********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                 )
ROBERT R. RULE  d/b/a           )  
RULE COMMUNICATIONS, et al.     )  File No.  25594-CD-P/L-95, et al.
                                )                           
     
BEEPERMART, INC.                )  File No.  25748-CD-P/ML-93
                                )  
ZHEN FANG FU, et al.            )  File No.  25787-CD-P/L-95, et al. 
                                )  
For Reconsideration of Authorizations   )    )    
and Denial of Applications      )
for Facilities in the Paging    )
and Radiotelephone Service      )
                                 


                             ORDER


   Adopted:  August 17, 1999            Released:  August 17, 1999

By the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:

     1.   This Order grants three petitions for reconsideration of actions taken by the Commercial
Wireless Division's Narrowband Branch listed in Attachments A and B.  For the reasons discussed below, this
Order also dismisses as moot three petitions to deny certain license applications.  The petitions to deny are
listed in Attachment C. 

     2.   Attachment A lists two consolidated petitions for reconsideration.  Robert R. Rule d/b/a Rule
Communications and BeeperMart, Inc. seek reconsideration of the Narrowband Branch's dismissal of their
applications as defective.  In response to the petitions, the Narrowband Branch returned the applications to
pending status and subsequently granted the applications.  The petitions, however, were not formally granted. 
Because these petitions technically remain pending, we formally grant the petitions by this Order.

     3.   Attachment B lists one petition for reconsideration.  In this petition, BeeperMart, Inc.  seeks
reconsideration of the Narrowband Branch's dismissal of its application as defective.  In response to the
petition, the Narrowband Branch returned the application to pending status.  The petition, however, was not
formally granted.  Because the petition technically remains pending, we formally grant the petition by this
Order.

     4.   Attachment C lists three petitions to deny.  In two of these petitions, the petitioners (RAM
Technologies, Inc. and Metrolink, Inc.) claim that grant of Zhen Fang Fu's and Wharton Telecom Holdings,
Inc.'s (Wharton) applications, respectively, will cause harmful interference to their proposed or authorized
facilities.  After the petitions were filed, however, the Narrowband Branch, on its own motion, dismissed the
application of Zhen Fang Fu and dismissed the application of Wharton at Wharton's request.  In the other
petition, Capitol Radiotelephone Company, Inc. seeks dismissal of the application of RAM Technologies, Inc.
as defective.  After the filing of this petition, however, the Narrowband Branch, on its own motion, dismissed
the underlying application.  Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions listed in Attachment C as moot.
     
     5.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 4(i) and  405
of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C  154(i), 405, and by Sections 0.331 and 1.106 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R  0.331, 1.106, the petitions for reconsideration listed in Attachments A and
B of this Order ARE GRANTED.       

     6.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 4(i) and 309(d)
of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C  154(i), 309(d), and by Sections 0.331 and 22.130 of
the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R  0.331, 22.130, the petitions to deny listed in Attachment C of this Order
ARE DISMISSED as moot.                  



                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                              
                              Paul D'Ari                         
                                   Chief, Policy and Rules Branch
                              Commercial Wireless Division
                              Wireless Telecommunications Bureau














The petitions, however, were not formally granted.  Because these petitions technically remain pending, we
formally grant the petitions by this Order.