******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Longstreet Communication International, Inc. ) File No. 00138-CW-L-96 Request for Waiver of Section 24.711(a)(2) of ) the Commission's Rules Regarding ) Market No. B012 ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 16, 1999 Released: March 16, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) has before it a Petition for Waiver, filed on February 12, 1997, by Longstreet Communication International, Inc. (Longstreet). Longstreet requests that the Commission "waive" the requirement that it pay a late fee for failure to meet the deadline for submitting the balance of a down payment for a C block PCS license that Longstreet won at auction. Because Longstreet's petition was filed in response to the Longstreet Waiver Order, which granted in part Longstreet's request for a waiver of section 24.711(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, we will treat Longstreet's petition as a petition for reconsideration. For the reasons discussed below, we deny Longstreet's petition. II. BACKGROUND 1. On February 4, 1997, the Bureau released an Order granting, in part, Longstreet's 1996 Petition, because it found that Longstreet presented sufficient facts to meet the standard for a partial waiver of the down payment rule. The Bureau found that prior to the second down payment, Longstreet made all previously required auction payments on time and in full. In addition, Longstreet paid the second down payment as soon as it realized its error and the Bureau found that there was no indication in the record that the payment delinquency was part of a deliberate effort by Longstreet to delay payment. Finally, the Bureau noted that upon receiving notice from the Commission that its account was delinquent, Longstreet paid the balance due. 2. While the Bureau concluded that the public interest would not be served by rigid enforcement of the second down payment deadline, which would have resulted in the cancellation of Longstreet's conditional license, it also concluded that Longstreet was not entitled to a complete waiver of the default rules. The Bureau stated that it is the applicant's responsibility to become aware of Public Notices released by the Commission, and failure to do so does not excuse Longstreet for making an untimely payment. Accordingly, the Bureau assessed Longstreet a late fee of five percent of the untimely payment paid, which amounts to $5,546.25, and stated that the late fee serves to underscore the importance of making timely payment of all auction payments. 3. In its petition, filed on February 12, 1997, Longstreet argues that the five percent late payment fee should be waived in its entirety. Longstreet contends that because it was never personally served notice of the second down payment requirement, it should not be penalized for the late payment. III. DISCUSSION 4. We disagree with Longstreet's argument that the Bureau was required to provide personal notice of the second down payment deadline. Neither the Administrative Procedures Act nor the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, require the Commission to provide applicants personal notice of procedural payment deadlines. Longstreet had adequate notice of the second down payment deadline because: (1) section 24.711(a)(2) of the Commission's rules states that the second down payment must be made within five business days of the conditional grant; (2) this requirement was explained in the Bidder Information Package, which Longstreet received before the auction; and (3) the Final Down Payment Public Notice, released on September 17, 1996, notified the public that the second down payment was due on September 24, 1996. Because it is incumbent upon applicants to diligently prosecute their applications by ascertaining and complying with the applicable payment deadlines established by public notice, we reject Longstreet's argument that it did not receive proper notice. 5. Accordingly, pursuant to section 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Waiver filed February 12, 1997, by Longstreet Communication International, Inc. IS DENIED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the license for market B012 (Altoona, Pennsylvania) will be removed from Auction No. 22. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James D. Schlichting Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau