******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) A+ NETWORK, INC. ) File No. D058723 ) Request for Waiver of the ) Commission's Interim Paging ) Application Criteria ) ORDER Adopted: September 22, 1999 Released: September 22, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On July 30, 1996, A+ Network, Inc. (A+), the predecessor-in-interest to Metrocall USA, filed a request for a waiver of the interim paging application criteria as established by the Commission's First Report and Order (Order), in WT Docket No. 96-18, released April 23, 1996. Specifically, the Order permits incumbent paging licensees to submit applications for additional stations which are located within 65 km (40 miles) of authorized and operational co-channel facilities licensed to the applicant. A+ requested a waiver so that it can acquire aditional sites on the 929.0125 MHz frequency which are beyond 40 miles of authorized and operational sites on the same frequency. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the waiver request. 2. In accordance with section 22.119 of the Commission's rules, a waiver request may be granted if it is shown that (1) the underlying purpose of the rule would not be served, or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that a grant of the requested waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) in view of unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or that the applicant has no reasonable alternative. A+ states that, absent this waiver, Charleston area residents, and A+'s existing regional subscribers, may be without paging services in the subject service area for several years. On the basis of the record before us, we are neither persuaded that grant of this waiver would be in the public interest, nor do we find that A+ has presented unique or unusual factual circumstances sufficient to justify grant of its waiver request. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated by section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), and by sections 0.331 and 22.119 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331, 22.119, the waiver request filed by A+ Network, Inc. on July 30, 1996, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cynthia S. Thomas Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau