Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

     In the Matter of                        File No. EB-10-TC-467        
     VoiceNet Telephone, LLC                 NAL/Acct. No.: 201132170019  
     Apparent Liability for Forfeiture       FRN: 0010943694              


                                                       Released: July 1, 2011

   By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

   On June 16, 2011, the Commission released a Notice of Apparent Liability
   for Forfeiture (NALF), FCC 11-91, in the above-captioned proceeding. This
   Erratum amends the NALF as indicated below:

    1. A new sentence is added at the end of footnote 3 to read as follows:

   "See Letter from Mitchell F. Brecher, Counsel for VoiceNet Telephone, LLC,
   to Kimberly A. Wild, Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications
   Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission,
   at Section II, Tab A and Tab B (Mar. 28, 2011) ("Response to Second

    2. In paragraph 4, the third sentence is corrected by replacing "Billing
       Concepts" with "Billing Concepts/USBI" in both instances and the
       fourth and fifth sentence are corrected to read as follows:

   "Generally, the third-party carrier supplies only a consumer's telephone
   number and the amount to be charged to the billing aggregator, which
   directs the LEC to place the charge on the consumer's telephone bill.
   Proof of consumer authorization is not provided by the third-party carrier
   nor required by the LEC."

    3. The second sentence and its accompanying cite is deleted from footnote

    4. The last sentence of paragraph 17 is corrected to read as follows:

   "On these facts, if a consumer did not authorize VoiceNet's service, the
   mere act of sending an email or mail without requiring a response from the
   consumer is not sufficient "verification.""

    5. The last two sentences in paragraph 19, before the indented quote, are
       corrected to read as follows:

   "In other cases, refunds were not provided until after the consumer filed
   a complaint with a state or federal regulatory authority or consumer
   protection agency. For example, Complainant Smith, who filed a complaint
   with the Better Business Bureau, explained:"

    6. In paragraph 26 replace "S: 503(b)(5)" with "S: 503(b)."

    7. In paragraph 31, replace "Mitchell F. Brecher, Greenberg Traurig, LLP,
       2101 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037" with "Matthew Berry,
       Patton Boggs LLP, 2550 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037."


   P. Michele Ellison


   Enforcement Bureau

   (Continued from previous page)


   Federal Communications Commission


   Federal Communications Commission