of Section 245(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket No. 9661,  nZ'Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 15014, 15016 (para. 2 n.5) (Detariffing Reconsideration Order).k of interstate, interexchange services offered  e14by nondominant interexchange carriers.Z 1P nZ2'ԍ Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace, Implementation of Section 245(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket No. 9661, Second Report and Order, 11 FCC  nZ'Rcd 20730 (1996) (Detariffing Second Report and Order). Following a stay of the Detariffing Second Report  nZ 'and Order by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and upon the petitions of a number of parties who claimed that the public disclosure requirement contained in that Order would lead to some of the same ills that prompted the Commission to order complete detariffing, the Commission eliminated the public  nZ"'disclosure requirement. Detariffing Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,04754 (paras. 5973). Acting on petitions for reconsideration of that Order, the Commission subsequently concluded that consumers should have ready access to information concerning the rates, terms, and conditions governing the provision of interstate, interexchange services offered by nondominant carriers. The Commission therefore reinstated the public  nZ&'disclosure requirement that was originally established in the Detariffing Second Report and Order, and also"&Y +&&%" required carriers that have Internet Websites to post this information online. Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace, Implementation of Section 245(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, As  nZ 'Amended, CC Docket No. 9661, Second Order on Reconsideration and Erratum, FCC 9947, released March 31,  nZ'1999 (Detariffing Second Reconsideration Order), 1999 WL 176557. In addition, as part of the Commission's biennial"1Z +&&ZZ"  e4review of regulations, pursuant to Section 11 of the Act,<[ nZa'ԍ 47 U.S.C.  161.< the Commission has eliminated Part 41 requirements as they apply to franks for interstate and international services as issued by common carriers regulated by the Act to common carriers regulated by Act, as well as to common carriers not regulated by the Act; and also as they apply to any franks for interstate and international services as may be issued by wireless common carriers regulated by the Act to  e4common carriers not regulated by the Act and to others.\@ nZ~ 'ԍ 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review " Elimination of Part 41 Telegraph and Telephone Franks, CC Docket No. 98-119, Report and Order, FCC 98-344, released Feb. 3, 1999, 1999 WL 46911. These forbearance actions will apply to common carriers operating under Part 27. The Commission has also eliminated prior approval  e_4requirements for most pro forma transfer applications involving telecommunications carriers.V]H _ nZ'ԍ Federal Communications Bar Association's Petition for Forbearance from Section 310(d) of the Communications Act Regarding NonSubstantial Assignments of Licenses and Transfers of Control Involving Telecommunications Carriers Licensed by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Memorandum Opinion and  nZ'Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6293 (1998). See also Biennial Regulatory Review Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, WT Docket No. 9820, Report and  nZX'Order, FCC 98234, released Oct. 21, 1998, 1998 WL 735878. But see Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the Commission's Rules To Redesignate the 27.529.5 GHz Frequency Band, To Reallocate the 29.530.0 GHz Frequency Band, To Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, CC Docket No. 92297, Petitions for Further Reconsideration of the Denial of Application for Waiver of the Commission's Common Carrier PointtoPoint Microwave Radio Service Rules, Fourth Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11655, 1166971 (paras. 2729) (1998) (Partition and disaggregation  nZ'agreements subject to formal assignment process). See also 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review Streamlining of Mass Media Applications, Rules, and Processes, MM Docket No. 9843, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 13 FCC Rcd 11349, 1137679 (paras. 7282) (1998) (Section 310(d), 47 U.S.C.  310(d), requires prior Commission approval of transfer or assignment in any manner; revisions to rules governing common carrier transfers and assignments distinguished as based on statutory forbearance authority.)V In  eH4the 47 GHz Notice, which proposed service rules for spectrum bands allocated to both fixed and mobile services, though not broadcast services, we sought comment on whether the exercise of  e 4forbearance authority in the CMRS Second Report and Order, under Section 332(c)(1)(A) of the  e 4Act, should be extended to fixed service carriers.^  nZ\"'ԍ The statutory sections affected by that Order are 47 U.S.C.  203, 204, 205, 211, 212 and 214.  e 4150. We similarly seek comment in this context on whether we should exercise our authority under Section 10 of the Act to forbear from applying to nonCMRS licensees of this spectrum the specific Title II requirements that the Commission previously has determined not to" 8^ +&&ZZ " apply to CMRS licensees. Specifically, we seek comment on application of each of the three conditions specified by Section 10 of the Act in the context of services in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands. Under the first two parts of the test, we request in particular comment on the definition of consumer, what information we should consider when performing these evaluations, and examples of applying these tests in evaluating whether forbearance is appropriate. With respect to the third condition, we seek comment on the appropriate market that would apply to fixed, common carrier licensees in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands. We note that we have not forborne from regulation of fixed wireless services in service rule  eH4proceedings for the 24, 28, and 39 GHz bands._H nZ 'ԍ See, e.g., Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Redesignate the 27.5 29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5 30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Services and for Fixed Satellite Services, CC Docket No. 92297, and Suite 12 Group Petition for Pioneer's Preference, PP22, Third Notice of Rulemaking and Supplemental Tentative  nZ 'Decision, 11 FCC Rcd 53, 6566 (para.109) (1995) (LMDS Third Notice); 39 GHz Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18636 (para. 76) (Common carriage permitted without discussion of forbearance). We therefore also ask commenters to address how, if at all, that should affect our forbearance decisions in this proceeding. For instance, should such determinations more appropriately be made, or necessarily be made, in service rule proceedings for individual bands, or should the Commission develop standards for determining the weight to be accorded (1) the circumstances of specific services and (2) the broader considerations of regulatory consistency?  e 4251. In light of the fact that it may take longer for the Commission to conduct a forbearance analysis than to adopt service rules for the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands, we propose during the interim: (1) to adopt a discontinuance provision that is consistent with common carrier obligations set forth in Subpart E of Part 1 and in Part 61 through Part 64 of the  eK4Commission's Rules;X`K@ nZ<'ԍ 47 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart E, Parts 6164.X and (2) to apply other parts of the Commission's Rules to ensure compliance of fixed common carriers with Title II of the Communications Act.  e4352. Section 214(a) of the Communications Act@a nZ'ԍ 47 U.S.C.  214(a).@ requires that no common carrier may discontinue, reduce, or impair service without Commission approval. We propose that if a fixed, common carrier Part 27 licensee voluntarily discontinues, reduces, or impairs service to a community or part of a community, it must obtain prior authorization as provided under Section  e463.71 of the Commission's Rules,?b`  nZ"'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  63.71.? but an application would be granted within 30 days after filing if no objections were received. We propose that if a noncommon carrier Part 27 licensee voluntarily discontinues, reduces, or impairs service to a community or part of a community, it"| b +&&ZZ"  e4must give written notice to the Commission within seven days. c nZy'ԍ This is consistent with the modification of Section 101.305(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.   nZA'101.305(c), adopted for LMDS. LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12655 (para. 254).  We also propose, however, that neither a fixed, common carrier, nor noncommon carrier Part 27 licensee need surrender its license for cancellation if discontinuance is a result of a change in status from common carrier to  e4noncommon carrier or the reverse.td  nZ'ԍ See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12655 (para. 255). t  e4453. We further propose that if the service provided by a fixed common carrier Part 27 licensee is involuntarily discontinued, reduced, or impaired for a period exceeding 48 hours, the licensee must promptly notify the Commission, in writing, as to the reasons for the discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service, including a statement indicating when  e14normal service is to be resumed.{e1 nZ'ԍ See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 1265455 (paras. 252255). { We propose that when normal service is resumed, the licensee must promptly notify the Commission. We seek comment on these proposals.  e 4554. Section 312(g) of the Communications Act provides that the license of any broadcasting station that fails to transmit broadcast signals for any consecutive 12month period  e 4expires as a matter of law at the end of that period.if @ nZ'ԍ Section 312(g) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.  312(g).i In addition, Section 73.1750 of the Commission's Rules states that a licensee of a broadcast station shall notify the Commission of  e4permanent discontinuance of operation at least two days before operation is discontinued.@g nZ'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  73.1750.@ We ask whether any considerations may suggest that we should adopt different provisions for broadcast services provided over this spectrum under Part 27. For example, how should we should treat a prolonged discontinuance of broadcast service licensed under Part 27 that would require termination of the license under Section 312(g), when a counterpart wireless service licensee, or an overall licensee who has chosen to use a portion of its spectrum block for broadcasting, would still have several years in which to demonstrate performance?  e' P110PW X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:63. We also seek comment regarding whether to permit licensees in adjacent service areas to coordinate their operations and agree to an alternative field strength along their shared border. We are aware that through coordination many steps can be taken to limit or prevent interference, such as use of robust technologies, partitioning the use of frequencies, taking advantage of terrain shielding and other propagation effects, and use of directional antennas. We invite comment on this approach to control of interference in the context of the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands, both generally and if used in conjunction with power flux density or field strength standards. If commenters suggest that power flux densities or field strength standards should be established as interference limits, in conjunction with a coordination process, we ask that they propose specific values for such limits. Commenters should also address any special sharing considerations that might be appropriate in an environment where disparate services might be using the same spectrum in adjacent service areas.  e4?64. Regarding whether a general coordination approach should be used, comments are invited on specific aspects of procedures, such as those contained in Section 101.103 of the  e 4Commission's Rules,@r X nZ$'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  101.103.@ that should apply. While we suggest that Section 101.103 can serve as a useful framework for coordination in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands, our objective is"!r +&&ZZ? " to ensure that licensees receive protection from harmful interference with the minimum regulation necessary. If we adopt a general coordination approach, we tentatively conclude that the coordination concepts of Section 101.103 generally should be applied to licensees in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands and should be incorporated into Part 27 of the Rules for these bands. We seek comment on the best way to effect this incorporation, including comment on which provisions of Section 101.103 may be appropriate for incorporation into Part 27. We also note that for 28 GHz LMDS and 39GHz licensees, the need for coordination is triggered based  e_4on the station's distance from the licensee's service area boundary.#s_ nZ'ԍ LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 1266164 (paras. 273281); 39 GHz Report and Order,  nZ '12 FCC Rcd at 1863233 (paras. 6669).  See Section 101.103 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  101.103.# For purposes of our considering a coordination approach for the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands, we seek comment on what the appropriate distance should be to trigger this coordination, and whether there should be any other criteria, in addition to distance to the service area boundary, that would trigger a need to coordinate.  e 4@65. We seek comment on what, if any, limits for equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP) are necessary or appropriate under either a coordination or field strength limit approach. We observe that transmitters used in the private land mobile service, cellular radio service, and fixed microwave services typically employ substantially different output powers. The substantial differences between these services, however, are minor in comparison to the output powers of full power broadcast services. Accordingly, if commenters believe that power limits are necessary, we invite comments as to what those limits should be and the basis for the suggested limits. We also solicit views as to whether we should establish limits on output power for all transmitters, or just mobile equipment.  e4 P128EM A66. Finally, Section 27.64 of the Commission's Rules>t  nZ'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  27.64.> states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be noninterfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by Part 27 licensees on these bands, including broadcasting, we solicit comment on whether we should apply this rule  ee4for this spectrum. We also seek comment regarding whether interference protection can be guaranteed and whether Section 27.64 of our Rules, if retained, should be changed to direct adjacent service area licensees to cooperate to eliminate or ameliorate interference. This alternative would require each licensee ultimately to assume responsibility for protecting its own receiving system from interference from transmitters in adjoining areas that meet our standards. We also seek comment on whether we should apply any changes with respect to Section 27.64 to the 2.3 GHz band. " t +&&ZZb"Ԍ e'X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:z  nZ'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  27.52.> subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental  e 4evaluation must be performed.{ x nZ'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  1.1307(b), 2.1091, 2.1093. The RF radiation exposure limits are set forth in 47 C.F.R.  1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093, as modified in Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, ET Docket No. 9362, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15123 (1996); First Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 17512 (1997); Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC  nZ'Rcd 13494 (1997) (RF Guidelines Second Reconsideration Order). In adopting the rule, the Commission concluded that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure are required by applicants desiring to use the following types of transmitters: (1) fixed operations, including base stations and radiolocation transmitters, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is greater than 1,000 watts; (2) all portable devices; and (3) mobile devices, if the ERP of the station, in its normal configuration, will be 1.5  e44watts or greater.