Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

     In the Matter of                          )                             
     TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.          )     File No. EB-10-IH-0557  
     Parent Company of CNN America, Inc. and   )     NAL Account No.         
     Courtroom Television Network LLC,               201032080036            
     Holders of Various Licenses in the        )                             
     Wireless and International Services             FRN No. 0006873228      
     Apparent Liability for Forfeiture                                       


   Adopted: September 10, 2010 Released: September 10, 2010

   By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:


    1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
       that Turner Broadcasting System, Inc ("Turner"), parent company of CNN
       America, Inc. and Courtroom Television Network LLC, holders of various
       licenses in the wireless and international radio services, apparently
       willfully and repeatedly violated section 310(d) of the Communications
       Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 25.119 and 1.948 of the
       Commission's rules ("Rules"), in connection with an internal company
       reorganization. Pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, we conclude
       that Turner is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the total amount
       of $16,000.


    2. Turner is an Atlanta-based corporation which provides programming for
       the cable industry. Among its wholly-owned subsidiaries at the time of
       the license transfers at issue was Cable News Network, LP LLLP
       ("CNN-LP"), holder of 49 licenses in various wireless and
       international radio services. According to Turner, on December 31,
       2006, its controlling 10 percent general partnership interest in
       CNN-LP was contributed to Turner's wholly owned subsidiary, CNN
       Investment Company, Inc., which at the time held the remaining 90
       percent limited partnership interest. Immediately thereafter, CNN-LP
       was merged into CNN Investment Company, Inc., the latter of which was
       the surviving entity. CNN Investment Company, Inc. simultaneously
       changed its name to Cable News Network, Inc. ("CNN-Inc."). All of
       these events occurred on the same day and resulted in a pro forma
       transfer of control of CNN-LP, immediately followed by a pro forma
       assignment of the 49 subject licenses, to CNN-Inc. Turner did not seek
       or obtain prior Commission consent for either transaction.

    3. Turner states that in May 2009 it undertook a review of its licensing
       portfolio in preparation for another corporate restructuring. This
       restructuring contemplated the pro forma assignment of nine of the 49
       licenses from CNN-Inc. to Turner, 38 of the licenses to wholly-owned
       subsidiary CNN America, Inc. ("CNN America"), and two of the licenses
       to wholly-owned subsidiary Courtroom Television Network LLC ("Court
       TV"). According to Turner, at this time it discovered that CNN-LP
       still held the licenses.

    4. Turner thereafter prepared and filed appropriate applications seeking
       Commission consent to the assignment of the 49 licenses from CNN-LP to
       Turner, CNN America and Court TV, respectively.  The Wireless
       Telecommunications Bureau and International Bureau subsequently
       granted the respective applications pending before them and referred
       the matters to the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") for investigation.
       The Bureau immediately commenced an investigation on March 9, 2010, by
       directing a letter of inquiry to Turner requesting information and
       documents relating to the referenced transactions. In its response,
       dated April 8, 2010, Turner represented, among other things, that it
       had incorrectly believed no prior FCC approval was required for the
       2006 transactions because the operations and ultimate control of the
       affected licenses did not change as a result of the reorganization.


    5. Under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, any person who is determined by
       the Commission to have willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with
       any provision of the Act or any rule, regulation, or order issued by
       the Commission shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture
       penalty. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act defines willful as "the
       conscious and deliberate commission or omission of [any] act,
       irrespective of any intent to violate" the law. The legislative
       history to section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition
       of willful applies to both sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act, and the
       Commission has so interpreted the term in the section 503(b) context.
       The Commission may also assess a forfeiture for violations that are
       merely repeated, and not willful.  "Repeated" means that the act was
       committed or omitted more than once, or lasts more than one day. In
       order to impose such a penalty, the Commission must issue a notice of
       apparent liability, the notice must have been received or have been
       sent to the last known address of the person against whom the notice
       has been issued, and such person must have an opportunity to show, in
       writing, why no such penalty should be imposed. The Commission will
       then issue a forfeiture if it finds, by a preponderance of the
       evidence, that the person has willfully or repeatedly violated the Act
       or a Commission rule.

    6. Section 310(d) of the Act states that "[n]o construction permit or
       station license, or any rights thereunder, shall be transferred,
       assigned, or disposed of in any manner, voluntarily or involuntarily,
       directly or indirectly, or by transfer of control of any corporation
       holding such permit or license, to any person except upon application
       to the Commission and upon finding by the Commission that the public
       interest, convenience, and necessity will be served thereby." In
       accordance with sections 25.119 and 1.948 of the Rules, a transfer of
       a station license or wireless authorization by transfer of control of
       any corporation or any other entity holding such license requires
       application to and prior approval from the Commission.

    7. In the instant case, Turner effectuated an internal corporate
       reorganization in 2006 that resulted in the pro forma transfer of 
       control and pro forma assignment of 49 wireless and international
       licenses without prior Commission approval. Turner concedes that it
       did not seek or obtain prior Commission consent for either transaction
       and that the dereliction continued at least until remedial
       applications were filed in 2009. Under the circumstances presented
       herein, we conclude that Turner engaged in the unauthorized transfer
       of control and unauthorized assignment of the 49 subject licenses in
       apparent willful violation of section 310(d) of the Act, and sections
       25.119 and 1.948 of the Rules.

    8. In determining the amount of a forfeiture penalty, section
       503(b)(2)(E) of the Act and section 1.80(a)(4) of the Rules direct the
       Commission to take into account "the nature, circumstances, extent,
       and gravity of the violation . . . and the degree of culpability, any
       history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as
       justice may require." In this regard, we note that every case presents
       a unique set of circumstances and turns on its specific facts.
       Pursuant to the Forfeiture Policy Statement and section 1.80 of the
       Rules, the base forfeiture amount for a pro forma unauthorized
       assignment of license or transfer of control is $1,000. The Commission
       has found, however, that while the number of licenses involved should
       be considered an aggravating factor, multiplying the base forfeiture
       amount by the number of licenses at issue could result in an excessive
       forfeiture. We also consider other mitigating and aggravating factors,
       such as the nature of the transaction, including whether the transfer
       was pro forma or substantial, and the length of time prior to the
       filing of corrective applications, if any. In this case, we recognize
       that the unauthorized transfer involved 49 licenses, but was pro forma
       in nature and resulted from a single transaction. However, the length
       of time that it took for Turner to file corrective applications was
       clearly excessive. We therefore find the fact that the unauthorized
       license transfers occurred as a result of a single transaction is a
       mitigating factor. The number of licenses and the period of operation
       (over two-and-one-half years) prior to filing corrective applications
       are aggravating factors. Based on the precedent cited herein and
       applying the factors set forth in section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act and
       section 1.80 of the Rules, we conclude that Turner is apparently
       liable for a total forfeiture of $16,000.


    9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311,
       0.314 and 1.80 of the Rules, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. is
       amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for apparently willfully
       violating section 310(d) of the Act and sections 25.119 and 1.948 of
       the Rules.

   10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.80 of the Rules,
       that within thirty (30) days of the release date of this Notice,
       Turner SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL
       FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
       proposed forfeiture.

   11. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
       payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission.  The
       payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. 
       Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal
       Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.
       Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank - Government
       Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
       63101. Payments by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 021030004,
       receiving bank Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and account number
       27000001. For payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance
       Advice) must be submitted.  When completing the FCC Form 159, enter
       the NAL/Account number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and
       enter the letters "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code).
       Turner will also send electronic notification within forty-eight (48)
       hours of the date said payment is made to and

   12. The response, if any, to this Notice of Apparent Liability for
       Forfeiture must be mailed to Hillary S. DeNigro, Chief, Investigations
       and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications
       Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 4-C330, Washington, D.C. 20554
       and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced above.

   13. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
       response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
       (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
       financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
       accounting practices (GAAP); or (3) some other reliable and objective
       documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current
       financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically
       identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial
       documentation submitted.

   14. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent
       Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to:
       Chief Financial Officer -- Financial Operations, Federal
       Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
       Washington, D.C. 20554. For answers to questions, please contact the
       Financial Operations Group Help Desk at 1-877-480-3201 or Email:

   15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
       for Forfeiture shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt
       requested, to Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., Michelle Hylton,
       Senior Counsel, One CNN Center, Atlanta, GA 30303-2762.


   P. Michele Ellison

   Chief, Enforcement Bureau

   47 U.S.C. S: 310(d).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 25.119, 1.948.

   See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).

   See Response of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. to the Enforcement
   Bureau's March 9, 2010 Letter of Inquiry, dated April 8, 2010 at 2 ("LOI

   See Id. at 2.


   See File Nos. 0003974137, 0003974367, SES-ASG-20090911-01155,
   SES-ASG-20090911-01162 and SES-ASG-20090911-01163.

   See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Assignment of License Authorization
   Applications, Transfer of Control of Licensee Applications, De Facto
   Transfer Lease Applications and Spectrum Manager Lease Notifications,

   Designated Entity Reportable Eligibility Event Applications, and
   Designated Entity Annual Reports, Public Notice, Report Number 5360 (rel.
   Oct. 21, 2009); Satellite Communications Services Information RE: Actions
   Taken, Public Notice, Report No. SES-01217 (rel. Feb. 3, 2010).

   See Letter from Gary Schonman, Special Counsel, Investigations & Hearings
   Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to Junan Gibson, Cable News Network, LP
   LLLP, dated March 9, 2010 ("LOI").

   See LOI Response at 2.

   See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(a)(1).

   47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1).

   See H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982).

   See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and
   Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991) (Southern California Broadcasting Co.).

   See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., Grand Isle, Louisiana, Notice of
   Apparent Liability for Monetary Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362, P: 10
   (2001) ("Callais Cablevision") (issuing a Notice of Apparent Liability
   for, inter alia, a cable television operator's repeated signal leakage).

   Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd at 4388, P: 5; Callais
   Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362, P: 9.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(f).

   See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc.,  Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589,
   7591, P: 4 (2002) (forfeiture paid).

   47 U.S.C. S: 310(d).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 25.119(d), 1.948.

   See LOI Response at 2.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E).

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(a)(4).

   See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section
   1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and
   Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17115 (1997), recons. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303
   (1999) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.

   See, e.g., ARINC, Inc., Order and Consent Decree, 24 FCC Rcd 5325 (Enf.
   Bur., IHD 2009). The ARINC Consent Decree required the company to pay a
   voluntary contribution of $15,000 for the unauthorized pro forma transfer
   of control of 163 licenses, after taking into consideration the fact that
   the transfers occurred as a result of a single transaction, the company's
   voluntary disclosure, the number of licenses at issue and the two month
   period prior to filing corrective applications.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914.

   (...continued from previous page)


   Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1648


   Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1648