Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

   In the Matter of )


   CCO SOCAL I, LLC ) File No. EB-11-SF-0169

   Community Unit ID: CA0230 )

   King City, CA ) NOV No. V201132960031


                              NOTICE OF VIOLATION

   Released: September 30, 2011

   By the District Director, San Francisco Office, Western Region,
   Enforcement Bureau:

    1. This is a Notice of Violation ("Notice") issued pursuant to Section
       1.89 of the Commission's Rules, to CCO SOCAL I, LLC ("CCO"), operator
       of a cable system in King City, California.

    2. On August 22, 2011, in response to a complaint that a signal was
       interfering with the California Department of Forestry and Fire
       Protection (CALFIRE) land mobile units and fire station operating on
       151.2500 MHz in King City, California, an agent from the Enforcement
       Bureau's San Francisco Office located the interfering signal on
       151.2500 MHz to sporadic cable signal leakage from CCO's cable system
       in and around King City, California. During the course of the
       investigation, the agent inspected CCO's cable system located in King
       City, California, and observed the following violations:

   a. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.613: "(a) Harmful interference is any emission,
   radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a
   radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades,
   obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating
   in accordance with this chapter. (b) [A multi-channel video programming
   distributor] that causes harmful interference shall promptly take
   appropriate measures to eliminate the harmful interference." At the time
   of the inspection, the agent observed signal leakage near the intersection
   of Enfield Road and Pine Canyon Road, in close proximity to and en route
   to CALFIRE's fire station on Pine Canyon Road, which was capable of
   causing harmful interference to the reception of fire communications on
   151.250 MHz.

   b. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.605(a)(12): "As an exception to the general provision
   requiring measurements to be made at subscriber terminals, and without
   regard to the type of signals carried by the cable television system,
   signal leakage from a cable television system shall be measured in
   accordance with the procedures outlined in 76.609(h) and shall be limited
   as follows: Over 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz - 20 micro-volts per
   meter, measured at 3 meters." At the time of the inspection, the agent
   measured signal leakage in excess of 20 mV/m on the frequency of 133.2625
   MHz at:

   1) 45181 Crown Ave. 58 uV/m

    3. Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
       and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, CCO must submit a written
       statement concerning this matter within 20 days of release of this
       Notice. The response must fully explain each violation, must contain a
       statement of the specific action(s) taken to correct each violation
       and preclude recurrence, and should include a time line for completion
       of pending corrective action(s). The response must be complete in
       itself and signed by a principal or officer of CCO. All replies and
       documentation sent in response to this Notice should be marked with
       the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to the following

   Federal Communications Commission

   San Francisco Office

   5653 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 105

   Pleasanton, CA 94588-8543

    4. This Notice shall be sent to CCO at its address of record.

    5. The Privacy Act of 1974 requires that we advise you that the
       Commission will use all relevant material information before it,
       including any information disclosed in your reply, to determine what,
       if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false
       statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is
       punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.


   Thomas N. Van Stavern

   District Director

   San Francisco District Office

   Western Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.89.

   47 U.S.C. S: 403.

   P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3).

   18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq.

   Federal Communications Commission


                       Federal Communications Commission