The supplemental comments I would like to make are: 
The argument I have made that to exclude the two systems is to
thwart the spirit of Section 255, I fear may not weigh heavily
enough to permit the FCC to rule favorably. It fear that the
Telecommunications Act may not specifically cover the end users
of such systems, only manufacturers and providers of 
telecommunications services. 

If this narrow view is taken then truly the spirit of Section 255 is
ignored. I urge for a broad view of what constitutes "providers of
telecommunication services". I think there is good reason and
logic to consider users of telecommunication equipment as
"providers of -----services" when they use the two systems I
mention above. They are in essence providing "directory 
assistance" just the same in many ways as the actual providers
who are usually considered carriers. In addition this
"telecommunication service" is making possible the completion of
telecommunications. 

Very truly yours Leo A. LaPointe 
49 Highland Terrace 
Worthington, Ohio 43085 
614-888-0921 

The following comments were inadvertently ommitted in my
immediately preceding comments just a few minutes ago. 

The opinion expressed below relates to the FCC's request for
comments re "enhanced services" as to its tentative conclusion to
consider it has no authority in this area. 

I am referring to interactive voice menus and voice mail as the
two systems that should definitely not be considered as outside
the scope of the FCC. There may be others. I regret any
confusion I may have caused by ommitting the foregoing 
information. Thank you.