NEW station application for Anderson, SC -- March 29, 1996 -- Audio Services Division (FCC) USA
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554
29 March 1996
IN REPLY REFER TO: 1800B2-RMD
ABS Communications, Incorporated
300 Arboretum Place
Suite 590
Richmond, Virginia 23236
In re: Application for New FM Station
Anderson, SC
File No. BPH-951101MA
Dear Applicant:
This concerns your referenced application for a new station which is mutually exclusive with
the pending license renewal application for Station WJMZ-FM, Anderson, SC (File No.
BRH-950801VV).
Section 204 of the recently-enacted Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110
Stat. 56 (1996), amended Section 309 of the Communications Act by adding Section 309(k),
which eliminates the comparative renewal process and specifies a new two-step procedure for
broadcast station license renewals. Under the new procedure, as outlined below, your
referenced application cannot be accepted and considered by the Commission.
The new two-step renewal procedure sets forth new standards which the Commission is
required to use in determining whether to grant a licensee's renewal application. See 47
U.S.C. § 309(k)(1). In making this determination, the Commission is prohibited from
considering "whether the public interest, convenience, and necessity might be served by the
grant of a license to a person other than the renewal applicant." 47 C.F.R. § 309(k)(4).
Only if the Commission determines, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, that a
renewal applicant has failed to meet the new renewal standards may the Commission "accept
and consider such applications for a construction permit as may be filed under Section 308
specifying the channel and broadcasting facilities of the former licensee." 47 U.S.C.
§ 309(k)(3). These new procedures apply to all renewal applications filed after May 1,
1995.
Because the Commission has not made a determination that the licensee for WJMZ-FM has
failed to meet the requirements of Section 309(k)(1), your application cannot be accepted for
filing. Accordingly, your application for construction permit (File No. BPH-951101MA) IS
HEREBY DISMISSED as unacceptable for filing and is returned with this letter.
Sincerely,
Stuart B. Bedell
Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division
Mass Media Bureau
Attachment
cc: Marissa G. Repp, Esquire
Alan C. Campbell, Esquire