********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                )
CKC Communications, Inc.        )
d/b/a/ Connors Communications,  )
                                )
     Complainant,               )
                                   )
          v.                    )            File No. E-97-26
                                )
MFS Intelenet, Incorporated,    )
                                )
     Defendant.                 )
                                )

                             ORDER

   Adopted:  January 28, 1998           Released:  January 29, 1998

By the Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch, Enforcement Division, Common
Carrier Bureau:

     1.   On May 6, 1997 CKC Communications d/b/a Connors Communications (Connors)
filed the above-captioned complaint against MFS Intelenet, Incorporated (MFS), alleging violation
of Commission rules and Section 201(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. 
Connors claimed that MFS changed the long distance service for three of Connors' offices without
authorization.

     2.   On January 27, 1998, Connors and MFS jointly filed a motion requesting that the
Commission dismiss Connors' complaint with prejudice.  The aforementioned motion states that the
parties, "have entered into an extra-judicial settlement of the matter giving rise to the complaint,
thereby obviating the need for the Commission to resolve the dispute."

     3.   We are satisfied that granting the jointly filed motion to dismiss Connors' complaint
will serve the public interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of
further time and resources by the parties and by the Commission.

     4.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority
delegated under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, that
the parties' Joint Motion To Dismiss The Complaint With Prejudice IS GRANTED.

     5.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned complaint is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE and that this proceeding is TERMINATED.


                    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                    Kurt A. Schroeder
                    Chief, Formal Complaints and
                    Investigations Branch
                    Enforcement Division
                    Common Carrier Bureau