Official Documents
|
| |
Antenna Tower Lighting and Marking Requirements
|
The FCC has been given the authority by Congress to require the painting
and/or illumination of antenna towers when it determines that such towers may
otherwise constitute a menace to air navigation. 47 U.S.C. § 303(q). The
FCC's rules governing antenna tower lighting and painting requirements are
based upon the advisory recommendations of the FAA, which are set forth in
two FAA Advisory Circulars. 47 CFR §§ 17.21-17.58. Although the FAA's
lighting and painting standards are advisory in nature, the FCC's rules make the
standards mandatory. The standards and specifications set forth in these FAA
documents are incorporated by reference into the FCC's rules, making these
advisory standards mandatory for antenna towers.
The FCC always requires an FAA determination that an antenna tower will
not pose an aviation hazard before it will grant permission to build that antenna
tower. Information required on the FCC construction permit form advises the
FCC staff as to whether such a tower location or height is involved. The
FAA's determination takes into consideration the location and height of the
proposed tower, and its safety lighting and marking.
Each new or altered antenna tower structure registered must conform to the
FAA's painting and lighting recommendations set forth on the structure's FAA
determination of "no hazard," and must be cleared with the FAA and filed with
the FCC. If the FAA determines that the tower would be a physical hazard, the
FCC will not approve the construction permit application. (When, however, the
FAA determines that there is an aviation hazard due to possible radiofrequency
interference with aviation communication signals, the FCC makes an independent
analysis of who will be responsible for resolving possible conflicts, and may not
automatically defer to the FAA determination as to what party should bear the cost
of any needed equipment changes.)
The FAA advisory circulars set forth detailed specifications for lighting and
painting. If, however, the FAA's standards allow more than one lighting or
painting option for a particular structure, the person seeking FAA clearance for a
tower may indicate on FAA Form 7460-1m which of the specified types of
marking and lighting systems is desired. With respect to telecommunications
towers, the most common option approved by the FAA is the substitution of white
flashing lights for a combination of red lights and painting. Any requests for deviation from standards must be filed electronically on https://oeaaa.faa.gov, by selecting marking and lighting deviation as the structure type.
Where the FAA approves the substitution of high intensity white lights for a
combination of red lights and painting, and the antenna tower is located in a
residential neighborhood, the Commission requires the applicant to prepare an
environmental assessment. 47 CFR § 1.1307(a)(8). The Commission, upon
review of the environmental assessment, may determine that the proposed
substitution of high intensity white lights would not have a significant impact, and
may process the application without further review. 47 CFR § 1.1308(d). If,
however, based upon a review of the environmental assessment, the Commission
determines that the proposed high intensity lights would have a significant
environmental impact upon the human environment, the Commission will inform
the applicant. The applicant will have the opportunity to amend its application to
eliminate the environmental problem. If the problem is not eliminated, the
Commission will publish in the Federal Register a Notice of Intent that an
Environmental Impact Statement be prepared. 47 CFR § 1.1308(c). The
Commission may, to assist in the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement, request further information from the applicant, interested persons and
other agencies or authorities. The Commission may also direct that objections to
the proposed lighting be raised with the appropriate state or local authorities. 47
CFR § 1.1314(d).
As part of the its aeronautical study, the FAA may, if it considers it necessary,
solicit comments from or convene a meeting of all interested persons for the
purpose of gathering all facts relevant to the effect of the proposed construction
on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace. See 14 CFR §§
77.35, 77.41-77.69. The FAA regional office forwards its recommendation to
FAA headquarters in Washington for final approval. The final FAA determination
also must be submitted to the FCC with any antenna construction permit
application that requires FAA notification. These structures will be subject to
inspection and enforcement of marking and lighting requirements by the FCC.
Although there is no absolute height limit for antenna towers, both agencies
have established a rebuttable presumption against structures over 2,000 feet above
ground level. The FCC has a policy that applications filed with the FCC for
antenna towers higher than 2,000 feet above ground will be presumed to be
inconsistent with the public interest and the applicant will have a burden of
overcoming that strong presumption. The applicant must accompany its
application with a detailed showing directed to meeting this burden. Only in the
exceptional case, where the Commission concludes that a clear and compelling
showing has been made that there are public interest reasons requiring a tower
higher than 2,000 feet above ground, and after the parties have complied with
applicable FAA procedures, and full Commission coordination with FAA on the
question of menace to air navigation, will a grant be made. See 47 CFR § 1.61
Note.
The FAA presumption against construction of structures over a certain height
is set forth in the FAA rules. A proposed structure or an alteration to an existing
structure that exceeds 2,000 feet in height above the ground will be presumed to
be a hazard to air navigation and to result in an inefficient utilization of airspace
and the applicant has the burden of overcoming that presumption. Each notice
submitted under the FAA rules proposing a structure in excess of 2,000 feet above
ground must contain a detailed showing, directed to meeting this burden. Only in
exceptional cases, where the FAA concludes that a clear and compelling showing
has been made that it would not result in an inefficient utilization of the airspace
and would not result in a hazard to air navigation, will a determination of no
hazard be issued. See 14 CFR § 77.17(c).
DTV Fact Sheet and FAQs
FAA's web site
DTV Home Page
|
|
