******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) American Mobilphone, Inc. ) FCC File No. CWD 96-1 Request for Extension/Reinstatement and) for Extended Implementation Schedule ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: September 26, 1997 Released: September 26, 1997 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division: 1. This matter was remanded to the Commission by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Pursuant to the Court's instructions, we determine that American Mobilphone, Inc. (AMI) has eight months from the March 7, 1997 remand within which to construct its paging systems. 2. In February of 1993, the Commission proposed to give paging operators exclusive rights to a particular channel. In addition, the Commission proposed that those paging operators applying for the new licenses would have eight months to construct their systems or their licenses would terminate. The Commission also proposed a "slow growth option" for systems with more than thirty transmitters. Under the "slow growth option," applicants could receive up to three years to construct their systems. During the pendency of this rule making proceeding, AMI filed fifteen applications for paging licenses. Between August 1993 and February 1994, the Commission granted AMI's fifteen applications. 3. On October 14, 1993, the Commission published a Sunshine Notice announcing an open meeting on the Notice of Proposed Rule Making. At the open meeting in November, the Commission adopted a final order -- which mirrored the proposed rules. In the final order, the Commission determined that it would not grant requests to extend the construction period for grandfathered paging licenses. The Commission defined grandfathered paging licenses as those for whom applications were filed before the October 14, 1993 Sunshine Notice announcing the Commission meeting. According to the rules set forth in the Report and Order, AMI was considered a "grandfathered" applicant and was not eligible for the "slow growth option." Thus, AMI was subject to its original eight month construction deadline. 4. AMI filed a petition for reconsideration seeking "slow growth" eligibility and requested that its eight-month construction period be tolled pending the outcome of the reconsideration petition. When the construction deadline lapsed, in January of 1995, the Commission had not yet acted upon AMI's petition for reconsideration. However, on February 8, 1996, the Commission denied AMI's petition for reconsideration. 5. AMI subsequently appealed the Commission's decision to the D.C. Court of Appeals. The Court denied AMI's petition for review but nonetheless stated that the Commission must grant AMI eight months from the date of the March 7, 1997, opinion within which to construct its stations. 6. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 402(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 402(h), and by delegated authority under Section 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331, American Mobilphone, Inc. is granted eight months from March 7, 1997, within which to construct its paging systems. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David L. Furth Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau