Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Applicatio n of) ) ITT-Dow Jones Television ) (Assignor) ) ) and ) File No. BALCT-970519IB ) Paxson Communications of ) New York-31, Inc. ) (Assignee) ) ) For Assignment of License of ) Station WPXN-TV, New York, New York ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 3, 1998 Released: March 4, 1998 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: 1. The Commission, by the Chief, Mass Media Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, has before it for consideration the above-captioned application seeking consent to assign the license of WPXN-TV, Channel 31 (Ind.), New York, New York from ITT-Dow Jones Television to Paxson Communications of New York-31, Inc. (Paxson-New York), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Paxson Communications Corporation (PCC). PCC also controls Paxson Philadelphia License, Inc., the licensee of WPPX(TV), Channel 61 (Ind.), Wilmington, Delaware. Because the Grade B contours of WPXN-TV, New York and WPPX(TV), Wilmington overlap, Paxson-New York requests a permanent waiver of the Commission's duopoly rule, Section 73.3555(b), to allow common ownership of the two stations. In the alternative, Paxson-New York seeks a conditional waiver of the duopoly rule, subject to the outcome of the pending broadcast television ownership rulemaking concerning the duopoly and other multiple ownership rules. See Review of the Commission's Regulations Governing Television Broadcasting, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 11 FCC Rcd 21655 (1996) (Television Ownership Second Further Notice). PCC additionally currently controls Paxson New York License, Inc., the licensee of WIPX(TV), Channel 43 (Ind.), Bridgeport, Connecticut, whose Grade B contour overlaps the Grade B contour of WPXN-TV. To permit common ownership of WIPX(TV), Bridgeport and WPXN-TV, New York, Paxson-New York requests a temporary six-month waiver of the duopoly rule pending divestiture of WIPX(TV). Duopoly Rule Standard 2. The television duopoly rule, 47 C.F.R.  73.3555(b), generally prohibits the common ownership of television stations whose Grade B contours overlap. The objective of the duopoly rule is to promote diversity in programming sources and viewpoints and to prevent an undue concentration of economic power by fostering economic competition in broadcasting. Multiple Ownership Rules, 22 FCC 2d 306, 307 (1970), recon. granted in part, 28 FCC 2d 662 (1971). In adopting the duopoly rule's fixed standard of a prohibited overlap of Grade B service contours, the Commission expressly acknowledged the need for "flexibility" in that rule's application, noting that waivers should be granted where rigid conformance to the rule would be "inappropriate." Multiple Ownership of Standard, FM and Television Broadcast Stations, 45 FCC 1476, 1479 n.12, recon. granted in part, 3 RR 2d 1554 (1964). The Commission has accordingly developed a set of factors to be considered when evaluating an applicant's request for waivers of the duopoly rule, including the extent of the overlap, the number of media voices available in the overlap area, the distinctiveness of the respective markets, the independence of the stations' operations, and the concentration of economic power resulting from the combination. Assessment of a temporary waiver request relies on the same factors considered for a permanent waiver, but the factors may be accorded different weight and may be analyzed differently due to the limited duration of the proposed combination. After weighing these various factors, the Commission considers whether the public interest benefits that would be gained from waiving the duopoly rule outweigh any detrimental effects that would result from the overlap. As with any waiver, it will only be granted if the Commission concludes that the waiver is in the public interest. 3. We are currently reexamining our broadcast television ownership policies, including the duopoly rule. In January 1995, the Commission proposed a new analytical framework within which to evaluate our broadcast television ownership rules. See Review of the Commission's Regulations Governing Television Broadcasting, Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10 FCC Rcd 3524 (1995) (Television Ownership Further Notice). Subsequent to the release of that Television Ownership Further Notice, Congress directed the Commission to conduct a rulemaking proceeding to determine whether to retain, modify or eliminate existing limitations on the number of television stations that an entity may control within the same television market. See Section 202(c) of Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (Feb. 8, 1996) (Telecomm Act). In response to this Congressional directive in the Telecomm Act and to update the record, the Commission released the Television Ownership Second Further Notice. In that Second Further Notice, the Commission tentatively concluded to authorize common ownership of television stations that are in separate Designated Market Areas (DMAs) and whose Grade A contours do not overlap. 11 FCC Rcd at 21681. 4. The Commission stated in the Television Ownership Second Further Notice that it would be inclined, during the pendency of the television ownership proceeding, to grant temporary duopoly waivers involving stations in different DMAs with no overlapping Grade A signal contours, conditioned on coming into compliance with the outcome of the proceeding within six months of its conclusion. It also noted there its tentative conclusion in the Television Ownership Second Further Notice that the record in that proceeding "supports relaxation of the geographic scope of the duopoly rule from its current Grade B overlap standard to a standard based on DMAs supplemented with a Grade A overlap criterion." Id. The Commission further stated that "we do not believe granting waivers satisfying the proposed standard, and conditioning them on the outcome of this proceeding, will adversely affect our competition and diversity goals in the interim." Id. Additionally, the Commission gave the staff delegated authority to act on applications seeking waivers consistent with this interim policy. With regard to waiver requests not falling in this category (i.e., those involving stations in the same DMA or with overlapping Grade A signal contours), the Commission stated it would be disinclined to grant them during the pendency of the television ownership proceeding absent extraordinary circumstances. Id. New York City/Wilmington Conditional Waiver 5. Waiver Showing. Paxson-New York contends that the Commission should grant a permanent waiver of the duopoly rule (or, in the alternative, a conditional waiver subject to the outcome of the Television Ownership Second Further Notice), because common ownership of WPXN-TV, Channel 31, New York and WPPX(TV), Channel 61, Wilmington will not adversely affect diversity or competition in the "minimal" area of Grade B overlap between the two stations. The predicted Grade B overlap between WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) encompasses 68.4 square kilometers, representing 0.3% and 0.36% of the land area within the WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) Grade B contours, respectively, and 130,005 persons, representing 0.76% and 2.2% of the populations within the Grade B contours of WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV), respectively. An application is, however, pending before the Commission to modify the facilities of WPXN-TV. See File No. BPCT-961205KF. Taking this proposed modification into account, the Grade B overlap between WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) would encompass 306.3 square kilometers, representing 1.2% and 1.6% of the land area within the WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) Grade B contours, respectively, and 209,972 persons, representing 1.2% and 3.5% of the populations within the Grade B contours of WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV), respectively. Paxson-New York asserts that this degree of overlap, while not de minimis, is safely within the range of Grade B overlap allowed by the Commission in previous duopoly decisions. 6. Paxson-New York emphasizes that WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) serve separate and distinct markets. WPXN-TV serves the New York City DMA, the nation's largest television market, while WPPX(TV) serves the Philadelphia DMA, the fourth largest market. The licensed sites of the stations are approximately 157 kilometers apart. Paxson-New York also notes that the Commission has recognized the "unique" nature of the New York/Philadelphia duopoly, and has consistently granted waivers so as to allow applicants to control stations in both of these important markets, even where the degree of Grade B contour overlap was considerably larger than in the instant case. 7. In addition, Paxson-New York identifies a large number of television stations and other media available to residents of the WPXN/WPPX overlap area. According to Paxson-New York, 23 full service (16 commercial and seven noncommercial) television stations other than WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) provide Grade B or better service to all or a part of the overlap area, and the entire overlap area receives a minimum of 20 other television signals. The overlap area also receives the signals of 43 radio stations (28 FM and 15 AM), and is served by several cable television systems and daily and weekly newspapers. Paxson-New York contends that this number of television stations serving the overlap area is comparable to other cases involving the New York and Philadelphia DMAs in which the Commission has approved permanent duopoly waivers. 8. Finally, Paxson-New York asserts that WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) will be operated separately, with separate staffs and different general managers. Due to the distance between the two stations and their separate management, WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) will not share sales personnel or office space, or offer joint advertising rates. 9. Discussion. Based on the Commission's ownership policy outlined in the Television Ownership Second Further Notice and the specific showing made the applicants in this case, we believe that grant of a conditional waiver of the duopoly rule, subject to the outcome of the pending ownership proceeding, is justified. The temporary common ownership of WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV) would be consistent with the interim policy set forth in the Television Ownership Second Further Notice, as the stations are in separate DMAs and there is no Grade A overlap. Moreover, our examination of the record presented here, including Paxson-New York's showings as summarized at  5-8 above, reveals nothing suggesting that we should not follow the established interim policy in this case. Accordingly, we conclude that grant of a temporary waiver, conditioned on the resolution of the pending broadcast television ownership rulemaking, will serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. Any request to extend this conditional waiver should be filed at least 45 days prior to the end of the six-month period and will be closely scrutinized. New York City/Bridgeport Temporary Waiver 10. Waiver Showing. Because the Grade A contours of WPXN-TV, Channel 31, New York, and WIPX(TV), Channel 43, Bridgeport, overlap and both stations are assigned to the New York City DMA, Paxson-New York acknowledges that its temporary waiver request is not consistent with the interim policy established in the Television Ownership Second Further Notice and must therefore be evaluated under the "extraordinary circumstances" standard set forth in that Notice. Paxson-New York contends that extraordinary circumstances do warrant the grant of its requested temporary waiver in this case. 11. As an initial matter, Paxson-New York asserts that the degree of Grade A and Grade B overlap between WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) is less extensive than that present in recent cases where the Commission has granted temporary waivers of the duopoly rule. According to Paxson-New York's engineering study, the predicted Grade A overlap between WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) encompasses 237 square kilometers, representing 2.4% and 5.3% of the land area within the WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) Grade A contours, respectively, and 127,826 persons, representing 0.9% and 7.2% of the populations within the Grade A contours of WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV), respectively. The predicted Grade B overlap between WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) covers 2,545 square kilometers, representing 15.6% and 30% of the land area within the WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) Grade B contours, respectively, and 1,091,913 persons, representing 6.5% and 34.7% of the populations within the Grade B contours of WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV), respectively. 12. Paxson-New York also identifies a large number of television stations and other media serving the New York City DMA generally and the WPXN/WIPX overlap area specifically. According to Paxson-New York's submissions, twenty-two television stations are licensed to communities within the New York City DMA. Twenty-two television stations provide a Grade B or better signal to all or a portion of both the Grade A and Grade B overlap areas, and three additional stations provide Grade B or better service to the Grade B overlap area only. Paxson-New York asserts that this number of television stations serving the relevant overlap area exceeds that in other cases involving Grade A overlap in which the Commission has approved temporary duopoly waivers. With regard to other media, Paxson-New York notes that the New York City DMA is served by 107 cable systems owned by 30 separate owners and that cable penetration in the DMA has risen to 69%. Thirty-nine daily newspapers and approximately 332 weekly newspapers are published in the New York City DMA. Moreover, within the New York television metro market alone, there are a total of 137 radio stations. According to Paxson-New York's engineering study, 34 AM stations and 50 FM stations serve the WPXN/WIPX overlap area specifically. 13. In addition, Paxson-New York asserts that WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) serve separate markets, even though both stations are assigned to the New York City DMA. While WPXN-TV serves the New York City area, WIPX(TV) is licensed to Bridgeport, Connecticut, and its transmitter is located in Seymour, Connecticut, which is located in the Hartford-New Haven DMA. As a result, Paxson-New York states that WIPX(TV) provides minimal coverage to the New York City DMA, and has also been unable to obtain cable carriage in most communities within the New York City market. Indeed, Paxson-New York estimates that WIPX(TV) is currently carried on cable systems serving only four of the 29 counties in the New York Area of Dominant Influence (ADI), and the 25 counties in which WIPX(TV) is not carried contain 89% of the ADI's television households. The two stations will moreover be operated independently during the brief period of common ownership by Paxson entities. WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) will, Paxson-New York states, have separate studios and offices, and WIPX(TV) will maintain its current studio and office space in Bridgeport. The stations will conduct their sales operations independently and will air separate programming. 14. For the reasons set forth in  12-13, Paxson-New York further contends that the level of economic competition and diversity in the New York City DMA will remain high, notwithstanding the temporary common ownership of WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV). The Commission has, according to Paxson-New York, granted temporary duopoly waivers in recent cases involving smaller and less competitive markets than the New York market at issue here. 15. Finally, Paxson-New York states that grant of the temporary waiver will serve the public interest by facilitating the launch of PAXNET, PCC's new family-oriented network that is scheduled to launch in September 1998. Following its acquisition by Paxson-New York, WPXN-TV will be the new network's flagship station in the eastern United States. Grant of a temporary waiver allowing Paxson entities to control both WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) for a brief period will, Paxson-New York asserts, help ensure the successful start of a new network that will contribute to program diversity and network competition in most major television markets. Paxson-New York contends that all of these factors, along with its firm commitment to divest WIPX(TV) in six months, constitute extraordinary circumstances warranting grant of a temporary duopoly waiver. 16. Discussion. Following our review of the record in this case, we conclude that Paxson-New York has demonstrated the requisite extraordinary circumstances justifying grant of a temporary six-month waiver. Although we stated in the Television Ownership Second Further Notice that we would, during the pendency of the television ownership proceeding, be disinclined to grant waivers inconsistent with our interim policy, we believe, based on the totality of circumstances presented here, that a brief, fixed waiver of the television duopoly rule is warranted. 17. As we have previously stated, the Commission is not constrained from granting a temporary waiver where circumstances "will not significantly frustrate the policies underlying the multiple ownership rules." Telemundo Group, Inc., Debtor in Possession, 10 FCC Rcd 1104, 1106 (1994) (quoting Family Television Corp., 59 RR 2d 1344, 1348 (1986)). Allowing Paxson entities to commonly own WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV) for a brief period will not undermine our goals of promoting diversity in programming and viewpoints and fostering economic competition, given, as described above, the large number of broadcast and other media voices serving New York, the top ranked DMA in the country. In particular, we note that the Commission has previously approved temporary duopoly waivers in cases involving a greater degree of Grade A and Grade B contour overlap and smaller and less competitive markets, so as to facilitate multiple station transactions. We also note WIPX(TV)'s limited over-the-air and cable coverage of the New York City DMA, and Paxson-New York's pledge to operate WPXN- TV and WIPX(TV) independently during the brief period of common ownership by Paxson entities. Based on these factors, we conclude that diversity and competition in the New York City DMA will not be adversely affected by a short period of common ownership of WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV). 18. Moreover, as in the case of multiple-station transactions where we have granted temporary waivers for duopolies not consistent with our interim policy, we believe that grant of the waiver requested here will "promote commerce [and] encourage investment in the broadcast industry." Stockholders of CBS Inc., 11 FCC Rcd at 3755. The record reflects PCC's plans to launch later this year a new television network, which should enhance program diversity and growth and competition in the broadcast industry. We recognize the important role that owning a station in New York City may play in the success of such an emerging network, and we believe that grant of the requested temporary waiver is appropriate to facilitate PCC's acquisition of a New York City station and its launch of the seventh broadcast network in this country. 19. Finally, Paxson-New York expressed its "firm commitment to divest WIPX(TV) in six months" in its waiver request. See February 9, 1998 Supplement to Assignment of License Application at 14. Moreover, we note that, under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement between the parties to the WPXN-TV transaction, PCC is obligated to "dispose of the Bridgeport Station [i.e., WIPX(TV)] prior to consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby if necessary in order to obtain the FCC Consent." See Section 5.01 of May 12, 1997 Asset Purchase Agreement. Given Paxson-New York's express commitment in its application, and PCC's contractual obligation to dispose of WIPX(TV) if necessary to obtain Commission consent to the WPXN-TV assignment, we are assured of Paxson-New York's and PCC's intention to divest WIPX(TV) as expeditiously as possible. 20. Because we believe that grant of the requested waiver will, for the reasons set forth above, serve the public interest, convenience and necessity, we will grant Paxson-New York a six-month waiver of the television duopoly rule to permit temporary common ownership of WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV). Any request to extend this temporary waiver should be filed at least 45 days prior to the end of the six-month period and will be closely scrutinized. Conclusion 21. In view of the foregoing, and having determined that the applicants are qualified in all respects, we find that a grant of the application to assign the license of WPXN-TV from ITT-Dow Jones Television to Paxson-New York will serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. 22. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That the petition to deny filed by Crown Communications Incorporated IS DISMISSED as moot. 23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the request of Paxson Communications of New York-31, Inc. for a permanent waiver of the duopoly rule, Section 73.3555(b) of the Commission's rules, to permit common ownership of WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV), IS DENIED. 24. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the request of Paxson Communications of New York-31, Inc. for a conditional waiver of the duopoly rule, Section 73.3555(b) of the Commission's rules, to permit common ownership of WPXN-TV and WPPX(TV), IS GRANTED, subject to the outcome of the Commission's pending broadcast television ownership rulemaking (MM Docket Nos. 91-221 and 87-8). Should divestiture be required as a result of that proceeding, the licensee is directed to file, within six months from the release of the final order in MM Docket Nos. 91-221 and 87-8, an application for Commission consent to dispose of such station as would be necessary for Paxson Communications Corporation to come into compliance with the rules as provided in the final order. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the request for temporary waiver of the duopoly rule, Section 73.3555(b), to permit common ownership of WPXN-TV and WIPX(TV), IS GRANTED, provided that within six months of the consummation of the assignment of WPXN- TV to Paxson Communications of New York-31, Inc., Paxson Communications Corporation must file applications with the Commission arranging for the disposition of WIPX(TV), or otherwise coming into compliance with the broadcast multiple ownership rules. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the application for the assignment of the license of station WPXN-TV, New York, New York, BALCT-970519IB, from ITT Dow Jones Television to Paxson Communications of New York-31, Inc., IS GRANTED, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau