******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Application of ) ) CLEAR PAGING, INC. ) File No. 24361-CD-P/L-95 ) For a New Paging Service ) Facility to Operate on 931.6125 MHz at) Fort Pierce, Florida ) ORDER Adopted: November 19, 1997 Released: November 19, 1997 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division: 1. By this action, the Commercial Wireless Division denies Clear Paging, Inc.'s ("Clear") petition for reconsideration ("Petition") of the grant by the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (formerly Narrowband Branch) of its application for a new paging facility on frequency 931.6125 MHz at Fort Pierce, Florida. 2. On December 27, 1994, Clear filed an application for a new paging service facility to operate on frequency 931.6125 MHz at Fort Pierce, Florida. The Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch granted Clear a construction permit for a new paging facility to operate on frequency 931.6625 MHz as Clear's requested frequency was unavailable. On June 13, 1996, Clear filed its Petition seeking reconsideration of the assigned frequency, and requested assignment of its preferred frequency, 931.6125 MHz. 3. Section 22.31(b)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules requires an applicant to file its application within sixty days of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for filing. In response to Clear's Petition, the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch determined that Clear's preferred frequency had already been assigned to Airtouch Paging, whose application was filed on November 23, 1990. Airtouch Paging's application was accepted for filing on December 12, 1990. Since Clear's application was received after the filing window closed, the available frequency was assigned to an applicant in the earlier filing window. 4. Additionally, applicant's are not entitled to their requested frequency. Section 22.501(p)(2) allows an applicant to specify a frequency. However, the Commission is not bound by such requests. Accordingly, we deny Clear's Petition. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 405, authority delegated by Sections 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331, and pursuant to  1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration filed on June 13, 1996, by Clear Paging, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David L. Furth Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau