NOTICE ********************************************************* NOTICE ********************************************************* This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect. If the original document contained-- * Footnotes * Boldface & Italics --this information is missing in this version The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed too. If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect version. For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file how2ftp. File how2ftp (.txt & .wp) is in directory \pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous. ***************************************************************** ******** $// Order Granting Extension of Time, MM Dkt. 95-92, DA 95-1711 //$ $/ 1.46 Motions for Extension of Time /$ $/ FOR FCC RECORD ONLY /$ Before the DA 95-1711 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of) ) Review of the Commission's ) MM Docket No. 95-92 Regulations Governing Programming) Practices of Broadcast Television ) Networks and Affiliates ) ) 47 C.F.R.  73.658(a), (b), (d), ) (e) and (g) ) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Adopted: August 2, 1995; Released: August 3, 1995 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: 1. On June 15, 1995, the Commission initiated a rulemaking proceeding reexamining the Commission's rules governing programming practices of networks and their affiliates -- specifically the right to reject rule, the time option rule, the exclusive affiliation rule, the dual network rule and the network territorial exclusivity rule. Notice of Proposed Rule Making in MM Docket No. 95-92, FCC 95-254 (released June 15, 1995). Comments were due August 28, 1995, and reply comments were due September 27, 1995. 2. On July 17, 1995, the Network Affiliated Stations Alliance (NASA) filed a motion seeking a 60-day extension of time to file comments and reply comments. NASA contends that additional time is necessary to compile the substantial economic data required to properly assess the rules at issue. Further, NASA submits that given the lengh of time these rules have been in place and the breadth of the proposals in the Notice, an extension of 60 days is reasonable. 3. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.46, it is our policy that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. We do not agree that a 60-day extension is warranted in this case. We are persuaded by petitioner, however, that some extension of time is necessary to enable parties to carefully compile a complete record regarding the complex issues raised in this proceeding. We will therefore extend the comment and reply comment deadlines by 30 days. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed in MM Docket No. 95-92 by the Network Affiliated Stations Alliance IS GRANTED to the extent indicated above. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for filing comments in the above- captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to September 28, 1995, and the time for filing reply comments IS EXTENDED to October 27, 1995. 6. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau