WPC 2 BP Z Courier 10cpi3|x Times (Scalable)CG Times Bold (Scalable)HP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSx  @HCNX@2<;L"3|w IF#6X@DQw@# @Hy!kX@Courier 10cpiCG Times (Scalable)@DQ>@#"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYddddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdddddddd~d~d~d~ddddddddd8ddddoddd~d~d<|8tddddddlLkdkd~d~d~ddddddXCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"Ȑdhd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUvŐdȐYYCCCCŐz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC2[PX ZCourier 10cpiCG Times (Scalable)CG Times Bold (Scalable)Courier 10cpi (Bold)?xxx,wx6X@8;X@8wC;,[hXw P7XP7zC;,"sXz_ p^7X?xxx,;x `B;XddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"Ȑdsd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ`ȐȐȮzȐUvŐdȐddCCCCŐzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲdxN`xoȐCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddddddddCddddddddo8dddddϐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddxoddddddodddddddddood8doddrddoddN8ooddddoNododdddooooȐdYCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"Ȑdsd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ`ȐȐȮzȐUvŐdȐddCCCCŐzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ddddudSddddd,?xxx,>x6X@8;X@?xxx,x `B;X8wC;,#[AXw P7XP7zC;,7ZXz_ p^7XTdY,#+S P7PLegal - Dup LongLegal - Dup ShortLegal - Dup ShortStandard - Dup LongStandard p ShortStandard - Dup LongStandard - Dup ShortMonarch'3'32 X-X!G ?< Federal Communications Commission DA 972233 _________________________________________________________________ #Xw P7[hXP# l Before the W FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554  Yv- In re Applications of hh,V) ` `  hh,V)  YH-MOBILETEL. INC. hh,V)pp ` `  hh,V)  Y -For Facilities in the Domestic PublicV) File No. 10538CL461B89  Y -Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service)  Y -on Frequency Block Bhh,V)  Y -in Market 461, Louisiana 8 St. JamesV)  Y -` `  hh,V)pp  xx- X(#(# Y -` `  hh,V) pp  xx- X(#(#  Y-For Facilities in the Domestic PublicV) File No. 10539CLP462B89 X  Yy-Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service)  Yb-on Frequency Block Bhh,V)  YK-in Market 462, Louisiana 9 Plaquemines)  Y-R ORDER ă  Y-@ ` ` Adopted: October 20, 1997; Released:October 21, 1997 X By the Assistant General Counsel:  }1. This order dismisses a Petition for Special Relief filed August 18, 1997 by   MobileTel,Inc. ("MobileTel"), which requests that the Commission reinstate MobileTel's   licenses to serve the Plaquemines and St. James RSAs. BellSouth Mobility Inc. filed an   opposition to MobileTel's Petition on August 27, 1997; MobileTel filed a reply on September 9, 1997; and BellSouth filed a further response on September 23, 1997.  |2. In a previous order in this proceeding, the Commission dismissed MobileTel's   ,applications as unacceptable for filing and rescinded its licenses because, at the time it filed its   <applications, MobileTel was not a wireline common carrier eligible for the Block B cellular  Y -  authorizations in question. See MobileTel, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 19098 (1996). The court of  Y!-  appeals affirmed the Commission's order. See Mobiletel, Inc. v. FCC, 107 F.3d 888 (D.C.  Y"-  Cir.), pet. for rehearing denied per curiam, 107 F.3d 897 (1997), pet. for cert. filed, July 28,   1997. Mobiletel now argues in its Petition that the Commission's holding is inconsistent with  Yi$-  the decision in Algreg Cellular Engineering, 12 FCC Rcd 8148 (1997), because both cases   [involve applicants which were in noncompliance with regulatory requirements that were"R%0*''p&"   ,subsequently eliminated, but the Commission dismissed Mobiletel's applications whereas it did  Y-not dismiss the offending application in Algreg.  {3. The Commission has no jurisdiction at this time to entertain MobileTel's request.   MobileTel did not seek timely reconsideration of the Commission's order, and it is too late to  Y-  do so now. See 47 U.S.C. 405; 47 C.F.R. 1.106(f); Reuters Ltd. v. FCC, 781 F.2d 946,  Yv-  95152 (D.C. Cir. 1986); Woods Communications Group, Inc., FCC 97320, released   September 12, 1997 11. Furthermore, once a petition for review has been filed in court, the   Commission has no authority to conduct further proceedings unless the court orders a remand.  Y1-  See Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 463 F.2d 268, 283 (D.C. Cir. 1971), cert. denied,   406 U.S. 950 (1972). If Mobiletel wishes to reopen the record, it must apply to the court for  Y -  such relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2347(c). Id.; New Radio Corp., 2 FCC Rcd 112 (1987)   (Commission policy is not to consider requests to remand court proceedings because parties  Y -  ;seeking remand should apply directly to the court); accord, White Mountain Broadcasting Co.,  Y -Inc., 66 FCC2d 672, 673 (1977) (concurring statement).  _4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED That the Petition for Special Relief IS DISMISSED. ` `  hh,VJohn I. Riffer ` `  hh,VAssistant General Counsel ` `  hh,VAdministrative Law Division ` `  hh,VOffice of General Counsel ` `  hh,