Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

   In the Matter of )


   Oxford Media Group, Inc. ) File No.: EB-FIELDNER-12-00005753

   Licensee of TV Station WJYS-DT )

   Facility ID #32334 ) NOV No.: V201332320004

   Hammond, IN )

                              NOTICE OF VIOLATION

                                                 Released: February  20, 2013

   By the District Director, Chicago Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement

    1. This is a Notice of Violation (Notice) issued pursuant to Section 1.89
       of the Commission's rules^ to Oxford Media Group, Inc. (Oxford Media),
       licensee of TV Station WJYS-DT in Hammond, Indiana. Pursuant to
       Section 1.89(a) of the Rules, issuance of this Notice does not
       preclude the Enforcement Bureau from further action if warranted,
       including issuing a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture for
       the violation(s) noted herein.^

    2. On December 6, 2012, an agent of the Commission's Chicago Office
       inspected Station WJYS-DT  at its main studio at 18600 South Oak Park
       Avenue, Tinley Park, Illinois, and observed the following violations:

   a. 47 C.F.R S 11.61(b): "Entries shall be made in EAS Participant records,
   as specified in SS 11.35(a) ...." At the time of the inspection, there
   were no entries in the station log concerning EAS tests sent and received
   during the last three weeks in August 2012 and tests sent during the last
   two weeks of November 2012.

   b. 47 C.F.R. S 73.1870 (b)(3): "The designation of the chief operator must
   be in writing with a copy of the designation posted with the station
   license." At the time of inspection, a copy of the written designation for
   the chief operator was not posted with the station license or made
   available to the FCC agent.

   c. 47 C.F.R. S 73.1870 (c)(3): "Review of the station records at least
   once each week to determine if required entries are being made correctly.
   Additionally, verification must be made that the station has been operated
   as required by the rules or the station authorization. Upon completion of
   the review, the chief operator or his designee must date and sign the log,
   initiate any corrective action which may be necessary, and advise the
   station licensee of any condition which is repetitive." At the time of
   inspection, there was no indication that the chief operator had signed the
   station log.

    3. Pursuant to Section 308(b)  of the Communications Act of 1934, as
       amended,^ and Section 1.89 of the Rules, we seek additional
       information concerning the violations and any remedial actions taken.
       Therefore, Oxford Media must submit a written statement concerning
       this matter within twenty (20) days of release of this Notice. The
       response (i) must fully explain each violation, including all relevant
       surrounding facts and circumstances, (ii) must contain a statement of
       the specific action(s) taken to correct each violation and preclude
       recurrence, and (iii) must include a time line for completion of any
       pending corrective action(s). The response must be complete in itself
       and must not be abbreviated by reference to other communications or
       answers to other notices.^

    4. In accordance with Section 1.16 of the Rules, we direct Oxford Media
       to support its response to this Notice with an affidavit or
       declaration under penalty of perjury, signed and dated by an
       authorized officer of Oxford Media with personal knowledge of the
       representations provided in Oxford Media's response, verifying the
       truth and accuracy of the information therein,^ and confirming that
       all of the information requested by this Notice which is in the
       licensee's possession, custody, control, or knowledge has been
       produced. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or
       conceal any material fact in reply to this Notice is punishable by
       fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.^

    5. All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should
       be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to
       the following address:

   Federal Communications Commission

   Chicago Office

   1550 North Northwest Highway, Room 306

   Park Ridge, IL 60068

    6. This Notice shall be sent to Oxford Media Group at its address of

    7. The Privacy Act of 1974^ requires that we advise you that the
       Commission will use all relevant material information before it,
       including any information disclosed in your reply, to determine what,
       if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance.


   James M. Roop

   District Director

   Chicago District Office

   Northeast Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   ^47 C.F.R. S 1.89.

   ^47 C.F.R. S 1.89(a).

   ^ 47 U.S.C. S 308(b).

   ^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.89(c).

   ^Section 1.16 of the Commission's rules provides that "[a]ny document to
   be filed with the Federal Communications Commission and which is required
   by any law, rule or other regulation of the United States to be supported,
   evidenced, established or proved by a written sworn declaration,
   verification, certificate, statement, oath or affidavit by the person
   making the same, may be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the
   unsworn declaration, certification, verification, or statement in writing
   of such person . . . . Such declaration shall be subscribed by the
   declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially
   the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under
   penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
   (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S 1.16.

   ^18 U.S.C. S 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S 1.17.

   ^P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S 552a(e)(3).

                       Federal Communications Commission


                       Federal Communications Commission