Click here for Microsoft Word Version

This document was converted from
WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Word or WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version (above).


                         Before the
                   Washington, D.C. 20554

AT&T Corporation,                  )
     Complainant,                  )    
          v.                  )    File No. E-99-15S 
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,    )
Pacific Bell, and Nevada Bell,          )
     Defendants.                   )


     Adopted: January 10, 2001               Released: 
January 11, 2001 

By the Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, 
Enforcement Bureau:

          1.   This matter comes before the Commission as a 
Joint Motion of AT&T Corporation and Southwestern Bell 
Telephone Company, Pacific Bell, and Nevada Bell to Dismiss 
With Prejudice (Joint Motion). The above-captioned complaint 
addresses the defendants' practice of improperly assessing 
carrier common line charges for interstate calls involving 
certain optional calling services. 

     2.   We are satisfied that granting this motion to 
dismiss with prejudice will serve the public interest by 
promoting the private resolution of disputes and by 
eliminating the need for further litigation and the 
expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and 
of this Commission.

     3.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 
1, 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended, 47 U.S.C.  151, 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the 
authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the 
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.111 and 0.311, that the 
Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice IS GRANTED.

     4.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned 
complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that this 
proceeding IS TERMINATED.


                         Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief
                         Market Disputes Resolution Division
                         Enforcement Bureau