|Federal Communications Commission
1919 - M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
|News media information 202 / 418-0500
Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830
Released October 31, 1997
POTENTIAL MODULES FOR DETERMINING
CUSTOMER LOCATION AND OUTSIDE PLANT DESIGN IN
FORWARD-LOOKING MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING
UNIVERSAL SERVICE SUPPORT FOR NON-RURAL CARRIERS
Comment Date: November 26, 1997
CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-160
In the Universal Service Order released May 8, 1997, the Commission, acting on the recommendation of the Federal-State Joint Board, concluded that universal service support for non-rural carriers should be determined by subtracting a benchmark revenue amount from the forward-looking economic cost of providing the supported services.(1) The Commission concluded that it should continue to review two cost models, the Hatfield Model and the Benchmark Cost Proxy Model (BCPM).(2) The Commission further concluded that it would select the platform design features(3) of a forward-looking economic cost mechanism by the end of 1997 and select a complete mechanism, including input values, by August 1998.(4) In a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in this proceeding,(5) the Commission stated that it would consider a hybrid mechanism, combining the best features of both models, and might also "study alternative algorithms and approaches that could be submitted by parties other than model sponsors or that could be generated internally by Commission staff."(6)
Commission staff members William Sharkey and Mark Kennet of the Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau; C. Anthony Bush of the Competition Division, Office of the General Counsel; and Commission contractor Vaikunth Gupta of Panum Communications have developed an engineering process mechanism, known as the Hybrid Cost Proxy Model or HCPM. The HCPM represents individual views on potential approaches to customer location and outside plant design issues. It is not an official statement by the Commission or any FCC Commissioner and should not be interpreted as a Commission decision or proposed Commission decision. The HCPM differs from previous models that have been submitted to the Commission primarily in its usage of Census data to locate subscribers to the network and in its greater reliance on explicit optimization techniques in modeling loop plant. The model is written in a high-level programming language (Turbo-Pascal) and compiled versions can be supported on a number of computing environments. The Bureau is considering whether these platform components should be incorporated into a forward-looking economic cost mechanism as replacements for the components presently used in the Hatfield Model or BCPM. The algorithms and assumptions employed in these modules were described in public workshops that the Bureau held on September 3 and 11, 1997.(7) The HCPM software is now available, via the World Wide Web, for public review and comment.
The HCPM consists of a customer location module, known as CENBLOCK, and a loop design module, known as FEEDDIST. While this initial release is a fully functional version of both modules, several significant components have not yet been incorporated. The Bureau is releasing the modules at this time in order to make their basic structure available for public comment at the earliest possible time. The portions that are planned, but not yet implemented, are explained in detail in the supporting documentation. As with any complex software product, it is possible that bugs in the code or other design flaws remain undetected. Users of the model are encouraged to report, in their comments, any suspected problems that they may encounter.
This release includes the following components:
Parties are also encouraged to submit their comments on diskette. Such diskette submissions are in addition to and not a substitute for the formal filing requirements addressed above. Parties submitting diskettes should submit them to Sheryl Todd of the Common Carrier Bureau, 2100 M Street, N.W., Room 8611, Washington, D.C. 20554. Such a submission should be on a 3.5 inch diskette formatted in an IBM compatible form using WordPerfect 5.1 for Windows or compatible software. The diskette should be submitted in "read only" mode. The diskette should be clearly labelled with the party's name, proceeding, type of pleading (comment on HCPM) and date of submission. Each diskette should contain only one party's comments in a single electronic file. The diskette should be accompanied by a cover letter.
For further information about the HCPM, contact William Sharkey, (202) 418-2743 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Action by the Chief, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau.
1. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, FCC 97-157 (rel. May 8, 1997) (Order) at paras. 199-201.
2. The proponents of the Hatfield Model are AT&T and MCI. The proponents of BCPM are US West, Sprint, and BellSouth. See Order at Appendix J for a description of the Hatfield Model and BCPM.
3. In the context of a forward-looking economic cost mechanism, the "platform" refers to the fixed algorithms and assumptions built into a cost model, as contrasted with user-specified "inputs" into a cost model. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward Looking Mechanism for High Cost Support for Non-Rural LECs, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-160, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. Jul. 18, 1997) (FNPRM) at paras. 17-18.
4. Order at para. 245.
5. Federal State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High Cost Support for Non-Rural LECs, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-160, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. Jul. 18, 1997).
6. FNPRM at para. 35.
7. See Public Notice, DA 97-1870 (rel. Aug. 28, 1997).