******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 ) WT Docket No. 96-18 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate ) Future Development of Paging Systems ) ) Implementation of Section 309(j) ) PR Docket No. 93-253 of the Communications Act -- ) Competitive Bidding ) SECOND ERRATA Second Errata released: August 5, 1999 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: On May 24, 1999, the Commission released the Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration and Third Report and Order (FCC 99-98) in the captioned proceeding. These errata correct the following errors in the released text and after publication of the summary of this item in the Federal Register but before publication of the complete item in the FCC Record: 1. Footnote 51 is replaced with the following: "Robert J. and Laurie F. Keller d/b/a Western Maryland Wireless Company filed an application for review on December 28, 1998. Petitions for reconsideration were filed on January 13, 1999, by the following parties: AirTouch Paging, AirTouch Paging of California, AirTouch Paging of Kentucky, AirTouch Paging of Texas, AirTouch Paging of Virginia, Blooston, Mordkofsky, Jackson & Dickens (Allcom Communications, Inc., et al.), Arch Capitol District, Inc., Arch Connecticut Valley, Inc., Arch Southeast Communications, Inc., Becker Beeper, Inc., Blasiar, Inc., Electronic Engineering Company, Hello Pager Company, Paging Systems Management, Inc., PowerPage Inc., Robert Kester et al., Satellite Paging, Inc., South Texas Paging, Inc. (Arthur Flemmer), USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II, Westlink Licensee Corporation (refiled on April 7, 1999), Westlink of New Mexico Licensee (refiled on April 7, 1999), Pan Am License Holdings, Inc., American Beeper Company of the Virgin Islands, Afton Communications, Paging Systems, Inc., Judy Leonardis, and Schuykill Mobile Fone, Inc." 2. Footnote 52 is replaced with the following: "Petitions for reconsideration of the CWD Order were also filed on January 13, 1999, by Ameritech Mobile Services, Inc., Capitol Radiotelephone Company Inc. dba Capitol Paging, Clear Paging, Inc., Express Message Corporation, Western Paging I Corporation (two petitions), Metrocall USA, Inc., Morris Communications, Inc., Unicom Paging, Inc. (Joe Walters, Jr.), and Sims Company, Inc. (two petitions). Because these petitioners raise arguments specific to whether their applications were actually mutually exclusive with other applications, we will resolve their petitions in a separate order." This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau