Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
Click here for NAL


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


Media Contact:

Will Wiquist, (202) 418-0509

For Immediate Release


`Long Distance Consolidated Billing Company' Allegedly Changed and Added Charges To Consumers' Accounts Without Authorization


WASHINGTON, July 30, 2015 - The Federal Communications Commission plans a $2.4 million fine against Long Distance Consolidated Billing Company. This telephone company, based in Waterford, Michigan, allegedly switched consumers' regional toll service providers without their authorization ("slamming"), misrepresented the company's identity during telemarketing calls, and placed unauthorized charges on consumers' telephone bills ("cramming").

"It is unacceptable for any company to pad unauthorized charges on bills or trick consumers into changing their preferred phone company," said Travis LeBlanc, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau. "The FCC will not tolerate companies that deceive consumers into changing their telephone services or carriers."

The Enforcement Bureau reviewed over 70 complaints against Long Distance Consolidated Billing Company (LDCB) that consumers filed with the Commission, the Better Business Bureau, state regulatory agencies, and directly with LDCB. Consumers repeatedly complained that LDCB switched their regional toll service providers without their authorization. In some cases, consumers stated that LDCB's telemarketer pretended to be employed by the consumer's own telephone carrier. The investigation also showed that LDCB placed charges for its service on consumers' local telephone bills without their authorization.

The Commission has charged LDCB with willfully and repeatedly switching consumers' preferred regional toll carrier without verified authorization, misrepresenting its identity to consumers, and cramming unauthorized charges onto consumers' telephone bills. Commission rules prohibit a carrier from switching a customer's preferred long distance carrier without obtaining authorization from the customer to make such a change. The Communications Act makes it unlawful for a carrier to misrepresent its identity or the nature of its service to obtain that authorization. The Act also makes it unlawful for a carrier to include unauthorized charges or fees on consumers' telephone bills.

With today's action, the Commission has now taken more than 30 enforcement actions for cramming or slamming in the past five years. These actions collectively have announced more than $110 million in penalties to the U.S. Treasury, and are slated to return more than $250 million to consumers.

For more information about the FCC's rules protecting consumers from unauthorized charges on telephone bills, see the FCC consumer guide to slamming,, or cramming,

To file a complaint with the FCC, go to or contact the FCC's Consumer Center by calling 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322) voice or 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322) TTY; faxing 1-866-418-0232; or by writing to:

Federal Communications Commission

Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau

Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division

445 12th Street, SW

Washington, DC 20554

The Notice of Apparent Liability is available at:

Action by the Commission July 30, 2015 by Order (FCC 15-96). Chairman Wheeler, Commissioners Clyburn, Rosenworcel, Pai, and O'Rielly.


Office of Media Relations: (202) 418-0500

TTY: (888) 835-5322

Twitter: @FCC [HYPERLINK:]

This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC, 515 F.2d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1974).