Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture of ) ) UPPER CUMBERLAND REGIONAL ) File No. 920EF0044 AIRPORT BOARD ) ) Licensee of Aviation Radio Service ) Station WRLB2730, Sparta, Tennessee ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 1999 Released: July 1, 1999 By the Chief, Enforcement and Consumer Information Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. Introduction 1. The Chief, Enforcement and Consumer Information Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ("Bureau"), has under consideration: (a) a Notice of Apparent Liability ("NAL") against Upper Cumberland Regional Airport Board ("UCRAB"), licensee of Aviation Radio Service Station WRLB2730, Sparta, Tennessee; and (b) a response to the NAL filed by UCRAB on June 11, 1999. The Bureau issued a forfeiture of $2,000 against UCRAB for operating station WRLB2730 after its license had expired, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 87.18(a) of the Commission's Rules. UCRAB argues in its response that the proposed forfeiture should be reduced or canceled. For the reasons discussed below, we deny UCRAB's request. II. Background 2. On May 7, 1976, the Sparta-White County Airport Commission ("Sparta") was granted a license to operate Aviation Radio Service Station WYY2 (later changed to WRLB2730) at the Sparta-White County Airport in Sparta, Tennessee. Thereafter, Sparta regularly filed applications to renew its license for this station. On May 11, 1997, however, Sparta allowed its license for Station WRLB2730 to lapse without filing an application for renewal, despite Sparta's continued operation of the station. 3. On September 30, 1998, UCRAB (formerly known as Sparta) voluntarily notified the Commission of its failure to timely seek renewal of its license. Pursuant to Section 1.925(a) of the Commission's Rules, UCRAB filed a request for Special Temporary Authority (STA) to continue operating Station WRLB2730 during the pendency of its application for a new station license. UCRAB provided no explanation for its failure to file a timely renewal application. On November 3, 1998, the Bureau staff granted UCRAB's request for an STA. On May 26, 1999, the Bureau issued the NAL finding UCRAB apparently liable for a forfeiture of $2,000. III. Discussion 4. In its response, UCRAB admits that it operated the station without appropriate authorization from the Commission. UCRAB argues, however, that it is "not directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the airport" and that it relies upon a Fixed Base Operator ("FBO") to handle the airport management. UCRAB states that around the time the license expired, UCRAB was "expanding the airport and installing a new FBO." Once the new FBO was in place, the oversight was found and prompt action was taken to rectify the oversight. UCRAB concedes that the change in management does not excuse the lapse, but requests that the Commission consider it when reviewing the forfeiture. 5. UCRAB's argument does not provide a basis for reducing the $2,000 forfeiture amount proposed in the NAL. UCRAB repeatedly used the station without the appropriate authorization, waiting almost 18 months from the expiration of the authorization to file the STA. UCRAB failed to take timely action to rectify the status of the expired license. Moreover, although UCRAB may have relied on the FBO to ensure that its license remained in good standing, UCRAB had the ultimate responsibility for complying with the Act and the Commission's Rules. The Commission has held that "a licensee cannot absolve itself for violations of Commission rules by simply isolating itself from the day-to-day operation of its station, especially where it has unreasonably placed heavy reliance on the competence or trustworthiness of its employees who have been delegated management responsibilities." Finally, we previously considered mitigating factors in setting the proposed forfeiture amount of $2,000 in the NAL, and UCRAB has not presented us with any other factor that would justify a further reduction of the forfeiture. We therefore conclude that a $2,000 forfeiture is appropriate. IV. Conclusion and Ordering Clauses 6. Based on the foregoing, UCRAB's arguments are insufficient to justify reduction or cancellation of the forfeiture. We find that UCRAB is liable for a $2,000 forfeiture. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Upper Cumberland Regional Airport Board SHALL FORFEIT to the United States the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000) for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 87.18(a) of the Commission's Rules. 8. A copy of this Notice shall be sent, by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Upper Cumberland Regional Airport Board, Attn: William E. Walker, 750 Airport Road, Sparta, Tennessee 38583. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Chief, Enforcement and Consumer Information Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau