Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                           Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                     Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                )
Galaxy Telecom, L.P.            )    File No. EB-02-TS-122
                                )
Operator of Cable Systems in the States of   )
                                )
Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,    )
Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,    )
Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,     )
Texas                           )
                                )
Request for Waiver of Section 11.11(a) of the     )    
Commission's Rules              )    
                                        
                              ORDER 

Adopted:  June 18, 2002                 Released:  June 21, 2002 

By the Chief, Technical  and Public Safety Division,  Enforcement 
Bureau:

1.        In  this  Order,   we  grant   Galaxy  Telecom,   L.P., 
  (``Galaxy'') temporary,  36-month waivers  of Section  11.11(a) 
  of  the  Commission's  Rules  (``Rules'')  for  the  217  cable 
  systems listed in the Attachment A.  Section 11.11(a)  requires 
  cable  systems serving  fewer  than 5,000  subscribers  from  a 
  headend  to  either  provide  national  level  Emergency  Alert 
  System  (``EAS'')  messages  on  all  programmed  channels   or 
  install EAS equipment  and provide a video interrupt and  audio 
  alert  on all  programmed  channels  and EAS  audio  and  video 
  messages  on at  least one  programmed  channel by  October  1, 
  2002.1

2.        The Cable Act of 1992  added new Section 624(g) to  the 
  Communications  Act  of 1934  (``Act''),  which  requires  that 
  cable  systems be  capable of  providing  EAS alerts  to  their 
  subscribers.2  In 1994, the Commission adopted rules  requiring 
  cable systems to participate in EAS.3  In 1997, the  Commission 
  amended the  EAS rules  to provide financial  relief for  small 
  cable systems.4  The Commission declined to exempt small  cable 
  systems  from the  EAS requirements,  concluding that  such  an 
  exemption would be  inconsistent with the statutory mandate  of 
  Section  624(g).5    However,  the   Commission  extended   the 
  deadline   for  cable   systems  serving   fewer  than   10,000 
  subscribers to  begin complying with the  EAS rules to  October 
  1, 2002,  and provided cable systems  serving fewer than  5,000 
  subscribers the option  of either providing national level  EAS 
  messages  on   all  programmed  channels   or  installing   EAS 
  equipment and  providing a video interrupt  and audio alert  on 
  all programmed channels and EAS audio and video messages on  at 
  least  one programmed  channel.6  In  addition, the  Commission 
  stated that  it would grant waivers of  the EAS rules to  small 
  cable  systems  on  a case-by-case  basis  upon  a  showing  of 
  financial  hardship.7   The Commission  indicated  that  waiver 
  requests must contain at least the following information:   (1) 
  justification for the waiver, with reference to the  particular 
  rule sections  for which  a waiver is  sought; (2)  information 
  about the financial status of the requesting entity, such as  a 
  balance sheet and  income statement for the two previous  years 
  (audited, if possible);  (3) the number of other entities  that 
  serve the  requesting entity's coverage area  and that have  or 
  are expected to  install EAS equipment; and (4) the  likelihood 
  (such  as proximity  or frequency)  of hazardous  risks to  the 
  requesting entity's audience.8

3.        On April 2, 2002, Galaxy filed a request for  temporary 
  waivers of Section  11.11(a) for 234 small rural cable  systems 
  in 15 states.   Galaxy requests waivers ranging from 18  months 
  to  36 months  based on  system  size.  In  particular,  Galaxy 
  requests 36-month temporary  waivers for the 217 cable  systems 
  listed in  Attachment A of this  Order.  Galaxy indicates  that 
  these  cable systems  serve  approximately between  9  and  948 
  subscribers.   In  further  support  of  its  waiver  requests, 
  Galaxy states that  it is currently operating under Chapter  11 
  bankruptcy    pursuant   to    a   Court-approved    plan    of 
  reorganization.9   Based  on  price  quotes  provided  by   EAS 
  equipment manufacturers,  Galaxy estimates that  it would  cost 
  approximately $10,000  per headend,  for a total  of over  $2.3 
  million  to install  EAS equipment  at these  systems.   Galaxy 
  asserts  that this  cost will  impose a  substantial  financial 
  hardship on it  and provides its financial statements for  2000 
  and 2001  in support  of this assertion.   In addition,  Galaxy 
  submits  that  its subscribers  will  continue  to  have  ready 
  access  to  national   EAS  information  from  other   sources, 
  including  its cable  systems.  In  this regard,  Galaxy  notes 
  that  its subscribers  currently have  access to  national  EAS 
  messages  from several  sources,  including from  Galaxy's  own 
  cable systems.  Galaxy also asserts  that its subscribers  will 
  have access to  EAS information through over-the-air  reception 
  of broadcast  television and radio  stations.  Finally,  Galaxy 
  expects to be able  to fund the EAS equipment and  installation 
  for its  largest system by  April 2004, with  the remainder  of 
  its  systems  being brought  into  compliance  on  a  phased-in 
  schedule by October 2005.

4.        Based upon our review of  the financial data and  other 
  information submitted by  Galaxy we conclude that a  temporary, 
  36-month  waiver of  Section 11.11(a)  for the  217 systems  is 
  warranted.10  In  particular, we find  that the estimated  $2.3 
  million cost  of EAS  equipment for these  cable systems  could 
  impose a financial hardship on Galaxy. 

5.        We note that  the Commission recently  amended the  EAS 
  rules  to  permit  cable  systems  serving  fewer  than   5,000 
  subscribers  to   install  FCC-certified  decoder-only   units, 
  rather  than both  encoders  and  decoders, if  such  a  device 
  becomes  available.11    Based  on   comments  from   equipment 
  manufacturers, we  anticipate that such  a decoder-only  system 
  could  result  in  significant  cost  savings  to  small  cable 
  systems.12  

6.        Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED  that, pursuant to  Sections 
  0.111,  0.204(b) and  0.311 of  the Rules,13   Galaxy  Telecom, 
  L.P.  IS GRANTED  a waiver  of Section  11.11(a) of  the  Rules 
  until  October  1,  2005  for  the  cable  systems  listed   in 
  Attachment A. 

7.         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Galaxy Telecom, L.P.  place 
  a copy of this waiver in its system files.

8.        IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that  a copy of this Order  shall 
  be sent by  Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to  counsel 
  for  Galaxy  Telecom,  L.P.  Christopher  C.  Cinnamon,   Esq., 
  Cinnamon  Mueller,  307  North  Michigan  Avenue,  Suite  1020, 
  Chicago, Illinois 60601.

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                         


                         Joseph P. Casey
                         Chief, Technical and Public Safety 
Division
                         Enforcement Bureau
                                             Attachment A


Galaxy Telecom, L.P.

Cable Systems:


Alabama
Butler, Alabama
Grove Hill/Whatley Alabama
Uniontown, Alabama
Nauvoo, Alabama
Pine Hill, Alabama
Arley, Alabama
Jasper/Pineywood, Alabama
Thomaston, Alabama
Mexia, Alabama
Cuba, Alabama
Orville, Alabama
Pennington, Alabama

Colorado
Limon, Colorado
Larimer Co., Colorado
Gilpin/Jefferson/Boulder, Colorado
Lyons, Colorado
Ordway, Colorado
Hugo, Colorado
Cheyenne Wells, Colorado
Weld Co., Colorado
Holly, Colorado
Eads, Colorado
Walsh, Colorado
Westcliffe, Colorado
Granada, Colorado
Stratton, Colorado
Flagler, Colorado
Deertrail, Colorado
Wiley, Colorado

Florida
Clay Co./Middleburg, Florida
Spruce Creek South, Florida
Lawtey, Florida
Penney Farms, Florida
W. Putnam Co./Hawthorne, Florida
Pedro/Summerfield, Florida
Bronson, Florida
Hernando Co., Florida
E Lake Co/Paisley/Deland, Florida
Sandpiper MHP/Umatilla, Florida
Hampton/Stark, Florida
E Putnam Co., Florida
Live Oak, Florida
Sharpes Ferry, Florida
Smith Lake Shores MHP, Florida

Georgia
Sanford/Clarke, Georgia
Arnoldsville/Clark Co., Georgia
Lincolnton Co., Georgia
Avalon City, Georgia
Bishop City, Georgia
Rayle, Georgia
Raysville, Georgia

Illinois
Lake of Egypt/Johnson Co., Illinois
Carrier Mills, Illinois
Jackson Co., Illinois
Alexander Co., Illinois
Rosiclare, Illinois
Freeman Spur, Illinois
Vienna, Illinois
Galatia, Illinois
Pittsburg, Illinois
Golconda, Illinois

Kansas
Marion, Kansas
Minneapolis, Kansas
Hillsboro, Kansas
Rossville, Kansas
Chapman, Kansas
Strong City, Kansas
Clifton, Kansas
Blue Rapids, Kansas
Solomon, Kansas
Wakefield, Kansas
Overbrook, Kansas
Americus, Kansas
Pomona, Kansas
Riley, Kansas
Onaga, Kansas
Alma, Kansas
Meriden, Kansas
Waverly, Kansas
Olpe, Kansas
Milford, Kansas
Hartford, Kansas
Maple Hill, Kansas
White City, Kansas
Melvern, Kansas
Eskridge, Kansas
Hope, Kansas
Alta Vista, Kansas
Dwight, Kansas
Quenemo, Kansas
Richmond, Kansas
Neosha Rapids, Kansas
Cuba, Kansas
Vassar Lake/Osage, Kansas
Woodbine, Kansas
McFarland, Kansas
Lyons Co., Kansas
Havensville, Kansas
Reading, Kansas
Tamps, Kansas
Williamsburg, Kansas
Harveyville, Kansas
Morganville, Kansas
LakeWabaunsee, Kansas
Palmer, Kansas
Barnes, Kansas
Paxico, Kansas
Lehigh, Kansas
Walton, Kansas
Durham, Kansas
Green, Kansas

Kentucky
Hickman, Kentucky
Hazel, Kentucky

Louisiana
Kentwood, Louisiana

Missouri
Slater, Missouri
Gallatin, Missouri
Memphis, Missouri
Princeton, Missouri
Smithton, Missouri
Cass Co., Missouri
Green Castle, Missouri
Greentop, Missouri
Hallsville, Missouri
New Bloomfield, Missouri
Novinger, Missouri
Sturgeon, Missouri
Higbee, Missouri

Mississippi
Canton, Mississippi
Winona, Mississippi
Lexington, Mississippi
Iuka, Mississippi
Calhoun City, Mississippi
Charleston, Mississippi
Sumner, Mississippi
Itta Benna, Mississippi
Poplarville, Mississippi
Eupora, Mississippi
Monticello, Mississippi
Shelby, Mississippi
Tylertown, Mississippi
Mound Bayou, Mississippi
Prentiss, Mississippi
Hickory Flat, Mississippi
Coffeeville, Mississippi
Taylorsville, Mississippi
Lake, Mississippi
Lumberton, Mississippi
Macedonia, Mississippi
Ashland, Mississippi
Marshall Co., Mississippi
N.A.S. Meridian, Mississippi
Richton, Mississippi
Dekalb, Mississippi
Leakesville, Mississippi
Sumrall, Mississippi
Chunky, Mississippi
Shubuta, Mississippi
Bassfield, Mississippi
Bentonia, Mississippi
Stateline, Mississippi
Mosselle, Mississippi
Pachuta, Mississippi


Nebraska
Central City, Nebraska
Wymore, Nebraska
Albion, Nebraska
Burwell, Nebraska
Fullerton, Nebraska
Stromsburg, Nebraska
Grand Island. Nebraska
Genoa, Nebraska
Osceola, Nebraska
Waco, Nebraska
Deshler, Nebraska
Newman Grove, Nebraska
Peru, Nebraska
Saint Edward, Nebraska
Sargent, Nebraska
Humphrey, Nebraska
Shelby, Nebraska
Nelson, Nebraska
Ceresco, Nebraska
Valparaiso, Nebraska
Silver Creek, Nebraska
Cedar Rapids, Nebraska
Bellwood, Nebraska
Beaver Crossing, Nebraska
Chester, Nebraska
Meadow Grove, Nebraska
Malcolm, Nebraska
Polk, Nebraska
Arcadia, Nebraska
North Loup, Nebraska
Western, Nebraska
Scotia, Nebraska
Gresham, Nebraska
Duncan, Nebraska
Bradshaw, Nebraska
Glenvil, Nebraska
Garland, Nebraska
Ulysses, Nebraska
Brainard, Nebraska
Raymond, Nebraska
Taylor, Nebraska
Staplehurst, Nebraska
Byron, Nebraska
Benedict, Nebraska

South Carolina
Cross Hill East (Mountville), South Carolina
Greenville (SE) Co., South Carolina
Laurens SE, South Carolina
McCormick Co., South Carolina

South Dakota
Pennington/Rimrock Hwy, SD, South Dakota
Hill City, South Dakota
Newell, South Dakota
Boulder Canyon, South Dakota
Whitewood, South Dakota

Tennessee
Hazel, Kentucky

Texas
Franklin, Texas
Calvert, Texas
Bremond, Texas
Lott, Texas
Crawford, Texas
Chilton, Texas

_________________________

  1 47 C.F.R.  11.11(a).

  2 Cable Television  Consumer Protection and Competition Act  of 
1992, Pub. L. No. 102-385,  16(b), 106 Stat. 1460, 1490  (1992).  
Section 624(g) provides that  ``each cable operator shall  comply 
with such standards as the  Commission shall prescribe to  ensure 
that viewers of video programming  on cable systems are  afforded 
the same emergency  information as is  afforded by the  emergency 
broadcasting system pursuant to Commission regulations ....''  47 
U.S.C.  544(g).  

  3 Amendment  of Part 73, Subpart  G, of the Commission's  Rules 
Regarding the Emergency  Broadcast System, Report  and Order  and 
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FO Docket Nos. 91-171/91-
301, 10  FCC  Rcd  1786  (1994)  (``First  Report  and  Order''), 
reconsideration granted in part, denied in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11494 
(1995).

  4 Amendment  of Part 73, Subpart  G, of the Commission's  Rules 
Regarding the  Emergency  Broadcast  System,  Second  Report  and 
Order, FO  Docket Nos.  91-171/91-301, 12  FCC Rcd  15503  (1997) 
(``Second Report and Order'').

  5 Id. at 15512-13.

  6 Id. at 15516-15518.

  7 Id. at 15513.

  8 Id. at 15513, n. 59.

  9 On October 31, 2001, Galaxy Telecom, L.P. and Galaxy  Telecom 
Capital Corp. filed  for Chapter  11 bankruptcy  with the  United 
States Bankruptcy Court, the Eastern District of Missouri.

  10 The  waivers will  extend 36  months from  October 1,  2002, 
until October 1,  2005.  Galaxy Telecom,  L.P. also  specifically 
requested waiver of  the testing and  monitoring requirements  of 
the EAS rules for the 217  systems.  We clarify that the  waivers 
we are granting  also encompass  the EAS  testing and  monitoring 
requirements.  

  11 Amendment  of Part  11 of the  Commission's Rules  Regarding 
the Emergency Alert System,  EB Docket 01-66, FCC  02-64 at   71 
(released February 26, 2002).

  12 One manufacturer  estimated that an EAS decoder-only  system 
can reduce the cost by 64% over what a cable operator would spend 
for an encoder/decoder unit.  Id. at  70.

  13 47 C.F.R.  0.111, 0.204(b) and 0.311.