******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** DA 98-339 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of) ) Petition of LCI Telecom Corp. ) for Declaratory Rulings ) CC Docket No. 98-5 ) ORDER Adopted: February 20, 1998 Released: February 20, 1998 By The Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. On February 18, 1998, the Competitive Telecommunications Association (CompTel) and the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) filed motions seeking an extension of time to file comments regarding the above-captioned petition for declaratory rulings filed by LCI International Telecom Corp. (LCI). In its petition, LCI proposes that the Regional Bell Operating Companies be allowed "Fast Track" entry into the long distance market if they agree to separate their retail and wholesale activities. 2. In its motion, CompTel states that the LCI petition raises extremely complex legal and policy issues which it is currently studying. CompTel believes that a brief, two- week extension of time will allow it and all other interested parties to examine the proposal more fully before filing comments. NASUCA requests a 30-day extension of time in which to file comments, arguing that because of the breadth of the subject matter, additional time is needed to study the issues and determine if the proposal "is in the best interests of consumers." 3. On February 19, 1998, LCI filed a letter stating that it does not oppose a 30- day extension of the deadline for filing comments on its petition. LCI states that it believes a 30-day extension of both the comment and reply comment dates would be consistent with the goals of its petition. On this same date, the Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, the Competition Policy Institute, and MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed comments in support of the NASUCA motion for a 30-day extension of time in which to file comments. On February 20, 1998, NARUC filed a letter supporting the NASUCA request for an extension of the comment cycle an additional 30 days. 4. It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time are not routinely granted. In this instance, however, no party objects to a 30-day extension of the deadline for filing comments regarding the LCI petition. Moreover, the petitioning party, LCI, does not oppose the 30-day extension request. Under these circumstances, we will grant all parties a 30-day extension of the deadline for filing comments regarding the LCI petition. Reply comments will be due 30 days from the date initial comments are due. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motions for extension of time filed by the Competitive Telecommunications Association and the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ARE GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED until March 23, 1998. The deadline for filing reply comments IS EXTENDED until April 22, 1998. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol Mattey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau