WPC 2 BPZ Courier 10cpi3|wUx6X@8;X@HP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSx  @HMCX@2< ZLH3|wHP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSX\  P6G;HMCPCG Times (Scalable)CG Times Bold (Scalable)CG Times Italic (Scalable) X-#Xj\  P6G;[hXP#  @--@Њ#X\  P6G;P#X01Í ÍX01Í Í#Xj\  P6G;[hXP#2pvp*kka8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2vGt1a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2   G  a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2    a 1 a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2<< Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2 LGa2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   2~;3Gza7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:/?Q0@0Technical[4]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B=&=>   Technical[1]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B>4?$@     Technical[7]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B?&AB  . Technical[8]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B@&CD  . 23A}1B 2C2D%3Paragraph[1]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BA$ab Paragraph[2]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BB/cd` ` ` Paragraph[3]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BC:ef` ` `  Paragraph[4]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BDEgh` ` `  26E3F4GR5H6Paragraph[5]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BEPij` ` ` hhh Paragraph[6]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BF[kl Paragraph[7]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BGfmn Paragraph[8]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BHqop 2!>I 7J7K9L<Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph FontI11#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#toc 1toc 1J` hp x (#44` hp x (#toc 2toc 2K` hp x (#4 4 ` hp x (#toc 3toc 3L` hp x (#4 4 ` hp x (#2#EMS>Nq@OBPvDtoc 4toc 4M` hp x (#4 <4 <` hp x (#toc 5toc 5N` hp x (#4<4<` hp x (#toc 6toc 6O` hp x (#44` hp x (#toc 7toc 7P 2MQUERsGSITKtoc 8toc 8Q` hp x (#44` hp x (#toc 9toc 9R` hp x (#44` hp x (#index 1index 1S` hp x (#4 4 ` hp x (#index 2index 2T` hp x (#4 4 ` hp x (#2[RUMVPWPXQtoatoaU` hp x (#` hp x (#captioncaptionV;1#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#_Equation Caption_Equation CaptionW11#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#endnote referenceendnote referenceX44#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#2_TYRZpS[qS\eSfootnote referencefootnote referenceY4#XP\  P6QXP#1S&C5C^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct )Zqr` ` ` 2S&C6C^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct )[s t . 3S&C7C^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct )\ uv 2V]eT^T_pU`U4S&C8C^fDocument StyleNF2CC! -2( -Ct )] wx 5S&C9C^fDocument StyleNF2CC/ -2( -Ct )^*yz   6S&C:C^fDocument StyleNF2CC= -2( -Ct )_{|` ` ` 7S&C;C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK -2( -Ct )`8}~@  2>YaVbXWcWdX8S&C<C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersY -2( -Ct )aA@` ` `  ` ` ` 9S&C=C^fDocument StyleNF2CCg -2( -Ct )b0    10S&C>C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersu -2( -Ct )cJ` ` ` @  ` ` ` 11S&C?C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )dS` ` `  @  2~\epYf&ZgZh[12S&C@C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )e\` ` `  @hhh hhh 13S&CAC^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )fe` ` `  hhh@ hhh 14S&CBC^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )gn` ` `  hhh@  15S&CCC^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )hw` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp 2_i\jj]k]lt^16S&CDC^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct )iF   ׃  17S&CEC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )j&  . 18S&CFC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )k&  . 19S&CGC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )l*    2amB_n_ok`pa20S&CHC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )m'   21S&CIC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )n&   22S&CJC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )o4$     23S&CKC^fTechnical Document StyleCC+ -2( -Ct )p&  . 2cqar}Wbsbt\c24S&CLC^fTechnical Document StyleCC9 -2( -Ct )q&  . 25S&CMC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)CG -2( -Ct )r$ 26S&CNC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)CU -2( -Ct )s/` ` ` 27S&COC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)Cc -2( -Ct )t:` ` `  2fu!dvdwhexf28S&CPC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)Cq -2( -Ct )uE` ` `  29S&CQC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )vP` ` ` hhh 30S&CRC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )w[ 31S&CSC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )xf 2Gjy gzg{h|si32S&CTC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )yq Default ParaC^fDefault Paragraph Font2CC -2( -Ct )z;;#PP##PP#_Equation CaC^f_Equation CaptionF2CC -2( -Ct ){;;#PP##PP#endnote refeC^fendnote referenceF2CC -2( -Ct )|>>#PP##PP#2gl}yj~lkv{kvkfootnote refC^ffootnote referenceF2CC -2( -Ct )}>#PP#heading 3heading 3~heading 4heading 4 heading 5heading 5 2qnvlvmvmvmheading 6heading 6 heading 7heading 7 heading 8heading 8 endnote textendnote text 2qvnoZ7qdqfootnote textfootnote text toa headingtoa heading` hp x (#(#(#` hp x (#1, 2, 3,?@65NumbersO@/"=(1*1÷$t ?.E1.A, B,t ?@65Uppercase Letters1 ?*1÷$t ?.E .2t'rprqIsesfootnote tex6footnote text̺=(?. 0&ܺ*?.ںd 0E2(33`O5hT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5h.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>` ` ` 34`O5iT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5i.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>  . 35`O5jT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5j.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>  2KveQttpIuu36`O5kT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5k.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>  37`O5lT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5l.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>*   38`O5mT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5m.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>` ` ` 39`O5nT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>8@   2x}vwwQx40`O5oT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>A@` `  ` ` ` 41`O5pT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5p.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>0    42`O5qT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>J` ` @  ` `  43`O5rT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>S` `  @  2>|0yyzm{44`O5sT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>\` `  @hh# hhh 45`O5tT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>e` `  hh#@( hh# 46`O5uT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>n` `  hh#(@- ( 47`O5vT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>w` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2~p|*}}4~48`O5wT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5w.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>F *  ׃  49`O5xT(G2PTechnical Document Stylex.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 50`O5yT(G2PTechnical Document Styley.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 51`O5zT(G2PTechnical Document Stylez.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>*    2`+ۀ52`O5{T(G2PTechnical Document Style{.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>'   53`O5|T(G2PTechnical Document Style|.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&   54`O5}T(G2PTechnical Document Style}.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>4$     55`O5~T(G2PTechnical Document Style~.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 2}56`O5T(G2PTechnical Document Style.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 57`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>$ 58`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>/` ` ` 59`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>:` ` `  2(܅60`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>E` ` `  61`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>P` ` ` hhh 62`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>[ 63`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>f 2͆64`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>q 65`O5T(G2PDefault Paragraph Font5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>OO#P P##P P#66`O5T(G2P_Equation Caption^aO5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>OO#PP##PP#67`O5T(G2Pendnote reference^aO5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>RR#PP##PP#2>[p]q͌68`O5T(G2Pfootnote reference^aO5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>R#PP#69 _5(_>7footnote text _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tZP70 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t` ` ` 71 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t  . 2=epeՍ:p͎72 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t  73 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t  74 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t*   75 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t` ` ` 2Ցo176 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+t8@   77 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tA@` `  ` ` ` 78 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t0     79 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tJ` ` @  ` `  2j)80 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tS` `  @  81 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+t\  ` `  @hh# hhh 82 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+te  ` `  hh#@( hh# 83 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tn ` `  hh#(@- ( 2#384 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tw` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 85 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tF *  ׃  86 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t&  . 87 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t&  . 2_88 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t*    89 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t'   90 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t&   91 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t4$     2}92 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t&   . 93 _5(_>7Technical Document StyledK+b70t _5xŗ+t&!"  . 94 _5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+t$#$ 95 _5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+t/%&` ` ` 2`Ҝe96 _5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+t:'(` ` `  97 _5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+tE)*` ` `  98 _5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+tP+,` ` ` hhh 99 _5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+t[-. 2QFFa100_5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+tf/0 101_5(_>71. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)dK+b70t _5xŗ+tq12 102_5(_>7Default Paragraph Font5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tw3w4#PP##PP#103_5(_>7_Equation Caption _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tw5w6#PP##PP#2IL٣%104_5(_>7endnote reference _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tz7z8#PP##PP#105_5(_>7footnote reference _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tz9:#PP#HeadingChapter HeadingJ d  ) I. ׃  Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers>a݅@  I.   X(# 2{^doӨSubheadingSubheading0\ E A.  FOOTNOTEFootnote - AppearancePHIGHLIGHT 1Italics and Boldldedd+. DRAFT ONHeader A Text = DRAFT and Dateؽ X =8` (#FDRAFTă r  ` (#=D3 1, 43 12pt (Z)(PC-8))T2Dă  ӟ2lX1 1;DRAFT OFFTurn Draft Style off@@    HEADERHeader A - AppearanceLETTER LANDLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5 3'3'Standard'3'3StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11 ;   LEGAL LANDLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5f 3'3'Standard'A'AStandardZ K e6VE L"nu;   2ư11ϮnXnLETTER PORTLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11L 3'3'Standard3'3'StandardZ K e6VE L"nU9   LEGAL PORTLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 14 3'3'StandardA'A'StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 119   TITLETitle of a DocumentK\ * ăFOOTERFooter A - Appearanced2fdyjݱGBLOCK QUOTESmall, single-spaced, indentedN X HIGHLIGHT 2Large and Bold LargeB*d. HIGHLIGHT 3Large, Italicized and Underscored V -qLETTERHEADLetterhead - date/marginsu H XX  3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"nE9    * 3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3' II"n"Tv3'StandarddZ K e VE L"nU9 Ѓ   2zE-ݵ8 8BINVOICE FEETFee Amount for Math Invoice ,, $0$0  MEMORANDUMMemo Page FormatD.   ! M E M O R A N D U M ă r  y<N dddy   INVOICE EXPSEExpense Subtotals for Math Invoice:A ,p, $0$00INVOICE TOTTotals Invoice for Math Macroz 4p, $0$002[XM[[INVOICE HEADRHeading Portion of Math Invoice+C`*   4X 99L$0 **(  ӧ XX NORMALReturn to Normal TypestyleSMALLSmall TypestyleFINEFine Typestyle2![[[CLARGELarge TypestyleEXTRA LARGEExtra Large TypestyleVERY LARGEVery Large TypestyleENVELOPEStandard Business Envelope with Header+w ,,EnvelopeZ K e VE L"n,,EnvelopeLarge, Italicized and Under;    ,, 88+  `   2XSKMACNormal,.Style 14Swiss 8 Pt Without Margins$$D Co> PfQ  )a [ PfQO Style 12Dutch Italics 11.5$$F )^ `> XifQ  )a [ PfQO Style 11Initial Codes for Advanced IIJ )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 ! )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   x )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   j-n )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  jBX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 2 lh|Style 3oDutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/Tabs )a [ PfQO  ddn  # c0*b, oT9 !Style 4 PSwiss 8 Point with MarginsDq Co> PfQ  dddd  #  Style 1.5Dutch Roman 11.5 Font4h )a [ PfQO  dddn Style 2Dutch Italic 11.5$ )^ `> XifQ 2%>~Style 5Dutch Bold 18 Point$RH$L T~> pfQ_  )a [ PfQO Style 7Swiss 11.5$$V )ao> PfQ ]  )a [ PfQO Style 6Dutch Roman 14 Point$$N w [ PfQ   )a [ PfQO Style 10oInitial Codes for Advanced U )a [ PfQK  dddn  ##  [[ b, oT9 !b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  QN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 2W^cStyle 8PfInitial Codes for Beginninggi )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9  [ &e )^ `> XifQ ` Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   d )^ `> XifQ Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jH )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  j )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 9Initial Codes for Intermediate )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 Њ [ e )^ `> XifQ ` Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   3 )^ `> XifQ Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jf )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc.`+ >Page  jX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 "Sh5^18MSS888S8888SSSSSSSSSS88Jxir{icx{8Aui{x`xoYi{xxxl888SS8JSJSJ8SS..S.SSSS>A.SSxSSJJSJSSSSSS8SSSSSSSSS.xJxJxJxJxJorJiJiJiJiJ8.8.8.8.{SxSxSxSxS{S{S{S{SxSxJ{SxSxSxS{S`SxSxSxSrSrSrS{SiSiSiSiSxSxSxSxSxS{S{SS.SSSSz]SSuSiSiSk2g/a{S{SxSxSxoSoSZ?YSYSiSiSiS{S{S{S{SxxSkI8SS888WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxSSS8JDDSSSSSS;SSSS;88VVS++SSffSSxSc]]8VS;"xxSxWxxS唔S88xfxxxxxxxxxxx8SxS]SxoS8SxJS`xlxxxxxxxxxxMxxxxxxofxGcxxxxxxxSxxxxxxxJxxxxJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfi]f]oJiAlJ{SxJ8.uJo]]{JoSxJxf`SfSSiJxJofx]fffxi{8SxxxfJffff88SSSSx{SSSxxxf8`SJ8"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYddddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdddddddd~d~d~d~ddddddddd8ddddoddd~d~d<|8tddddddlLkdkd~d~d~ddddddXCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"Ȑdhd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUvŐdȐYYCCCCŐz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC2U"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲdxN`xoȐCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddddddddCddddddddo8dddddϐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddxoddddddodddddddddood8doddrddoddN8ooddddoNododdddooooȐdYCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"Ȑdsd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ`ȐȐȮzȐUvŐdȐddCCCCŐzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC"Sh5^$(8<><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx:J2J2H2H2YHC2C26&6262?2?2?2J2J2J2J2^HH2@,!22!!!WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHHH222!,))22X222YY2#2222Y#!!442Ydd22==Ld2d2H2;SS88Y!42^x#"ddddHHddd2Hdd4HHYYddd2YYddd Y2!!dddddH=dYHHHHHHHHHHx!d2H282YdHdC2!2H,29HNAddHHHHHHHHHHddddd.dHHHHdddddddddddddddddddHHddddddSC=NdHddd+;HHHHddddddHHH2HHdHHdddHHH,HHHH,HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!HHH!HHH!HHH!HHHHHHHHHHHHHH=?8=8C,?'A,J2H,!F,C8[8J,C2H,H=92=22?,H,C=H8N===H?J!2HHH=,====!!2222HJ222HHH=!92,!d"Sh5^18PSS888S8888SSSSSSSSSS88Sddoxd`xx8Jo]oxdxdS]xdd]]888SS8SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSS??.SJoJJ?JSJSSSSSS8SSSSSSSSS.dSdSdSdSdSooJdJdJdJdJ8.8.8.8.oSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]JdSxSxSxS]JxSdSdSdSdSoSoSoSxSdSdSdSdSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSS/SSSSSSSoS]S]S]/]/doSoSxSxSodSdSS?SSSS]S]S]SxSxSxSxSo]S]?8SS888WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxSSS8SMMSSSSSS;SSSS;88SSS..SSffSSxSYSS8SS;"xxSxSxxS哓S88xfxxxxxxxxxxx8SfS]SxoS8SxJS`xlxxxxxxxxxxMxxxxxxofxGcxxxxxxxSxxxxxxxJxxxxJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxfff]f]oJfA]JxSxJ8.oJo]]oJoSxJxffSfSS]J]Joff]fffffx8Sx]]fJffff88SSSSfxSSS]]]f8`SJ82\GF`"Sh5^;C`ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȰdxxxsCYoxxdoxxooCCCddCddYdY8dd88Y8ddddLL8dYYYLYdYddddddCddddddddd8xdxdxdxdxdYxYxYxYxYC8C8C8C8dddddddddoYxddddoYdxdxdxdxdddddxdxdxdxddddddddd8ddddddddododp8p8xddddxdxddLddddodododddddodpLCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCd]]ddddddFddddFCCddd88ddzzdddkddCddF"Ȑddd尰dCCȐzȰxCdzdodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUvŐdȐYYCCCCzzzozoYzNoYdYC8YooYdYzzdzddoYoYzzozzzzzCdoozYzzzzCCddddzdddooozCsdYC"Sh5^18MSS888S8888SSSSSSSSSS88SxoxxodAPoxdx]oxxxxo888SS8S]J]J;S].8].]S]]JA8]SxSSJSSSSSSSSS8SSSSSSSS].xSxSxSxSxSxxJoJoJoJoJA.A.A.A.x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSd]xSxSxSxSxSxSx]oSoSoSoSSSSSS]]S.S]SS_SS]oSoSoAo.x]x]SS{xSxS]A]S]SoSoSoSx]x]x]x]xxSoJ8SS888WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxSSS8SGGSSSSSS;SSSS;88``S++SSffSSxSi]]8`S;"xxSx`xxS唔S88xfxxxxxxxxxxx8SxS]SxoS8SxJS`xrxxxxxxxxxxPxxxxxxofxGcxxxxxxxSxxxxxxxSxxxxSxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfo]f]oJoAoJJxJA.Jo]]xJoSJxffSfSSoJxJofx]fffxoASxxfJffff88SSSSxSSSxxxf8fSJ8Ax/c81,c P7PB8wC;,[hXw P7XPC7zC;,sXz_ p^7XDV"G($,hG P7hPEH<!, ,< P7,P&Fz-b81,-b&_ x$&7X&P6uC;,-/3Xu&_ x$&7XXy.f81,f_ p^7 dddn Style 2Dutch Italic 11.5$ )^ `> XifQ 2>2 Y- $//MO&O, US West Request for Limited Waiver of Section 22.903, DA 96605//$ $/ 22903, Cellular Geographic Service Area/$ 0FOR RECORD ONLYTP  Yv-x` `  hh@hpp  xxDA 96 605 2(Before the W FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 T  Y -TP  Yy-In the Matter of hh@h) x` `  hh@h)  YK-Request of U S WEST Communications, Inc.h)pp  Y4-for a Limited Waiver of Section 22.903@h)  Y-of the Commission's Ruleshh@h)  X- :ORDER T  Y-TP Adopted: April 17, 1996 hh@hppReleased:  y   y April 17, 1996 y   y   Yf- By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: BI. INTRODUCTION T  Y -TPx 1. This Order addresses the Request for Limited Waiver ("Request"), filed on January23, 1995, by U S WEST Communications, Inc. ("U S WEST"), seeking a limited  Y-waiver of Section 22.903 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  22.903.^' zPV"-ԍ#X\  P6G;P# Section 22.903 of the Commission's rules was amended effective Jan. 1, 1995. See Revision of Part 22  zP #-of the Commission's Rules Governing the Public Mobile Services, Report and Order, CC Docket No. 92115, 9  zP#-FCC Rcd 6513 (1994)(Part 22 Rewrite). In the Request, US WEST requests that the Commission waive any requirement in Section 22.903 that would prohibit it from providing cellular service to customers in U S WEST's local exchange  Y"-service area awaiting the installation of landline telephone service."' xP7(-ԍ Request of U S WEST Communications, Inc. for a Limited Waiver of Section 22.903 of the Commission's Rules, at 1 (filed Jan.23, 1996) ("U S WEST Request").""F0*0*0*#"Ԍ Y-ԙx2. In a Public Notice issued January 26, 1996, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau sought comment on US WEST's Request to determine whether the request is  Y-consistent with the waiver criteria set forth in Sections 1.3 and 22.119 zPK-ԍ#X\  P6G;P# Current Section 22.119 was formerly Section 22.19, and was amended effective Jan. 1, 1995. See Part  zP-22 Rewrite, supra note 1. of the Commission's rules and whether the request is consistent with the Commission's public interest goals. We  Y-received two comments and one reply comment in this proceeding.$ zPy-ԍ#X\  P6G;P# See Public Notice, DA 9684, "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on US WEST Request for Limited Waiver of Section 22.903 of the Commission's Rules," rel. Jan. 26, 1996. AT&T Wireless, Inc. ("AT&T") and the Minnesota Office of the Attorney General and the Minnesota Department of Public Service ("DPS/OAG") filed comments on Feb. 2, 1996. US WEST filed reply comments on Feb.7, 1996. As discussed below, we grant U S WEST's Request for the limited purpose of ensuring that telephone subscribers have access to the public switched network, and require U S WEST to amend its Cost Allocation Manual to account for the costs of this program as "below the line." We further limit this waiver in duration to one year from the date of its release, and condition this grant on U S WEST's compliance with reporting requirements.  X -] II. BACKGROUND T  Y -TP x3. The Request seeks a waiver of Section 22.903 of the Commission's rules, which governs the conditions under which Bell Operating Companies, their affiliates and successors (BOCs) may provide cellular service. Section 22.903 provides, in pertinent part, that: XxAmeritech Corporation, Bell Atlantic Corporation, BellSouth Corporation, NYNEX Corporation, Pacific Telesis Group, Southwestern Bell Corporation, U.S. West, Inc., their successors in interest and affiliated entities (BOCs) may engage in the provision of cellular service only in accordance with the conditions in this section, unless otherwise authorized by the FCC. BOCs may, subject to other provisions of law, have a controlling or lesser interest in or be under common control with separate corporations that provide cellular service only under the following conditions:  A* * *  Y|-x` ` (b) Independence. Separate corporations must operate independently in the provision of cellular service. Each separate corporation must: (1) maintain its own books of account; (2) have separate officers; (3) employ separate operating, marketing, installation and maintenance personnel; and, (4) utilize separate computer and transmission facilities in the provision of cellular services. x` "0*(("Ԍx A* * * 47 CFR  22.903 (b).  Y-x4. The original version of Section 22.903 was adopted as Section 22.901 in 1981,H xP-ԍ#C\  P6QP# Inquiry Into the Use of the Bands 825845 MHz and 870890 MHz for Cellular Communications  zP-Systems, Report and Order, CC Docket No. 79318, 86 FCC 2d 469 (1981) (1981 Order). Originally, the Commission had adopted a onesystempermarket policy for cellular service, with the license in each market to  xPw-be held by the local exchange carrier. Inquiry Relative to the Future Use of the Frequency Band 806960 MHz,  zP? -Second Report and Order, Docket No. 18262, 46 FCC 2d 752 (1974); recon. granted in part, 51 FCC 2d 945  zP -(1975), clarified 55 FCC 2d 771 (1975), aff'd sub nom. NARUC v. FCC, 525 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1976), cert.  zP -denied, 425 U.S. 992 (1976). On reconsideration, the restriction allowing only local exchange carriers to provide cellular service was lifted. 51 FCC 2d 945 (1975).   Y-and amended in 1982 to apply only to AT&T and its affiliates.$ xP-ԍ#C\  P6QP# Inquiry Into the Use of the Bands 825845 MHz and 870890 MHz for Cellular Communications Systems; and Amendment of Parts 2 and 22 of the Commission's Rules Relative to Cellular Communications  zP-Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 79318, 89 FCC 2d 58 (1982)  zPp-(1982 Order). In 1983, the Commission  Yv-further amended Section 22.901 to apply to the divested Bell Operating Companies.&v  xP-ԍ#C\  P6QP# Policy and Rules Concerning the Furnishing of Customer Premises Equipment, Enhanced Services and  zP-Cellular Communications Services by the Bell Operating Companies, Report and Order, CC Docket No. 83 zP}-115, 95 FCC 2d 1117, 113839, 1150 (1983) ( 5759, 80), aff'd sub nom., Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v.  zPG-FCC, 740 F.2d 465 (7th Cir. 1984) (BOC Separation Order). The  Y_-final revision of the separate subsidiary requirement occurred in the 1994 Part 22 Rewrite  YJ-Order as part of the comprehensive reorganization of Part 22 of the Commission's rules. In that Order, Section 22.903 was amended to incorporate the provisions of former Sections  Y -22.901(b) and (c).}  zP-ԍ#C\  P6QP# Part 22 Rewrite, 9 FCC Rcd at 666061.} Section 22.903 thus imposes the same structural separation requirements as the predecessor rule.  X -  III. CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES T  Y -TPx5. In its Request , U S WEST seeks a partial waiver of Section 22.903 in order to  Y-make cellular service available to "held order" customers.O XD xP!-ԍ In a footnote, U S WEST states that it believes that its held order activities do not contravene any of the restrictions set forth in  22.903, but, "[i]n order to simplify and therefore expedite the review process," U S WEST seeks no interpretation of the rule. U S WEST Request at 1 n.3.O US WEST defines "held order" customers as local exchange customers who have been waiting for installation of their first  Yf-landline telephone service lines for seven or more days because of a lack of facilities.9 fd zP{&-ԍ Id. at 1.9 U S WEST states that its program for held order customers was fashioned in cooperation with the"O 0*((*" Utah Public Service Commission and entails the acquisition by U S WEST of bulkrate services and handsets from cellular providers, including its own cellular affiliate, U S WEST New Vector Group, Inc. (New Vector), after issuance of a request for purchase (RFP). The cellular services and handsets are then loaned to eligible held order customers. U S WEST states that it will pay the cellular provider for all recurring monthly charges and unlimited airtime, but toll (intrastate and interstate) charges will not be covered. Held order customers, according to US WEST, will only be required to pay USWEST an amount approximately equal to the standard monthly landline rates for this service, with U S WEST  YH-paying the difference between the cellular and landline rates.9 H zP -ԍ Id. at 3.9 USWEST states that it may take measures, depending on the RFP winners' technical capabilities, to limit the capabilities of the cellular service provided, such as blocking roaming capabilities, or limiting the range  Y -of the service to the customer's "home cell."9  Z zP-ԍ Id. at 4.9 U S WEST states that it expects that other state regulatory commissions within its 14state area may seek or expect implementation of  Y -similar held order programs.9  zPr-ԍ Id. at 5.9  Y -x6. U S WEST asserts that it meets its the test for a waiver because the cellular loaner program is specifically designed to remedy the problem of substantial inconvenience to subscribers who are without access to dialtone service while they await installation of landline telephone service. U S WEST also contends that subscribers will benefit because calls to their landline telephone numbers will be callforwarded to their cellular phones, thus enabling them to advertise their landline telephone numbers before landline service is  Y-initiated.;~ zPL-ԍ Id. at 67.;  Y-x7. U S WEST claims that grant of its request will not undermine the purposes underlying Section 22.903. It states that crosssubsidization is not an issue because it does not seek relaxation of any of the restrictions governing its interaction with New Vector. According to U S WEST, cellular service for the held order program will be acquired pursuant to a RFP in which all cellular providers, including resellers, will be allowed to participate, and any dealings between U S WEST and New Vector will be conducted on a compensatory, armslength basis. U S WEST also maintains that grant of its request will not  YN-increase opportunities for discrimination.;N zP$-ԍ Id. at 78.;  Y -x8. Finally, U S WEST states, eligibility for the held order program will be limited to only a relatively small number of customers who have not received service for their first lines for at least seven days or longer after placing orders. US WEST states that it will"0*((+ " report to the Commission on a quarterly basis on the number of customers by state that are  Y-participating in the cellular loaner program.; zPb-ԍ Id. at 89.;  Y-x9. The Minnesota DPS and OAG support U S WEST's request, but contend that the Request is more restrictive than necessary and that the FCC should grant broader, more  Y-flexible relief.@Z xP-ԍ DPS/OAG Comments at 1.@ They argue that U S WEST's use of the qualifying phrase "due to a lack of facilities" creates uncertainty as to who is eligible for the program and gives U S WEST broad discretion to deny eligibility. DPS/OAG recommend that the Commission allow cellular service without limitation as to the reason for U S WEST's inability to provide  Y1-timely landline service.;1 zP -ԍ Id. at 34.;  Y -x 10. DPS/OAG also suggest several other changes to the held order program. They contend that the program should be extended to outofservice situations, stating that customers without service due to U S WEST's lack of response to repair requests need telephone service as much as customers who initially request service and do not receive  Y -itinatimely manner.; | zP-ԍ Id. at 45.; DPS/OAG also recommend that the Commission allow U S WEST to provide substitute cellular service within a time frame shorter than the seven days U S WEST has proposed. DPS/OAG propose a fiveday minimum for held order customers and  Yb-a twoday minimum for customers with medical needs.9b zP!-ԍ Id. at 5.9 DPS/OAG argue that the Commission should not require payment from customers as a condition of the substitute cellular program. They state that "[t]he Commission should recognize and acknowledge that it is the traditional province of the states to determine rates for intrastate telephone service and not address this issue in the waiver request." DPS/OAG state that it would be unfair to charge landline rates to customers who receive cellular service under the program, citing such considerations as access to long distance, sound quality, battery power, and the need to  Y-obtain and return the cellular telephone.9 zP!-ԍ Id. at 6.9 Finally, DPS/OAG endorse U S WEST's RFP approach, but contend that individual states may wish to work out the details of the held order program (such as distribution and return of cellular handsets), and urge the Commission "to make specific findings only to the extent necessary to address its concerns"|2 0*((" and leave other aspects of the substitute cellular service for determination at the state  Y-level."; zPb-ԍ Id. at 78.;  Y-x 11. AT&T opposes U S WEST's request. AT&T states that, in Utah, U S WEST has already asked for bids and granted a contract to New Vector so that U S WEST will resell New Vector's service without FCC approval. AT&T contends that grant of U S WEST's request "would deny entities that are in the business of providing wireless services the opportunity to govern how potential subscribers are exposed to cellular service," because USWEST, rather than the cellular service provider, would control how the service is presented to customers. AT&T alleges that U S WEST would not be motivated to provide its landline customers with a positive experience with a competing technology and would have a strong incentive to ensure that these customers do not recognize cellular service as a  Y -viable replacement for wireline services.? Z xP-ԍ AT&T Comments at 23.?  Y -x 12. AT&T argues that grant of the waiver request would allow the telephone company itself to provide service without involving New Vector, thus "significant issues would arise in this case regarding the ability of the Commission to detect attempts by U S  Yy-WEST to have its landline ratepayers subsidize the held order cellular service.";y zP-ԍ Id. at 34.; AT&T states that USWEST's behavior in Utah "does not give AT&T any comfort about the company's ability to act in a nondiscriminatory manner," given the short amount of time that AT&T had to respond to the RFP less than two weeks and the fact that the contract  Y-was awarded to New Vector.9| zPJ-ԍ Id. at 4.9 AT&T also argues that U S WEST has not taken action to eliminate the held order problem in its region and should not be afforded a waiver to do so. AT&T proposes instead that the "voucher" system, by which U S WEST reimbursed held order customers for cellular service that they acquired on their own, be modified by an adjustment in USWEST's monthly reimbursement and by AT&T's voluntary waiver of early termination charges, which, AT&T contends, would likely be waived by other wireless  Y-providers in USWEST's territory.9 zPR!-ԍ Id. at 5.9  Ye-x 13. In its reply, U S WEST states the Commission should review and pass on the merits of its waiver request as filed. It states that it is willing to make some modification in its waiver request consistent with the suggestions of DPS/OAG, but only if such modified  Y -request meets the necessary standard for waiver of Section 22.903.@  xPq'-ԍ U S WEST Reply at 12.@ Specifically, U S" 0 0*((K" WEST opposes the DPS/OAG view that the program should be "tailored to meet the specific needs of individual states," claiming that a uniform program was designed for purposes of efficiency and minimized administrative costs. U S WEST thus defends the "lack of facilities" limitation on customer eligibility as verifiable and accounting for virtually all held orders which extend beyond seven days. It opposes extension of the program to customers with service outages as inappropriate, complex and costly. It also opposes reduction of the sevenday minimum held order period, arguing that a sevenday period is appropriate to determine the availability and operation of landline facilities and that a shorter period would increase administrative complexity and the "churn" of customers who would participate in the cellular loaner program only for a very brief period of time before receiving landline  Y -service.;  zP -ԍ Id. at 35.; USWEST states, however, that it would be willing to extend substitute cellular service to eligible held order customers identified before the seven days elapse, and that such an approach would not increase the number of customers receiving such service. U S WEST also agrees to modify its program to extend it to customers with certified medical needs after  Y -a twoday held order period.; q zP-ԍ Id. at 56.;  Y-x 14. U S WEST states that the DPS/OAG position that substitute cellular service should be provided free of charge should be rejected for two reasons: (1) statutory federal preemption of state regulation of rates charged for commercial mobile radio services (CMRS) and (2) the assurance that a "free" cellular loaner program is not being used to "lock in" customers who might otherwise choose the service of a competing local exchange carrier. US WEST also states that the DPS/OAG position that states should be able to modify the design of the held order program in unspecified ways is inappropriate in a waiver context  Y-because the parameters of the request would not be properly defined.; zP-ԍ Id. at 67.;  Y-x15. U S WEST argues that AT&T's opposition contains nothing of substance that would warrant denial of the Request. U S WEST contends that AT&T's concerns about USWEST's control over the quality of cellular service are unsupported because U S WEST is not the cellular service provider, that being instead the winner of the RFP. U S WEST also states that AT&T's claims about the potential for crosssubsidization are misplaced because the states will decide how U S WEST accounts for the cost of the program. U S WEST maintains that AT&T's concerns about the potential for discriminatory conduct are misplaced. It states that it awarded the contract for the cellular loaner program in Utah to  Y -New Vector after a bona fide RFP and after New Vector submitted the lower bid.;  zPO$-ԍ Id. at 89.; Finally, U S WEST argues that AT&T's suggested changes to the voucher system (including its offer to forego termination charges) will not provide and adequate remedy to the held order problem in that AT&T is not a cellular provider in many U S WEST local exchange service" '0*((!" areas and the loaner program is structured to meet customer concerns about seeking and  Y-acquiring their own cellular service.:  zPb-ԍ Id. at 10.:  X- IV. DISCUSSION T  Y-TPx16. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where there is "good cause" to do so, because the particular facts would make strict compliance with the rule  Y_-inconsistent with the public interest.!_Z zPj -ԍ#X\  P6G;P##C\  P6QP# WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972).   Requests for waivers of the cellular rules must comply with the Commission's rule which allows the Commission to grant a waiver if the underlying purpose of the rule would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case and a grant of the waiver would be in the public interest, or if, in view of unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable  Y -alternative."  zP-ԍ#c P7P##C\  P6QP# Part 22 Rewrite, 9 FCC Rcd at 6593 (22.119(a)). Waivers are thus appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will better serve the public interest than adherence to  Y -the general rule.#  zP-ԍ#X\  P6G;P##C\  P6QP# Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Further, the Commission's grant of a waiver must be based on articulated, reasonable standards that are predictable, workable, and not susceptible to  Yy-discriminatory application.$y zP-ԍ#X\  P6G;P##C\  P6QP# Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. For the reasons stated below, we find that U S WEST has made the required showing of unique or unusual circumstances, pursuant to Section 22.119, for waiver of Section 22.903, and that the regulatory treatment of BOCprovided cellular service resulting from a waiver of Section 22.903 under the conditions proposed by USWEST for its held order program would not undermine competition or otherwise violate the Communications Act. We therefore grant USWEST's Request.  Y-x17. As a preliminary matter, we find that the interim substitute service provided by USWEST under its held order program is cellular service, although we recognize the unique circumstances under which this cellular service will be provided. According to U S WEST, such service will be acquired from facilitiesbased cellular licensees and then sold, albeit at landline rates, by USWEST's telephone operating company to its held order customers. The service will be provided over cellular frequencies through the use of cellular facilities, and by means of cellular handsets. Because it is cellular service, this"N$0*((k"  Y-temporary service is also appropriately classified as commercial mobile radio service.]%^ zPy-ԍ See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of  zPC-Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93252, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411, 1454 (1994) (CMRS  zP -Second Report and Order), reconsideration pending.] The fact that such service may be offered for a time to telephone service subscribers, in place of the usual landline service offered by telephone companies, does not alter its identity or  Y-character as cellular service or CMRS.&  xPZ-ԍ In this regard, we note the Commission's recent proposal to treat fixed wireless local loop services as an integral part of the CMRS services offered by a CMRS provider. Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Permit Flexible Service Offerings in the Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 966, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 9617 (released Jan. 26, 1996).  As a BOC providing cellular service, USWEST is required to obtain a waiver of Section 22.903 before it may be permitted to provide such service on conditions other than those specified in that rule. We note that USWEST may  Yv-have already implemented its held order program in Utah.V'v zP-ԍ See, e.g., AT&T Comments at 12.V While we appreciate USWEST's and the states' desires to ensure service to held order customers in an expeditious fashion, we caution U S WEST and the other companies subject to our rules that, no matter the public interest objectives of the program at issue, the implementation of such a program predicated on a waiver request should not precede the filing or grant of the waiver request and that such actions risk forfeitures or other enforcement actions.  Y -x18. The purposes of our cellular structural separation rules are well settled. As noted above, the restrictions in Section 22.903 were placed on the BOCs to prevent them from "using predatory pricing tactics or misallocating the shared costs of cellular and  Y-conventional wireline service . . . ."z(h  zP-ԍ#X\  P6G;P# 1981 Order, 86 FCC 2d 469 at 8081.z In particular, the Commission expressed concern that without structural separation, BOCs could favor their own cellular affiliates through improper  Yb-crosssubsidization or discriminatory interconnection practices.z)b  zP -ԍ#X\  P6G;P# 1982 Order, 89 FCC 2d 58 at 49192.z Accordingly, Section 22.903 requires structural separation between U S WEST's cellular activities and its landline local exchange activities.  Y-x19. In the case before us, we find that rigid application of Section 22.903 to USWEST's held order program would not serve the public interest objectives of the rules. AT&T has not convinced us that these purposes will be undermined if U S WEST, through its telephone operating company, is permitted to provide cellular service to held order landline customers, rather than through its cellular separate subsidiary. Any concern about the effect on potential wireless subscribers of their introduction to wireless services through the temporary cellular service U S WEST will provide is more than offset by the public interest benefit in providing a means for landline held order customers to gain access to the"e )0*(({" public switched network. The Commission has previously noted, in the very different context of a study area waiver, the public interest benefit in waiving certain rules to allow customers of a local exchange carrier (LEC) to be served by alternatives to that LEC's provision of local exchange services, particularly where service may be improved by doing  Y-so.8*o xP4-ԍ #X\  P6G;P#U S West Communications, Inc. and Eagle Telecommunications, Inc. Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of "Study Area" Contained in Part 36, AppendixGlossary of the Commission's Rules, 10 FCC Rcd 1771, 1774 (1995) ( 19).8 As in that context, we believe that the scope of the waiver we grant here should be  Y-constrained by the public interest purpose which underlies its grant, as we discuss below.+ zP= -ԍ #X\  P6G;P#See id. at 177475, ( 20) (placing limit on the financial impact of the study area waiver on the universal service fund).  Y_-x20. We find that USWEST's Request presents special circumstances because it affects a relatively small number of customers, who would otherwise not gain access to the public switched network on the conventional terms and conditions enjoyed by telephone service subscribers, and because, consistent with the underlying purpose of our structural separation rule, U S WEST will gain no anticompetitive advantage in the provision of cellular service. We therefore waive the application of Section 22.903 to U S WEST for the purpose of providing temporary cellular service to landline local exchange customers who have not received landline service, under the terms by which U S WEST has framed its Request, and subject to the conditions described below. We believe that this decision will serve the public interest by permitting subscribers experiencing delays in obtaining landline telephone service to gain access to the public switched network by means of temporary cellular service.  Y4-x21. We also note that, in the period since U S WEST filed its Request, Congress has  Y-enacted the Telecommunications Act of 1996.,Y xP'-ԍ Pub. L. No. 104104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996), amending the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47  zP-U.S.C.   151, et seq. Section 601(d) of the 1996 Act provides: XxNotwithstanding section 22.903 of the Commission's regulations (47 C.F.R. 22.903) or any other Commission regulation, a Bell operating company or any other company may, except as provided in sections 271(e)(1) and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended by this Act as they related to  Y-wireline service,- xP!-ԍ The crossreferenced sections,  271(e)(1) and 272, govern, respectively, limitations on joint marketing of local and long distance services by certain large national telecommunications carriers seeking to provide local exchange service in competition with the BOC in the BOC's service area until that BOC is authorized pursuant to Section 271(d) to provide inregion interLATA services, and BOC provision of certain services, including inregion interLATA service, through separate corporate affiliates. Section 272 describes structural and transactional requirements for the BOC separate affiliates. jointly market and sell commercial mobile services in conjunction with telephone exchange service, exchange access, intraLATA"| + -0*((|" telecommunications service, interLATA telecommunications service, and  Y-information services."D. zPb-ԍ Id. at  601(d). D  Arguably, this provision provides some measure of relief to U S WEST by allowing it to sell cellular service in conjunction with telephone exchange service. On the other hand, U S WEST's held order program may not be within the scope of Section 601(d), because the  Yv-program does not entail any "joint" marketing or sales of landline service and CMRS./!vZ xP -ԍ Representative Burr's statement at the introduction of the "Manager's Amendment" containing Section 601(d) to proposed H.R. 1555 indicates that Section 601(d) was "designed to permit the Bell operating telephone  yP -companies to resell the cellular services of their cellular affiliates." 141 Cong. Rec . H8456 (daily ed. Aug. 4, 1995) (emphasis added). Moreover, the fact that the held order program might involve cellular service provided by nonaffiliated entities rather than service provided exclusively by U S WEST's own affiliate,  Y1-New Vector,701C xP%-ԍ Request at 7.7 would also indicate that U S WEST may not be engaged in the type of joint  Y -marketing or joint sales activity contemplated by Section 601(d).s1  zP-ԍ See floor statement of Representative Burr, supra at note 47.s We need not reach such difficult issues of statutory interpretation because we have decided to waive the provisions of Section 22.903 which would prohibit USWEST's held order program. We believe that in any event the relief accorded the BOCs in Section 601(d) does not impair our authority for reasonable regulation of such activity. For purposes of this waiver order, we clarify that the US WEST held order program must be separate and distinct from any other USWEST activity involving the joint marketing of cellular and landline services and that USWEST may not utilize the held order program as a means to market or promote the cellular service offerings of its affiliate, New Vector. We defer the matter of the scope of Section 601(d) to a Commission proceeding that will review the full range of issues pertaining to Section  Y4-22.903.  Y-x22. We agree with U S WEST that our grant of its Request should be in accord with the parameters of the Request itself, and we do not believe it is appropriate, absent any overriding federal purpose, to require USWEST to expand the scope of activities inconsistent with Section 22.903 beyond the level that it has requested. We therefore grant the Request as modified by U S WEST's reply comments. We need not, in the context of the waiver we grant here, address the modifications to the held order program suggested by DPS/OAG. If U S WEST wishes to broaden the scope of the waiver we grant here, it is free to file an additional request for such relief.  Y7-  x23. We also need not address the DPS/OAG position that the charges for the temporary cellular service in U S WEST's held order program should be determined by individual state public utility commissions, because a decision on this issue is not necessary"  e 10*((," for or instrumental to our decision to grant the waiver requested by U S WEST. We note that Congress has set forth the conditions for state regulation of CMRS, and we believe that  Y-these statutory provisions have relevance here.M2 zPK-ԍ See 47 U.S.C.  332(c)(3).M  Y-x24. We note that our decision that the temporary cellular service to be provided by USWEST is CMRS has other ramifications as well. Contrary to the position put forward  Yv-in U S WEST's reply,H3vZ zP -ԍ See U S WEST Reply at 9.H we do not believe that the decision as to how U S WEST will account for the costs of the held order program may be left to the states, at least insofar as those costs are generated by the provision of CMRS. Consistent with the Commission's  Y1-decision in the CMRS Second Report and Order,41 zP -ԍ See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 1492; see also Eligibility for the Specialized Mobile Radio Services and Radio Services in the 220222 MHz Land Mobile Band and Use of Radio Dispatch  zP`-Communications, GN Docket No. 9490, Report and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 6280, 629394 & n.77 (1995),  zP*-reconsideration pending (clarifying that, in complying with the requirement to separate regulated activities from those classified as nonregulated for federal accounting purposes, carriers are to include in the nonregulated category those activities not subject to rate regulation, per 47 C.F.R. 32.23).  we require U S WEST as a condition of this waiver order to file changes in its Cost Allocation Manual required under Part 64 of the Commission's rules to reflect as "below the line" all the expenses generated by U S WEST's resale of cellular service, including the costs of acquiring such service. We believe that this action addresses the concerns of AT&T regarding the potential for crosssubsidization and the incentive for discrimination by U S WEST in favor of its cellular affiliate, will protect ratepayers for USWEST's landline services from subsidizing U S WEST's CMRS operations, and will encourage U S WEST from relying any more than necessary on this program as a substitute for building and maintaining its wireline network.  YM-x25. Finally, we remain concerned about the incidence of the provision of cellular service outside of the Commission's current competitive safeguards embodied in Section 22.903. Because we believe that the interim provision of cellular service to landline local exchange service customers will provide only a temporary solution to U S WEST's held order problem, we see no need to grant a permanent waiver of our rules. Accordingly, we limit the duration of the waiver we grant here to one year from the release date of this order. In addition, we accept U S WEST's offer to provide a quarterly report detailing at the end of each quarter the number of customers by state that are participating in the cellular loaner program, but we believe that additional reporting requirements are also necessary and appropriate. Specifically, we require U S WEST to include in its quarterly report, in addition to the information described above, (1) the total number of customers, by state, who acquired cellular service under the held order program at any time during the quarter and cumulatively over the duration of the program; (2) the total number of customers, by state, who were provided with temporary cellular service for a period of 30 or more days, by quarter and cumulatively; and (3) the total number of customers, by state, who were"  j 40*((" provided temporary cellular service for 90 or more days during the course of the program, with a breakout in the last category that specifies the length of time such customers have received the cellular service. We believe that this additional information will not only provide us with the details to judge the extent of participation in U S WEST's cellular loaner program, but will also provide the Commission and the states with a valuable quarterly indicator as to the scope of USWEST's held order situation.  X_-- V. ORDERING CLAUSES T  Y1-TPx26. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority of Sections 4 and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154 and 303, and Sections 1.3 and 22.119 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.3 and 22.119, a waiver of Section 22.903, 47 C.F.R.  22.903, is GRANTED to U S WEST Communications, Inc. for the provision of resold cellular service to its held order landline local exchange customers, as described herein. Such waiver will expire upon one (1) year from the date of release of this Order.  Yy-x27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that U S WEST Communications, Inc. SHALL FILE, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order, amendments to its Cost Allocation Manual, and subsequent amendments as may be necessary, pursuant to Section 64.903 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  64.903, as described herein.  Y-x28. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that U S WEST Communications, Inc. SHALL FILE, upon ninety (90) days of the release of this Order, and each quarter thereafter during such period as cellular service is provided pursuant to the terms of this Order, a Report detailing the number of customers participating, or having participated, in U S WEST's held order program, as described herein. x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhMichele C. Farquhar x` `  hhActing Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau