Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Application of ) Huntington CUSA Settlement Group, L.C. ) for Authorization to Provide ) Domestic Cellular Public Radio Telephone Service ) File No. 10078-CL-110-A-93 on Frequency Block A in an Unserved Area ) In the Huntington - Ashland, West Virginia ) Kentucky, Ohio MSA, Market No. 110A ) ORDER Adopted: November 26, 1997 Released: November 26, 1997 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. In this Order, we dismiss the above captioned unserved area application of Huntington CUSA Settlement Group, L.C. (Huntington), for the Huntington-Ashland, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio MSA, Market No. 110A pursuant to Huntington's request. We further dismiss a petition to deny (petition) that application filed on June 16, 1995 by West Virginia Cellular Telephone Corp. (West Virginia Cellular), and approve a settlement agreement filed on June 28, 1995 between Huntington and Great Seal Cellular Limited Partnership (Great Seal). 2. Pursuant to section 22.128(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission considers a request by an applicant for dismissal of its application after it has been listed on Public Notice as accepted for filing to be a request for dismissal without prejudice. Additionally, if the applicant requests dismissal without prejudice, the Commission will, pursuant to section 22.128(a)(2), dismiss the application without prejudice. Huntington's letter requests dismissal of its application without prejudice. We will grant that request and dismiss Huntington's application without prejudice. Consequently, we will dismiss West Virginia Cellular's petition as moot. 3. The settlement agreement between Huntington and Great Seal also includes the declaration of Douglas S. Holladay, Jr., President, FGI Cellular Management, Inc., General Partner of Great Seal, stating that his company has agreed to pay Huntington up to $10,000 as reimbursement for its legitimate and prudent expenses of prosecuting Huntington's application. In the agreement, Great Seal indicates, inter alia, that it will refrain from filing a Petition to Deny Huntington's application. The agreement does not address West Virginia Cellular's petition. 4. Section 22.129 provides that a party seeking to withdraw a petition to deny must obtain Commission approval and certify that it has not received money or other consideration in excess of the reasonable and prudent expenses incurred in preparing and prosecuting its pleadings in exchange for the withdrawal of those pleadings. The party must also provide an itemized accounting of the expenses for which it seeks reimbursement. We conclude that the documents submitted by Huntington and Great Seal comply with section 22.129 of the Commission's rules. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to section 22.128(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  22.128(a), the application of the Huntington CUSA Settlement Group, L.C. filed on September 22, 1993, IS DISMISSED without prejudice. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 22.129 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  22.129, the Settlement Agreement between Huntington CUSA Settlement Group, L.C. and Great Seal Cellular Limited Partnership filed on June 28, 1995, IS APPROVED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to section 22.130 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 22.130, that the Petition to Deny filed by West Virginia Cellular Telephone Corporation on June 16, 1995, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David L. Furth Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau