WPC 2 BT Z w (TT)3|P (TT)Times New Roman (Bold) (TT)Times New Roman (Italic) (TT)HP LaserJet 4/4M 5/5M (HP)HPLAS4.WRSC\  P6Q,,$rGP20@@VLTimes New Roman (TT)"5@^*7DSS77S^*7*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx7Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf7.7NS7JSJSJ7SS..S.SSSS7A.SSxSSJP!PZ*7777CE7SSxJxJxJxJxJooJfJfJfJfJ7.7.7.7.xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxJxSxSxSxSxS]SxSxJxJoJoJoJfJfJfJxSxSxxSxSxSxSCS7S777SAxSf.fExSxSxSxo7oE]A]AN:*LS7JSSSSS.4}}S2S}277JJS77SS7J72t7[[[[^ee*C`^.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*7DSS77S^*7*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx7Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf7.7NS7JSJSJ7SS..S.SSSS7A.SSxSSJP!PZ7SJSS7]777JJ:S7A7xx*7SSSS!S7.S^7SC[227`L*724S}}}Jxxxxxxoffff7777xxxxxxx^xxxxxx]SJJJJJJoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSSS I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)2m 3b@X@- Times New Roman (TT)Times New Roman (Bold) (TT)"5@^*7]SS.77S_*7*.SSSSSSSSSS77___SxoxxofASoxfx]oxxxxo7.7aS7S]J]J7S].7].]S]]JA7]SxSSJB%BW*7777CE7S]xSxSxSxSxSxxJoJoJoJoJA.A.A.A.x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSf]xSxSxSxJxJxJoJoJoJSSSS]]C]A]A7A]S]o.oEx]x]SxxJxJ]A]AN:*ZS7SSSSSS27}}S2}}S}277SSS77SS7S72t7[[[[_ee*C`_.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*7]SS.77S_*7*.SSSSSSSSSS77___SxoxxofASoxfx]oxxxxo7.7aS7S]J]J7S].7].]S]]JA7]SxSSJB%BW7SSSS7]777SS:S7A7xx*7SSSS%S7}2S_7}SC[227`Z*727S}}}SxxxxxxxooooAAAAxx_xxxxxf]SSSSSSxJJJJJ....S]SSSSS[S]]]]S]Times New Roman (TT)Times New Roman (Bold) (TT)Times New Roman (Italic) (TT)Roman~y.G8*XG4  pQ7PC2X DXP\  P6QXP.7UC2XxXU4  pQX"5@^2CRdd$CCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`l2CC!CCPRCddYYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddoddYYYYYzYzYzYddddddPdCdCCCdNdz8zRdddCRoNoNNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddnddddddd2@ nM5"5@^2Coddȧ8CCdr2C28ddddddddddCCrrrdzNdzoȐC8CtdCdoYoYCdo8Co8odooYNCodddYO,Oh2CC!CCPRCdodddddȐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddzodddYYYYYYddddooPoNoNCNodo8RoodȐYYoNoNNF2ldCdddddd66Otoc 5H/=(O/LG@>*O/6.G$E^=T>h!(# ` hp x (#2lk  P!bW" X]# bdtoc 6.G?66Otoc 6H/=(O/LG@?*O/6.G$E ^?T@!(#` hp x (#toc 7.G@66Otoc 7H/=(O/LG@@*O/6.G$E!ABtoc 8.GA66Otoc 8H/=(O/LG@A*O/6.G$E"^CTD!(#` hp x (#toc 9.GB66Otoc 9H/=(O/LG@B*O/6.G$E#^ETF!(#B` hp x (#2l$ k% r& y'index 1GC66Oindex 1H/=(O/LG@C*O/6.G$E$^GTH` !(# ` hp x (#index 2GD66Oindex 2H/=(O/LG@D*O/6.G$E%^ITJ` !(#B` hp x (#toa heading66Otoa heading/=(O/LG@E*O/6.G$E&^KTL!(# ` hp x (#captionGF66OcaptionH/=(O/LG@F*O/6.G$E'MN#x6X@KX@##b6X@C@#2 ()&D*&j+}_Equation Ca66O_Equation CaptionO/LG@G*O/6.G$E(OP#x6X@KX@##b6X@C@#2 6.GH66ODefault Paragraph FontLG@H*O/6.G$E)gQgR#Xv6X@CX@##b6X@C@#3 6.GI66O_Equation CaptionO/LG@I*O/6.G$E*gSgT#Xv6X@CX@##b6X@C@#a1Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/+$UV 2,?-Ǔ.Z/a2Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/,/WX` ` ` a3Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/-:YZ` ` `  a4Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/.E[\` ` `  a5Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O//P]^` ` ` hhh 20ӕ12F3a6Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/0[_` a7Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/1fab a8Paragraph+O/ 6.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)H/=(O/|*O/2qcd a1Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/38ef@   2v4Ԙ5o67a2Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/4Agh@` `  ` ` ` a3Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/5Jij` ` @  ` `  a4Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/6Skl` `  @  a5Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/7\mn` `  @hh# hhh 2Ξ89g:/;a6Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/8eop` `  hh#@( hh# a7Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/9nqr` `  hh#(@- ( a8Right Par+O/ 6.Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO/LG@}*O/:wst` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 1 ?)T G66]Default Paragraph Fontr "G*g!?)T $E;;Q;R#Xv6X@ CX@##b6X@ C@#2ڧ@Z@@"5@^.=K\\!==\g.=.3\\\\\\\\\\33gggQzzpf=Gpfzfpp=3=V\=Q\Q\Q=\\33\3\\\\=G3\\\\QX%Xc.====IK=\\QQQQQzzQpQpQpQpQ=3=3=3=3\\\\\\\\\\Q\\\\\f\\QQzQzQzQpQpQpQ\\\\\\I\=\===\G\p3pK\\\z=zKfGfGN@.S\=Q\\\\\39\7\7==QQ\==\\=Q=7t=eeeegoo.Ijg2Z\\yeCpj`vZefeloPpPj`e~~tro.=K\\!==\g.=.3\\\\\\\\\\33gggQzzpf=Gpfzfpp=3=V\=Q\Q\Q=\\33\3\\\\=G3\\\\QX%Xc=\Q\\=f===QQ@\=G=.=\\\\%\=3\g=\Ie77=jS.=79\Qzpppp====gf\QQQQQQzQQQQQ3333\\\\\\\e\\\\\\\{y.C8*XC\  P6QP.~y.G8*XG4  pQ7PC2X DXP\  P6QXP.7UC2XxXU4  pQX2J=.X &J\  P6Q&P.2N=.X7&N4  pQ&0J=.X3&J*f9 xQ&X"5@^.=f\\3==\i.=.3\\\\\\\\\\==iii\zzpG\zpfzz=3=j\=\fQfQ=\f3=f3f\ffQG=f\\\QH(H_.====IK=\f\\\\\QzQzQzQzQG3G3G3G3f\\\\ffff\\f\\\\pf\\\QQQzQzQzQ\\\\ffIfGfG=Gf\fz3zKff\QQfGfGN@.c\=\\\\\\7<\7\7==\\\==\\=\=7t=eeeeioo.Iji2Z\\yeCpj`vZefeloPpPj`e~~tro.=f\\3==\i.=.3\\\\\\\\\\==iii\zzpG\zpfzz=3=j\=\fQfQ=\f3=f3f\ffQG=f\\\QH(H_=\\\\=f===\\@\=G=.=\\\\(\=7\i=\Ie77=jc.=7<\\zzzzGGGGipf\\\\\\QQQQQ3333\f\\\\\e\ffff\f2@ @L @- "5@^.=M\\'==\|.=.3\\\\\\\\\\==|||\ppzpp=Qzfzpp\fppffG3GM\=\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\GG3\QzQQGI2Ic.====IK=\\p\p\p\p\p\zzQpQpQpQpQ=3=3=3=3z\\\\\\\\\fQp\\\\fQ\p\p\p\p\zQzQzQpQpQpQ\\\\\\I\=\===\QzQf3fKz\z\\zpGpK\G\GN@.`\G\\\\\\39\7\7==ff\==\\=f=7t=eeee|oo.Ij|2Z\\yeCpj`vZefeloPpPj`e~~tro.=M\\'==\|.=.3\\\\\\\\\\==|||\ppzpp=Qzfzpp\fppffG3GM\=\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\GG3\QzQQGI2Ic=\f\\=\===ff@\=G=zf.G\\\\2\=3\|=\Ie77=j`.=79\\ppppppzpppp====z|fp\\\\\\\zQQQQQ3333\\\\\\\e\\\\\Q\"5@^%-77\V%%7>%7777777777>>>1eOIIOC=OO%+OCbOO=OI=COOhOOC%%47%17171%777V7777%+77O77155<%%%%,-%77O1O1O1O1O1bII1C1C1C1C1%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O1O7O7O7O7O7=7O7O1O1I1I1I1C1C1C1O7O7OO7O7O7O7,7%7%%%7+O7CC-O7O7O7bOI%I-=+=+N&27%177777"SS7!TT7S!%%117n%%77ln%1n%!t%<<<<>mBBs,?>[N6Wms[77UUUH_%7777777777>>>1eOIIOC=OO%+OCbOO=OI=COOhOOC%%47%17171%777V7777%+77O77155%T7,OOOOOO=7111111I111117777777<7777777"5@^*7FSS$77Sq*7*.SSSSSSSSSS77qqqSffoxffxx7Jo]oxfxfS]xff]]A.AFS7SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSSAA.SJoJJAC.CZ*7777CE7SSfSfSfSfSfSooJfJfJfJfJ7.7.7.7.oSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]JfSxSxSxS]JxSfSfSfSfSoJoJoJfJfJfJxSxSxxSxSxSxSCS7S777SJoJ].]EoSoSxSofAfESASAN:*WSASSSSSS.4}}S2S}277]]S77SS7]72t7[[[[qee*C`q.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*7FSS$77Sq*7*.SSSSSSSSSS77qqqSffoxffxx7Jo]oxfxfS]xff]]A.AFS7SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSSAA.SJoJJAC.CZ7S]SS7S777]]:S7A7o]*ASSSS.S7.Sq7SC[227`W*724S}}}Sffffffoffff7777xoxxxxxqxxxxx]fSSSSSSSoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSJS28@ @Z @^ڻ"5@^F,F\Wim,==Fq,q,`WWWWWWWWWW,,iqiOvW`\`\Wdi0A`Omd````WSiWiW\W===`W,W\S\S9S`00\0`W\WJJA`OiWSO=#=i,,,,`0K,W`WWWWWWWWWWW\S\S\S\S\S00000000d``W`W`W`Wi`i`i`i`,SWW`\`W`W\S`W\\WW``WW\S\S\S\S``\SdSdWddSdSi`i`0```000`A`\O0OKd`d```,,`J`KWJ,,N,,A\,OWWW\,WWWWSWWWWWW,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,WWtWqeeOWoo.0SW2ZWWyeCpS`vZefeloPpPj`e~~tro,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,F,F\Wim,==Fq,q,`WWWWWWWWWW,,iqiOvW`\`\Wdi0A`Omd````WSiWiW\W===`W,W\S\S9S`00\0`W\WJJA`OiWSO=#=i,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SWW\0\`WWWWWWW0qWW,SA,,WWWWWWOWWWWWWW\\\\\0000`d`````W`iiii\\`WWWWWWSSSSS0000W`WWWWWOW````S\"5@^?(?SO_c(88?g(g(WOOOOOOOOOO((_g_GkOWSWSO[_,;WGc[WWWWOK_O_OSO888WO(OSKSK3KW,,S,WOSOCC;WG_OKG8 8_((((W,E(OWOOOOOOOOOOOwSKSKSKSKSK,,,,,,,,[WWOWOWOWO_W_W_W_W(KOOWSWOWOSKWOSSOOWWOOSKSKSKSKWWSK[K[O[[K[K_W_W,WWW,,,W;WSG,GE[W[WWW((WCWEOC((N((;S(GOOOS(OOOOKOOOOOO(((((((((((((((OOtOg[[GOee*,KO.wROOn[CfxKxWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((?(?SO_c(88?g(g(WOOOOOOOOOO((_g_GkOWSWSO[_,;WGc[WWWWOK_O_OSO888WO(OSKSK3KW,,S,WOSOCC;WG_OKG8 8_(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((KOOS,SWOOOOOOO,gOO(K;((OOOOOOGOOOOOOOSSSSS,,,,W[WWWWWOW____SSWOOOOOOwKKKKK,,,,OWOOOOOGOWWWWKS"5@^&&209<!!&>>400000000009>9+@04242079$4+<744440-909020!!!4002-2--42O4020(($4+90-+!!94)0400000000000G2-2-2-2-2-744040404094949494-004240402-40220044002-2-2-2-442-7-7077-7-94944444$42++)7474444(4)0(N$2+00020000-00000000t0>77+0c<<&&209<!!&>>400000000009>9+@04242079$4+<744440-909020!!!4002-2--42O4020(($4+90-+!!9-002240000000>00-$000000+0000000222224744444049999224000000G-----0400000+04444-2{y.C8*XC\  P6QP .~y.G8*XG4  pQ7PC2X DXP\  P6QXP.7UC2XxXU4  pQX2J=.X &J\  P6Q&P.2N=.X7&N4  pQ&0J=.X3&J*f9 xQ&XP,%X)J,\  P6QJP 2S=FXRRY&S\  P@Q&P y.K8?XRqK\  P@QP I-!&XR,-\  P@Q,P{,C8*X3,C*f9 xQXI(!XI,(\  P6Q,P2 @jBd"5@^!)22SN!!28!2222222222888,\HCCH=8HH!'H=YHH8HC8=HH^HH=!!/2!,2,2,!222N2222!'22H22,006!!!!()!22H,H,H,H,H,YCC,=,=,=,=,!!!!H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H2H2H2H282H2H,H,C,C,C,=,=,=,H2H2HH2H2H2H2(2!2!!!2'H2==)H2H2H2YHC!C)8'8'N#-2!,22222KK2LL2K!!,,2d!!22bd!,d!t!77778c<local radio ownership rules. Furthermore, the proposed assignees of the stations to be divested have  xLdemonstrated their qualifications to acquire the stations. Our review of the record in this case reveals no  xother circumstances that would preclude grant of the divestiture applications. In this regard, we note that  x-the Department of Justice has reviewed the merger and will require Hicks to divest its prospective interests  x>in the five SFX stations to be divested in the Greenville and Houston areas, as well as in certain SFX  S8- xstations in the Jackson, NassauSuffolk and Pittsburgh areas, see supra,  4, but otherwise has determined  S- xjnot to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. See, e.g., Shareholders of Citicasters, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd  S- x.at 19142.#Zx {OT- xY#C\  P6QP# I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:effect on competition in these markets. See, e.g., NewCity Communications, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd 3929, 395455 (1997).  S -  x20. We believe that it is appropriate to ensure that the trust, which would give Hicks beneficial  xinterests in stations that exceed the numerical ownership limits, is short term. Accordingly, we will  xyapprove assignment of the stations to be divested to the trust for a limited period of up to six months or,  xin the case of the stations subject to the DOJ settlement agreement, up to six months from the filing of  ST$- x[the proposed Final Judgment in the Department of Justice's civil antitrust action, or within five business  S,%- xdays after notice of entry of the Final Judgment. See supra,  4. This will allow a reasonable period of  xtime for the necessary divestitures to be completed and the trust to be terminated. Any request to extend  xthis temporary period should be filed at least 45 days prior to the end of the period and will be closely  xkscrutinized. In addition, with regard to the stations subject to the DOJ settlement agreement, we will  ximpose a condition on our action requiring the trustee to comply with the terms of the DOJ settlement"( %.))0*"  x=agreement in connection with the ultimate sale of the stations. We also will coordinate our review of the  xproposed sale of these stations with the Department of Justice before taking action on any such  S- xapplications. Furthermore, with regard to the stations to be divested in the Orlando, Greenville and  xHouston markets, we emphasize that we are approving assignment of these stations to the trust for the  xLlimited purpose of providing a means for the merger to proceed should the good faith and diligent efforts of the parties to accomplish the divestitures concurrently with the merger fail.  Q-  ONETOAMARKET WAIVER REQUESTS TP  S-  x21. OneToAMarket Waiver Showings. Hicks bases its requests for onetoamarket waivers on  Sr- xthe standards adopted in the Second Report and Order in MM Docket No. 877, 4 FCC Rcd 1741  SL - x("Second Report and Order"), recon. granted in part, denied in part, 4 FCC Rcd 6489 (1989) ("Second  S& - x-Report and Order Recon."). Under these standards, the Commission presumptively favors waiver requests  xzinvolving television and radio station combinations in the top 25 markets where at least 30 separately  xowned, operated and controlled broadcast licensees or "voices" would remain after the proposed  S - x.combination.&$ x yO- xh#C\  P6QP# I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:stations, it has no broadcast interests in the subject markets. Hicks states that none of the broadcast stations at issue is in financial distress.  S-  x29. Competition and Diversity. Hicks contends that its proposed ownership of televisionradio  xcombinations in the HartfordNew Haven, Indianapolis and Norfolk markets will not have a significant  xadverse effect on either diversity or competition in those markets. Hicks asserts that after the merger the  x/HartfordNew Haven market would be served by 32 separate voices, including 11 television stations  xlicensed to eight separate owners in the DMA and 41 radio stations (21 AM and 20 FM) licensed to 25" ).))!"  xseparate owners in the HartfordNew Haven television metro market. Hicks also states that the market  xNis served by other mass media outlets and lists 24 cable operators reaching 86 percent of the total  xhouseholds, one multichannel multipoint distribution services ( MMDS) operator, 12 LPTV stations and  x{13 daily and 43 weekly newspapers and publications. With regard to economic concentration and  xcompetition, Hicks states that its proposed combination will garner a combined television and radio  xadvertising revenue share of 25.95 percent. Hicks also states that the relevant market includes two  xArbitronranked radio advertising revenue markets: Hartford, in which WPOP(AM), WHCN(FM),  xWKSS(FM) and WWYZ(FM) garner a combined share of 33.77 percent; and New Haven, in which  x=WPLR(FM) garners a 45.25 percent share. Hicks asserts that the fourstation American Radio Systems  xLicense Corp. group in the Hartford market commands a 49.34 percent radio advertising revenue share, and the threestation Clear Channel group in the New Haven market commands a 45.25 percent share.   Ox30. Hicks states that the Indianapolis market would be served by 39 separate voices after the  xjmerger, including 14 television stations licensed to 13 separate owners in the DMA and 42 radio stations  x(12 AM and 30 FM) licensed to 27 separate owners in the Indianapolis television metro market. Hicks  xLalso states that the market is served by other mass media outlets and lists 40 cable operators reaching 65  xxpercent of the households, six MMDS and one multipoint distribution services operators, 11 LPTV stations  xand 28 daily and 51 weekly newspapers and publications. Hicks states that its proposed combination will  xgarner a combined television and radio advertising revenue share of 24.27 percent in the Indianapolis market.   x31. Hicks contends that the Norfolk market would be served by 30 separate voices after the  xMmerger, including eight television stations licensed to eight separate owners in the DMA and 36 radio  x<stations (14 AM and 22 FM) licensed to 25 separate owners in the Norfolk television metro market. Hicks  xLalso states that the market is served by other mass media outlets and lists 14 cable operators reaching 74  xpercent of the households, two MMDS operators, 17 LPTV stations and four daily and 14 weekly  xjnewspapers and publications. With regard to economic concentration and competition, Hicks states that  x.WAVYTV garners 26.54 percent of television advertising revenue in the DMA, a share similar to those  x-of the other network affiliates in the DMA. WKLRFM garners a 4.5 percent share of the Arbitronranked  Sx- xRichmond radio advertising revenue market.*zxx yO- x#C\  P6QP# I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:Database ("BIA Radio Database") indicates that Hicks's proposed radio combination garnered a 37.4  xlpercent share of 1997 radio advertising revenues in the Hartford and New Haven radio advertising  Sl- xmarkets.-ZlHx yOT- x#C\  P6QP# I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:by Hicks, as well as our independent research, we have verified that there are four VHF and 10 UHF  xtelevision stations licensed in the Indianapolis DMA, and 12 AM and 30 FM radio stations in the  xIndianapolis television metro market. Following the proposed merger, there will be a total of 56 radio  xand television stations in the market representing 39 separate broadcast "voices." A wide variety of other  x!media are also available, including 28 daily and 51 weekly newspapers and publications, 40 cable television systems and 11 LPTV stations.   x*43. With respect to economic concentration and competition, our independent research in the BIA  xyTV Database indicates that WISHTV garnered 22.9 percent of 1997 television advertising revenue in the  xIndianapolis market. Our independent research in the BIA Radio Database indicates that Hicks's proposed  xkradio combination garnered 27.2 percent of 1997 radio advertising revenue in the Indianapolis market.  xTogether, the stations in Hicks's proposed combination garnered a combined television and radio advertising revenue share of 24 percent in the Indianapolis market.   x+44. Norfolk is ranked as the 39th largest television market. Based on the showing submitted by  x0Hicks, as well as our independent research, we have verified that there are three VHF and 5 UHF  xtelevision stations licensed in the Norfolk DMA, and 14 AM and 22 FM radio stations in the Norfolk  xtelevision metro market. Following the proposed merger, there will be a total of 44 radio and television  xstations in the market representing 30 separate broadcast "voices." A wide variety of other media are also  x=available, including 4 daily and 14 weekly newspapers and publications, 14 cable television systems and 17 LPTV stations.   x,45. With respect to economic concentration and competition, our independent research in the BIA  xLTV Database indicates that WAVYTV garnered 25 percent of 1997 television advertising revenue in the  xNorfolk market, one station in the DMA had a comparable television advertising revenue share and two  xMstations had greater television audience shares. Our independent research in the BIA Radio Database  xindicates that WKLRFM garnered 3.1 percent of radio advertising revenue in the 1997 Richmond radio  xadvertising market. If all of WKLRFM's revenues were attributed to the Norfolk radio advertising  xjmarket, WAVYTV and WKLRFM would have commanded a combined television and radio advertising  SP-share of 18.1 percent in the Norfolk market./P|x yOl - xy#C\  P6QP# I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:- xG.P., 11 FCC Rcd at 16734 (conditional onetoamarket waiver granted where combination garnered 24.2  xpercent combined television and radio advertising revenue in 42nd television market). Our conclusion also  xjtakes into account the DOJ's review of the proposed merger, and its decision to require the divestiture of  xcertain stations in markets other than the HartfordNew Haven, Indianapolis and Norfolk markets but  S-otherwise not to oppose the merger on antitrust grounds. See supra,  4. x   x.47. We conclude, based on the record, that temporary, conditional waivers of the onetoamarket  xrule for Hicks's proposed radiotelevision combinations in the HartfordNew Haven and Norfolk markets,  x.and a permanent, unconditional waiver of the onetoamarket rule for Hicks's proposed radiotelevision  xcombination in the Indianapolis market, are appropriate in this case. The markets in question are both  xdiverse and highly competitive. Although some of Hicks's commonlycontrolled facilities in each of these  xmarkets are technically significant, competing facilities do exist. Grant of the waivers will result in  xeconomic efficiencies and facilitate enhanced local programming by the stations in question. Moreover,  S:- xgrant of the waivers will facilitate the proposed merger.0Z:x yO- x#C\  P6QP# I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8: