******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) CC Docket No. 97-250 Tariffs Implementing Access Charge Reform) ) GTE System Telephone Companies ) Transmittal No. 232 Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No. 1 ) ) GTE Telephone Operating Companies ) Transmittal No. 1131 Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No. 1 ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 5, 1998 Released: February 5, 1998 By the Deputy Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. On December 30, 1997, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) initiated an investigation into the provisions contained in incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) access charge reform tariffs. On January 28, 1998, the Bureau designated the specific issues for investigation in this proceeding in a separate order. On January 21, 1998, GTE System Telephone Companies filed Transmittal No. 232 to revise Tariff F.C.C. No. 1 and GTE Telephone Operating Companies filed Transmittal No. 1131 to revise Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, both proposing changes to the multiline business and Integrated Service Digital Network primary rate interface and end user common line charges. We have no record of the receipt of any petitions filed against these GTE tariff transmittals to date. II. DISCUSSION 2. These transmittals raise issues that were designated for investigation in the Access Charge Reform Tariffs Designation Order. Therefore, we suspend these transmittals for one day, following the currently scheduled effective date, and make these transmittals subject to the investigation initiated in the Access Charge Reform Tariffs Suspension Order. 3. At the conclusion of the investigation, the rates that are the subject of this suspension order may be subject to the special, two-way adjustment mechanism described in the Access Charge Reform Tariffs Suspension Order, for the reasons stated therein. We therefore put customers on notice that any revised rates provided in the transmittals suspended for one day by this order are provisional rates. If these provisional rates are found at the conclusion of the investigation initiated by the Access Charge Reform Tariffs Suspension Order to be below a just and reasonable level, we may allow carriers prospectively to charge higher rates for some elements to reflect the fact that they were charging less than would have been permitted for those elements during the pendency of the investigation. If these provisional rates are found at the conclusion of the investigation initiated by the Access Charge Reform Tariffs Suspension Order to be above those permitted by our rules, and thus unreasonably high, we may require the LECs to make refunds to their customers. It is also possible that, in some cases in which the same customer has paid both charges that were found to be too high and charges that were found to be too low, refunds could be offset by amounts allowed for recoupment. III. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS 4. This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the permit-but- disclose requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.  1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b), as well. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91 and 0.291, that the tariff revisions filed by GTE System Telephone Companies and GTE Telephone Operating Companies ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced tariff transmittals IS INSTITUTED AND CONSOLIDATED in CC Docket No. 97-250. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that GTE System Telephone Companies and GTE Telephone Operating Companies SHALL FILE, within five business days of the release date of this Order, tariff revisions to reflect the one day suspension from the currently scheduled effective date of February 5, 1998. GTE System Telephone Companies and GTE Telephone Operating Companies should cite the DA number of the instant Order as the authority for these filings. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91 and 0.291, that GTE System Telephone Companies and GTE Telephone Operating Companies SHALL KEEP ACCURATE ACCOUNT of all amounts received by reason of the provisions that are the subject of this investigation. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Patrick Donovan Deputy Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau