Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


Federal Communications Commission
445 12
Street, S.W.
Washington, D. C.  20554
This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action.  Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action.
See MCI v. FCC, 515 F.2d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
March 15, 2013 Mark Wigfield, 202-418-0253
Citations Issued To Robocallers That Made Millions Of Calls To Wireless Phones Without 
Washington, D.C. – Two providers of automatically dialed calls using prerecorded or artificial 
voice messages—“robocalls”—were issued citations today for making millions of robocalls to 
wireless phones without prior authorization from the call recipients.  The FCC Enforcement 
Bureau’s Telecommunications Consumers Division conducted investigations and issued citations 
to Dialing Services, LLC and Richard Gilmore (d/b/a Democratic Dialing), respectively.
In its investigations, the Bureau uncovered evidence that Dialing Services, LLC and Democratic 
Dialing each made in excess of one million calls to wireless phones without the recipient’s 
authorization during certain months in 2011 and/or 2012.  The investigations also showed that 
each company failed to provide certain identification information required under federal law.
“Consumers have increasingly been sounding the alarm on robocalls, rightly complaining about 
unwanted, intrusive cell phone calls and text messages from strangers, or worse yet computers,”
said Michele Ellison, Chief of the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau.  “These citations set the stage for 
significant monetary penalties if violations continue,” Ms. Ellison warned.    
The Communications Act and the Commission’s rules generally prohibit robocalls and 
autodialed calls (including autodialed live calls, prerecorded or artificial voice messages, and 
autodialed text messages) to wireless phones and other mobile services (such as paging systems), 
unless the calls are made for emergency purposes, or the calls are made with the prior express 
consent of the called party.  The Bureau’s investigations showed that none of the calls made by 
either company were for an emergency purpose.  When FCC staff spoke to a sampling of call 
recipients directly, not one of them had ever given permission to anyone to robocall them on 
their wireless phones.
The citations require each company to certify within fifteen calendar days that it has ceased 
making robocalls to wireless phones without prior authorization, and that the calls it makes 
include the required identifications. Issuance of citations is the required first step before the FCC 
could impose fines of up to $4.8 million for the particular violations at issue in the citations.   
Robocallers who make illegal calls to wireless phones may be liable for penalties of $16,000 per 
call, resulting in fines that could reach tens of millions of dollars or more, depending on the 
volume of violations.
Dialing Services, LLC—Citation:
Richard Gilmore (d/b/a Democratic Dialing)—Citation:
FCC Enforcement Advisory on Autodialed and Prerecorded Calls (Sept. 2012):
News about the Federal Communications Commission can also be found
on the Commission’s web site