********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                                Before the
                     Federal Communications Commission
                          Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of  )
                  )  CUID Nos.NJ0001 (Absecon)
Lenfest Atlantic, Inc.  )     NJ0005 (Somers Point)
                                           )           NJ0006 (Atlantic City)   
Refund Plan             )     NJ0015 (Millville)
                  )     NJ0030 (Ocean City)

                                     
                       ORDER

      Adopted:  February 18, 1998                Released:  February 26, 1998   

By the Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

      1.    In this Order we consider the refund plans filed by the above-captioned operator
("Operator")  in the above-captioned communities pursuant to our orders listed in Appendix A  
("Refund Orders"). Our review of Operator's refund plans reveals that the refund plans do not
comply with the requirements of the Refund Orders.

      2.     In each of its refund plans Operator states that it does not dispute the Commission's
findings, regarding its CPST rates, however, Operator raises an issue which Operator believes
requires a calculation of the refund amount which differs from the calculation prescribed in the
Refund Orders.  Operator did not file petitions for reconsideration or applications for review of the
Refund Orders.  Consequently, Operator is now attempting to raise in its refund plans an issue
concerning inter-tier offsets that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with
the Commission's Rules.    

      3.     Specifically, Operator argues, in its refund plans, that it is entitled to offset its
undercharges on its basic service tier ("BST") with its overcharges on its cable programming services
tier ("CPST").  The Commission has addressed the issue of inter-tier offsets in Cencom Cable Income
Partners ("Cencom").  In Cencom, the Commission determined that such inter-tier offsets are
"inconsistent with the Commission's conclusion in the [Implementation of Sections of the Cable
Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, MM Docket 92-266,
Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking] that cable operators should not
balance low BST rates with CPST rates that exceed the maximum permitted rate for the tier."  
Based on the Commission's holding in Cencom we have determined that Operator's refund plans are
unacceptable and that Operator has failed to comply with the Refund Orders.  Operator shall have
thirty days from the release of this Order to resubmit refund plans which comply with this Order and
with the Refund Orders.

      4.     Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.962 of the Commission's
Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 76.962, that Operator's refund plans ARE NOT ACCEPTED.

      5.     IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's
Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 76.961, that Operator revise its refund plans as detailed herein and resubmit
its plan to the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, within thirty days of the release of this Order.

      6.     This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.321 of the
Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321.

      
      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 



      Elizabeth W. Beaty
      Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
      Cable Services Bureau
APPENDIX A


1. In the Matter of Sammons Communications, Inc., Absecon, New Jersey, CUID NJ0001;
   Somers Point, New Jersey, CUID NJ0005; Ocean City, New Jersey, CUID NJ0030; 
   10 FCC Rcd 10022 (1995) 
  
2. In the Matter of Sammons Communications, Inc., Atlantic City, New Jersey 
   CUID No. NJ0006, 10 FCC Rcd 5553 (1995) 

3. In the Matter of Sammons Communications, Inc., Millville, New Jersey
   CUID No. NJ0015, 10 FCC Rcd 9311 (1995)