WPC! 2 BPZ Courier 10cpi3|w[Ix6X@8;X@HP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSx  @Hi$gEX@2m< ZL-@3|wHP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSC\  P6QHi$gEP I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)CG Times (Scalable)CG Times Bold (Scalable)2_O "Sh5^18MSS888S8888SSSSSSSSSS88Jxir{icx{8Aui{x`xoYi{xxxl888SS8JSJSJ8SS..S.SSSS>A.SSxSSJJSJSSSSSS8SSSSSSSSS.xJxJxJxJxJorJiJiJiJiJ8.8.8.8.{SxSxSxSxS{S{S{S{SxSxJ{SxSxSxS{S`SxSxSxSrSrSrS{SiSiSiSiSxSxSxSxSxS{S{SS.SSSSz]SSuSiSiSk2g/a{S{SxSxSxoSoSZ?YSYSiSiSiS{S{S{S{SxxSkI8SS888WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxSSS8JDDSSSSSS;SSSS;88VVS++SSffSSxSc]]8VS;"xxSxWxxS唔S88xfxxxxxxxxxxx8SxS]SxoS8SxJS`xlxxxxxxxxxxMxxxxxxofxGcxxxxxxxSxxxxxxxJxxxxJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfi]f]oJiAlJ{SxJ8.uJo]]{JoSxJxf`SfSSiJxJofx]fffxi{8SxxxfJffff88SSSSx{SSSxxxf8`SJ8"Sh5^18MSS888S8888SSSSSSSSSS88SxoxxodAPoxdx]oxxxxo888SS8S]J]J;S].8].]S]]JA8]SxSSJSSSSSSSSS8SSSSSSSS].xSxSxSxSxSxxJoJoJoJoJA.A.A.A.x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSd]xSxSxSxSxSxSx]oSoSoSoSSSSSS]]S.S]SS_SS]oSoSoAo.x]x]SS{xSxS]A]S]SoSoSoSx]x]x]x]xxSoJ8SS888WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxSSS8SGGSSSSSS;SSSS;88``S++SSffSSxSi]]8`S;"xxSx`xxS唔S88xfxxxxxxxxxxx8SxS]SxoS8SxJS`xrxxxxxxxxxxPxxxxxxofxGcxxxxxxxSxxxxxxxSxxxxSxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfo]f]oJoAoJJxJA.Jo]]xJoSJxffSfSSoJxJofx]fffxoASxxfJffff88SSSSxSSSxxxf8fSJ8"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYddddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdddddddd~d~d~d~ddddddddd8ddddoddd~d~d<|8tddddddlLkdkd~d~d~ddddddXCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"Ȑdhd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUvŐdȐYYCCCCŐz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC"Sh5^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲdxN`xoȐCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddddddddCddddddddo8dddddϐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddxoddddddodddddddddood8doddrddoddN8ooddddoNododdddooooȐdYCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"Ȑdsd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ`ȐȐȮzȐUvŐdȐddCCCCŐzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC2K!ZAF`"Sh5^!.22YN!!!2Y!!!!2222222222!!dYd,YH?EJ?;HJ!'F?[JH9HC6?JH^HHA!!!22!,2,2,!222N2222%'22H22,,2,d222222!222222222H,H,H,H,H,YCE,?,?,?,?,!!!!J2H2H2H2H2J2J2J2J2H2H,J2H2H2H2J292H2H2H2E2E2E2J2?2?2?2?2H2H2H2H2H2J2J222222I822F2?2?2@>:J2J2H2H2YHC2C26&6262?2?2?2J2J2J2J2^HH2@,!22!!!WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHHH222!,))22X222YY2#2222Y#!!442Ydd22==Ld2d2H2;SS88Y!42^x#"ddddHHddd2Hdd4HHYYddd2YYddd Y2!!dddddH=dYHHHHHHHHHHx!d2H282YdHdC2!2H,29HNAddHHHHHHHHHHddddd.dHHHHdddddddddddddddddddHHddddddSC=NdHddd+;HHHHddddddHHH2HHdHHdddHHH,HHHH,HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!HHH!HHH!HHH!HHHHHHHHHHHHHH=?8=8C,?'A,J2H,!F,C8[8J,C2H,H=92=22?,H,C=H8N===H?J!2HHH=,====!!2222HJ222HHH=!92,!dx/c81,c P7Py.f81,f_ p^78wC;,[hXw P7XP7zC;,sXz_ p^7XH<!, ,< P7,PV"G($,hG P7hPrdPerfect/DBM WP_ISDIALOGWP_SETNSLBPOPUPDBM_Repaint3DBordersSculpturedDialogsO"Sh5^$(8<><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx4. Tyler, who seeks the reallotment of Channel 259C3 from Tishomingo to Tuttle, as   its first local aural service, submits that its request complies with the provisions of Section   1.420(i) of the Commission's Rules which permits the modification of a station's authorization   to specify a new community of license without affording other interested parties an opportunity  Y-  to file competing expressions of interest. See Modification of FM and TV Authorizations to  Y-  [Specify a New Community of License ("Change of Community R&O"), 4 FCC Rcd 4870",N(N(ZZ_"  Y-  (1989), recon. granted in part ("Change of Community MO&O"), 5 FCC Rcd 7094 (1990).   YTyler states that the reallotment meets the threshold requirements of Section 1.420(i) in that the   allotment of Channel 259C3 at Tuttle is mutually exclusive with its allotment at Tishomingo and   that the reallotment will not deprive Tishomingo, a community of 3,116 persons, of its sole local   ,aural service since there is a pending application for a new noncommercial FM station (BPED Y-970127MD).% xP-  ԍ On October 14, 1997, the Commission granted the construction permit application of South Central Oklahoma Christian Broadcasting, Inc. for Station KAZC on Channel 202A.  5. Tyler states that Tuttle, with a 1990 population of 2,807 persons, is an incorporated   city with a mayor, city manager and city counsel. Tuttle has its own police and volunteer fire   departments, a parks board, planning commission, board of adjustment, city attorney, four   =primary and secondary schools and two city parks. In addition, the Tuttle Public Works   ;Authority provides gas, water, sewer and garbage services. Tyler states that Tuttle also has its   own post office and zip code, numerous churches, two banks, a nursing home, two dentists and   Ka chiropractor and an osteopath, a local chamber of commerce and a weekly newspaper, the  Y -  Tuttle Times. In addition, the community is home to businesses such as Braum's Dairy and   Delta Faucet. Therefore, it states that Tuttle is a community for allotment purposes. Tyler   submits that Station KTSH presently provides service to 36,134 persons while, as a Tuttle   station, it will be able to serve a total of 767,353 persons, for a net gain of 731,219 persons.   Further, while the relocation of the transmitter site will result in a loss area, he states that the   entire area will continue to receive at least five fulltime services. Tyler states that he will apply for the channel, if allotted to Tuttle.  @6. Tyler states that Tuttle is not located within an urbanized area, and from the   ,transmitter site proposed for Channel 259C3, only 23% of the Oklahoma City Urbanized Area   will receive a 70 dBu signal from Station KTSH. Therefore, in accordance with Commission  Y-  policy as set forth in Headland, Alabama, and Chattahoochee, Florida, he says that there is no   <need for the Commission to determine whether Tuttle is independent of the Urbanized Area before determining that Tishomingo is entitled to a first local service preference.  7. In order to effectuate the allotment at Tishomingo, Tyler requests the substitution of   hChannel 292C1 for Channel 261C1 at Woodward, the modification of Station KWFX's license   Kaccordingly, and the substitution of Channel 260C1 for Channel 259C1 at Alva, Oklahoma,   along with the modification of Station KXLS(FM)'s license to specify operation on the alternate   xClass C1 channel. He states that each station can operate on the alternate channel from their   present transmitter sites. Tyler states that he is unsure as to the status of Channel 261C1 at   JWoodward, noting that the Commission cancelled the station's Class C1 construction permit in   >1994 and the station's statement that "it 'does not intend to utilize the Channel 261C1   construction permit' and relinquishes and surrenders any right which it or KWFXFM may have   to that construction permit." However, should the Commission determine that Station KWFX   is entitled to reimbursement for the cost of changing channel, Tyler states that he will reimburse"# ,N(N(ZZ$"   jboth licensees for the reasonable and prudent costs associated with such a change in their operating channels.  08. In a supplement to his petition, Tyler states that the conflict between the use of   hChannel 261C1 at Woodward and the same channel at Mooreland can be removed with the use   of alternate channels. Therefore, he proposes that Channel 292C1 be substituted for Channel   w261C1 at Woodward, which can be used at Station KWFX's presently licensed transmitter site,   and that Channel 283C1 be allotted to Mooreland, which can be used at the transmitter site   proposed by FM 92. The allotment of Channel 259C3 at Tuttle would still require the substitution of channels at Alva.  9. Chisholm Trail Broadcasting Co., Inc. ("Chisholm Trail"), licensee of Station KXLS,   xAlva, Oklahoma, filed a motion to dismiss Tyler's petition. It argues that Tyler's petition is,   at best, prematurely filed since it would remove Tishomingo's sole local broadcast service. In  Y -  this regard, Chisholm Trail states that the Commission, in Change of Community R&O, supra,   Yheld that we would not allow a station to change its community of license if the effect were to   deprive the original community of its sole local broadcast service. Further, it points out that the   Commission, on reconsideration, stated that the replacement of an existing station with either   a vacant allotment or an unconstructed permit would not, by itself, adequately cure the  YK-  disruption to existing service which would occur from the removal of an operating station. See  Y4-  also Llano and Marble Falls, Texas, 10 FCC Rcd 4913 (1995), Kaukana and Cleveland,  Y-  Wisconsin, 6 FCC Rcd 7142, 7143, n.3 (1991) and Klamath Falls, Altamont and Butte Falls,  Y-  ZOregon, and Dorris, California, 10 FCC Rcd 7583 (1995). Chisholm Trail also submits that   Tyler's claim that Tishomingo will continue to receive local service from a new noncommercial   ,station is in error since the community cannot continue to receive service from a station which   does not exist. Chisholm Trail points out that the Review Board has previously found that "'the   filing of an application...does not necessarily assure the expeditious advent of a station.'"  Y-  KSantee Cooper Broadcasting Co., 99 FCC 2d 781 (Rev. Bd. 1984). Finally, Chisholm Trail   ystates that the Commission has "repeatedly" stated that the public interest is not served by   removing a community's sole local transmission service solely to provide a first local  YN-  wtransmission service to another community, citing Potts Camp and Saltillo, Mississippi, 12 FCC  Y7-  Rcd 372, 3713 (1997), Sibley, Iowa and Brandon, South Dakota, 11 FCC Rcd 3635 (1996), and  Y -  ZLlano and Marble Falls, Texas, supra. Given that Tyler bases its request on the existence of   another local service at Tishomingo, it argues that Tyler is asking the Commission to accept and   act on its petition even though it is contingent upon the licensing of Station KAZC at  Y-  JTishomingo. This, it contends, is in conflict with the policy set forth in Cut and Shoot, Texas,   11 FCC Rcd 16383 (1996), which states that the Commission no longer will accept petitions for   hrule making which are contingent upon the action of third parties in order to effect compliance with the Commission's rules.  10. We believe that the proposals of FM 92 and Tyler warrant consideration since the   iallotments could provide first local aural services at both Mooreland and Tuttle, Oklahoma.  Y:&-  Chisholm Trail is correct that, pursuant to the policy set forth in Change of Community MO&O,  Y#'-  supra, the removal of Station KTSH from Tishomingo would constitute the removal of the"#',N(N(ZZP("  Y-  ;community's sole local service because Station KAZC has not been licensed. % xPy-  !ԍ "We specifically wish to clarify that replacement of an operating station with a vacant allotment or   unconstructed permit, although a factor to be considered in favor of the proposal, does not adequately cure the  xP -  Kdisruption to 'existing service' occasioned by removal of an operating station." See Change of Community MO&O,  xP-supra, at 7097. However, while   the Commission has stated that the removal of a community's sole local existing service would   Jnot be undertaken lightly, it did not place an absolute ban on such actions. Therefore, Tyler is   requested to provide further information demonstrating why the public interest would be served   by removing Tishomingo's sole local broadcast service in order to provide a first such service  Y-  to Tuttle. See Change of Community MO&O, supra, at 4096. See also Llano and Marble  Yv-Falls, Texas, supra.  .11. As discussed by both FM 92 and Tyler, Station KWFX's license was modified from  Y1-  ;Channel 228A to Channel 261C1 pursuant to the Report and Order in MM Docket 90286, the   station was granted a construction permit for that channel on April 22, 1992, and, at the request   of the thenlicensee, Fuchs Communications, the construction permit was forfeited and cancelled   on September 2, 1994. However, while Classic has continued to operate on Channel 228A, the   licensee has now filed an application specifying operation on Channel 261C1. However,   JClassic's application requests that it be allowed to continue operating with Class A power of 6   + kW at its current location pending the filing of another application specifying a new antenna and   =transmitter site which will allow an increase in power to 25 kW. Classic states that it is   planning to submit such an application "as soon as a new location becomes available and as soon   -as finances allow." Based on this request wherein Classic does not propose to operate with   -minimum Class C1 facilities, even after it obtains a new transmitter and transmitter site, we   ibelieve it appropriate to alternatively propose the substitution of Channel 228A for Channel   261C1 at Woodward and request that Classic state which channel and class it intends to pursue.   JIn accordance with Commission policy, Tyler has stated his intention to reimburse both Classic   and Chisholm Trail for the reasonable and prudent expenses related to the change of channel   should his proposal be adopted. No such statement has been provided by FM 92. Therefore,  Y-  it is requested to do so in comments herein. See, e.g., Cordele, Dawson & Montezuma,  Y-Georgia, 8 FCC Rcd 7672 (1993).  12. A staff engineering study has confirmed that the alternate allotment proposal   submitted by Tyler can be effectuated in compliance with the Commission minimum distance   Kseparation requirements. Channel 260C1 can be allotted to Alva at Station KXLS's licensed   transmitter site. Channel 292C1 can be allotted to Woodward at Station KWFX's licensed   Ltransmitter site as well as at the transmitter site set forth in its pending application (BPH  h970811IC). Channel 228A can be allotted to Woodward at Station KWFX's presently licensed   transmitter site. Channel 283C1 can be allotted to Mooreland with a site restriction of 9.3   kilometers south (5.8 miles) to avoid a shortspacing to Station KTCM, Channel 262C2,   Kingman, Kansas. Channel 259C3 can be allotted to Tuttle with a site restriction of 9.3" ,N(N(ZZ!"  Y-kilometers (5.8 miles) east to accommodate Tyler's desired transmitter site.|X% xPy-  ԍ The coordinates for Channel 260C1 at Alva are 363541 North Latitude; 981538 West Longitude. The   coordinates for Channel 283C1 at Mooreland are 362124; 991337. The coordinates for Channel 259C3 at Tuttle are 351733; 974258. The coordinates for Channel 292C1 at Woodward are 362542; 992410.|  /13. Accordingly, we seek comments on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of   Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, for the community listed below, to read as follows:  Y-lăpp  xx- X(#(# Yv-` `  hh,VChannel No.  Y_-City ` `  hh,Present ppProposed  Y1-TOption Iă  Y -Alva, Oklahomahh,259C1, 278C1, 289C2260C1, 278C1, 289C2  Y -Mooreland, Oklahomahh,Vpp283C1  Y -Tishomingo, Oklahomahh,259C3pp  Y -Tuttle, Oklahomahh,Vpp259C3  Y -Woodward, Oklahomahh,240A, 261C1, 266C, 272A240A, 266C, 272A, 292C1(#(#  Yy-rROption IIă  YK-Alva, Oklahomahh,259C1, 278C1, 289C2260C1, 278C1, 289C2  Y4-Mooreland, Oklahomahh,Vpp283C1  Y-Tishomingo, Oklahomahh,259C3pp  Y-Tuttle, Oklahomahh,Vpp259C3  Y-Woodward, Oklahomahh,240A, 261C1, 266C, 272A228A, 240A, 266C, 272A(#(#  14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That pursuant to Section 316(a) of the   Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Chisholm Trail Broadcasting Co., Inc., licensee of   Station KXLS(FM), Alva, Oklahoma, and Classic Communications, Inc., licensee of Station   KWFX, Woodward, Oklahoma, SHALL SHOW CAUSE why their licenses SHOULD NOT BE   hMODIFIED to specify operation on Channel 260C1 and Channel 292C1 or 228A, respectively, as proposed herein instead of their present Channel 259C1 and Channel 261C1, respectively.    15. Pursuant to Section 1.87 of the Commission's Rules, Chisholm Trail and/or Classic   may, not later than October 19, 1998, file a written statement showing with particularity why  Y-  their licenses should not be modified as proposed in the Order to Show Cause. The Commission   may call on Chisholm Trail and/or Classic to furnish additional information. If Chisholm Trail   and/or Classic raises a substantial and material question of fact, a hearing may be required to   resolve such a question pursuant to Section 1.87. Upon review of the statements and/or   additional information furnished, the Commission may grant the modification, deny the"",N(N(ZZ#"   modification, or set the matter of modification for hearing. If no written statement is filed by   the date referred to above, Chisholm Trail and/or Classic will be deemed to have consented to  Y-  the modification as proposed in the Order to Show Cause and a final Order will be issued by the   Commission, if the abovementioned channel modification is ultimately found to be in the public interest.    16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the Secretary SHALL SEND, BY CERTIFIED  Y_-  YMAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rule Making and  YH-  Order to Show Cause to the licensees of Station KXLS(FM) and KWFX, as follows: Station   KXLS, Chisholm Trail Broadcasting Co., 316 East Willow, Enid, OK 73701; Station KWFX, Classic Communications Inc., P.O. Box 1600, Woodward, OK 73802.  17. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required,   cutoff procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are   incorporated by reference herein. In particular, we note that a showing of continuing interest is required by paragraph 2 of the Appendix before a channel will be allotted.  l18. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 19, 1998, and reply   comments on or before  %yy November 3 %yy , 1998, and are advised to read the Appendix for the proper   procedures. Comments should be filed with the Secretary, Federal Communications   Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. Additionally, a copy of such comments should be served on the petitioners, or their counsel or consultant, as follows: Kathryn R. Schmeltzer Kevin M. Walsh Fisher Wayland Cooper Leader & Zaragoza, L.L.P. 2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006  (Counsel to FM 92) Gary S. Smithwick Smithwick & Belendiuk, P.C. 1990 M Street NW Suite 510 Washington, D.C. 20036  (Counsel to Tyler)  ]19. The Commission has determined that the relevant provisions of the Regulatory   Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to rule making proceedings to amend the FM Table of  Yh$-  Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules. See Certification That Sections 603  YQ%-  and 604 of the Regulatory  Flexibility Act Do Not Apply to Rule Making to Amend Sections  Y:&-73.202(b), 73.504 and 73.606(b) of the Commission's Rules, 46 FR 11549, February 9, 1981. "#',N(N(ZZP("Ԍ L20. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact LeslieK. Shapiro, Mass   Media Bureau, (202) 4182180. For purposes of this restricted notice and comment rule making  Y-  proceeding, members of the public are advised that no ex parte presentations are permitted from   the time the Commission adopts a Notice of Proposed Rule Making until the proceeding has been   Ydecided and such decision is no longer subject to reconsideration by the Commission or review  Y-  by any court. An ex parte presentation is not prohibited if specifically requested by the   YCommission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or resolution of issues in the   hproceeding. However, any new written information elicited from such a request or a summary   Zof any new oral information shall be served by the person making the presentation upon the   /other parties to the proceeding unless the Commission specifically waives this service  Y -  hrequirement. Any comment which has not been served on the petitioner constitutes an ex parte   ;presentation and shall not be considered in the proceeding. Any reply comment which has not   Jbeen served on the person(s) who filed the comment, to which the reply is directed, constitutes  Y -an ex parte presentation and shall not be considered in the proceeding. ` `  hh,FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ` `  hh,John A. Karousos ` `  hh,Chief, Allocations Branch ` `  hh,Policy and Rules Division ` `  hh,Mass Media Bureau Attachment: Appendix ",N(N(ZZP"  Y-` ` APPENDIX    1. Pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r), and 307(b) of   Kthe Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61, 0.204(b) and 0.283 of the   Commission's Rules, IT IS PROPOSED TO AMEND the FM Table of Allotments, Section  Y-  x73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, as set forth in the Notice of Proposed  Yv-Rule Making to which this Appendix is attached.  YH-  = 2. Showings Required. Comments are invited on the proposal(s) discussed in the  Y1-  Notice of Proposed Rule Making to which this Appendix is attached. Proponent(s) will be   expected to answer whatever questions are presented in initial comments. The proponent of a   proposed allotment is also expected to file comments even if it only resubmits or incorporates   xby reference its former pleadings. It should also restate its present intention to apply for the   ;channel if it is allotted and, if authorized, to build a station promptly. Failure to file may lead to denial of the request.  Y-   3. Cutoff protection. The following procedures will govern the consideration of filings in this proceeding.    (a) Counterproposals advanced in this proceeding itself will be considered, if advanced   iin initial comments, so that parties may comment on them in reply comments. They will not  Y-  jbe considered if advanced in reply comments. (See Section 1.420(d) of the Commission's Rules).    (b) With respect to petitions for rule making which conflict with the proposals in this  Y-  wNotice, they will be considered as comments in the proceeding, and Public Notice to this effect   will be given as long as they are filed before the date for filing initial comments herein. If they   are filed later than that, they will not be considered in connection with the decision in this docket.   Y (c) The filing of a counterproposal may lead the Commission to allot a different channel than was requested for any of the communities involved.  Y -  , 4. Comments and Reply Comments; Service. Pursuant to applicable procedures set out   Jin Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, interested parties may  Y-  file comments and reply comments on or before the dates set forth in the Notice of Proposed  Y -  wRule Making to which this Appendix is attached. All submissions by parties to this proceeding   or by persons acting on behalf of such parties must be made in written comments, reply   comments, or other appropriate pleadings. Comments shall be served on the petitioner by the   person filing the comments. Reply comments shall be served on the person(s) who filed   >comments to which the reply is directed. Such comments and reply comments shall be  YQ%-  ,accompanied by a certificate of service. (See Section 1.420(a), (b) and (c) of the Commission's   Rules.) Comments should be filed with the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554."#' ,N(N(ZZP("Ԍ Y-  .ԙ 5. Number of Copies. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1.420 of the   Commission's Rules and Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission.  Y-   6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available   for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239) at its headquarters, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.