Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                         Before the
              Federal Communications Commission
                   Washington, D.C. 20554

A Telecommunications, Accessible Payphones,  Admiralty      
Industries d/b/a San Diego Pay Telephones, Advanced Pay     
Phone Services, Inc., Bay Area Telephone, Bay Distribution  
Service, Inc. d/b/a Western Telecom, C/B Tel Inc., Central  
Telephone, Inc., Century Payphone Systems, Charles Parsons  
d/b/a Bayphones, Coin Communications, Cook Payphone         
Company, Covenant Development Corp., Custom Teleconnect,    
Inc., DTI Com LLC d/b/a  Dee Union Svc., Easycoin Vending   
Corp., The Telephone Company, Expense Management, Inc.,     
GCB Communications Inc. d/b/a Pacific Communications,       
Golden State Payphones, JA Communications, Littlejohn       
Communications Inc., Megatronics Payphones, Mid-Valley      
Payphones, Nastel Communication Corp., Nevada Telephone,    
Inc., Pac Western, Paramount Payphone Southern LLC, Pay     
Phones North, Inc., Payphone Technology Telesystems, Paytel 
Northwest, Inc., PBS Telecom, Precision Pay Phones, Pro Com, 
Professional Communications, Public Payphone, Inc., Public  
Payphones, Public Paytel, Public Phone, Randy Hong d/b/a    
)     File No.
Teletrex, RJ Communications, Robert Tong d/b/a Public Phone 
)     EB-05-MD-024
Management., Stars and Stripes Communication Corporation,   
Supertel, Tele Tech Inc., The Phone People Inc., The Redmond
Group, Western Payphone Network Inc., Western Payphone      
Systems, Western      Telephone,  WHB  Payphones,  and  Zane 
Greene,   )
     Complainants,                                )
               v.                                 )   
Tel-America of Salt Lake City, Inc.,                        
     Defendant.                                   )

                     ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Adopted:  January 12, 2006              Released:    January 
13, 2006

By the Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, 
Enforcement Bureau:

     1.        On August 22, 2005, the above-captioned 
complainants (``Complainants'') filed a formal complaint1 
against Tel-America of Salt Lake City, Inc. (``Defendant'') 
pursuant to section 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, 
as amended (``Act'').2  In their Complaint, Complainants 
alleged that Defendant violated sections 201(b), 276(b), and 
416(c) of the Act and Commission rules by failing to make 
certain payphone compensation payments.3  

     2.        Complainants have now filed a Motion4 
requesting that the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice.  
Complainants state that they have reached a mutually-
acceptable resolution of their dispute with Defendant, and 
that Defendant does not oppose the Motion.5

     3.        We are satisfied that dismissing the 
Complaint with prejudice will serve the public interest by 
promoting the private resolution of disputes and by 
eliminating the need for further litigation and the 
expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and 
this Commission.

     4.         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 
sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), and 208, 
sections 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  
1.720-1.736, and the authority delegated in section 0.111 
and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.111 and 
0.311, that the Joint Motion IS GRANTED, that the Complaint 
IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that this proceeding IS 


Rosemary H. McEnery  
     Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division
                         Enforcement Bureau

11   Formal  Complaint, File  No. EB-05-MD-024  (filed Aug. 
22, 2005) (``Complaint''). 

2   47 U.S.C.  208.

3   Complaint at 15,  67.

4   Motion  to Dismiss,  File No. EB-05-MD-024  (filed Nov. 
22, 2005) (``Motion'').    

5   Motion at 2,  3.