| 4(  nZ 'ԍ Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10861 (para. 154 n.344), noting that 1,000 watts ERP equates  nZ'to 1,640 watts EIRP. In the RF Guidelines Second Reconsideration Order, the Commission increased the  nZ'exclusion threshold for mobile devices operating above 1.5 GHz from 1.5 watts to 3 watts ERP. RF Guidelines  nZe 'Second Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 13514 (para. 51). N463V   e4F71. With regard to RF safety requirements, we propose to treat services and devices in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands in a comparable manner to other services and devices that have similar operating characteristics. We tentatively conclude that the requirements in Section 27.52 that the Commission adopted for licensees in the 2.3 GHz band will apply to the same extent to licensees in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands. As the Commission has""| +&&ZZO" previously stated, the Commission is providing guidance on acceptable methods of evaluating compliance with the Commission's exposure limits in OET Bulletin No. 65, which has replaced  e4OST Bulletin No. 65.m}  nZK'ԍ Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10862 (para. 154 n.346). OET Bulletin No. 65 (Edition 9701) was issued on August 25, 1997. It is available for downloading at the FCC Web Site: www.fcc.gov/ oet/rfsafety. Copies of OET Bulletin No. 65 also may be obtained by calling the FCC RF Safety Line at (202) 4182464.m  e4G72. The Commission adopted the 1,000 watts ERP threshold for 2.3 GHz to recognize the flexibility with respect to use, power, location, and other factors that was accorded licensees operating in that band, and determined that this power limit was appropriate to ensure  e_4compliance with the Commission's RF exposure standards for most situations.~ _ nZ 'ԍ Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10862 (para. 154 n.345), noting that, in a pending petition for  nZ 'reconsideration of the RF Guidelines Report and Order, the Commission was considering whether to revise the threshold for requiring routine evaluation of mobile devices above 1.5 GHz from 1.5 watts to 3 watts. This  nZ'change was made in the RF Guidelines Second Reconsideration Order. Moreover, the Commission found the 1,000 watts ERP threshold consistent with its existing rules for transmitters and devices of comparable use and similar operating frequencies. For the same reasons, we propose to adopt the 1,000 watts ERP threshold for operations in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands. Consistent with the modifications the Commission adopted for the 2.3 GHz band, we also propose to modify Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the  e 4Commission's RulesV  nZ'ԍ 47 C.F.R.  1.1307(b), 2.1091, 2.1093.V to include services and devices applicable to the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands. We invite comment on our proposals and any alternatives. "#(  +&&ZZE"  e4 4.` ` Special Considerations for Use of Channels 65, 66 and 67  e4H73. In the Public Safety Spectrum Second Notice on the use of channels 63, 64, 68, & 69  e4by Public Safety  nZ4'ԍ See Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements For Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Agency Communications Requirements Through the Year 2010; Establishment of Rules and Requirements of Priority Access Service, WT Docket No. 9686, Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 12  nZ'FCC Rcd 17706 (1997) (Public Safety Spectrum Second Notice). we sought comment on the potential for interference to GLONASSEX nZ 'ԍ GLONASS is the Russian Federation Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System which will use the 15981605 MHz portion of the RadionavigationSatellite Service (spacetoEarth) allocation at 15591610 MHz, when the GLONASS system reaches its final frequency configuration after 2005.E and  e4GPS  nZ% 'ԍ GPS (Global Positioning System) is also in operation, and it will be the United States component of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). GPS utilizes the lower portion of the RadionavigationSatellite Service (spacetoEarth) allocation from 15591610 MHz on a primary basis, and is maintained by the United States Department of Defense. satellites from public safety systems operating in the 794806 MHz band (TV channels  e46869).u  nZ'ԍ See Public Safety Spectrum Second Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 1777817779. u Specifically, we sought comment on the effects of second harmonic transmissionsH  nZ'ԍ Radio transmitters produce energy not only on the desired frequency (such as 794 MHz) but also lesser amounts of energy on multiples of the desired frequency, known as harmonics. In this example, the second harmonic (twice the desired frequency) would be 1588 MHz. Although most of the power generated is on the desired frequency, very sensitive receivers can detect the smaller amounts of power generated on the harmonic frequencies.  to GPS and GLONASS receivers from public safety systems operating in this newly allocated band. The second harmonic transmissions of commercial services operating on TV channels 6567 also fall within the bandwidth identified by NTIA as being used by the GPS (1563.421587.42  e14MHz).1 nZ'ԍ See letter from William T. Hatch, Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, NTIA, to Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, FCC, May 11, 1999. Therefore, the use of the band 776794 MHz by commercial services raises many of these same concerns. NTIA recommends that stringent standards be adopted to ensure that equipment that operates in these bands does not cause radio frequency interference to the Global  e 4Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) P nZ 'ԍ GNSS as currently envisioned will consist of the GPS and GLONASS systems that provide radionavigation satellite services worldwide. when used for precision approach and landing. We recognize that this issue will be of critical importance to both navigation and commercial interests and therefore we desire to obtain as complete a record as possible before making a decision. We believe that additional information is needed before we arrive at a final decision with respect to this matter. Therefore, we seek comment on the impact of imposing the outof"$ +&&ZZ"ԫband emission limits recommended by NTIA on the design of commercial equipment for use in the 776794 MHz band.  e4I74. Specifically, in its May 11, 1999 letterX nZ4'ԍ NTIA's submission is exempt from the ex parte rules otherwise applicable to submissions received after Commission issuance of a Sunshine Agenda. See Section 1.1204(a)(5) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.1204(a)(5). NTIA notes that the protection of spectrum used to support the GNSS is consistent with the U.S. commitment to the continuous availability of GPS announced in the Presidential Decision Directive of March 29, 1996, and enacted by  ev4Congress in the Defense Authorization Act of 1998.v nZ 'ԍ National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Pub. L. 10585, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1629). NTIA also notes that Congress further directed the Administration to protect the integrity of the Global Positioning System frequency spectrum against interference and disruption in the Defense FY99 Appropriations Conference  e14Report,^1@ nZ"'ԍ H.R. Conf. Rep. 105746, 105th Cong., 2d Sess. 1998. ^ and in the Commercial Space Act of 1998.x1 nZ'ԍ Commercial Space Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105303, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2843).x  e 4J75. To protect these systems NTIA specifically advocates that outofband emissions be limited to 70 dBW/MHz equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) for wideband emissions  e 4and 80 dBW/700 Hz for narrowband emissionsX `  nZ'ԍ For purposes of NTIA's analysis, wideband interference was considered to have a bandwidth in the range of 100 kHz to 1 MHz; narrowband interference was considered to have a bandwidth less than or equal to 700 Hz., and that these limits be applied to all spurious emissions, including second harmonics in the 15591610 MHz range. These limits are based on international recommendations by RTCA and ETSI for mobile earth terminals in the Mobile  e4Satellite Service (MSS).  nZ'ԍ See RTCA Inc. Special Committee 159, Assessment of Radio Frequency Interference Relevant to the GNSS, Document No, RTCA/DO235, January 27, 1997. The RTCA report contained two appendices ! one was endorsed by the aviation community and the other by the MSS community. The MSS community arrived at a  nZ'value that was less stringent (i.e., 54 dBW/MHz) than that arrived at by the aviation community with respect to  nZ'protection of GLONASS. See also, European Testing and Standards Institute (ETSI) standards TBR041 and TBR042 for Mobile Earth Terminals in the 1.6/2.4 GHz and 2.0 GHz range, respectively. Additionally, we note that potential full power broadcast use of this spectrum could pose additional difficulties for the GNSS system. Because conventional full power broadcast stations would operate at powers several orders of magnitude larger than those used by commercial fixed and mobile stations, additional attenuation of outofband emissions may be required to protect the GNSS systems. NTIA has recommended, in this case, that an emission limit of 110 dB below the average transmitter power should be included as the"% +&&ZZ" proposed unwanted emission limit, including harmonics, for DTV transmitters operating in the 746764 MHz and 776794 MHz bands. NTIA notes that the current DTV mask requires that emissions, including harmonics that are more than 6 MHz from the channel edge, must be attenuated by this amount. It believes that this value is consistent with the current harmonic suppression levels that can be achieved by television transmitters and will protect GNSS precision approach landing operations.  e_4K76. The Commission is committed to ensuring that the GNSS is protected adequately against interference. We note that the standard recommended by NTIA is necessary only to protect the GNSS band at 15591605 MHz. Based on the information before us at this time, we  e 4tentatively propose to adopt the NTIA recommended emissions limits,  nZ 'ԍ We propose, however, to adopt an absolute limit of 80 dBW on the e.i.r.p. of discrete emissions of less  nZ[ 'than 700 Hz bandwidth, rather than a limit on narrowband spectral power density. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 to Implement the Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite (GMPCS) Memorandum of Understanding and Arrangements; Petition of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to Amend Part 25 of the Commission's Rules to Establish Limits for Mobile and Portable Earth Stations  nZ{'Operating in the 16101660.5 MHz Band, ____, FCC 9937, para. 78, released March 5, 1999 (GMPCS Notice).  but to apply them only to emissions that fall within the GNSS band. Outside the 15591605 MHz GNSS band, we  e 4propose that the standard addressed earlier in the section on outofband spurious emissions (i.e., 43 + 10 log P) would apply. We believe that it is imperative that all parties fully understand the need for and ramifications of the NTIA proposed standard on use of the 700 MHz band for commercial wireless services. Therefore, we request comment on the standard recommended by NTIA to protect GNSS operations. We also invite comment as to whether extenuating conditions such as low antenna height, propagation losses, body suppression of signals, and wall attenuation should be taken into account in calculating the outofband emission requirements. In addition, we are interested in obtaining a better understanding of the levels of radio energy that currently exist in the GNSS spectrum as a result of spurious emissions from other communications systems and electronic equipment. This information will enable us to determine whether stringent limits for commercial equipment are necessary and likely to be effective in accomplishing the desired objective.  e4L77. We observe that stringent outofband emissions limits are generally more difficult to meet for mobile and handheld transmitters than for base and control stations or for fixed service stations. Typical operation of mobile units in the cellular and broadband PCS services, for example, are required to suppress outofband emissions by approximately 50 dB below the  ee4transmitter carrier signal.=e@ nZV"'ԍ Cellular rules require that outofband emissions must be attenuated below the mean power of the unmodulated carrier (P) on any frequency twice, or more than twice, the fundamental frequency by 43 + 10 log (P) dB. Broadband PCS emissions must be attenuated by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency outside  nZ$'the licensee's frequency block. This gives a value of 47.8 dB attenuation for 3 watt mobiles. See Sections 22.917 and 24.238 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  22.917 and 24.238. = The standard recommended by NTIA would require approximately"e&  +&&ZZ0" 8590 dB suppression for typical fullpower mobile equipment and approximately 7580 dB for  e4handhelds and portables. nZb'ԍ For the purposes of the GLONASS standard, we have assumed the narrowband limit of 80 dBW as sufficient for commercial services bandwidths of up to 150 kHz. We are very much concerned about whether the proposed emissions standard would severely curtail the availability of the 36 megahertz of spectrum designated by Congress for commercial use. Specifically, we request factual data and technical information as to the impact this proposal may have on the use of the 700 MHz band for commercial wireless services. We also seek information on how the proposal may affect the equipment cost, size, weight and battery life of handheld or portable equipment. We are aware that Global Mobile Personal Communications via Satellite (GMPCS) terminals have been proposed to meet the same  eH4standard we have proposed herein. XH  nZ 'ԍ See GMPCS Notice. Section 25.213 (b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  25.213 (b), requires that MSS equipment operating in 16101626.5 MHz meet essentially these levels within the band 1574.397 1576.443 MHz.  We invite comment as to whether it is feasible for commercial fixed and mobile equipment to meet the same standards as these commercial mobile satellite systems. We solicit suggestions as to any and all alternative approaches or measures that the Commission can take to alleviate the impact of the proposed standard. For example, we invite comment as to whether there may be a way to restrict mobile use near airports. We also seek comment on whether a transition plan to more stringent levels would be appropriate to protect the future GNSS.  e4M78. In summary, we request comment on the risk of harmonic interference to GPSassisted landings from systems licensed under the rules proposed in this Notice, and whether the emissions limits noted above that have been recommended by NTIA would provide the necessary protection for GNSS systems from anticipated commercial fixed and mobile operations in these bands. We also request specific comment on how to address potential full power broadcast use of this spectrum, and whether the limits proposed by NTIA would be a serious burden on the use  e4of this spectrum for full power broadcasting.X@ nZ'ԍ In this regard, we note that the Commission also has before it a waiver request filed March 3, 1999 by Harris Corporation, seeking relaxation of the 110 dB attenuation requirement in adjacent bands while continuing to protect the GPS bands.  e'X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and a reference to WT Docket No. 99168. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet EMail. To obtain filing instructions for EMail comments, commenters should send an email to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, get form .  e 4i106. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of comments and reply comments are available through the Commission's duplicating contractor: International Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.  e4'X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8: