******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Liability of Kenneth B. Ulbricht ) ) Assignee of License for Station KSWB, ) Seaside, Oregon ) ) For a Forfeiture ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 23, 1996 Released: December 31, 1996 By the Chief, Mass Mass Bureau: 1. The Commission, by the Chief, Mass Media Bureau, acting pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283(c)(3) of the Commission's Rules, has before it for consideration: (1) a Notice of Apparent Liability ("NAL") for forfeiture in the amount of $10,000, issued on October 5, 1995; and (2) an October 30, 1995 response thereto submitted by Kenneth B. Ulbricht, d/b/a Seaside Broadcasting ("Ulbricht"). Ulbricht requests that the forfeiture be rescinded. For the reasons that follow, we deny Ulbricht's request and hereby impose a forfeiture in the amount of $10,000, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  503(b). 2. In the NAL, we determined that Ulbricht had willfully and repeatedly violated Section 310(d) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  310(d), and Section 73.3540 of the Commission's Rules, by assuming control of Station KSWB, Seaside, Oregon without Commission authorization. The apparently unauthorized transfer of control occurred no later than April 1, 1995, when a Lease Management Agreement ("LMA") between Ulbricht and "God's Ministry of Deliverance and Restoration" (the "Ministry"), an entity apparently controlled by Monte Clark ("Clark"), went into effect. Clark, in addition to his role in the Ministry, was the sole principal of Monte Corporation, licensee of KSWB. The LMA itself and information provided by Ulbricht and Clark indicated that Clark had relinquished control of KSWB to Ulbricht prior to Commission action on the pending application to assign the station's license from Monte Corporation to Ulbricht (File No. BAL-950110EH). Because the Commission granted that application on October 5, 1995, the period of unauthorized transfer of the station lasted slightly more than six months. 3. In his response to the NAL, Ulbricht disputes that he assumed control of the station prior to our authorization. Ulbricht claims that all programming and personnel issues were discussed with Clark's personal representative, Ujual Strestha ("Strestha"), at weekly staff meetings. According to Ulbricht, Strestha never objected to staff recommendations, and Strestha's only directive to Ulbricht was that the station refrain from broadcasting specific religious programming that Clark might find offensive. Ulbricht also contends that Strestha "dealt with" compliance with Commission rules at the weekly staff meetings but provides no further explanation. Ulbricht admits that he paid Strestha but insists that such payment was at Clark's direction and that Strestha was never his (Ulbricht's) employee. In his statement, Strestha describes himself as a manager for the station, hired by the Ministry, to look after the Ministry's interests, and as a salesman. He further states that his work for the Ministry included assuring that the station is "running without any FCC violation." Strestha does not explain how he managed the station or who, if anyone, reported to him. 4. With respect to station finances, Ulbricht acknowledges that Clark has not had access to the station's checkbook. Ulbricht contends that, when the LMA was entered into, Clark had no working capital, the station's accounts payable were seriously in arrears, and there were virtually no accounts receivable. Further, Ulbricht states that the station's equipment was transferred to him following foreclosure by the equipment company. Ulbricht submits that any working capital that the station now has was contributed by him or was generated from operations under the LMA. Ulbricht further contends that he denied Clark access to station finances because he was concerned Clark would use the money for a Nigerian oil venture. 5. Finally, regarding ability to pay, Ulbricht submits that a forfeiture would seriously impair the station's ability to continue operations. In this regard, while the station's balance sheet shows that liabilities exceed assets by $73,000, the station's largest liability is a debt due to Ulbricht for $107,000. Further, while the station's income statement shows a loss of more than $63,000 over five "periods," the most recent period shows a modest profit of $1,000. 6. Section 310(d) of the Communications Act and Section 73.3540 of the Commission's Rules require the consent of the Commission prior to effectuation of a voluntary assignment of license or transfer of control. In ascertaining whether an unauthorized transfer of control has occurred, the Commission focuses on whether an individual or entity other than the licensee has obtained the right to determine the basic operating policies of the station. See WHDH, Inc., 17 FCC 2d 856, 863 (1969), aff'd sub nom. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 444 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 923 (1971). After carefully considering Ulbricht's response, we continue to believe that Ulbricht prematurely assumed control of KSWB, contrary to the Act and our Rules. 7. From Ulbricht's submissions, it appears that Ulbricht, not Clark, had the ultimate control over the station's personnel, programming and finances. In this regard, the only person at the station who ever reported to Clark was Strestha. However, Strestha was paid by Ulbricht, not Clark. Likewise, although Strestha may have viewed himself as a manager working on behalf of the Ministry, there is no evidence that he managed anything or supervised anyone. As for programming, while Strestha supposedly had some authority to object to religious programming that Clark might find objectionable, there is no evidence that Strestha ever exercised such authority. On the contrary, it appears that all programming decisions were made by Ulbricht. Finally, with respect to finances, Ulbricht has acknowledged that Clark had no role whatsoever. Indeed, Clark never saw the station's checkbook, and all equipment at the station was owned by Ulbricht. Because all of the foregoing occurred before the Commission granted the application to assign the station's license to Ulbricht, we conclude that an unauthorized transfer of control to Ulbricht took place in violation of both Section 310(d) of the Communications Act and Section 73.3540 of the Commission's Rules. 8. In determining the amount of a forfeiture, the Commission is to consider "the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may require." Section 503(b)(2)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  503(b)(2)(D). As described above, Ulbricht willfully exercised complete control over the station prior to having obtained Commission authorization. The violations began at least by April 1, 1995, the date the LMA became effective, and continued until the grant of the referenced assignment application on October 5, 1995, a period of slightly more than six months. Thus, the violations were repeated. Further, we perceive no mitigating circumstances with respect to Ulbricht's actions. Ulbricht has advanced no reason why he could not have waited for the Commission to grant his application prior to his assuming control over the station. In addition, Ulbricht has made no argument that the amount of the forfeiture is inappropriate in light of the precedent cited in the NAL. Finally, we conclude that the station's financial situation does not warrant a reduction in the forfeiture. The information submitted shows that the largest single creditor of the station is Ulbricht, himself, and that the station is beginning to turn a profit. Accordingly, we conclude that the $10,000 forfeiture is warranted. 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  503(b), Kenneth B. Ulbricht, d/b/a Seaside Broadcasting FORFEIT to the United States the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) for the willful and repeated violations of Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  310(d), and Section 73.3540 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  73.3540 as described above. Kenneth B. Ulbricht may take any of the steps outlined in the attachment to this letter regarding payment of the forfeiture pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules. 10. The Mass Media Bureau will send by Certified Mail -- Return Receipt Requested, copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Forfeiture Order to Kenneth B. Ulbricht. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau