WPC_L 2?BJZECourier3|q #Xj\  P6G;߈XP#HP LaserJet 5PHPLAS5P.PRS5x  @\$]X@ X-#Xj\  P6G;߈XP#2,qKXCourierTimes New Roman"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDdDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddxHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd<?xxx,x6X@`7X@7jC:,߈Xj\  P6G;XP2fS^ ZK Z-  #2PG;P#3|q HP LaserJet 5PHPLAS5P.PRS5x  @\$]X@"i~'^99Ipp.DDNt9D99pppppppppp99tttp̅}9ep}}999\p.ppepp9pp..e.ppppDe9peeeeE5EtD9sZDDD9DDDDDDpD|9pppppȰepppp99999999pppppppppepp|pepppppeese|pppppppspsp9.D|DD9|Xssep.p:pDpDp.pxppppȼDDDeees}L}9}Zpppppps}e}e}eppDpe}Dp|8dp,(,WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNHxxHlpD|pppppLJpDHpD,,DDpDDxppxHxxHsdd,DdD"dxdldtxxd2HKt+ f CourierArialArial BoldCG TimesCG Times BoldLine Draw (Scalable-Cr)"i~'^:D`pp8DDLt8D88ppppppppppDDttt|Đ|8p|||D8Dtp8p|p|pD||88p8||||LpD|pppdL8LtD8ttDDD8DDDDDDpD|8pppppȰppppp88888888|||||||||pp|||p||ppppptppppp|||||||88D|DD8|pttp|8|L|D|`|8|||||ȼLLLpppt|`|D|t||||||t|d|d|d||D|p|Dp:dp,0,WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNHxxHppD|pppppLHpDPpD88ddpDDxppxHxxHs||8ddD"dxxldtxxd",^CCU5PP[CPCCCCCvCCCk5vC55v5PvCvvvvP>PPCiPPPCPPPPPPPCvCCCCCCCCvvvvvC5PPPCgv5DPO5PPPvvvYCivvvPvPAu4/4WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNTT~PYVPTO33PPPPTTuu3OuO"uu~uu",tB^ f ^ENluuNNNuNNNNuuuuuuuuuuNNhN[}NNNuuNhuhuhNuuAAuAuuuuV[Auuuuhhuhu=uuuuuNuuuuuuuuuAhhhhhhhhhhNANANANAuuuuuuuuuuhuuuuuuguggguuguuguuuuuuuNAuuuuNuuuuATuAAuuuuuTTu~Y~Y~Y}uTAuuuuuuuuggguuu}uuuNuuNNNWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNuuuNh__uuuuuuRuuuuRNNyyu<<uuuuuNyuR"uyuCuNNNuuuuNuhulcuhhNNNNh[huhNAhhuhuuuhhNuhNNuuuuuuuNuhN /;k  PP9~~+k~~KkKk&&pY2@f 7f &\2f _5",tB^ f ^Yd ddd dddddd, , dudddddSSSouS,NdS dSdSdSdSdSdTlTT llrrrlTddddW,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdzz  i idd NN,,,, dii",,,,,,,,,  ,,,  ,,,V' dd,,,,,, d, ,,d,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ddddudSddddd,,8VnDVVbbJDDPD\> J2J>8 &>>,,,,,,,,`` 8888,,,,,,,,,,zz&&>>>r",tB^ f ^Yd ddd dddddd, , u,ddddiSdSud,NdS7uSuSuSuSrSuTxuSSrurxf,ddddW,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNd%  i idd NN,,,, d^i",,,,,,,,,  ,,,  ,,,V' dd,,,,,, d, ,,d,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,dddduuSudddd,,8VnDVVbbJDDPD\> J2J>8 &>>,,,,,,,,`` 8888,,,,,,,,,,zz&&>>>r<?xxx,QSx6X@`7X@9NC,2PG;P1mC9,4Xm2PG;XP/qC:,WXq2pPG;XANE,w$ PE37PTdY, PE37PDSdY,"Gw_ pi78wC;,WXw PE37XPD 7zC;,"ZXz_ pi7X?xxxX0Rx6X@B X@",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d|8|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddxxdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCxCddoddCdYds]xUvdYYCCCCx~oxoY~NYdYC8YooYdYxsdxdd~YYxoxxx~CdxYxxxxCCdddddddxCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L2f @5Z]L",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCdxN`xoCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddd4dddddCddddddddo8dddddYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddpddddxodddXXddXddXdddddooL8doddNopddo8PdN8ppoddXXdpLoNpLodPDdopoopodXYXodoodddCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddxxddd~ooCsdF"dsd9dCCxCddoddCdYds`xUvdddCCCCxoxoYNYYYN8YooYdYxxdxddYYxoxxxNdxYxxxxCCdddddddxCxdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L P-%#XX2PQ4XP# Statement of  FCC Commissioner Susan Ness .Before the I Subcommittee on Communications  Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation  /United State Senate TP  P_-#QJune 10, 1998 TP    xMr. Chairman and members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to participate in today's hearing. xYou have entrusted the Federal Communications Commission with enormous responsibilities under the Communications Act and, most particularly, under the provisions enacted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. We are accountable to you for the decisions we make to implement these laws, and I welcome the opportunity to discuss the Commission's activities with you. xI remain convinced that the principles and policies of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 are right on target. This law is bringing about changes that will increasingly produce more competition, more choice, more innovation, and lower prices all to the benefit of American consumers. This law also strengthens our commitment and our ability to deregulate and discard regulations that have outlived their usefulness. Throughout the time since the passage of the statute, the Commission has maintained a steadfast adherence to the law you wrote. I am aware that each member of this Subcommittee can identify FCC decisions you would have made differently, but you have my personal assurance that we have made every effort to remain faithful to the letter and spirit of the law. " (0*0*0*@)"ԌxOf course, there remains a great deal of unfinished business. Transforming the local telephone market from monopoly to competition the single biggest change sought to be effectuated by the Telecommunications Act has proved to be a more complicated and timeconsuming task than anyone could have known. Transitions take time. Monopoly providers, not unexpectedly, fight to retain their marketplace advantage. The FCC and the state commissions and the courts and the carriers all have a lot of work in front of us before consumers fully enjoy the fruits of competition in local services. xBut, there are signs of healthy progress. My personal assessment is that the momentum of competition is increasing. xEven as competition enters the local telephone marketplace, Congress made it clear that it wanted to maintain universal service affordable telephone service for everyone. It is important to explain that the FCC has not withdrawn any of the support that makes local phone service affordable in high cost areas; a variety of highcost subsidies remain in place, and we have done nothing that requires local phone rates to increase. But one major task that remains to be completed is to reform highcost support mechanisms in ways that are competitively neutral and competitively sustainable.  R -xThus far, we have been unable to do so for several reasons. The biggest difficulty relates to the competing interests of the highcost states and the lowcost states, and the prospect that any FCC order that lacks consensus support will be mired in jurisdictional litigation. Another major problem is the inherent complexity of":&0*((`'" devising models that accurately compute the economic costs of serving consumers in areas of differing density, topography, climate, etc. A workable solution must be devised this year, so that the interests of consumers in rural, insular, and highcost areas, as well as those in lowcost areas, are safeguarded and incumbents and  RH-new entrants alike can finalize and execute their business plans. We are working closely and diligently with state commissioners through the mechanism of the Joint Board on universal service to accomplish this task.  R -xAs you know, we are also revisiting issues relating to the newest element of universal service the requirement that we promote telecommunications access for elementary and secondary schools, libraries, and rural health care providers. Since the passage of the Act in 1996, the Internet has integrated into the fabric of our society far more rapidly and pervasively than anyone would have imagined when the Act was drafted. It is more critical than ever that children in lower income school districts have access to this invaluable information tool. We as a nation cannot afford to be fostering through our inaction a widening of the divide between the technology  RN-"haves" and "havenots." xA variety of issues have arisen regarding the mechanisms we have established to implement the schools, libraries, and rural health care support provisions. You have raised important issues, and we have sought to be responsive to your concerns. We are seeking to consolidate the Schools and Libraries Corporation, the Rural Health Care Corporation, and the Universal Service Administrative Corporation. We are prepared to address the salary issues. And there is an active dialogue underway":&0*((`'"  R-on the issue of collection rates. It is vital that we continue to engage on these issues in as constructive a manner as possible.  R-xAnother major area of activity this year will be to rule on a number of proposed  Rv-mergers. Our job is to review these carefully and approve only those that bring the prospect of increasing competition, not reducing it. We will also continue our review of applications by Bell companies to offer long distance services. It may well be that, sometime this year, we will see one or more applications that demonstrate compliance with the criteria you established for opening local markets. xAs competition has grown, new problems have arisen. Slamming is proving to be an especially severe problem. We are committed to use all tools at our disposal to attack it, and we welcome your efforts to create even stronger consumer protections through additional legislation. Cramming is a newer problem, but the Commission and carriers are working proactively to prevent this kind of abuse from  R-taking hold. As competition takes hold, I firmly believe that we must escalate our efforts to prevent these and other consumer abuses. It is imperative that the Commission respond immediately and forcefully to eliminate consumer fraud and  R -abuse. xTo this end, I believe that we may need to consider establishing an Office of Consumer Affairs to ensure that these kinds of problems are given priority treatment. xThis is a critical year for the rollout of digital television. Many of the FCC issues are behind us, but others still lie ahead, such as the fee structure for ancillary uses and cable mustcarry. To reduce the danger of delays, I will be chairing an":&0*((`'" FCC strike force to work cooperatively with local authorities and broadcasters to help resolve tower siting problems. xI am pleased that most of the stations pledging to be on the air by this Fall report that they are on schedule to do so. xIf all goes well, we can expect to see the fruits of ten years of labor ripen later this fall into a spectacular television viewing experience. Right here on Capitol Hill, I had the opportunity to witness the opening game of the American League's Texas Rangers and Chicago White Sox broadcast in true highdefinition television, and it was superb. Digital television also will facilitate convergence with computers, and permit broadcasters to deliver a whole new array of other digital services to the American public in addition to traditional video programming. xDuring the transition from analog to digital, I want to make sure that consumers are not misled or confused when they go to buy new digital TV sets and settop devices. Minimizing disruption and making the transition to DTV as smooth as possible for all Americans is complicated by the involvement of so many industries with competing incentives: broadcasters, cable operators, consumer electronics manufacturers, and computer companies. xTomorrow, we will adopt rules to implement Section 629 of the Act, which calls for the commercial availability of settop devices in stores and through distributors  R"-other than video service providers. These devices are becoming more like network computers and will play an increasingly important role in spurring new digital services and new functionality. ":&0*((`'"ԌxWhile digital equipment is being developed for the broadcast, cable, computer, and satellite industries, unfortunately, gaps exist between them and in a number of important respects, the devices are not compatible. For example, it is very doubtful that the new DTV sets that will be available for the first time this fall will be fully compatible with cable systems carrying digital signals. What's lacking is agreement by the cable, consumer electronics, and motion picture industry on the standard for the short piece of cable, also called the "firewire," that connects digital televisions to other digital devices. I do not believe the Commission should attempt to impose technical standards that ensure DTV compatibility, but we can and should encourage and facilitate marketplace solutions. The need for equipment compatibility is becoming more pressing as new service providers outside of the broadcast and cable arena introduce new services intended for reception on television sets in the home. xWe are also continuing to take steps to promote competition to cable by every means open to us. Increased competition to cable would result in benefits to consumers such as lower prices, new programming packages, and better customer service. For example, we're examining whether our program access rules can and should be improved to facilitate such competition. We are also exploring ways to streamline DBS regulations, to lift any undue burdens on what has emerged as the foremost competitor to cable. xThe coming year will also see growing consumer acceptance of new wireless services, as prices fall and consumer choices proliferate. The Commission will continue to administer the spectrum in ways that create additional competition. And":&0*((`'" we'll make sure that all aspects of our spectrum management responsibilities domestic and international are discharged efficiently. X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8: