********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In re Licenses of               )
                                 )
SUPERCOM, INC., et al.          )  File Nos. 26628-CD-R-88 
                                )            26626-CD-R-88  
For Paging and Radiotelephone   )            26624-CD-R-88
Service Stations KNKD286,       )
KNKD293 and KNKJ322 in          )
the State of Michigan           )
                                 )
                                 )
                                 )
                                 )
                             ORDER

   Adopted:  September 30, 1999         Released:  September 30, 1999

By the Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau:

     1.   This Order dismisses as moot the Petition for Revocation of Licenses (Petition) filed by
Range Corporation (Range) against the above-captioned licenses of Supercom, Inc. (Supercom), the
predecessor-in-interest to Superior Technologies, Inc.

     2.   Range filed its Petition on March 6, 1997, alleging that Supercom was operating the
subject stations without proper authority at Baraga, Iron River, Newberry, and Manistique, Michigan. 
After the Petition was filed, however, the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch of the Commercial
Wireless Division, on its own motion, notified Supercom that it was operating without authority at these
four sites and to discontinue service immediately, or enforcement actions will result.  Accordingly, we
dismiss the Petition as moot. 

     3.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated by Section 4(i) of the
Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C  154(i), and by Section 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R  0.331, the Petition for Revocation of Licenses filed by Range Corporation on March 6, 1997 IS
DISMISSED as moot.                 



                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                              
                              Cynthia S. Thomas                  
                                   Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch
                              Commercial Wireless Division
                              Wireless Telecommunications Bureau