Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) CITY OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON ) FCC File Nos. 9505714741, ) 9505714742, 9505714743 Request for Reconsideration of Secondary) Status and Reinstatement of Primary Status for) Station WIA988, Metaline Falls, Washington, ) Station WIA989, Metaline Falls, Washington, ) Station WIA990, Spokane, Washington ) ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: October 27, 1999 Released: October 27, 1999 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The City of Seattle, Washington, Light Department (Seattle) seeks reconsideration of the action of the former Private Radio Bureau, Licensing Division, Microwave Branch according secondary status to Station WIA988, Metaline Falls, Washington; Station WIA989, Metaline Falls, Washington; and Station WIA990, Spokane, Washington, when the stations' licenses were re-issued after they had expired. The three stations, which operate in the fixed microwave service (FMS) in the 2 GHz band, form a communications link between Seattle's power dispatch center and its Boundary Powerhouse, a 1000 megawatt generating station. For the reasons set forth below, we find that Seattle's petitions for reinstatement were untimely. Accordingly, they were correctly treated as applications for new stations and accorded secondary status. II. BACKGROUND 2. In 1992, the Commission reallocated portions of the 2 GHz band from FMS to emerging technology services (ET), including the personal communications services. In doing so, the Commission adopted a plan intended to reaccommodate the FMS licensees in a manner that would be most advantageous for the incumbent users, least disruptive to the public and most conducive to the introduction of new services. Accordingly, first, to preserve the availability of the existing vacant 2 GHz spectrum, the Commission stated that it would license all new facilities in the 2 GHz band on a secondary basis. Second, rather than immediately clearing the 2 GHz band of the incumbent FMS users, the Commission permitted the incumbents to continue to occupy the band on a co-primary basis with the ET licensees for a significant length of time, by the end of which the incumbents were to relocate to another portion of the spectrum. The Commission also provided that incumbent FMS licensees could make certain modifications and retain primary status for their facilities, and could make major extensions or expansions to their systems and be accorded primary status for the new facilities if they made a special showing of need to justify primary status. Third, the Commission provided the ET licensees with the option of requiring the FMS incumbents to relocate sooner and paying the additional costs caused by the earlier relocation. One practical effect of the Commission's transition plan was that incumbent FMS licensees that were authorized on a primary basis would have the costs of relocating to other bands paid for by the new ET licensees if the ET licensees forced them to relocate. On the other hand, FMS licensees that were authorized on a secondary basis would be treated differently. 3. Stations WIA988, WIA989, and WIA990 were originally authorized with primary status in 1980. Due to an administrative oversight, Seattle failed to renew the licenses timely and the licenses automatically expired on January 11, 1995. Upon learning that the licenses had expired, Seattle notified the Commission and received Special Temporary Authority to continue to operate the stations. On May 12, 1995, Seattle filed applications to reinstate the licenses for Stations WIA988, WIA989, and WIA990. On May 31, 1995, Seattle was issued new licenses which contained conditions making the stations' operations secondary to future ET licensees. On June 20, 1995, Seattle timely requested reconsideration of the action imposing the conditions and asked that the stations be granted primary status. III. DISCUSSION 4. Seattle's licenses for Stations WIA988, WIA989, and WIA990 expired on January 11, 1995 and Seattle did not file its applications for reinstatement until May 12, 1995. We conclude that Seattle's reinstatement applications, coming four months after the licenses expired, were not timely, and that Seattle's applications therefore should have been treated as applications for new licenses. New 2 GHz FMS facilities are authorized only on a secondary basis to ET licensees. We therefore conclude that a secondary status condition was properly placed on Seattle's licenses. 5. Seattle asks that it be accorded primary status so that if an ET licensee forces it to relocate its stations to another band, it will have the cost of relocation paid by the ET licensee. The Commission has decided, however, that while incumbent FMS stations are eligible for having their relocation costs paid, new FMS stations are not. Because Seattle allowed its licenses to expire, its stations fall into the latter category. We therefore deny Seattle's petition for reconsideration. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 405 and Sections 1.10 and 101.69 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.106, 101.69, the petition for reconsideration filed by the City of Seattle, Washington on June 20, 1995, IS DENIED. 7. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau