******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Operator Communications, Inc. ) d/b/a/ ONCOR Communications, ) ) Complainant, ) ) v. ) ) BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., ) File No. E-97-30 BellSouth Public Communications, Inc.,) File No. E-97-31 and TelTrust Communications Services,) File No. E-97-32 ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 31, 1998 Released: April 1, 1998 By the Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. On June 5, 1997, Operator Communications, Inc., d/b/a ONCOR Communications, ("ONCOR"), filed the above-captioned complaint against BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., BellSouth Public Communications, Inc., and TelTrust Communications Services, alleging violation of a Commission order and Sections 201(b), 202(a), and 276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. ONCOR claimed that the two BellSouth defendants, in concert with TelTrust, interfered with enforceable agreements between ONCOR and payphone location providers by switching the presubscribed interexchange carrier from ONCOR to Teltrust without authorization. 2. On March 26, 1998 and March 31, 1998, counsel for ONCOR represented that the parties had concluded a settlement and would file a motion to dismiss as soon as all parties had signed the original of the settlement agreement and the motion to dismiss. Based on these verbal representations, we conclude that the parties have entered into a settlement of the matter giving rise to the complaints, thereby obviating the need for the Commission to resolve the dispute. 3. We are satisfied that dismissing these complaints will serve the public interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of further time and resources by the parties and by the Commission. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority delegated under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned complaints are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that these proceedings are TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kurt A. Schroeder Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau