From: To: A16.A16(KIDSTV) Date: 10/11/95 3:08pm Dear FCC Comissioners, I have done some research on the violence on television and it's effect on children and here is what I have found. In a special report by Anita Diamant, she discusses the issue of violence in the media. In her research, she states that exposure to TV violence is hazardous to children's health and welfare. She claims that an overwhelming majority of Americans--87 percent of those questioned in a parents poll said that the media "contains too much violence", and 73 percent agreed that the "depiction of violence in movies, on TV, and so forth is the cause of increased acts of violence in our society." Forty-four percent thought that limiting the amount of violence on television and in films would be "very effective" and another forty-one percent thought that it would be "moderately effective" in reducing real-life violence. In another article written from a U.S. News and World Report called "Sex and Violence on TV" and written by Mark Silver, the same topic is addressed. He covers similar issues as Anita Diamant and also intoduces another. Silver claims that the"V-chip" is the favorite solution in blocking channels that might show programs that are too violent for children to watch. "Both Houses of Congress have supported legislation requiring that new TV sets come with a chip enabling parents to block violent programs. The V-chip is a few years away....in the interim, children will see thousands of violent acts on TV." Silver also says that in a study performed by the American Psychological Association, the typical child watching 27 hours of TV a week, will view 8000 murders and 100,000 acts of violence from age 3 to age 12. "Promos for violent shows are especially proned to "condensed violence" with no context." Judging from this research, it is evident that the exposure to violence on television is a problem for the youth of today. Personally, I believe that something should be done regarding violence in the media. The idea of the V-chip is a good one but the public might not want to wait that long for a solution. I think that immediate action is necessary. Parental control can also be part of the answer but, we have to consider that in a dual income household, there is not always an adult figure to mediate what should and should not be viewed by the children. Because of this predicament, I feel that the FCC should play a role in helping to resolve this dilemma. I think that there needs to be more restrictions on violent programming that may be influencial and even detrimental to today's children. By regulating children's television, I feel that there will be a decrease in the percentage of negative outcomes that are an indirect result of violence in the media. Thank you for your time, Marlaina Schiavo CC: FCCMAIL.SMTP("MASSMEDIA@LIBER.ITHACA.EDU")